Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← GIL Manual GLAS → ← FN Communications Equipment HLIT →

GILT, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.

Communications Equipment capital-intensive Cyclical

Revenue is Commercial (62%), Defense (22%) and Network Infrastructure and Services (15%).

Latest annual: FY2025 20-F · US listing is the ordinary share
GILT · Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$452M
+47.9% YoY · 22% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 5-yr average
Revenue $452M 5-yr avg $296M
Gross margin 30% 5-yr avg 35%
Operating margin 5.2% 5-yr avg 6.0%
ROIC 6% 5-yr avg 7%
Owner-earnings margin 2% 5-yr avg 4%
Free cash flow margin 2% 5-yr avg 4%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What it is
A capital-intensive business, run on heavy physical assets that must be kept working and earn a return above what they cost to maintain.
Situation
Cyclical. Margins collapse and recover repeatedly across the record; a single year, good or bad, misstates the through-cycle earning power.
What moves the needle
Gross margin has run about 33% and operating margin about 5.2% through the cycle, a spread the cycle sets more than the company does. The margin is cyclical, swinging between 0.3% and 23% over the years, so the through-cycle figure carries more than any single year — and the balance sheet at the trough more than the peak. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Return on capital has sat near the cost of capital (median 10%). By owner earnings: roughly 6% of revenue reaches owners as cash, though it swings. The cycle and the balance sheet decide this one; the worst year tells more than the median, and the rest is in the 10-K.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

Where the money comes from

read the 20-F →

The largest slice of sales is Commercial at 62%, but the profit engine is Network Infrastructure And Services: 15% of revenue and 51% of the profitable segments' operating profit. Defense ran a $23M operating loss.

Revenue by reportable segment, FY2025
Operating profit profitable segments only
  • Commercial62%$281M49% of profit
  • Defense22%$100Mloss of $23M
  • Network Infrastructure And Services15%$70M51% of profit
By geographyUnited States61%Other21%Peru15%Israel2%

From the segment footnote of the company's own 20-F. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of the profitable segments' operating profit (a loss-making segment carries its loss in dollars in the legend, not a share of the bar), before unallocated corporate costs.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2016–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2016’162017’172018’182019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMDec 2025
Income statement
$280M$283M$266M$257M$166M$215M$240M$266M$305M$452M$452MRevenueRevenue
27%29%35%37%25%33%36%39%37%30%30%Gross marginGross mgn
$755K$11M$21M$26M$38M$2M$10M$28M$28M$23M$23MOperating incomeOp. inc.
0.3%3.8%8.0%10.1%22.7%1.0%4.1%10.6%9.1%5.2%5.2%Operating marginOp. mgn
($5M)$7M$18M$37M$35M($3M)($6M)$24M$25M$21M$21MNet incomeNet inc.
-4%-8%2%17%15%-10%-10%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
($37M)($17M)$32M$35M$43M$19M$11M$32M$32M$21M$21MOperating cash flowOp. cash
$13M$13M$13M$11M$10M$11M$12M$13M$14M$24M$24MDepreciationDeprec.
($45M)($37M)$459K($13M)($2M)$11M$5M($5M)($7M)($24M)($24M)Working capital & otherWC & other
$4M$4M$11M$8M$5M$9M$13M$11M$7M$11M$11MCapexCapex
1.5%1.3%4.0%3.1%2.8%4.2%5.3%4.0%2.2%2.5%2.5%Capex / revenueCapex/rev
($41M)($21M)$21M$27M$38M$10M($2M)$21M$25M$9M$9MOwner earningsOwner earn.
−14.7%−7.4%8.0%10.4%23.1%4.6%−0.8%8.0%8.2%2.0%2.0%Owner earnings marginOE mgn
($41M)($21M)$21M$27M$38M$10M($2M)$21M$25M$9M$9MFree cash flowFCF
−14.7%−7.4%8.0%10.4%23.1%4.6%−0.8%8.0%8.2%2.0%2.0%Free cash flow marginFCF mgn
$25M$20M$35M$0$0$0Dividends paidDiv. paid
6%10%12%22%1%3%14%13%6%6%ROICROIC
-3%3%7%14%14%-1%-2%9%8%4%4%Return on equityROE
4%6%−15%−2%9%4%Retained to equityRetained/eq
Balance sheet
$40M$53M$67M$75M$89M$84M$87M$104M$119M$185M$185MCash & investmentsCash+inv
$89M$50M$47M$48M$28M$39M$51M$45M$50M$86M$86MReceivablesReceiv.
$21M$29M$21M$27M$31M$28M$33M$39M$39M$45M$45MInventoryInvent.
$30M$34M$25M$21M$20M$20M$21M$14M$17M$32M$32MAccounts payablePayables
$81M$45M$44M$54M$39M$48M$63M$69M$71M$100M$100MOperating working capitalOper. WC
$239M$244M$246M$223M$239M$199M$215M$241M$256M$391M$391MCurrent assetsCur. assets
$147M$152M$140M$121M$149M$109M$126M$127M$101M$215M$215MCurrent liabilitiesCur. liab.
1.6×1.6×1.8×1.8×1.6×1.8×1.7×1.9×2.5×1.8×1.8×Current ratioCurr. ratio
$43M$43M$43M$43M$43M$43M$43M$55M$52M$170M$170MGoodwillGoodwill
$383M$392M$395M$392M$412M$368M$385M$427M$430M$746M$746MTotal assetsAssets
$26M$22M$17M$12M$8M$0$0$61M$61MTotal debtDebt
($14M)($31M)($50M)($63M)($81M)($84M)($119M)($124M)($124M)Net debt / (cash)Net debt
0.1×2.1×4.0×6.3×14.7×Interest coverageInt. cov.
$210M$218M$255M$270M$250M$248M$244M$275M$304M$500M$500MShareholders’ equityEquity
Per share
52.0M54.9M55.8M56.0M55.6M56.4M56.6M56.7M57.0M60.4M73.8MShares out (diluted)Shares
$5.38$5.15$4.78$4.59$2.99$3.81$4.24$4.70$5.36$7.48$6.12Revenue / shareRev/sh
$-0.10$0.12$0.33$0.66$0.63$-0.05$-0.10$0.41$0.44$0.34$0.28EPS (diluted)EPS
$-0.79$-0.38$0.38$0.48$0.69$0.18$-0.03$0.37$0.44$0.15$0.12Owner earnings / shareOE/sh
$-0.79$-0.38$0.38$0.48$0.69$0.18$-0.03$0.37$0.44$0.15$0.12Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh
$0.44$0.36$0.62$0.00$0.00$0.00Dividends / shareDiv/sh
$0.08$0.07$0.19$0.14$0.08$0.16$0.23$0.19$0.12$0.19$0.16Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh
$4.04$3.98$4.58$4.82$4.50$4.40$4.31$4.85$5.34$8.28$6.78Book value / shareBVPS
Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
9-yr5-yr
Revenue / share+3.7%/yr+20.1%/yr
Owner earnings / share−26.1%/yr
EPS−11.5%/yr
Capital spending / share+9.7%/yr+17.5%/yr
Book value / share+8.3%/yr+13.0%/yr

The record, charted

FY2016–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.

Share count
60Mpeak FY2025
ROIC
6%low FY2021
Gross margin
30%low FY2020

Owner earnings vs. net income

Owner earningsNet income

The accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.

$9Mowner earningsvs.$21Mnet incomelow FY2016

Where the cash went

ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetained

Each year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.

FY2018FY2025

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2025 the business reported $21M of profit but $9M of owner earnings: $12M less than the profit line, taken out by capital spending and the timing of cash.

Reported net income$21M
Owner earnings$9M · 2% of revenue
FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Reported net income$21M$25M$24M($6M)($3M)
Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back+$24M+$14M+$13M+$12M+$11M
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items−$24M−$7M−$5M+$5M+$11M
Cash from operations$21M$32M$32M$11M$19M
Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow−$11M−$7M−$11M−$13M−$9M
Owner earnings$9M$25M$21M($2M)$10M
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue2%8%8%-1%5%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .

Much of fiscal 2025's profit didn't arrive as operating cash; it sits in “working capital & other” above. That can be a real inventory or timing swing, or profit that doesn't run through operating cash at all: a heavy tax year, equity-method earnings, or investment income booked through investing. For a year like this, owner earnings understates the cash earned; the full cash-flow statement carries the rest.

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 20-F · source on SEC EDGAR →

Will it survive?

  • No meaningful interest burden
    Little or no interest expense reported
    What this means

    Little or no interest expense reported, the business isn't leaning on lenders to operate.

  • Net cash
    Cash $169M + ST investments $16M − debt $61M
    What this means

    Cash and short-term investments exceed every dollar of debt by $124M, on net the company owes nothing, and can act from strength when others can't. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.

  • Long (60+ days)
    DSO 69 + DIO 52 − DPO 36 days
    What this means

    Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.

Is it a good business?

  • Solid through the cycle
    9-yr median, range 1%–22%; 6% latest = NOPAT $23M ÷ invested capital $393M
    Industry peers: median -5%
    What this means

    The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 9 years (it ran 6% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.

  • Thin, recently turned positive
    latest $9M = operating cash $21M − maintenance capex $11M; positive each of the last 3 years, after an earlier loss stretch (10-yr median 5%)
    Industry peers: median -1%
    What this means

    What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 2% of revenue this year, a 5% median across 10 years.

  • Mostly cash-backed
    Cash from ops $21M ÷ net income $21M
    What this means

    How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.

How is the cash used?

  • Reinvests most of it
    Dividends + buybacks $0 ÷ Owner Earnings $9M
    What this means

    Of $9M Owner Earnings, $0 (0%) went back to shareholders, $0 dividends, $0 buybacks. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.

  • Investing or harvesting? 0.49×
    Harvesting
    Capex $11M ÷ depreciation $24M
    What this means

    Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.

Graham’s defensive tests · 2 of 6 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size Miss
    Revenue ≥ $2B · $452M
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.

  • Strong liquidity Near
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 1.82×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Conservative debt Pass
    Debt ≤ working capital · $61M vs $176M WC
    What this means

    Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.

  • Earnings stability Miss
    A profit every year (10-yr record) · 3 loss years
    What this means

    Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.

  • Dividend record Miss
    Uninterrupted dividends · 3 of 10 yrs
    What this means

    An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.

  • Earnings growth Pass
    Earnings +33% over the record · +248%
    What this means

    At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $0.31/share (latest year $0.28), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $6.78/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Durability & moat, 2016–2025

Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.

  • Profitable years 7 of 10
    What this means

    Lost money in 3 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.

  • Return on capital ≥ 15% 1 of 8 yrs
    What this means

    A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.

  • Operating margin 4% → 8% (3-yr avg ends)
    What this means

    Through the cycle the operating margin widened — about 4% early to 8% lately, median 5% — pricing power intact or improving.

  • Reinvestment, incremental ROIC returns capital
    What this means

    The capital base barely grew: this business returns cash through dividends and buybacks rather than reinvesting. Judge it on the cash returned, not on compounding.

  • Worst year 2016 · 0.3% op. margin
    What this means

    Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.

  • Share count +1.7%/yr
    What this means

    The share count is rising, dilution works against you on a per-share basis.

  • Dividend record rising
    What this means

    Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.

  • How management talks about it Promotional
    What this means

    The record is compounding, but the filing leans on a promoter’s vocabulary rather than the per-share, return-on-capital terms an owner uses. The results back the talk here; the register is still worth noting.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Low contestability

The moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.

In its own filing A competitive risk, new this year

Its FY2025 10-K names artificial intelligence as a competitive threat, in language that was not in the prior year's filing.

“Advances in Artificial Intelligence, or AI, and related technologies could disrupt our markets, intensify competition, and adversely affect demand for our products and services.”

AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Current Position

as of fiscal year-end, Dec 31, 2025

Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.

Current assets$391M
  • Cash & short-term investments$185M
  • Receivables$86M
  • Inventory$45M
  • Other current assets$74M
Current liabilities$215M
  • Debt due within a year$2M
  • Accounts payable$32M
  • Other current liabilities$182M
Current ratio1.82×all current assets ÷ what's due · Graham looked for 2×
Quick ratio1.60×stricter: inventory excluded
Cash ratio0.86×strictest: cash alone against what's due
Working capital$176Mthe cushion left after near-term bills
Debt due this year vs. cash$2M due · $185M cash covered by cash on hand, no refinancing forced · both figures from the Dec 31, 2025 balance sheet
Deeper floors
Tangible book value$277Mequity stripped of goodwill & intangibles
Debt incl. operating leases$64M$3M of it operating leases
Deferred revenue$9Mcustomer cash collected before delivery; operating float

From the company's latest filing.

How the cash was used, 2016–2025

Over the record, the business generated $170M of operating cash; how management split it reads as a cash builder, a large share of cash simply built up on the balance sheet.

  • Reinvested$82M · 48%
  • Dividends$80M · 47%
  • Retained (debt / cash)$8M · 5%
  • Returned to owners$80M

    91% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $80M as dividends and $0 as buybacks.

  • Source of fundingOperating cash

    Operating cash covered reinvestment and returns; over the span debt rose $35M and cash and short-term investments rose $145M.

  • Net change in share count42.1%

    The diluted count rose from 52M to 74M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.

  • Dividend record$0.00/sh

    Paid in 3 of the years on record. It was cut at least once along the way.

  • Return on what it retained45%

    Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out ($72M over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) grew $32M, so each retained $1 added about 0.45 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.

Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.

Acquisitions & goodwill

from the balance sheet & the 10-year cash-flow record

Goodwill grows only when a company acquires and falls only when it concedes it overpaid. The size of that bet, the cash put into buying rather than building, and how much has already been written off.

Goodwill & intangibles$224M30% of all assets; the premium carried on the balance sheet for businesses acquired
Against book equity34%goodwill is this share of book equity; the rest is the company’s own retained and paid-in capital
Cash spent acquiring$0over 10 years buying other businesses, against $82M of capital spent building

None written down over the record; the goodwill is still carried at full cost. That is the deals holding their value on the books so far; whether they keep doing so is the test an owner watches, since the write-down, when it comes, is the admission the price was too high.

Goodwill, acquired intangibles and equity from the latest balance sheet; acquisition spend and write-downs summed across the 10-year record, from the company's own filings.

Inverting the record

Invert: instead of why Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.

2 of the 5 tests turned up something to look into; the other 3 came back clean.

  • Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?42.1%

    Diluted shares grew 42.1% over 2016–2025. Owners were diluted on net; each share owns less of the business than it did. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.

  • Look hereDid debt outgrow the business?$26M → $61M

    Debt rose from $26M to $61M while owner earnings went from about ($14M) to $18M: measured against what the business earns, the balance sheet carries more debt than it did. Debt raised for buybacks or deals rather than growth is the kind that bites in a downturn.

And these came back clean
  • Is it less profitable than it was?
  • Did reported profit become cash?
  • Did receivables and inventory outpace sales?

Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.

Peers, Communications Equipment

The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueGross marginOp. marginROICOwner earn. margin
VISNVistance Networks Inc.$1.9B37%0.9%-0%10%
ESEESCO Technologies Inc.$1.1B39%12.2%7%11%
ADTNADTRAN Holdings Inc.$1.1B39%-4.9%-5%-1%
GILTGilat Satellite Networks Ltd.$452M34%6.6%10%6%
AIOTPowerFleet Inc.$444M50%-7.1%-8%-2%
MVSTMicrovast Holdings Inc.$428M10%-34.8%-30%-9%
HLITHarmonic Inc.$361M50%3.5%3%2%
PLPlanet Labs PBC$308M49%-77.3%-40%-40%
Group median39%-2.0%-3%0%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Enter the US price, in dollars: the NYSE/Nasdaq quote you hold. Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.'s US listing is the ordinary share itself. The record tables elsewhere on this page remain as filed.

Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. has delivered.

$

Through the cycle, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. earns about $28M on its 6.3% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 2.0% margin runs below that; the reported figure may understate a lean year. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.

Base

The assumptions

9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.

Enter a price above to run it.

Implied by the price
Owner-earnings growth · ’21→’25+44%/yr
Owner-earnings growth · since FY2023−34%/yr
Owner-earnings yield
P/E (3-yr earnings ’23–’25)
P/B
Graham’s price gate

Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.

Against a high-grade bond: Graham’s yardstick bond yield%

Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.

Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.

Owner earnings $9M on 74M shares outstanding, per the 20-F cover, as of 2025-12-31; net cash $124M. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. (GILT), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/GILT, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← GIL its page in the Manual GLAS →

Industry order: ← FN the Communications Equipment chapter HLIT →