Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← JOE Manual JPM → ← HAS Leisure Products KBSX →

JOUT, Johnson Outdoors Inc.

Leisure Products consumer brand Cyclical

Johnson Outdoors is a leading global manufacturer and marketer of branded seasonal, outdoor recreation products used primarily for fishing from a boat, diving, paddling, hiking and camping.

The Company's portfolio of well-known consumer brands has attained leading market positions due to innovation, marketing excellence, product performance and quality.

The Company's Fishing segment key brands are: Minn Kota electric motors for quiet trolling or primary propulsion, marine battery chargers and shallow water anchors; Humminbird sonar and GPS equipment for fish finding, navigation and marine cartography; and Cannon downriggers for controlled-depth fishing.

Latest annual: FY2025 10-K
JOUT · Johnson Outdoors Inc.
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$592M
−0.1% YoY · −0% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 5-yr average
Revenue $652M 5-yr avg $669M
Gross margin 37% 5-yr avg 37%
Operating margin 1.0% 5-yr avg 3.1%
ROIC 1% 5-yr avg 8%
Owner-earnings margin 4% 5-yr avg 2%
Free cash flow margin 4% 5-yr avg 1%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What it is
Revenue is Fishing (77%), Diving (13%) and Camping & Watercraft (10%).
Situation
Cyclical. Margins collapse and recover repeatedly across the record; a single year, good or bad, misstates the through-cycle earning power.
What moves the needle
Gross margin has run about 41% and operating margin about 8.9% through the cycle, a solid spread between what it charges and what the product costs to make. The operating margin has swung widely — from −7.3% to 15% — on a steadier 41% gross margin, so what moves it sits below the gross line, in operating spend and one-off charges more than in the cost of the product itself. Inventory runs near 17% of sales, so how fast it turns back into cash — and the risk of writing it down when demand softens — sits alongside the margin. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Return on capital has run in the teens (median 16%, above 15% in 5 of 10 years). Owner earnings agree: roughly 6% of revenue reaches owners as cash, consistently. Returns like these are solid but short of clear franchise economics; whether they hold is what the 10-K settles, not the multiple.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

Where the money comes from

read the 10-K →

Fishing is 77% of revenue, with Diving the other meaningful segment at 13%.

Revenue by reportable segment, FY2025
  • Fishing77%$458M
  • Diving13%$75M
  • Camping & Watercraft10%$58M
By geographyUnited States87%Europe6%Canada5%Other:2%

From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2016–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2016’162017’172018’182019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMApr 2026
Income statement
$434M$491M$544M$562M$594M$752M$743M$664M$593M$592M$652MRevenueRevenue
41%43%44%44%45%44%37%37%34%35%37%Gross marginGross mgn
9%9%8%8%8%7%6%9%10%10%9%SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev
4%4%4%4%4%3%4%5%5%5%5%R&D / revenueR&D/rev
$23M$46M$63M$64M$71M$111M$66M$12M($44M)($16M)$7MOperating incomeOp. inc.
5.3%9.3%11.6%11.3%12.0%14.8%8.9%1.8%−7.3%−2.7%1.0%Operating marginOp. mgn
$14M$35M$41M$51M$55M$83M$44M$20M($27M)($34M)($15M)Net incomeNet inc.
43%27%40%23%25%26%24%24%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
$43M$46M$63M$46M$61M$58M($62M)$42M$41M$56M$44MOperating cash flowOp. cash
$12M$13M$13M$14M$15M$13M$14M$16M$20M$21M$21MDepreciationDeprec.
$16M($4M)$7M($22M)($11M)($43M)($125M)$3M$47M$68M$37MWorking capital & otherWC & other
$12M$12M$19M$17M$16M$21M$32M$23M$22M$16M$19MCapexCapex
2.7%2.4%3.5%3.0%2.6%2.8%4.3%3.4%3.7%2.7%2.9%Capex / revenueCapex/rev
$32M$35M$50M$29M$46M$45M($76M)$25M$19M$40M$25MOwner earningsOwner earn.
7.3%7.1%9.2%5.2%7.7%6.0%−10.3%3.8%3.2%6.8%3.8%Owner earnings marginOE mgn
$32M$35M$44M$29M$46M$37M($94M)$19M$19M$40M$25MFree cash flowFCF
7.3%7.1%8.1%5.2%7.7%4.9%−12.6%2.9%3.2%6.8%3.8%Free cash flow marginFCF mgn
$9M$0$0$0$0$12M$0AcquisitionsAcquis.
$3M$4M$4M$6M$7M$8M$12M$13M$13M$14M$14MDividends paidDiv. paid
$2M$663K$675K$708K$460K$495K$509K$444K$436K$121KBuybacksBuybacks
10%19%24%32%32%38%14%2%-11%-5%1%ROICROIC
7%14%15%16%15%18%9%4%-6%-8%-4%Return on equityROE
5%13%13%14%13%16%7%1%−9%−11%−7%Retained to equityRetained/eq
Balance sheet
$87M$110M$151M$172M$212M$240M$130M$139M$162M$176M$108MCash & investmentsCash+inv
$42M$47M$41M$45M$67M$71M$92M$43M$41M$50M$127MReceivablesReceiv.
$68M$79M$89M$94M$97M$167M$249M$261M$210M$171M$187MInventoryInvent.
$25M$32M$34M$30M$37M$57M$54M$43M$36M$40M$52MAccounts payablePayables
$85M$94M$96M$108M$127M$181M$287M$262M$214M$181M$261MOperating working capitalOper. WC
$202M$241M$286M$323M$389M$491M$480M$459M$429M$409M$428MCurrent assetsCur. assets
$68M$84M$93M$88M$106M$138M$115M$104M$90M$105M$123MCurrent liabilitiesCur. liab.
3.0×2.9×3.1×3.7×3.7×3.6×4.2×4.4×4.7×3.9×3.5×Current ratioCurr. ratio
$11M$11M$11M$11M$11M$11M$11M$11M$0$10M$11MGoodwillGoodwill
$310M$354M$396M$436M$546M$674M$680M$682M$635M$604M$618MTotal assetsAssets
$7M$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0Total debtDebt
($80M)($110M)($151M)($172M)($212M)($240M)($130M)($139M)($162M)($176M)($108M)Net debt / (cash)Net debt
31.5×60.2×310.4×370.8×497.0×767.5×433.4×77.2×-286.3×-72.3×30.8×Interest coverageInt. cov.
$207M$243M$279M$325M$378M$459M$488M$500M$463M$418M$419MShareholders’ equityEquity
0.4%0.4%0.4%0.4%0.5%0.6%0.6%0.4%0.2%0.3%0.3%Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev
Per share
9.9M9.9M10.0M10.0M10.1M10.1M10.2M10.2M10.2M10.3M10.4MShares out (diluted)Shares
$44.01$49.45$54.45$56.12$59.04$74.27$73.23$65.11$58.00$57.72$62.86Revenue / shareRev/sh
$1.37$3.54$4.07$5.13$5.49$8.24$4.38$1.92$-2.60$-3.34$-1.47EPS (diluted)EPS
$3.22$3.50$5.03$2.90$4.56$4.44$-7.52$2.49$1.86$3.92$2.41Owner earnings / shareOE/sh
$3.22$3.50$4.42$2.90$4.56$3.65$-9.24$1.87$1.86$3.92$2.41Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh
$0.32$0.36$0.44$0.55$0.67$0.83$1.19$1.23$1.31$1.32$1.31Dividends / shareDiv/sh
$1.19$1.17$1.92$1.68$1.55$2.12$3.12$2.22$2.15$1.56$1.84Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh
$21.05$24.50$27.93$32.39$37.57$45.31$48.08$49.02$45.34$40.77$40.39Book value / shareBVPS
Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
9-yr5-yr
Revenue / share+3.1%/yr−0.5%/yr
Owner earnings / share+2.2%/yr−3.0%/yr
Dividends / share+16.9%/yr+14.4%/yr
Capital spending / share+3.1%/yr+0.1%/yr
Book value / share+7.6%/yr+1.6%/yr

The record, charted

FY2016–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.

Share count
10Mpeak FY2025
ROIC
−5%low FY2024
Gross margin
35%low FY2024

Owner earnings vs. net income

Owner earningsNet income

The accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.

$40Mowner earningsvs.($34M)net incomelow FY2022

Where the cash went

ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetained

Each year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.

FY2016FY2025

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2025 the business turned a $34M loss into $40M of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.

FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Reported net income($34M)($27M)$20M$44M$83M
Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back+$21M+$20M+$16M+$14M+$13M
Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost+$1M+$1M+$2M+$4M+$4M
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items+$68M+$47M+$3M−$125M−$43M
Cash from operations$56M$41M$42M($62M)$58M
Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume−$16M−$22M−$16M−$14M−$13M
Owner earnings$40M$19M$25M($76M)$45M
Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still−$6M−$17M−$8M
Free cash flow$40M$19M$19M($94M)$37M
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue7%3%4%-10%6%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position . The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $1M), owner earnings is nearer $39M.

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 10-K · source on SEC EDGAR →

Will it survive?

  • Does not cover its interest
    Operating income ($16M) ÷ interest expense $224K
    What this means

    A full year of operating profit didn't cover the interest bill. This is the zombie zone: the business depends on refinancing, asset sales, or forbearance to service its debt.

  • Net cash, debt-free
    Cash $176M − debt $0
    What this means

    Cash and short-term investments exceed every dollar of debt by $176M, on net the company owes nothing, and can act from strength when others can't. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.

  • Long (60+ days)
    DSO 31 + DIO 162 − DPO 38 days
    What this means

    Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.

Is it a good business?

  • Solid through the cycle
    10-yr median, range -11%–38%; -5% latest = NOPAT ($13M) ÷ invested capital $242M
    Industry peers: median 12%
    What this means

    The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 10 years (it ran -5% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.

  • Solid through the cycle
    10-yr median margin, range -10%–9%; latest $40M = operating cash $56M − maintenance capex $16M
    Industry peers: median 8%
    What this means

    What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 7% of revenue this year, a 6% median across 10 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $1M of SBC) leaves $39M.

  • Loss, but cash-generative
    Net income ($34M) · cash from operations $56M
    What this means

    The company reported a net loss, so a conversion ratio isn't meaningful. What matters then is whether operations still threw off cash, here, they did.

How is the cash used?

  • Reinvests most of it
    Dividends + buybacks $14M ÷ Owner Earnings $40M
    What this means

    Of $40M Owner Earnings, $14M (34%) went back to shareholders, $14M dividends, $121K buybacks. But the buybacks barely exceed stock issued to employees ($1M SBC), net of dilution, little was truly returned. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.

  • Investing or harvesting? 0.77×
    Harvesting
    Capex $16M ÷ depreciation $21M
    What this means

    Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.

Graham’s defensive tests · 3 of 6 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size Miss
    Revenue ≥ $2B · $592M
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.

  • Strong liquidity Pass
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 3.91×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Conservative debt Pass
    Debt ≤ working capital · $0 vs $304M WC
    What this means

    Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.

  • Earnings stability Miss
    A profit every year (10-yr record) · 2 loss years
    What this means

    Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.

  • Dividend record Pass
    Uninterrupted dividends · paid every year (10)
    What this means

    An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.

  • Earnings growth Miss
    Earnings +33% over the record · −146%
    What this means

    At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $-1.33/share (latest year $-3.31), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $40.35/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Durability & moat, 2016–2025

Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.

  • Profitable years 8 of 10
    What this means

    Lost money in 2 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.

  • Return on capital ≥ 15% 5 of 10 yrs
    What this means

    A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.

  • Operating margin 9% → −3% (3-yr avg ends)

    In the filing’s words The filing attributes gains to higher prices, but the margin in the record has not followed — the claim outruns the result here.

    What this means

    Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about 9% early to −3% lately, median 9% — competition or costs are biting in.

  • Reinvestment, incremental ROIC −25%
    What this means

    Reinvested capital came back at a negative incremental return over this window — the invested base grew while operating profit did not. The filings show where it went.

  • Owner earnings growth −1%/yr
    What this means

    Owner earnings shrank about 1% a year over the record.

  • Worst year 2024 · −7.3% op. margin
    What this means

    Operations went underwater in 2024, understand why before trusting the good years.

  • Share count +0.5%/yr
    What this means

    Roughly flat share count, little dilution, little buyback.

  • Dividend record rising
    What this means

    Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Low contestability

The moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.

AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Current Position

as of the latest quarter, Apr 3, 2026

Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.

Current assets$428M
  • Cash & short-term investments$108M
  • Receivables$127M
  • Inventory$187M
  • Other current assets$6M
Current liabilities$123M
  • Accounts payable$52M
  • Other current liabilities$70M
Current ratio3.48×all current assets ÷ what's due · Graham looked for 2×
Quick ratio1.96×stricter: inventory excluded
Cash ratio0.88×strictest: cash alone against what's due
Working capital$305Mthe cushion left after near-term bills
Revenue, latest quarter vs. a year ago+15.5%the freshest read on whether the business is still growing
Current ratio, recent quarters4.6× → 3.5×
Deeper floors
Tangible book value$399Mequity stripped of goodwill & intangibles
Net current asset value$228MGraham's net-net: current assets less all liabilities
Debt incl. operating leases$46M$46M of it operating leases
Deferred revenue$4Mcustomer cash collected before delivery; operating float

From the company's latest filing.

How the cash was used, 2016–2025

Over the record, the business generated $396M of operating cash; how management split it reads as a balanced allocator, splitting cash between the business, owners, and the balance sheet.

  • Reinvested$189M · 48%
  • Dividends$83M · 21%
  • Buybacks$6M · 2%
  • Retained (debt / cash)$118M · 30%
  • Returned to owners$89M

    37% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $83M as dividends and $6M as buybacks.

  • Average price paid for buybacks

    Buybacks ran $6M over the span, but the filings don't tag the share count needed to deduce the average price paid.

  • Net change in share count5.2%

    The diluted count rose from 10M to 10M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.

  • Dividend record$1.32/sh

    Paid in 10 of the years on record, the per-share dividend growing about 17% a year. It was never cut over the span.

  • Return on what it retained−6%

    Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out ($193M over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) fell $11M, so each retained $1 gave back about 0.06 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.

Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.

Management, ownership & pay

read the proxy →

From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.

Fiscal yearChief executivePay, as filed“Actually paid”Owner earnings
2021Helen P. Johnson-Leipold$3.2M$6.2M$45M
2022Helen P. Johnson-Leipold$2.4M−$849k($76M)
2023Helen P. Johnson-Leipold$2.1M$1.3M$25M
2024Helen P. Johnson-Leipold$2.1M$514k$19M
2025Helen P. Johnson-Leipold$2.8M$2.0M$40M

Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.

  • Insider ownership19.2%

    The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.

  • Stock-based compensation$1M

    The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 0% of revenue. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.

Inverting the record

Invert: instead of why Johnson Outdoors Inc. is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.

3 of the 6 tests turned up something to look into; the other 3 came back clean.

  • Look hereIs it less profitable than it was?4.6% vs 7.9%

    The owner-earnings margin averaged 7.9% early in the record and 4.6% across the last three years, and the latest year has not recovered. Ask the filing whether that is a structural drift or a cyclical trough — price, mix, cost, or a competitor — and whether it is permanent.

  • Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?5.2%

    Diluted shares grew 5.2% over 2016–2025, even as the company spent $6M on buybacks. The repurchases were outrun by issuance — to staff, in a raise, or in a deal — and the filing says which; owners' slice still shrank. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.

  • Look hereDid receivables and inventory outpace sales?25% → 48% of sales

    Receivables and inventory grew from $110M to $314M while revenue grew 50%: working capital is climbing faster than sales (25% of revenue then, 48% now). That can mean customers paying slower, stock building up, or revenue pulled forward. The filing's cash-flow and receivables notes say which.

And these came back clean
  • Did debt outgrow the business?
  • Did reported profit become cash?
  • Are "one-time" charges a yearly habit?

Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.

What an owner would ask, FY2025

read the 10-K →
  • Which reported numbers are a judgment call?
    Management names Income taxes, Inventory as critical estimates

    each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →

The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.

Peers, Leisure Products

The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueGross marginOp. marginROICOwner earn. margin
HASHasbro Inc.$4.7B67%10.5%12%12%
GOLFAcushnet Holdings Corp.$2.6B51%11.4%12%7%
PTONPeloton Interactive Inc.$2.5B43%-15.3%-10%-5%
CALYCallaway Golf Company$2.1B44%6.9%7%8%
YETIYETI Holdings$1.9B54%11.4%30%12%
BRCBrady Corporation$1.5B50%14.6%17%12%
FNKOFunko Inc.$908M36%4.7%6%5%
JOUTJohnson Outdoors Inc.$592M42%9.1%16%6%
Group median47%9.8%12%8%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Johnson Outdoors Inc. has delivered.

$

Through the cycle, Johnson Outdoors Inc. earns about $38M on its 6.4% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 6.8% margin runs in line with that. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.

Base

The assumptions

9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.

Enter a price above to run it.

Implied by the price
Owner-earnings growth · ’16→’25−1%/yr
Owner-earnings yield
P/E (3-yr earnings ’23–’25)
P/B
Graham’s price gate

Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.

Against a high-grade bond: Graham’s yardstick bond yield%

Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.

Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.

Free cash flow $25M on 10M shares outstanding (a weighted diluted average, the only count this filer tags); net cash $108M. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. Capex ($19M) runs well above depreciation ($21M), so this is a build-out; Steady-state swaps total capex for maintenance (≈ depreciation), lifting the base to about $28M, the cash it would throw off if it stopped expanding. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Johnson Outdoors Inc. (JOUT), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/JOUT, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← JOE its page in the Manual JPM →

Industry order: ← HAS the Leisure Products chapter KBSX →