Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← LQDT Manual LRN → ← KLAC Semiconductor Equipment ONTO →

LRCX, Lam Research Corporation

Semiconductor Equipment capital-intensive

Lam Research Corporation is a Delaware corporation, headquartered in Fremont, California.

We maintain a network of facilities throughout Asia, Europe, and the United States in order to meet the needs of our dynamic customer base.

Lam Research Corporation 2025 10-K The Lam Research logo, Lam Research, and all product and service names used in this report are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Lam Research Corporation or its subsidiaries in the United States and/or other countries.

Latest annual: FY2025 10-K
LRCX · Lam Research Corporation
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$18.4B
+23.7% YoY · 13% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 5-yr average
Revenue $21.7B 5-yr avg $16.5B
Gross margin 56% 5-yr avg 47%
Operating margin 34.3% 5-yr avg 30.4%
ROIC 65% 5-yr avg 59%
Owner-earnings margin 30% 5-yr avg 25%
Free cash flow margin 28% 5-yr avg 24%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What it is
Revenue is System (62%) and Customer Support and Other (38%).
What moves the needle
Gross margin has run about 46% and operating margin about 29% through the cycle, a solid spread between what it charges and what the product costs to make. That margin has stayed fairly steady relative to where it runs (24%–32% over the years), so unit growth and cost discipline, not a moving line, are the lever. Inventory runs near 18% of sales, so how fast it turns back into cash — and the risk of writing it down when demand softens — sits alongside the margin. Read this kind of business on the capital-goods cycle and the aftermarket. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Return on capital has run high across the record (median 52%, above 15% in 10 of 10 years), though buybacks and expensed R&D and brands shrink the capital base, so the figure overstates the underlying economics. The steadier read is owner earnings: roughly 24% of revenue reaches owners as cash, consistently. Whether these returns reflect real pricing power or an accounting artifact is the judgment the 10-K is for.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

Where the money comes from

read the 10-K →

System is 62% of revenue, with Customer Support and Other the other meaningful line at 38%.

Revenue by product line, FY2025
  • System62%$11.5B
  • Customer Support and Other38%$6.9B
By geographyChina34%South Korea22%Taiwan19%Japan10%United States7%Southeast Asia5%Europe3%

From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2011–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2011’112017’172018’182019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMMar 2026
Income statement
$3.2B$8.0B$11.1B$9.7B$10.0B$14.6B$17.2B$17.4B$14.9B$18.4B$21.7BRevenueRevenue
46%45%47%45%46%47%46%45%47%49%56%Gross marginGross mgn
10%8%7%7%7%6%5%5%6%5%5%SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev
12%13%11%12%12%10%9%10%13%11%11%R&D / revenueR&D/rev
$804M$1.9B$3.2B$2.5B$2.7B$4.5B$5.4B$5.2B$4.3B$5.9B$7.4BOperating incomeOp. inc.
24.8%23.7%29.0%25.5%26.6%30.6%31.2%29.7%28.6%32.0%34.3%Operating marginOp. mgn
$724M$1.7B$2.4B$2.2B$2.3B$3.9B$4.6B$4.5B$3.8B$5.4B$6.7BNet incomeNet inc.
10%6%24%10%13%11%11%12%12%10%10%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
$881M$2.0B$2.7B$3.2B$2.1B$3.6B$3.1B$5.2B$4.7B$6.2B$7.0BOperating cash flowOp. cash
$75M$307M$326M$309M$269M$307M$334M$342M$360M$386M$420MDepreciationDeprec.
$30M($125M)($224M)$488M($583M)($848M)($2.1B)$39M$172M$85M($551M)Working capital & otherWC & other
$127M$157M$273M$303M$203M$349M$546M$502M$397M$759M$950MCapexCapex
3.9%2.0%2.5%3.1%2.0%2.4%3.2%2.9%2.7%4.1%4.4%Capex / revenueCapex/rev
$806M$1.9B$2.4B$2.9B$1.9B$3.2B$2.8B$4.8B$4.3B$5.8B$6.5BOwner earningsOwner earn.
24.9%23.4%21.5%29.8%19.1%22.1%16.1%27.8%28.6%31.4%30.1%Owner earnings marginOE mgn
$754M$1.9B$2.4B$2.9B$1.9B$3.2B$2.6B$4.7B$4.3B$5.4B$6.0BFree cash flowFCF
23.3%23.4%21.5%29.8%19.1%22.1%14.8%26.8%28.6%29.4%27.7%Free cash flow marginFCF mgn
$0$116M$0$0$0$0$120M$0$0$0AcquisitionsAcquis.
$243M$308M$678M$657M$727M$815M$908M$1.0B$1.1B$1.2BDividends paidDiv. paid
$211M$812M$2.7B$3.8B$1.4B$2.7B$3.9B$2.0B$2.8B$3.4BBuybacksBuybacks
39%25%56%41%39%61%62%58%49%67%65%ROICROIC
29%25%37%47%44%65%73%55%45%54%63%Return on equityROE
21%32%32%31%53%60%44%33%43%52%Retained to equityRetained/eq
Balance sheet
$2.1B$2.4B$4.5B$3.7B$4.9B$4.4B$3.5B$5.3B$5.8B$6.4B$7.3BCash & investmentsCash+inv
$591M$1.7B$2.2B$1.5B$2.1B$3.0B$4.3B$2.8B$2.5B$3.4B$4.1BReceivablesReceiv.
$397M$1.2B$1.9B$1.5B$1.9B$2.7B$4.0B$4.8B$4.2B$4.3B$4.0BInventoryInvent.
$164M$465M$511M$377M$592M$830M$1.0B$471M$614M$854M$1.1BAccounts payablePayables
$824M$2.4B$3.5B$2.6B$3.4B$4.9B$7.3B$7.2B$6.1B$6.8B$7.1BOperating working capitalOper. WC
$3.3B$9.1B$9.1B$8.6B$10.9B$11.7B$12.3B$13.2B$12.9B$14.5B$13.3BCurrent assetsCur. assets
$681M$3.0B$3.2B$2.4B$3.2B$3.5B$4.6B$4.2B$4.3B$6.6B$5.2BCurrent liabilitiesCur. liab.
4.8×3.1×2.9×3.6×3.4×3.3×2.7×3.2×3.0×2.2×2.5×Current ratioCurr. ratio
$169M$99M$1.5B$1.5B$1.5B$1.5B$1.5B$1.6B$1.6B$1.6B$1.6BGoodwillGoodwill
$4.1B$12.1B$12.5B$12.0B$14.6B$15.9B$17.2B$18.8B$18.7B$21.3B$20.8BTotal assetsAssets
$904M$2.7B$2.4B$4.4B$5.8B$5.0B$5.0B$5.0B$5.0B$4.5B$4.5BTotal debtDebt
($1.2B)$309M($2.1B)$772M$880M$572M$1.5B($334M)($880M)($1.9B)($2.9B)Net debt / (cash)Net debt
149.5×16.2×33.0×21.0×15.1×21.5×29.1×27.8×23.0×33.1×44.9×Interest coverageInt. cov.
$2.5B$6.8B$6.5B$4.7B$5.2B$6.0B$6.3B$8.2B$8.5B$9.9B$10.6BShareholders’ equityEquity
1.6%1.9%1.6%1.9%1.9%1.5%1.5%1.6%2.0%1.9%1.7%Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev
Per share
1.25B1.84B1.81B1.60B1.49B1.45B1.41B1.36B1.32B1.29B1.26BShares out (diluted)Shares
$2.59$4.36$6.13$6.04$6.74$10.06$12.25$12.83$11.29$14.29$17.17Revenue / shareRev/sh
$0.58$0.92$1.32$1.37$1.51$2.69$3.27$3.32$2.90$4.15$5.31EPS (diluted)EPS
$0.64$1.02$1.32$1.80$1.29$2.23$1.97$3.56$3.22$4.49$5.17Owner earnings / shareOE/sh
$0.60$1.02$1.32$1.80$1.29$2.23$1.82$3.44$3.22$4.20$4.76Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh
$0.13$0.17$0.42$0.44$0.50$0.58$0.67$0.77$0.89$0.98Dividends / shareDiv/sh
$0.10$0.09$0.15$0.19$0.14$0.24$0.39$0.37$0.30$0.59$0.75Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh
$1.98$3.71$3.60$2.92$3.47$4.15$4.46$6.04$6.47$7.64$8.38Book value / shareBVPS

The diluted share count moved ×1.47 into 2017 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.

Share counts before 2023 are restated ×10 for a stock split, so per-share figures sit on one basis.

Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
14-yr5-yr
Revenue / share+13.0%/yr+16.2%/yr
Owner earnings / share+14.9%/yr+28.3%/yr
EPS+15.1%/yr+22.4%/yr
Dividends / share+26.9%/yr (8-yr)+15.1%/yr
Capital spending / share+13.3%/yr+34.0%/yr
Book value / share+10.1%/yr+17.1%/yr

The record, charted

FY2011–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked. Share counts on the current split basis.

Share count
1.3Bpeak FY2017
ROIC
67%low FY2017
Gross margin
49%low FY2023

Owner earnings vs. net income

Owner earningsNet income

The accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.

$5.8Bowner earningsvs.$5.4Bnet incomelow FY2011

Where the cash went

ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedBeyond op. cash

Each year's outlays against its operating cash: the mix, and how it drifts. The hatched cap is spending beyond that year's operating cash — financed from the balance sheet or borrowing, not operations.

FY2011FY2025

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2025 the business earned $5.8B of owner earnings, the operating cash left after the $386M it takes just to hold its position. It put $373M more into growth; free cash flow, after that spending, was $5.4B.

Reported net income$5.4B
Owner earnings$5.8B · 31% of revenue
FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Reported net income$5.4B$3.8B$4.5B$4.6B$3.9B
Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back+$386M+$360M+$342M+$334M+$307M
Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost+$343M+$293M+$287M+$259M+$220M
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items+$85M+$172M+$39M−$2.1B−$848M
Cash from operations$6.2B$4.7B$5.2B$3.1B$3.6B
Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume−$386M−$397M−$342M−$334M−$349M
Owner earnings$5.8B$4.3B$4.8B$2.8B$3.2B
Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still−$373M−$159M−$212M
Free cash flow$5.4B$4.3B$4.7B$2.6B$3.2B
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue31%29%28%16%22%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position (here about $386M, roughly its depreciation, the rate its assets wear out). The other $373M of its capital spending is growth it chose, not upkeep it owed; charged only with the maintenance it must do, the business earns well more than the year's free cash flow shows. The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $343M), owner earnings is nearer $5.4B.

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 10-K · source on SEC EDGAR →

Will it survive?

  • Comfortable
    Operating income $5.9B ÷ interest expense $178M
    What this means

    Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient, it says solvent, not cheap.

  • Net cash
    Cash $6.4B + ST investments $2.6B − debt $4.5B
    What this means

    Cash and short-term investments exceed every dollar of debt by $4.5B, on net the company owes nothing, and can act from strength when others can't. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.

  • Long (60+ days)
    DSO 67 + DIO 166 − DPO 33 days
    What this means

    Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.

Is it a good business?

  • Very high (≥25%) through the cycle
    10-yr median, range 25%–67%; 67% latest = NOPAT $5.3B ÷ invested capital $7.9B
    Industry peers: median 12%
    What this means

    The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 10 years (it ran 67% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.

  • High through the cycle
    10-yr median margin, range 16%–31%; latest $5.8B = operating cash $6.2B − maintenance capex $386M
    Industry peers: median 8%
    What this means

    What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 31% of revenue this year, a 23% median across 10 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $343M of SBC) leaves $5.4B.

  • Cash-backed
    Cash from ops $6.2B ÷ net income $5.4B
    What this means

    How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.

How is the cash used?

  • Returns about half
    Dividends + buybacks $4.6B ÷ Owner Earnings $5.8B
    What this means

    Of $5.8B Owner Earnings, $4.6B (79%) went back to shareholders, $1.1B dividends, $3.4B buybacks. Net of $343M stock comp, the real buyback was about $3.1B. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.

  • Investing or harvesting? 1.97×
    Expanding
    Capex $759M ÷ depreciation $386M
    What this means

    Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.

Graham’s defensive tests · 5 of 6 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size Pass
    Revenue ≥ $2B · $18.4B
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.

  • Strong liquidity Pass
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 2.21×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Conservative debt Pass
    Debt ≤ working capital · $4.5B vs $7.9B WC
    What this means

    Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.

  • Earnings stability Pass
    A profit every year (10-yr record) · no losses
    What this means

    Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.

  • Dividend record Near
    Uninterrupted dividends · 9 of 10 yrs
    What this means

    An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.

  • Earnings growth Pass
    Earnings +33% over the record · +185%
    What this means

    At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $3.65/share (latest year $4.28), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $7.89/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Durability & moat, 2011–2025

Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.

  • Profitable years 10 of 10
    What this means

    Never lost money over the record, the earnings stability Graham insisted on.

  • Return on capital ≥ 15% 10 of 10 yrs
    What this means

    A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.

  • Operating margin 26% → 30% (3-yr avg ends)
    What this means

    Through the cycle the operating margin widened — about 26% early to 30% lately, median 29% — pricing power intact or improving.

  • Reinvestment, incremental ROIC
    What this means

    The reinvested base moved too little against the change in profit to read a reliable return on it here — the figure would be a small-denominator artifact, not a moat. Judge this one on the owner-earnings record and the cash it returns instead.

  • Owner earnings growth +10%/yr
    What this means

    Owner earnings grew about 10% a year over the record.

  • Worst year 2017 · 23.7% op. margin
    What this means

    Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.

  • Dividend record rising
    What this means

    Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.

  • How management talks about it Promotional
    What this means

    The record is compounding, but the filing leans on a promoter’s vocabulary rather than the per-share, return-on-capital terms an owner uses. The results back the talk here; the register is still worth noting.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Low contestability

The moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.

In its own filing Raised, but not as a competitor

The filing raises AI among its risks, but in other terms (security, regulation, energy or the like), not as a competitor to its product; it frames AI mainly as a capability.

AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat, and the company is using it that way.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Current Position

as of the latest quarter, Mar 29, 2026

Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.

Current assets$13.3B
  • Cash & short-term investments$7.3B
  • Receivables$4.1B
  • Inventory$4.0B
Current liabilities$5.2B
  • Debt due within a year$750M
  • Accounts payable$1.1B
  • Other current liabilities$3.4B
Current ratio2.54×all current assets ÷ what's due · Graham looked for 2×
Quick ratio1.77×stricter: inventory excluded
Cash ratio1.40×strictest: cash alone against what's due
Working capital$8.1Bthe cushion left after near-term bills
Debt due this year vs. cash$750M due · $7.3B cash covered by cash on hand, no refinancing forced · both figures from the Mar 29, 2026 balance sheet
Revenue, latest quarter vs. a year ago+23.8%the freshest read on whether the business is still growing
Current ratio, recent quarters3.0× → 2.5×
Deeper floors
Tangible book value$8.8Bequity stripped of goodwill & intangibles
Net current asset value$3.1BGraham's net-net: current assets less all liabilities
Debt incl. operating leases$4.7B$272M of it operating leases
Deferred revenue$2.1Bcustomer cash collected before delivery; operating float

From the company's latest filing.

How the cash was used, 2011–2025

Over the record, the business generated $33.6B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a cash returner, paying most of what it earns straight back to owners.

  • Reinvested$3.6B · 11%
  • Dividends$6.5B · 19%
  • Buybacks$23.7B · 71%
  • Returned to owners$30.2B

    98% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $6.5B as dividends and $23.7B as buybacks.

  • Average price paid for buybacks$21.13

    Across the years where the filing reports a share count, 10M shares were bought for $211M, about $21.13 each.

  • Net change in share count1.0%

    The diluted count rose from 1250M to 1263M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.

  • Dividend record$0.89/sh

    Paid in 9 of the years on record, the per-share dividend growing about 27% a year. It was never cut over the span.

  • Return on what it retained

    Not read here: owner earnings are negative over the span, or the company returned nearly all its earnings rather than retaining them, so there is too little retained to measure a return on.

Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.

Management, ownership & pay

read the proxy →

From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.

Fiscal yearChief executivePay, as filed“Actually paid”Owner earnings
2021Timothy M. Archer$15.5M$56.9M$3.2B
2022Timothy M. Archer$16.9M$10.3M$2.8B
2023Timothy M. Archer$18.3M$35.5M$4.8B
2024Timothy M. Archer$30.1M$71.7M$4.3B
2025Timothy M. Archer$28.3M$14.7M$5.8B

Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.

  • Insider ownership<1%

    The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2025 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.

  • CEO pay ratio310:1

    What the chief earns for every dollar the median employee makes, per the 2025 proxy. A high ratio alone settles nothing; some businesses are genuinely top-heavy in scarce skill. A runaway figure is where Buffett starts asking whether the board is doing its job.

  • Stock-based compensation$343M

    The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 2% of revenue, equal to 6% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.

Inverting the record

Invert: instead of why Lam Research Corporation is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2011–2025.

None of the 5 tests turned up a mark; each came back clean. A clean panel says only that these particular ways of being wrong are not written into the record.

Each test came back clean
  • Is it less profitable than it was?
  • Did the share count rise anyway?
  • Did debt outgrow the business?
  • Did reported profit become cash?
  • Did receivables and inventory outpace sales?

Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.

What an owner would ask, FY2025

read the 10-K →
  • Which reported numbers are a judgment call?
    Management names Revenue recognition, Income taxes, Inventory as critical estimates

    each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →

The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.

Peers, Semiconductor Equipment

The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueGross marginOp. marginROICOwner earn. margin
CMICummins Inc.$33.7B25%11.3%20%8%
BKRBaker Hughes Company$27.7B66%5.1%3%4%
ETNEaton Corporation PLC$27.4B33%16.3%12%11%
JCIJohnson Controls International PLC$23.6B34%9.7%7%6%
CARRCarrier Global Corporation Common Stock$21.7B27%13.1%14%9%
LRCXLam Research Corporation$18.4B46%28.8%52%24%
ITWIllinois Tool Works Inc.$16.0B42%24.2%29%17%
CNHCNH Industrial N.V.$15.3B21%11.7%10%
Group median33%12.4%13%9%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Lam Research Corporation has delivered.

Lam Research Corporation’s latest year runs above its own through-cycle margin — the reported figure may flatter a peak. So the tool opens on the through-cycle base, Graham’s averaging cutting both ways; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.

$

Through the cycle, Lam Research Corporation earns about $4.4B on its 24.1% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 31.4% margin runs above that; the reported figure may flatter a peak you'd be paying on. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year. It comes pre-checked here for that reason, the same rule that already normalizes a trough; clear it to price the year as filed.

Base

The assumptions

9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.

Enter a price above to run it.

Implied by the price
Owner-earnings growth · ’21→’25+14%/yr
Owner-earnings growth · ’11→’25+10%/yr
Owner-earnings yield
P/E (3-yr earnings ’23–’25)
P/B
Graham’s price gate

Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.

Against a high-grade bond: Graham’s yardstick bond yield%

Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.

Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.

Free cash flow $6.0B on 1251M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-04-21; net cash $2.9B. The base opens on the through-cycle figure (the latest year sits above the record’s own median, and Graham’s averaging cuts both ways); clear Normalize to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. Capex ($950M) runs well above depreciation ($420M), so this is a build-out; Steady-state swaps total capex for maintenance (≈ depreciation), lifting the base to about $6.6B, the cash it would throw off if it stopped expanding. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Lam Research Corporation (LRCX), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/LRCX, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← LQDT its page in the Manual LRN →

Industry order: ← KLAC the Semiconductor Equipment chapter ONTO →