← All companies ← SVCO Manual SVV → ← SUPN Pharmaceuticals SXTC →

SVRA, Savara Inc.

Pharmaceuticals consumer brand UnprofitableDistress / turnaroundNet current asset value

Savara, together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries, which include Aravas Inc. and Savara ApS, operate in one segment with its principal office in Langhorne, Pennsylvania, though a majority of our employees work remotely.

Since inception, we have devoted substantially all of our efforts and resources to identifying and developing our product candidates, recruiting personnel, and raising capital.

We have incurred operating losses and negative cash flow from operations and have no product revenue from inception to date.

Latest annual: FY2025 10-K

SVRA · Savara Inc.

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025

$257K

Vital signs · FY2025

Cash & investments $236M

Cash burn · annual $101M

Runway 2.3 yrs

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

Situation: Unprofitable. No meaningful revenue yet; the record is the cash on hand against the burn. Distress / turnaround. Thin interest coverage, or operating cash burned against real debt, across the record. The balance sheet carries this situation; the debt schedule sets the clock. Net current asset value. Current assets alone exceed every liability combined, and the surplus is most of the balance sheet: the shape Graham called a net-net.
What moves the needle: Operating margin has run around −10969% through the cycle, the operating line deeply negative — so the lever is the path to a margin at all: revenue growth against the cost curve and the cash runway, not the level of a margin that isn't there yet. Stock-based pay runs about 161% of sales, a real and recurring claim on owners that the GAAP margin understates. Read this kind of business on the pipeline against the patent cliff, and pricing. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?: Return on capital has rarely cleared the cost of capital (median −64%, above 15% in 0 of 5 years). Owner earnings, the cash-based check, have been thin too. This is price-taker territory, where the balance sheet and the cycle matter more than any multiple; the rest is in the 10-K.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2010–2020

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left

2010’10	2012’12	2013’13	2014’14	2015’15	2016’16	2017’17	2019’19	2020’20
									Income statement
$489K	$0	$0	$0	$54K	$400K	$0	$0	$257K	RevenueRevenue
n/m	—	—	—	n/m	n/m	—	—	n/m	SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev
754%	—	—	—	n/m	n/m	—	—	n/m	R&D / revenueR&D/rev
($9M)	($16M)	($22M)	($29M)	($6M)	($11M)	($30M)	($79M)	($49M)	Operating incomeOp. inc.
n/m	—	—	—	n/m	n/m	—	—	n/m	Operating marginOp. mgn
($8M)	($16M)	($21M)	($29M)	($9M)	($11M)	($30M)	($78M)	($50M)	Net incomeNet inc.
									Cash flow & returns
($8M)	($14M)	($18M)	($25M)	($5M)	($8M)	($28M)	($45M)	($40M)	Operating cash flowOp. cash
$20K	$90K	$40K	$85K	$146K	$99K	$363K	$1M	$255K	DepreciationDeprec.
($696K)	$91K	$2M	$2M	$4M	$2M	$648K	$28M	$4M	Working capital & otherWC & other
$29K	$266K	$47K	$147K	$165K	$8K	$495K	$148K	$47K	CapexCapex
5.8%	—	—	—	305.6%	2.0%	—	—	18.3%	Capex / revenueCapex/rev
($8M)	($14M)	($18M)	($25M)	($5M)	($8M)	($29M)	($45M)	($40M)	Owner earningsOwner earn.
n/m	—	—	—	n/m	n/m	—	—	n/m	Owner earnings marginOE mgn
($8M)	($14M)	($18M)	($25M)	($5M)	($8M)	($29M)	($45M)	($40M)	Free cash flowFCF
n/m	—	—	—	n/m	n/m	—	—	n/m	Free cash flow marginFCF mgn
—	-64%	-77%	—	—	—	-21%	-83%	-58%	ROICROIC
-32%	-37%	-45%	—	—	—	-25%	-77%	-77%	Return on equityROE
−32%	−37%	−45%	—	—	—	−25%	−77%	−77%	Retained to equityRetained/eq
									Balance sheet
$28M	$37M	$29M	$17M	$19M	$13M	$94M	$122M	$82M	Cash & investmentsCash+inv
$480K	$699K	$964K	$1M	$3M	$536K	$3M	$3M	$3M	Accounts payablePayables
$28M	$37M	$46M	$58M	$42M	$15M	$98M	$124M	$85M	Current assetsCur. assets
$2M	$3M	$5M	$8M	$23M	$3M	$6M	$11M	$8M	Current liabilitiesCur. liab.
15.8×	14.5×	9.4×	6.9×	1.8×	4.2×	16.3×	11.4×	10.4×	Current ratioCurr. ratio
—	$3M	$3M	$3M	$3M	$3M	$27M	—	$0	GoodwillGoodwill
$28M	$47M	$55M	$71M	$54M	$29M	$160M	$136M	$98M	Total assetsAssets
—	—	—	—	$4M	$3M	$15M	$23M	$25M	Total debtDebt
—	—	—	—	($16M)	($10M)	($80M)	($99M)	($57M)	Net debt / (cash)Net debt
-5242.3×	—	—	—	-2.3×	-24.2×	-25.8×	—	—	Interest coverageInt. cov.
$27M	$42M	$48M	($18M)	($27M)	($36M)	$119M	$102M	$64M	Shareholders’ equityEquity
160.7%	—	—	—	283.3%	52.3%	—	—	n/m	Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev
									Per share
15.5M	47.6M	76.6M	122M	969K	2.0M	17.5M	40.0M	59.3M	Shares out (diluted)Shares
$0.03	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	$0.06	$0.20	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	Revenue / shareRev/sh
$-0.55	$-0.33	$-0.28	$-0.23	$-9.29	$-5.57	$-1.70	$-1.95	$-0.84	EPS (diluted)EPS
$-0.54	$-0.30	$-0.23	$-0.20	$-5.10	$-4.27	$-1.64	$-1.13	$-0.67	Owner earnings / shareOE/sh
$-0.54	$-0.30	$-0.23	$-0.20	$-5.10	$-4.27	$-1.64	$-1.13	$-0.67	Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh
$0.00	$0.01	$0.00	$0.00	$0.17	$0.00	$0.03	$0.00	$0.00	Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh
$1.72	$0.88	$0.62	$-0.15	$-28.21	$-18.30	$6.81	$2.54	$1.09	Book value / shareBVPS

The diluted share count moved ×3.08 into 2012 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.

The diluted share count moved ×1.61 into 2013 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.

The diluted share count moved ×1.6 into 2014 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.

The diluted share count moved ×1/126.35 into 2015 — shares retired, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.

The diluted share count moved ×2.02 into 2016 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.

The diluted share count moved ×8.94 into 2017 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.

The diluted share count moved ×2.28 into 2019 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.

The diluted share count moved ×1.48 into 2020 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.

Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded

	10-yr	5-yr
Revenue / share	−18.0%/yr	−40.0%/yr
Capital spending / share	−8.1%/yr	−65.8%/yr
Book value / share	−4.5%/yr	—

The record, charted

FY2010–2020

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.

Share count

59Mpeak FY2014

ROIC

−58%low FY2019

Owner earnings vs. net income

Owner earningsNet income

The accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.

($40M)owner earningsvs.($50M)net incomelow FY2019

Owner-earnings bridge

FY2015–FY2020cash-flow statement, SEC EDGAR →

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2020 the business turned a $50M loss into ($40M) of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.

	FY2020	FY2019	FY2017	FY2016	FY2015
Reported net income	($50M)	($78M)	($30M)	($11M)	($9M)
Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back	+$255K	+$1M	+$363K	+$99K	+$146K
Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost	+$5M	+$4M	+$552K	+$209K	+$153K
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items	+$4M	+$28M	+$648K	+$2M	+$4M
Cash from operations	($40M)	($45M)	($28M)	($8M)	($5M)
Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow	−$47K	−$148K	−$495K	−$8K	−$165K
Owner earnings	($40M)	($45M)	($29M)	($8M)	($5M)
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue	-15519%	—	—	-2094%	-9154%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position . The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $5M), owner earnings is nearer ($45M).

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 10-K · source on SEC EDGAR →

Will it survive?

Can it pay its interest? -106.4×

Does not cover its interest

Operating income ($124M) ÷ interest expense $1M

What this means
A full year of operating profit didn't cover the interest bill. This is the zombie zone: the business depends on refinancing, asset sales, or forbearance to service its debt.
How heavy is the debt, net of cash? +$206M

Net cash

Cash $33M + ST investments $203M − debt $30M

What this means
Cash and short-term investments exceed every dollar of debt by $206M, on net the company owes nothing, and can act from strength when others can't. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
How long is cash tied up? —

Not enough data

What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

Is it a good business?

Return on invested capital -64%

Below average through the cycle

5-yr median, range -83%–-21%; -49% latest = NOPAT ($98M) ÷ invested capital $200M

Industry peers: median -101%

What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 5 years (it ran -49% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
Owner-earnings margin -9154%

Consumes cash through the cycle

4-yr median margin, range -15519%–-1712%; latest ($101M) = operating cash ($101M) − maintenance capex $22K

Industry peers: median -2045%

What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's -39323% of revenue this year, a -9154% median across 4 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $14M of SBC) leaves ($115M).
Are earnings backed by cash? ($101M)

Loss, and burning cash

Net income ($119M) · cash from operations ($101M)

What this means
The company reported a net loss, so a conversion ratio isn't meaningful. What matters then is whether operations still threw off cash, here, they did not.

How is the cash used?

Where do the earnings go? —

Not enough data

What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
Investing or harvesting? 0.25×

Harvesting

Capex $22K ÷ depreciation $87K

What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.

Graham’s defensive tests · 2 of 5 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

Adequate size Miss

Revenue ≥ $2B · $257K

What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
Strong liquidity Pass

Current ratio ≥ 2× · 11.85×

What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
Conservative debt Pass

Debt ≤ working capital · $30M vs $221M WC

What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
Earnings stability Miss

A profit every year (9-yr record) · 9 loss years

What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
Dividend record Miss

Uninterrupted dividends · none paid

What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
Earnings growth —

Earnings +33% over the record · —

What this means
Earnings were negative early in the record, a growth rate isn't meaningful.
Moderate price —

P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price

What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $-0.26/share (latest year $-0.58), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $0.99/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Durability & moat, 2010–2020

Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.

Profitable years 0 of 9

What this means
Lost money in 9 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
Return on capital ≥ 15% 0 of 3 yrs

What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
Operating margin −6358% → −10960% (2-yr avg ends)

What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about −6358% early to −10960% lately, median −10969% — competition or costs are biting in.
Reinvestment, incremental ROIC returns capital

What this means
The capital base barely grew: this business returns cash through dividends and buybacks rather than reinvesting. Judge it on the cash returned, not on compounding.
Worst year 2020 · −19182.9% op. margin

What this means
Operations went underwater in 2020, understand why before trusting the good years.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Low contestability

The moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.

AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Current Position

as of the latest quarter, Mar 31, 2026

Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.

Current assets$209M

Cash & short-term investments$203M
Other current assets$6M

Current liabilities$16M

Accounts payable$4M
Other current liabilities$11M

Current ratio13.47×all current assets ÷ what's due · Graham looked for 2×

Quick ratio—inventory untagged this quarter, so withheld rather than shown equal to the current ratio

Cash ratio13.05×strictest: cash alone against what's due

Working capital$194Mthe cushion left after near-term bills

Current ratio, recent quarters11.3× → 13.5×

Deeper floors

Tangible book value$176Mequity stripped of goodwill & intangibles

Net current asset value$164MGraham's net-net: current assets less all liabilities

Debt incl. operating leases$30M$300K of it operating leases

From the company's latest filing.

Acquisitions & goodwill

from the balance sheet & the 9-year cash-flow record

Goodwill grows only when a company acquires and falls only when it concedes it overpaid. The size of that bet, the cash put into buying rather than building, and how much has already been written off.

Goodwill$00% of all assets; the premium carried on the balance sheet for businesses acquired

Against book equity0%goodwill is this share of book equity; the rest is the company’s own retained and paid-in capital

Cash spent acquiring$0over 9 years buying other businesses, against $1M of capital spent building

$27M written down across 1 year (2019): goodwill the company has already conceded it overpaid for, charged against earnings. A write-down costs no cash (the cash went out when the deal was signed), but it is management marking its own past judgment to market.

Goodwill, acquired intangibles and equity from the latest balance sheet; acquisition spend and write-downs summed across the 9-year record, from the company's own filings.

Management, ownership & pay

read the proxy →

From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.

Fiscal year	Chief executive	Pay, as filed	“Actually paid”	Net income
2023	Mr. Pauls	$3.8M	$5.7M	—
2024	Mr. Pauls	$4.9M	$4.0M	—
2025	Mr. Pauls	$4.8M	$9.9M	—

Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Net income is the whole business's, as filed, for the same fiscal years.

Insider ownership5.3%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
Stock-based compensation$14M
The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 5611% of revenue. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.

What an owner would ask, FY2025

read the 10-K →

Which reported numbers are a judgment call?
Management names Stock compensation as critical estimates
each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →

The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.

Peers, Pharmaceuticals

The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

Company	Revenue	Gross margin	Op. margin	ROIC	Owner earn. margin
STTKShattuck Labs Inc.	$1M	—	-1408.3%	-104%	-1059%
SLNSilence Therapeutics PLC	$559K	60%	-242.7%	-177%	-211%
QUCYQuantum Cyber N.V.	$537K	73%	-3005.0%	—	-2045%
DMACDiaMedica Therapeutics Inc.	$500K	—	-6879.4%	-67%	-5820%
MREOMereo BioPharma Group plc	$500K	—	-8021.4%	—	-6198%
SVRASavara Inc.	$257K	—	-6852.8%	-64%	-5624%
IXHLIncannex Healthcare Inc.	$86K	—	-27661.6%	—	-14559%
AVTXAvalo Therapeutics Inc.	$59K	63%	-1241.0%	-97%	-606%
Group median	—	—	-4928.9%	-97%	-3834%

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Savara Inc. is profitable, but owner earnings are negative this year because capital spending currently outruns operating cash, a build-out, so the owner-earnings reverse-DCF has no positive base to grow. We read the price from both ends instead: type a price to see the steady-state profitability it demands, then set the mature margin you would believe and weigh the two against each other. Nothing leaves your browser unless you enter it in your notebook.

Today’s price $

The assumptions Required return 9% Years to get there 10 Revenue growth 0% Mature owner-earnings margin 15%

Enter a price to run it.

Owner earnings it must reach—

Margin the price demands—

Owner-earnings margin today−39323%

Two reads of one future. From your price: the owner earnings the company must reach, valued at a mature multiple and discounted back at your rate, expressed as the margin it implies on revenue grown at your rate. From your belief: the mature margin you would credit, set on the dial above. When the margin the price demands runs above the one you would believe, you are paying for a future taken on faith. For a deep cyclical at a trough, normalized through-cycle earnings are the better lens; this mode is for the genuinely unprofitable, and for the profitable business whose capital spending currently outruns its cash.

Weigh SVRA against another business →

The owners of SVRA: the meeting and the votes →

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Savara Inc. (SVRA), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/SVRA, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← SVCO its page in the Manual SVV →

Industry order: ← SUPN the Pharmaceuticals chapter SXTC →