Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← MSI Manual MSTR → ← MGRC Trading Companies & Distributors NPKI →

MSM, MSC Industrial Direct Company Inc.

MSC is a leading North American distributor of a broad range of metalworking and maintenance, repair and operations products and services.

With a history of driving innovation in industrial product distribution for more than 80 years, we help solve our manufacturing customers' metalworking and MRO challenges.

Through our technical metalworking expertise and inventory management and other supply chain solutions, our team of more than 7,000 associates helps to keep our customers' manufacturing operations up and running and to improve their efficiency, productivity and profitability.

Latest annual: FY2025 10-K
MSM · MSC Industrial Direct Company Inc.
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$3.8B
−1.3% YoY · 3% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 5-yr average
Revenue $3.9B 5-yr avg $3.7B
Gross margin 41% 5-yr avg 41%
Operating margin 8.5% 5-yr avg 10.5%
ROIC 14% 5-yr avg 15%
Owner-earnings margin 6% 5-yr avg 8%
Free cash flow margin 6% 5-yr avg 8%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What moves the needle
Gross margin has run about 42% and operating margin about 12% through the cycle, a solid spread between what it charges and what the product costs to make. Inventory runs near 17% of sales, so how fast it turns back into cash — and the risk of writing it down when demand softens — sits alongside the margin. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Return on capital has run in the teens (median 15%, above 15% in 5 of 10 years). Owner earnings agree: roughly 8% of revenue reaches owners as cash, consistently. Returns like these are solid but short of clear franchise economics; whether they hold is what the 10-K settles, not the multiple.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2016–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2016’162017’172018’182019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMMay 2026
Income statement
$2.9B$2.9B$3.2B$3.4B$3.2B$3.2B$3.7B$4.0B$3.8B$3.8B$3.9BRevenueRevenue
45%45%43%43%42%41%42%41%41%41%41%Gross marginGross mgn
$376M$379M$421M$400M$351M$302M$469M$484M$390M$302M$332MOperating incomeOp. inc.
13.1%13.1%13.1%11.9%11.0%9.3%12.7%12.1%10.2%8.0%8.5%Operating marginOp. mgn
$231M$231M$329M$289M$251M$217M$340M$343M$259M$199M$231MNet incomeNet inc.
38%37%19%25%25%25%25%25%25%25%25%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
$401M$247M$340M$328M$397M$224M$246M$700M$411M$334M$306MOperating cash flowOp. cash
$72M$63M$63M$65M$69M$69M$70M$75M$81M$91M$99MDepreciationDeprec.
$84M($61M)($68M)($42M)$60M($79M)($183M)$263M$52M$31M($41M)Working capital & otherWC & other
$88M$47M$45M$52M$47M$54M$61M$92M$99M$93M$86MCapexCapex
3.1%1.6%1.4%1.5%1.5%1.7%1.7%2.3%2.6%2.5%2.2%Capex / revenueCapex/rev
$313M$200M$295M$277M$350M$171M$185M$607M$311M$241M$220MOwner earningsOwner earn.
10.9%6.9%9.2%8.2%11.0%5.3%5.0%15.1%8.1%6.4%5.6%Owner earnings marginOE mgn
$313M$200M$295M$277M$350M$171M$185M$607M$311M$241M$220MFree cash flowFCF
10.9%6.9%9.2%8.2%11.0%5.3%5.0%15.1%8.1%6.4%5.6%Free cash flow marginFCF mgn
$42M$87M$12M$2M$22M$58M$20M$24M$790K$240KAcquisitionsAcquis.
$384M$49M$82M$85M$3M$71M$27M$96M$188M$39MBuybacksBuybacks
14%14%18%16%15%12%17%19%16%12%14%ROICROIC
21%19%24%20%19%19%25%23%19%14%16%Return on equityROE
Balance sheet
$53M$16M$46M$32M$125M$41M$44M$50M$30M$56M$74MCash & investmentsCash+inv
$392M$472M$524M$541M$492M$560M$688M$435M$412M$423M$413MReceivablesReceiv.
$444M$465M$518M$559M$543M$624M$716M$727M$644M$644M$684MInventoryInvent.
$111M$121M$145M$160M$126M$186M$217M$226M$206M$225M$229MAccounts payablePayables
$726M$815M$897M$940M$909M$998M$1.2B$936M$850M$842M$868MOperating working capitalOper. WC
$981M$1.0B$1.1B$1.2B$1.2B$1.3B$1.5B$1.3B$1.2B$1.2B$1.3BCurrent assetsCur. assets
$479M$558M$491M$447M$409M$562M$726M$649M$605M$729M$825MCurrent liabilitiesCur. liab.
2.1×1.8×2.3×2.7×3.0×2.3×2.1×2.0×2.0×1.7×1.5×Current ratioCurr. ratio
$624M$634M$675M$677M$678M$693M$710M$718M$724M$724M$724MGoodwillGoodwill
$2.1B$2.1B$2.3B$2.3B$2.4B$2.5B$2.7B$2.5B$2.5B$2.5B$2.5BTotal assetsAssets
$607M$533M$535M$442M$616M$784M$793M$454M$508M$485M$507MTotal debtDebt
$554M$517M$489M$410M$490M$743M$750M$404M$479M$429M$433MNet debt / (cash)Net debt
64.7×30.6×29.1×23.7×21.0×20.8×26.6×21.5×15.1×12.5×15.0×Interest coverageInt. cov.
$1.1B$1.2B$1.4B$1.5B$1.3B$1.2B$1.4B$1.5B$1.4B$1.4B$1.4BShareholders’ equityEquity
0.5%0.5%0.5%0.5%0.5%0.5%0.5%0.5%0.5%0.3%0.4%Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev
Per share
61.1M57.0M56.7M55.5M55.6M56.1M56.0M56.2M56.4M55.9M56.0MShares out (diluted)Shares
$46.88$50.69$56.50$60.60$57.37$57.82$65.87$71.33$67.70$67.44$69.85Revenue / shareRev/sh
$3.79$4.06$5.81$5.20$4.51$3.87$6.06$6.11$4.58$3.57$4.13EPS (diluted)EPS
$5.13$3.52$5.20$4.98$6.29$3.04$3.30$10.80$5.52$4.31$3.93Owner earnings / shareOE/sh
$5.13$3.52$5.20$4.98$6.29$3.04$3.30$10.80$5.52$4.31$3.93Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh
$1.44$0.82$0.79$0.93$0.84$0.96$1.10$1.65$1.76$1.66$1.53Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh
$17.98$21.50$24.46$26.64$23.63$20.52$24.10$26.31$24.66$24.84$25.37Book value / shareBVPS
Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
9-yr5-yr
Revenue / share+4.1%/yr+3.3%/yr
Owner earnings / share−1.9%/yr−7.3%/yr
EPS−0.7%/yr−4.6%/yr
Capital spending / share+1.6%/yr+14.5%/yr
Book value / share+3.7%/yr+1.0%/yr

The record, charted

FY2016–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.

Share count
56Mpeak FY2016
ROIC
12%low FY2021
Gross margin
41%low FY2025
Net debt ÷ owner earnings
1.8×peak FY2021

Owner earnings vs. net income

Owner earningsNet income

The accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.

$241Mowner earningsvs.$199Mnet incomelow FY2021

Where the cash went

ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetained

Each year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.

FY2016FY2025

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2025 the business turned $199M of profit into $241M of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.

Reported net income$199M
Owner earnings$241M · 6% of revenue
FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Reported net income$199M$259M$343M$340M$217M
Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back+$91M+$81M+$75M+$70M+$69M
Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost+$13M+$19M+$19M+$19M+$18M
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items+$31M+$52M+$263M−$183M−$79M
Cash from operations$334M$411M$700M$246M$224M
Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow−$93M−$99M−$92M−$61M−$54M
Owner earnings$241M$311M$607M$185M$171M
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue6%8%15%5%5%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position . The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $13M), owner earnings is nearer $228M.

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 10-K · source on SEC EDGAR →

Will it survive?

  • Comfortable
    Operating income $302M ÷ interest expense $24M
    What this means

    Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient, it says solvent, not cheap.

  • How heavy is the debt, net of cash? $477M · 1.6× operating profit
    Modest net debt
    Cash $56M − debt $533M
    What this means

    Netting $56M of cash and short-term investments against $533M of debt leaves $477M owed, about 1.6× a year's operating profit (1.8× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.

  • Long (60+ days)
    DSO 41 + DIO 105 − DPO 37 days
    What this means

    Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.

Is it a good business?

  • Solid through the cycle
    10-yr median, range 12%–19%; 12% latest = NOPAT $227M ÷ invested capital $1.9B
    Industry peers: median 12%
    What this means

    The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 10 years (it ran 12% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.

  • Solid through the cycle
    10-yr median margin, range 5%–15%; latest $241M = operating cash $334M − maintenance capex $93M
    Industry peers: median 3%
    What this means

    What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 6% of revenue this year, a 8% median across 10 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $13M of SBC) leaves $228M.

  • Cash-backed
    Cash from ops $334M ÷ net income $199M
    What this means

    How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.

How is the cash used?

  • Returns about half
    Dividends + buybacks $122M ÷ Owner Earnings $241M
    What this means

    Of $241M Owner Earnings, $122M (51%) went back to shareholders, $83M dividends, $39M buybacks. Net of $13M stock comp, the real buyback was about $27M. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.

  • Investing or harvesting? 1.02×
    Maintaining
    Capex $93M ÷ depreciation $91M
    What this means

    Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.

Graham’s defensive tests · 2 of 6 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size Pass
    Revenue ≥ $2B · $3.8B
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.

  • Strong liquidity Near
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 1.68×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Conservative debt Near
    Debt ≤ working capital · $533M vs $497M WC
    What this means

    Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.

  • Earnings stability Pass
    A profit every year (10-yr record) · no losses
    What this means

    Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.

  • Dividend record Miss
    Uninterrupted dividends · none paid
    What this means

    An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.

  • Earnings growth Near
    Earnings +33% over the record · +1%
    What this means

    At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $4.78/share (latest year $3.57), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $24.86/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Durability & moat, 2016–2025

Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.

  • Profitable years 10 of 10
    What this means

    Never lost money over the record, the earnings stability Graham insisted on.

  • Return on capital ≥ 15% 5 of 10 yrs
    What this means

    A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.

  • Operating margin 13% → 10% (3-yr avg ends)
    What this means

    Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about 13% early to 10% lately, median 12% — competition or costs are biting in.

  • Reinvestment, incremental ROIC returns capital
    What this means

    The capital base barely grew: this business returns cash through dividends and buybacks rather than reinvesting. Judge it on the cash returned, not on compounding.

  • Owner earnings growth +1%/yr
    What this means

    Owner earnings grew about 1% a year over the record.

  • Worst year 2025 · 8.0% op. margin
    What this means

    Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.

  • Share count −1.0%/yr
    What this means

    The share count is shrinking, buybacks are quietly growing your slice of the business.

  • How management talks about it Promotional
    What this means

    Results have held roughly flat while the filing leans on a promoter’s vocabulary — watch whether the words are doing work the numbers are not.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Moderate contestability

AI is likely to reshape costs and some products here without clearly contesting or sparing the core moat; how the company itself frames it is the tell.

In its own filing Raised, but not as a competitor

The filing raises AI among its risks, but in other terms (security, regulation, energy or the like), not as a competitor to its product; it frames AI mainly as a capability.

The question is whether a moat the record shows as durable outlasts a technology that lowers the cost of part of what the firm sells. The durability is read in the record above, the filing's own framing of AI beside it; the industry label decides nothing on its own.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Current Position

as of the latest quarter, May 30, 2026

Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.

Current assets$1.3B
  • Cash & short-term investments$74M
  • Receivables$413M
  • Inventory$684M
  • Other current assets$105M
Current liabilities$825M
  • Debt due within a year$317M
  • Accounts payable$229M
  • Other current liabilities$279M
Current ratio1.55×all current assets ÷ what's due · Graham looked for 2×
Quick ratio0.72×stricter: inventory excluded
Cash ratio0.09×strictest: cash alone against what's due
Working capital$452Mthe cushion left after near-term bills
Debt due this year vs. cash$317M due · $74M cash cash alone won't cover the maturities; it leans on refinancing or operating cash · both figures from the May 30, 2026 balance sheet
Revenue, latest quarter vs. a year ago+7.8%the freshest read on whether the business is still growing
Current ratio, recent quarters2.0× → 1.5×
Deeper floors
Tangible book value$622Mequity stripped of goodwill & intangibles
Net current asset value$201MGraham's net-net: current assets less all liabilities
Debt incl. operating leases$534M$49M of it operating leases

From the company's latest filing.

How the cash was used, 2016–2025

Over the record, the business generated $3.6B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a balanced allocator, splitting cash between the business, owners, and the balance sheet.

  • Reinvested$678M · 19%
  • Buybacks$1.0B · 28%
  • Retained (debt / cash)$1.9B · 53%
  • Returned to owners$1.0B

    35% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $0 as dividends and $1.0B as buybacks.

  • Average price paid for buybacks

    Buybacks ran $1.0B over the span, but a stock split in the window left the reported buyback-share counts on a basis the diluted-share count doesn't match, so a comparable average price can't be drawn.

  • Net change in share count−8.4%

    The diluted count fell from 61M to 56M, so the buybacks outran the stock issued to staff.

  • Dividend record

    No dividend line was reported in the filing data over the span; the record here neither confirms nor rules out a payout.

  • Return on what it retained7%

    Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out ($1.7B over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) grew $117M, so each retained $1 added about 0.07 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.

Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.

Acquisitions & goodwill

from the balance sheet & the 10-year cash-flow record

Goodwill grows only when a company acquires and falls only when it concedes it overpaid. The size of that bet, the cash put into buying rather than building, and how much has already been written off.

Goodwill & intangibles$809M33% of all assets; the premium carried on the balance sheet for businesses acquired
Against book equity52%goodwill is this share of book equity; the rest is the company’s own retained and paid-in capital
Cash spent acquiring$268Mover 10 years buying other businesses, against $678M of capital spent building

None written down over the record; the goodwill is still carried at full cost. That is the deals holding their value on the books so far; whether they keep doing so is the test an owner watches, since the write-down, when it comes, is the admission the price was too high.

Goodwill, acquired intangibles and equity from the latest balance sheet; acquisition spend and write-downs summed across the 10-year record, from the company's own filings.

Management, ownership & pay

read the proxy →

From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.

Fiscal yearChief executivePay, as filed“Actually paid”Owner earnings
2021Erik Gershwind$5.2M$7.9M$171M
2022Erik Gershwind$6.5M$6.5M$185M
2023Erik Gershwind$4.9M$8.2M$607M
2024Erik Gershwind$4.4M$1.8M$311M
2025Erik Gershwind$5.9M$5.0M$241M

Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.

  • Insider ownership19%

    The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2025 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.

  • CEO pay ratio88:1

    What the chief earns for every dollar the median employee makes, per the 2025 proxy. A high ratio alone settles nothing; some businesses are genuinely top-heavy in scarce skill. A runaway figure is where Buffett starts asking whether the board is doing its job.

  • Stock-based compensation$13M

    The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 0% of revenue, equal to 4% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.

Inverting the record

Invert: instead of why MSC Industrial Direct Company Inc. is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.

None of the 5 tests turned up a mark; each came back clean. A clean panel says only that these particular ways of being wrong are not written into the record.

Each test came back clean
  • Is it less profitable than it was?
  • Did the share count rise anyway?
  • Did debt outgrow the business?
  • Did reported profit become cash?
  • Did receivables and inventory outpace sales?

Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.

What an owner would ask, FY2025

read the 10-K →
  • Which reported numbers are a judgment call?
    Management names Revenue recognition, Income taxes, Credit & receivables, Inventory as critical estimates

    each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →

The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.

Peers, Trading Companies & Distributors

The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueGross marginOp. marginROICOwner earn. margin
SITESiteOne Landscape$4.7B5.3%12%5%
RYZRyerson Holding Corporation$4.6B18%3.7%12%2%
AITApplied Industrial$4.6B29%8.4%13%7%
MSMMSC Industrial Direct Company Inc.$3.8B42%12.0%15%8%
SCSCScanSource$3.0B12%2.8%8%2%
BXCBluelinx Holdings Inc.$3.0B15%2.2%11%2%
DSGRDistribution Solutions Group Inc.$2.0B35%2.9%6%3%
GICGlobal Industrial Company$1.4B34%7.0%38%5%
Group median29%4.5%12%4%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what MSC Industrial Direct Company Inc. has delivered.

$

Through the cycle, MSC Industrial Direct Company Inc. earns about $309M on its 8.2% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 6.4% margin runs below that; the reported figure may understate a lean year. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.

Base

The assumptions

9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.

Enter a price above to run it.

Implied by the price
Owner-earnings growth · ’21→’25+12%/yr
Owner-earnings growth · ’16→’25+1%/yr
Owner-earnings yield
P/E (3-yr earnings ’23–’25)
P/B
Graham’s price gate

Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.

Against a high-grade bond: Graham’s yardstick bond yield%

Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.

Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.

Owner earnings $220M on 56M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-06-17; net debt $433M. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "MSC Industrial Direct Company Inc. (MSM), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/MSM, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← MSI its page in the Manual MSTR →

Industry order: ← MGRC the Trading Companies & Distributors chapter NPKI →