Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← HSBC Manual HTCO → ← HMR Marine Shipping HTCO →

HSHP, Himalaya Shipping Ltd.

Marine Shipping capital-intensive

A capital-intensive business, run on heavy physical assets that must be kept working and earn a return above what they cost to maintain.

Latest annual: FY2025 20-F · US listing is the ordinary share
HSHP · Himalaya Shipping Ltd.
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$132M
+6.7% YoY
Vital signs · TTM, with 4-yr average
Revenue $132M 4-yr avg $73M
Gross margin 79% 4-yr avg 79%
Operating margin 51.7% 4-yr avg 48.5%

The business in brief

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What moves the needle
Gross margin has run about 79% and operating margin about 52% through the cycle, a wide spread between price and the cost of what it sells — whether that advantage is durable pricing power or a margin that can erode is the question the record is for. That margin has stayed fairly steady relative to where it runs (40%–54% over the years), so unit growth and cost discipline, not a moving line, are the lever.
Is it a good business?
Return on capital has rarely cleared the cost of capital (median 5%, above 15% in 0 of 4 years). This is price-taker territory, where the balance sheet and the cycle matter more than any multiple; the rest is in the 10-K.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2022–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMDec 2025
Income statement
$0$37M$124M$132M$132MRevenueRevenue
77%81%79%79%Gross marginGross mgn
($2M)$15M$67M$68M$68MOperating incomeOp. inc.
39.8%54.0%51.7%51.7%Operating marginOp. mgn
($2M)$2M$21M$18M$18MNet incomeNet inc.
0%0%0%0%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
($1M)$6M$56M$52M$52MOperating cash flowOp. cash
$0$9M$27M$29M$29MDepreciationDeprec.
$507K($4M)$8M$5M$5MWorking capital & otherWC & other
$0$0$21M$27M$27MDividends paidDiv. paid
-1%3%8%8%ROICROIC
-2%1%14%11%11%Return on equityROE
−2%1%0%−6%−6%Retained to equityRetained/eq
Balance sheet
$263K$26M$19M$32M$32MCash & investmentsCash+inv
$0$811K$1M$700K$700KReceivablesReceiv.
$0$634K$2M$2M$2MInventoryInvent.
$15M$2M$800K$1M$1MAccounts payablePayables
($15M)($248K)$2M$1M$1MOperating working capitalOper. WC
$2M$33M$27M$40M$40MCurrent assetsCur. assets
$26M$25M$36M$37M$37MCurrent liabilitiesCur. liab.
0.1×1.3×0.7×1.1×1.1×Current ratioCurr. ratio
$178M$599M$880M$864M$864MTotal assetsAssets
$67M$439M$714M$689M$689MTotal debtDebt
$67M$414M$695M$657M$657MNet debt / (cash)Net debt
1.1×1.4×1.3×5.0×Interest coverageInt. cov.
$90M$154M$155M$162M$162MShareholders’ equityEquity
Per share
32.2M38.6M43.9M46.0M46.6MShares out (diluted)Shares
$0.00$0.95$2.81$2.87$2.83Revenue / shareRev/sh
$-0.06$0.04$0.48$0.38$0.38EPS (diluted)EPS
$0.00$0.00$0.47$0.58$0.58Dividends / shareDiv/sh
$2.81$3.99$3.52$3.51$3.47Book value / shareBVPS

The record, charted

FY2022–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.

Share count
46Mpeak FY2025
ROIC
8%low FY2022
Gross margin
79%low FY2023

Where the cash went

ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetained

Each year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.

FY2023FY2025
III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 20-F · source on SEC EDGAR →

Will it survive?

  • Comfortable
    Operating income $68M ÷ interest expense $14M
    What this means

    Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient, it says solvent, not cheap.

  • How heavy is the debt, net of cash? $657M · 9.6× operating profit
    Heavy net debt
    Cash $32M − debt $689M
    What this means

    Netting $32M of cash and short-term investments against $689M of debt leaves $657M owed, about 9.6× a year's operating profit (10.1× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.

  • Tight
    DSO 2 + DIO 22 − DPO 17 days
    What this means

    Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.

Is it a good business?

  • Below average through the cycle
    4-yr median, range -1%–8%; the latest year is left out — large non-operating charges put its operating line well above pretax profit
    Industry peers: median 4%
    What this means

    The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 4 years, so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.

  • Not enough data
    Industry peers: median 12%
    What this means

    The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

  • Cash-backed
    Cash from ops $52M ÷ net income $18M
    What this means

    How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.

How is the cash used?

  • Not enough data
    What this means

    The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

  • Investing or harvesting?
    Not enough data
    What this means

    The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

Graham’s defensive tests · 0 of 3 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size Miss
    Revenue ≥ $2B · $132M
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.

  • Strong liquidity Miss
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 1.08×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Conservative debt Miss
    Debt ≤ working capital · $689M vs $3M WC
    What this means

    Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $0.29/share (latest year $0.38), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $3.47/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Durability & moat, 2022–2025

Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.

  • Profitable years 3 of 4
    What this means

    Lost money in 1 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.

  • Return on capital ≥ 15% 0 of 4 yrs
    What this means

    A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.

  • Operating margin 52% (median, 3 yrs)
    What this means

    Over the 3 years on record the operating margin has run around 52% — too short a record to call a through-cycle trend, but that is the level the business earns at.

  • Reinvestment, incremental ROIC 11%
    What this means

    Reinvested capital came back at only a modest incremental return — near the cost of capital, where extra growth adds little per dollar. The record shows whether it is a soft stretch or a thinning moat.

  • Worst year 2023 · 39.8% op. margin
    What this means

    Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.

  • Share count +12.7%/yr
    What this means

    The share count is rising, dilution works against you on a per-share basis.

  • Dividend record rising
    What this means

    Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Low contestability

The moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.

AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Current Position

as of fiscal year-end, Dec 31, 2025

Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.

Current assets$40M
  • Cash & short-term investments$32M
  • Receivables$700K
  • Inventory$2M
  • Other current assets$5M
Current liabilities$37M
  • Debt due within a year$24M
  • Accounts payable$1M
  • Other current liabilities$12M
Current ratio1.08×all current assets ÷ what's due · Graham looked for 2×
Quick ratio1.04×stricter: inventory excluded
Cash ratio0.89×strictest: cash alone against what's due
Working capital$3Mthe cushion left after near-term bills
Debt due this year vs. cash$24M due · $32M cash covered by cash on hand, no refinancing forced · both figures from the Dec 31, 2025 balance sheet
Deeper floors
Tangible book value$162Mequity stripped of goodwill & intangibles
Net current asset value($663M)Graham's net-net: current assets less all liabilities
Debt incl. operating leases$689Mno operating-lease liability tagged this quarter, so debt alone

From the company's latest filing.

Peers, Marine Shipping

The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueGross marginOp. marginROICOwner earn. margin
KEXKirby$3.4B7.7%4%10%
MATXMatson$3.3B96%11.4%11%12%
TDWTidewater Inc.$1.4B-12.5%-6%3%
INSWInternational Seaways Inc. Common Stock$843M12.3%3%33%
PANLPangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd.$632M7.7%10%10%
LPGDorian LPG Ltd.$482M35.2%7%38%
GNKGenco Shipping & Trading Limited$342M-1.1%-0%31%
HSHPHimalaya Shipping Ltd.$132M79%51.7%5%
Group median9.6%4%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Enter the US price, in dollars: the NYSE/Nasdaq quote you hold. Himalaya Shipping Ltd.'s US listing is the ordinary share itself. The record tables elsewhere on this page remain as filed.

Himalaya Shipping Ltd. is profitable, but its owner-earnings base could not be formed from this filing’s tagged data (operating cash flow or capital spending is missing), so the owner-earnings reverse-DCF has no base to grow. We read the price from both ends instead: type a price to see the profitability it demands, then set the mature margin you would believe and weigh the two against each other. Nothing leaves your browser unless you enter it in your notebook.

$
The assumptions

Enter a price to run it.

Owner earnings it must reach
Margin the price demands
Owner-earnings margin today

Two reads of one future. From your price: the owner earnings the company must reach, valued at a mature multiple and discounted back at your rate, expressed as the margin it implies on revenue grown at your rate. From your belief: the mature margin you would credit, set on the dial above. When the margin the price demands runs above the one you would believe, you are paying for a future taken on faith. For a deep cyclical at a trough, normalized through-cycle earnings are the better lens; this mode is for the genuinely unprofitable, and for the profitable business whose capital spending currently outruns its cash.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Himalaya Shipping Ltd. (HSHP), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/HSHP, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← HSBC its page in the Manual HTCO →

Industry order: ← HMR the Marine Shipping chapter HTCO →