← All companies ← HCA Manual HCI → ← EU Coal & Consumable Fuels METC →
HCC, Warrior Met Coal Inc.
A capital-intensive business, run on heavy physical assets that must be kept working and earn a return above what they cost to maintain.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- Situation
- Capital build-out. Capital spending has surged to 24% of sales, today's earnings are charged less depreciation than tomorrow's will be. Cyclical. Margins collapse and recover repeatedly across the record; a single year, good or bad, misstates the through-cycle earning power.
- What moves the needle
- Gross margin has run about 46% and operating margin about 30% through the cycle, a spread the cycle sets more than the company does. The margin is cyclical, swinging between −3.5% and 46% over the years, so the through-cycle figure carries more than any single year — and the balance sheet at the trough more than the peak. Capital spending runs about 11% of sales, so the return earned on what it sinks into that plant weighs as much as the margin. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has run high across the record (median 35%, above 15% in 6 of 9 years), though buybacks and expensed R&D and brands shrink the capital base, so the figure overstates the underlying economics. The steadier read is owner earnings: roughly 29% of revenue reaches owners as cash, consistently. Whether these returns reflect real pricing power or an accounting artifact is the judgment the 10-K is for.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2017–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMMar 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||||||
| $1.2B | $1.4B | $1.3B | $783M | $1.1B | $1.7B | $1.7B | $1.5B | $1.3B | $1.5B | RevenueRevenue |
| 49% | 48% | 43% | 20% | 48% | 59% | 46% | 34% | 25% | 30% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| 3% | 3% | 3% | 4% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 4% | 5% | 5% | SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev |
| $423M | $508M | $383M | ($27M) | $244M | $801M | $541M | $255M | $46M | $142M | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 36.2% | 36.9% | 30.2% | −3.5% | 23.0% | 46.1% | 32.3% | 16.7% | 3.5% | 9.7% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| $455M | $697M | $302M | ($36M) | $151M | $641M | $479M | $251M | $57M | $138M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| -9% | — | 18% | — | 25% | 18% | 13% | 12% | -5% | 7% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | ||||||||||
| $435M | $559M | $533M | $113M | $352M | $842M | $701M | $367M | $229M | $207M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $75M | $97M | $97M | $118M | $141M | $115M | $127M | $154M | $189M | $196M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| ($100M) | ($241M) | $128M | $23M | $50M | $68M | $77M | ($59M) | ($36M) | ($148M) | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $93M | $102M | $107M | $87M | $58M | $205M | $492M | $457M | $320M | $332M | CapexCapex |
| 7.9% | 7.4% | 8.5% | 11.2% | 5.5% | 11.8% | 29.3% | 30.0% | 24.4% | 22.6% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $342M | $458M | $426M | $25M | $294M | $727M | $574M | $213M | $41M | $11M | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 29.2% | 33.2% | 33.6% | 3.2% | 27.7% | 41.8% | 34.2% | 14.0% | 3.1% | 0.8% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| $342M | $458M | $426M | $25M | $294M | $637M | $209M | ($90M) | ($91M) | ($125M) | Free cash flowFCF |
| 29.2% | 33.2% | 33.6% | 3.2% | 27.7% | 36.6% | 12.5% | −5.9% | −6.9% | −8.5% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| $0 | $0 | — | $0 | $0 | $0 | $2M | $0 | $0 | $0 | AcquisitionsAcquis. |
| $797M | $361M | $240M | $10M | $10M | $80M | $61M | $44M | $18M | $17M | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| $0 | $38M | $13M | $0 | $0 | — | — | — | — | — | BuybacksBuybacks |
| 59% | 52% | 35% | -2% | 23% | 71% | 36% | 13% | 2% | 6% | ROICROIC |
| 110% | 98% | 39% | -5% | 17% | 44% | 26% | 12% | 3% | 6% | Return on equityROE |
| −83% | 47% | 8% | −6% | 16% | 39% | 22% | 10% | 2% | 5% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | ||||||||||
| $35M | $206M | $193M | $212M | $396M | $829M | $738M | $492M | $300M | $203M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| $118M | $138M | $99M | $83M | $122M | $152M | $98M | $141M | $182M | $296M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| $54M | $57M | $98M | $119M | $60M | $154M | $184M | $208M | $236M | $252M | InventoryInvent. |
| $28M | $34M | $46M | $59M | $34M | $39M | $36M | $40M | $66M | $72M | Accounts payablePayables |
| $144M | $162M | $151M | $143M | $148M | $267M | $246M | $308M | $351M | $475M | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| $269M | $469M | $444M | $467M | $627M | $1.2B | $1.1B | $887M | $820M | $828M | Current assetsCur. assets |
| $108M | $124M | $129M | $170M | $122M | $153M | $148M | $170M | $257M | $238M | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 2.5× | 3.8× | 3.4× | 2.7× | 5.1× | 7.7× | 7.2× | 5.2× | 3.2× | 3.5× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| $993M | $1.4B | $1.3B | $1.4B | $1.5B | $2.0B | $2.4B | $2.6B | $2.8B | $2.8B | Total assetsAssets |
| $346M | $469M | $339M | $380M | $340M | $303M | $153M | $154M | $154M | $154M | Total debtDebt |
| $310M | $263M | $146M | $168M | ($56M) | ($527M) | ($585M) | ($338M) | ($146M) | ($48M) | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| — | — | — | — | — | 25.5× | 30.1× | 59.7× | 4.7× | 13.2× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| $413M | $713M | $766M | $725M | $872M | $1.4B | $1.9B | $2.1B | $2.1B | $2.2B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 1.0% | 0.9% | 1.0% | 1.1% | 1.4% | 1.5% | 1.5% | Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev |
| Per share | ||||||||||
| 52.8M | 52.9M | 51.5M | 51.2M | 51.4M | 51.7M | 52.0M | 52.3M | 52.6M | 52.8M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $22.14 | $26.04 | $24.63 | $15.30 | $20.59 | $33.62 | $32.21 | $29.14 | $24.90 | $27.84 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $8.62 | $13.17 | $5.86 | $-0.70 | $2.93 | $12.40 | $9.20 | $4.79 | $1.08 | $2.61 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $6.47 | $8.65 | $8.26 | $0.49 | $5.71 | $14.05 | $11.02 | $4.08 | $0.77 | $0.21 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $6.47 | $8.65 | $8.26 | $0.49 | $5.71 | $12.31 | $4.02 | $-1.72 | $-1.73 | $-2.37 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $15.09 | $6.81 | $4.67 | $0.20 | $0.20 | $1.54 | $1.17 | $0.84 | $0.34 | $0.33 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| $1.75 | $1.92 | $2.08 | $1.71 | $1.13 | $3.97 | $9.45 | $8.73 | $6.09 | $6.29 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $7.82 | $13.47 | $14.87 | $14.17 | $16.95 | $27.99 | $36.02 | $39.94 | $40.71 | $41.78 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 8-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +1.5%/yr | +10.2%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | −23.3%/yr | +9.5%/yr |
| EPS | −22.8%/yr | — |
| Dividends / share | −37.8%/yr | +10.8%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +16.8%/yr | +28.9%/yr |
| Book value / share | +22.9%/yr | +23.5%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2017–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedBeyond op. cashEach year's outlays against its operating cash: the mix, and how it drifts. The hatched cap is spending beyond that year's operating cash — financed from the balance sheet or borrowing, not operations.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business earned $41M of owner earnings, the operating cash left after the $189M it takes just to hold its position. It put $132M more into growth; free cash flow, after that spending, was ($91M).
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | $57M | $251M | $479M | $641M | $151M |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$189M | +$154M | +$127M | +$115M | +$141M |
| Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost | +$20M | +$22M | +$18M | +$18M | +$9M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | −$36M | −$59M | +$77M | +$68M | +$50M |
| Cash from operations | $229M | $367M | $701M | $842M | $352M |
| Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume | −$189M | −$154M | −$127M | −$115M | −$58M |
| Owner earnings | $41M | $213M | $574M | $727M | $294M |
| Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still | −$132M | −$303M | −$364M | −$90M | — |
| Free cash flow | ($91M) | ($90M) | $209M | $637M | $294M |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 3% | 14% | 34% | 42% | 28% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position (here about $189M, roughly its depreciation, the rate its assets wear out). The other $132M of its capital spending is growth it chose, not upkeep it owed; charged only with the maintenance it must do, the business earns well more than the year's free cash flow shows. The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $20M), owner earnings is nearer $21M.
Much of fiscal 2025's profit didn't arrive as operating cash; it sits in “working capital & other” above. That can be a real inventory or timing swing, or profit that doesn't run through operating cash at all: a heavy tax year, equity-method earnings, or investment income booked through investing. For a year like this, owner earnings understates the cash earned; the full cash-flow statement carries the rest.
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- AdequateOperating income $46M ÷ interest expense $10M
What this means
Comfortable in a normal year, but below the margin of safety Graham looked for. Worth checking how stable the coverage has been across a full cycle.
- Net cashCash $300M − debt $154M
What this means
Cash and short-term investments exceed every dollar of debt by $146M, on net the company owes nothing, and can act from strength when others can't. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Long (60+ days)DSO 51 + DIO 88 − DPO 25 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.
Is it a good business?
- Very high (≥25%) through the cycle9-yr median, range -2%–71%; 2% latest = NOPAT $46M ÷ invested capital $2.0BIndustry peers: median 14%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 9 years (it ran 2% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- High through the cycle9-yr median margin, range 3%–42%; latest $41M = operating cash $229M − maintenance capex $189MIndustry peers: median 14%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 3% of revenue this year, a 29% median across 9 years. It chose to put $132M more into growth, so free cash flow this year was ($91M) — the gap is investment, not weakness. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $20M of SBC) leaves $21M.
- Cash-backedCash from ops $229M ÷ net income $57M
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Returns about halfDividends + buybacks $18M ÷ Owner Earnings $41M
What this means
Of $41M Owner Earnings, $18M (44%) went back to shareholders, $18M dividends, $0 buybacks. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.
- Investing or harvesting? 1.70×ExpandingCapex $320M ÷ depreciation $189M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 3 of 6 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size NearRevenue ≥ $2B · $1.3B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity PassCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 3.19×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt PassDebt ≤ working capital · $154M vs $563M WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability NearA profit every year (9-yr record) · 1 loss year
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record PassUninterrupted dividends · paid every year (9)
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth MissEarnings +33% over the record · −46%
What this means
At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $4.96/share (latest year $1.08), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $40.56/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2017–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 8 of 9
What this means
Lost money in 1 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 6 of 9 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin 34% → 17% (3-yr avg ends)
In the filing’s words The filing attributes gains to higher prices but names price competition too — and the margin slipped, so the pressure is winning here.
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about 34% early to 17% lately, median 30% — competition or costs are biting in.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC −21%
What this means
Reinvested capital came back at a negative incremental return over this window — the invested base grew while operating profit did not. The filings show where it went.
- Owner earnings growth −13%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings shrank about 13% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2020 · −3.5% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2020, understand why before trusting the good years.
- Share count −0.0%/yr
What this means
Roughly flat share count, little dilution, little buyback.
- Dividend record paid
What this means
Paid a dividend in 9 of the years on record.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
The filing raises AI among its risks, but in other terms (security, regulation, energy or the like), not as a competitor to its product; it frames AI mainly as a capability.
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat, and the company is using it that way.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of the latest quarter, Mar 31, 2026Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$203M
- Receivables$296M
- Inventory$252M
- Other current assets$77M
- Accounts payable$72M
- Other current liabilities$166M
From the company's latest filing.
How the cash was used, 2017–2025
Over the record, the business generated $4.1B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a balanced allocator, splitting cash between the business, owners, and the balance sheet.
- Reinvested$1.9B · 47%
- Dividends$1.6B · 39%
- Buybacks$51M · 1%
- Retained (debt / cash)$538M · 13%
- Returned to owners$1.7B
54% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $1.6B as dividends and $51M as buybacks.
- Average price paid for buybacks—
Buybacks ran $51M over the span, but the filings don't tag the share count needed to deduce the average price paid.
- Net change in share count−0.1%
The diluted count barely moved (53M to 53M): buybacks roughly offset the stock issued to staff.
- Dividend record$0.34/sh
Paid in 9 of the years on record, the per-share dividend shrinking about 38% a year. It was cut at least once along the way.
- Return on what it retained−10%
Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out ($1.3B over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) fell $132M, so each retained $1 gave back about 0.10 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.
| Fiscal year | Chief executive | Pay, as filed | “Actually paid” | Owner earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | J. Scheller, III | $5.7M | $5.2M | $294M |
| 2022 | J. Scheller, III | $6.5M | $11.2M | $727M |
| 2023 | J. Scheller, III | $6.7M | $13.9M | $574M |
| 2024 | J. Scheller, III | $7.9M | $10.6M | $213M |
| 2025 | J. Scheller, III | $7.3M | $15.1M | $41M |
Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.
- Insider ownership2.1%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
- CEO pay ratio57:1
What the chief earns for every dollar the median employee makes, per the 2026 proxy. A high ratio alone settles nothing; some businesses are genuinely top-heavy in scarce skill. A runaway figure is where Buffett starts asking whether the board is doing its job.
- Stock-based compensation$20M
The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 2% of revenue, equal to 44% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why Warrior Met Coal Inc. is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2017–2025.
2 of the 5 tests turned up something to look into; the other 3 came back clean.
- Look hereIs it less profitable than it was?17.1% vs 32.0%
The owner-earnings margin averaged 32.0% early in the record and 17.1% across the last three years, and the latest year has not recovered. Ask the filing whether that is a structural drift or a cyclical trough — price, mix, cost, or a competitor — and whether it is permanent.
- Look hereDid receivables and inventory outpace sales?15% → 37% of sales
Receivables and inventory grew from $172M to $548M while revenue grew 26%: working capital is climbing faster than sales (15% of revenue then, 37% now). That can mean customers paying slower, stock building up, or revenue pulled forward. The filing's cash-flow and receivables notes say which.
- Did the share count rise anyway?
- Did debt outgrow the business?
- Did reported profit become cash?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
What an owner would ask, FY2025
read the 10-K →- How much of the revenue rides on one buyer?≈$822M · 56% of revenue on the largest customers (TTM)
“For the year ended December 31, 2025, we derived approximately 56% of our total sales revenues from our five largest customers.”verify →
- Does management own its misses?1 plain admission in this year's filing
“We determined that our natural gas and royalty business did not meet the criteria in ASC 280, Segment Reporting , to be considered as a reportable segment.”verify →
- Which reported numbers are a judgment call?Management names Income taxes as critical estimates
each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →
The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.
Peers, Coal & Consumable Fuels
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNRCore Natural Resources Inc. | $4.2B | — | 4.6% | 4% | 14% |
| BTUPeabody Energy Corporation Common Stock | $3.9B | — | 5.9% | 17% | 6% |
| ARLPAlliance Resource Partners L.P. Common | $2.2B | — | 18.0% | — | 21% |
| AMRAlpha Metallurgical Resources Inc. | $2.1B | — | 9.6% | 15% | 4% |
| HCCWarrior Met Coal Inc. | $1.3B | 46% | 30.2% | 35% | 29% |
| METCRamaco Resources Inc. | $537M | 21% | 6.5% | 14% | 9% |
| NCNACCO Industries Inc. | $277M | 13% | 21.3% | 12% | 21% |
| NRPNatural Resource Partners LP | $232M | — | 82.8% | — | 87% |
| Group median | — | 21% | 13.8% | 15% | 17% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFType today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Warrior Met Coal Inc. has delivered.
Warrior Met Coal Inc.’s latest year shows negative owner earnings, the mark of a build-out: total capital spending outruns the cash the business throws off today. So the tool opens on the steady-state base (maintenance capex in place of the build-out spend), the cash it would earn at rest; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.
Through the cycle, Warrior Met Coal Inc. earns about $383M on its 29.2% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 3.1% margin runs below that; the reported figure may understate a lean year. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Free cash flow ($125M) on 53M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-04-29; net cash $48M. The base opens on the steady-state figure (the latest year is negative on total capex mid-build-out); clear Steady-state to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. Capex ($332M) runs well above depreciation ($196M), so this is a build-out; Steady-state swaps total capex for maintenance (≈ depreciation), lifting the base to about $18M, the cash it would throw off if it stopped expanding. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← HCA its page in the Manual HCI →
Industry order: ← EU the Coal & Consumable Fuels chapter METC →