Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← DRVN Manual DSP → ← CTOS Trading Companies & Distributors DXPE →

DSGR, Distribution Solutions Group Inc.

Trading Companies & Distributors capital-intensive Distress / turnaroundSerial acquirer

Distribution Solutions Group Inc. is a global specialty distribution company providing value-added distribution solutions to the maintenance, repair and operations, original equipment manufacturer and industrial technology markets.

Through the strategic Mergers (as defined below) completed in 2022, the complementary distribution businesses of Lawson Products, Inc.

Through its collective businesses, DSG is dedicated to helping customers lower their total cost of operation by increasing productivity and efficiency with the right products, expert technical support, and fast, reliable delivery to be a one-stop solution provider.

Latest annual: FY2025 10-K
DSGR · Distribution Solutions Group Inc.
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$2.0B
+9.8% YoY · 41% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 5-yr average
Revenue $2.0B 5-yr avg $1.4B
Gross margin 33% 5-yr avg 32%
Operating margin 3.6% 5-yr avg 3.1%
ROIC 3% 5-yr avg 3%
Owner-earnings margin 2% 5-yr avg 2%
Free cash flow margin 2% 5-yr avg 2%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What it is
Revenue is led by TestEquity (40%) and Gexpro Services (25%), with 2 more segments behind.
Situation
Distress / turnaround. Thin interest coverage, or operating cash burned against real debt, across the record. The balance sheet carries this situation; the debt schedule sets the clock. Serial acquirer. Goodwill and acquired intangibles are 40% of assets, with meaningful acquisition spending in 4 of the record's 8 years; much of what this business is was bought, at prices the record carries.
What moves the needle
Gross margin has run about 34% and operating margin about 2.7% through the cycle, a solid spread between what it charges and what the product costs to make. The operating margin has swung widely — from 2.2% to 5.8% over the years — so the through-cycle figure carries more than any single year, and the worst year more than the best. Inventory runs near 18% of sales, so how fast it turns back into cash — and the risk of writing it down when demand softens — sits alongside the margin. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Return on capital has rarely cleared the cost of capital (median 6%, above 15% in 0 of 5 years). Owner earnings, the cash-based check, have been thin too. This is price-taker territory, where the balance sheet and the cycle matter more than any multiple; the rest is in the 10-K.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

Where the money comes from

read the 10-K →

Revenue spreads across 4 segments, the largest TestEquity at 40%.

Revenue by reportable segment, FY2025
  • TestEquity40%$782M
  • Gexpro Services25%$495M
  • Lawson24%$481M
  • Canada Branch Division11%$221M
By geographyUnited States74%Canada15%Latin America6%Europe3%Asia Pacific2%Other1%

From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2018–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2018’182019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMMar 2026
Income statement
$350M$371M$352M$520M$1.2B$1.6B$1.8B$2.0B$2.0BRevenueRevenue
54%53%53%25%34%35%34%33%33%Gross marginGross mgn
52%28%25%23%30%32%31%29%30%SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev
$9M$9M$21M$11M$42M$43M$56M$78M$72MOperating incomeOp. inc.
2.6%2.4%5.8%2.2%3.6%2.7%3.1%4.0%3.6%Operating marginOp. mgn
$6M$7M$15M($5M)$7M($9M)($7M)$8M$5MNet incomeNet inc.
9%25%27%43%57%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
$20M$9M$33M$10M($11M)$102M$56M$84M$68MOperating cash flowOp. cash
$7M$6M$7M$19M$45M$64M$74M$81M$81MDepreciationDeprec.
($278K)($8M)$9M($8M)($64M)$48M($11M)($5M)($23M)Working capital & otherWC & other
$3M$2M$2M$3M$8M$15M$14M$21M$19MCapexCapex
0.7%0.5%0.5%0.6%0.7%1.0%0.8%1.1%0.9%Capex / revenueCapex/rev
$18M$7M$31M$7M($19M)$87M$43M$63M$50MOwner earningsOwner earn.
5.1%1.9%8.8%1.4%−1.7%5.5%2.4%3.2%2.5%Owner earnings marginOE mgn
$18M$7M$31M$7M($19M)$87M$43M$63M$50MFree cash flowFCF
5.1%1.9%8.8%1.4%−1.7%5.5%2.4%3.2%2.5%Free cash flow marginFCF mgn
$5M$0$2M$34M$115M$260M$199M$2M$18MAcquisitionsAcquis.
$523K$5M$3M$0$2M$4M$3M$24MBuybacksBuybacks
10%6%12%3%3%3%ROICROIC
6%7%10%-3%1%-1%-1%1%1%Return on equityROE
6%7%10%−3%1%−1%−1%1%1%Retained to equityRetained/eq
Balance sheet
$12M$5M$28M$15M$25M$84M$66M$62M$53MCash & investmentsCash+inv
$38M$39M$45M$81M$166M$213M$251M$271M$307MReceivablesReceiv.
$53M$56M$62M$133M$264M$316M$348M$353M$374MInventoryInvent.
$15M$14M$22M$48M$80M$99M$126M$151M$168MAccounts payablePayables
$75M$81M$84M$165M$350M$431M$473M$473M$512MOperating working capitalOper. WC
$107M$106M$143M$236M$478M$657M$712M$747M$791MCurrent assetsCur. assets
$66M$57M$98M$215M$169M$242M$266M$291M$301MCurrent liabilitiesCur. liab.
1.6×1.9×1.5×1.1×2.8×2.7×2.7×2.6×2.6×Current ratioCurr. ratio
$20M$21M$93M$104M$348M$400M$463M$468M$475MGoodwillGoodwill
$197M$204M$256M$491M$1.2B$1.6B$1.7B$1.7B$1.8BTotal assetsAssets
$0$2M$0$228M$412M$568M$734M$700M$732MTotal debtDebt
($12M)($3M)($28M)$213M$388M$485M$668M$638M$679MNet debt / (cash)Net debt
9.1×15.0×31.4×0.7×1.7×1.0×1.0×1.4×1.3×Interest coverageInt. cov.
$99M$108M$155M$166M$563M$662M$641M$649M$648MShareholders’ equityEquity
2.1%1.1%0.4%0.9%0.2%Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev
Per share
9.3M9.4M9.3M10.2M35.1M44.9M46.8M47.2M47.0MShares out (diluted)Shares
$37.70$39.55$37.68$50.78$32.82$35.00$38.54$41.98$42.48Revenue / shareRev/sh
$0.67$0.77$1.62$-0.49$0.21$-0.20$-0.16$0.18$0.12EPS (diluted)EPS
$1.92$0.76$3.31$0.71$-0.55$1.94$0.91$1.33$1.05Owner earnings / shareOE/sh
$1.92$0.76$3.31$0.71$-0.55$1.94$0.91$1.33$1.05Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh
$0.27$0.22$0.18$0.30$0.24$0.34$0.29$0.45$0.40Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh
$10.69$11.52$16.64$16.18$16.05$14.75$13.68$13.77$13.78Book value / shareBVPS

The diluted share count moved ×3.42 into 2022 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.

Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
7-yr5-yr
Revenue / share+1.5%/yr+2.2%/yr
Owner earnings / share−5.1%/yr−16.6%/yr
EPS−17.3%/yr−35.8%/yr
Capital spending / share+7.3%/yr+19.8%/yr
Book value / share+3.7%/yr−3.7%/yr

The year, in the company's words

the filing →

Verbatim from the 10-K's management discussion. Each sentence is shown only because its subject, direction check out against the filed numbers on this page. The words are the company's; the arithmetic is the record's.

  • TestEquity+1.5%
    “TestEquity gross profit as a percentage of revenue decreased to 21.6% in 2025 compared to 22.8% in the prior year primarily due to higher depreciation expense on the expanded rental equipment fleet, higher inventory write-offs of $1.2 million and a shift in sales mix toward test and measurement which have lower margins partially offset by favorability in vendor rebates.”
    ✓ direction matches the filed record

The record, charted

FY2018–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.

Share count
47Mpeak FY2025
ROIC
3%low FY2022
Gross margin
33%low FY2021
Net debt ÷ owner earnings
10.2×peak FY2021

Owner earnings vs. net income

Owner earningsNet income

The accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.

$63Mowner earningsvs.$8Mnet incomelow FY2022

Where the cash went

ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedBeyond op. cash

Each year's outlays against its operating cash: the mix, and how it drifts. The hatched cap is spending beyond that year's operating cash — financed from the balance sheet or borrowing, not operations.

FY2018FY2025

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2025 the business turned $8M of profit into $63M of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.

Reported net income$8M
Owner earnings$63M · 3% of revenue
FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Reported net income$8M($7M)($9M)$7M($5M)
Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back+$81M+$74M+$64M+$45M+$19M
Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost+$5M
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items−$5M−$11M+$48M−$64M−$8M
Cash from operations$84M$56M$102M($11M)$10M
Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow−$21M−$14M−$15M−$8M−$3M
Owner earnings$63M$43M$87M($19M)$7M
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue3%2%6%-2%1%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .

Much of fiscal 2025's profit didn't arrive as operating cash; it sits in “working capital & other” above. That can be a real inventory or timing swing, or profit that doesn't run through operating cash at all: a heavy tax year, equity-method earnings, or investment income booked through investing. For a year like this, owner earnings understates the cash earned; the full cash-flow statement carries the rest.

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 10-K · source on SEC EDGAR →

Will it survive?

  • Thin
    Operating income $78M ÷ interest expense $55M
    What this means

    Operating profit covers interest, but with little room. A bad year, a refinancing at higher rates, or a revenue wobble closes the gap fast.

  • How heavy is the debt, net of cash? $638M · 8.2× operating profit
    Heavy net debt
    Cash $62M − debt $700M
    What this means

    Netting $62M of cash and short-term investments against $700M of debt leaves $638M owed, about 8.2× a year's operating profit (8.9× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.

  • Long (60+ days)
    DSO 50 + DIO 98 − DPO 42 days
    What this means

    Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.

Is it a good business?

  • Below average through the cycle
    5-yr median, range 3%–12%; 3% latest = NOPAT $39M ÷ invested capital $1.3B
    Industry peers: median 12%
    What this means

    The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 5 years (it ran 3% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.

  • Thin, recently turned positive
    latest $63M = operating cash $84M − maintenance capex $21M; positive each of the last 3 years, after an earlier loss stretch (8-yr median 2%)
    Industry peers: median 5%
    What this means

    What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 3% of revenue this year, a 2% median across 8 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $5M of SBC) leaves $58M.

  • Cash-backed
    Cash from ops $84M ÷ net income $8M
    What this means

    How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.

How is the cash used?

  • Reinvests most of it
    Dividends + buybacks $24M ÷ Owner Earnings $63M
    What this means

    Of $63M Owner Earnings, $24M (38%) went back to shareholders, $0 dividends, $24M buybacks. Net of $5M stock comp, the real buyback was about $19M. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.

  • Investing or harvesting? 0.26×
    Harvesting
    Capex $21M ÷ depreciation $81M
    What this means

    Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.

Graham’s defensive tests · 1 of 6 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size Near
    Revenue ≥ $2B · $2.0B
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.

  • Strong liquidity Pass
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 2.56×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Conservative debt Miss
    Debt ≤ working capital · $700M vs $455M WC
    What this means

    Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.

  • Earnings stability Miss
    A profit every year (8-yr record) · 3 loss years
    What this means

    Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.

  • Dividend record Miss
    Uninterrupted dividends · none paid
    What this means

    An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.

  • Earnings growth Miss
    Earnings +33% over the record · −128%
    What this means

    At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $-0.06/share (latest year $0.18), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $14.06/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Durability & moat, 2018–2025

Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.

  • Profitable years 5 of 8
    What this means

    Lost money in 3 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.

  • Return on capital ≥ 15% 0 of 8 yrs
    What this means

    A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.

  • Operating margin 4% → 3% (3-yr avg ends)
    What this means

    Through the cycle the operating margin held roughly steady — about 4% early, 3% lately, median 3%.

  • Reinvestment, incremental ROIC 3%
    What this means

    Reinvested capital came back at only a modest incremental return — near the cost of capital, where extra growth adds little per dollar. The record shows whether it is a soft stretch or a thinning moat.

  • Owner earnings growth +23%/yr
    What this means

    Owner earnings grew about 23% a year over the record.

  • Worst year 2021 · 2.2% op. margin
    What this means

    Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Moderate contestability

AI is likely to reshape costs and some products here without clearly contesting or sparing the core moat; how the company itself frames it is the tell.

In its own filing A competitive risk, new this year

Its FY2025 10-K names artificial intelligence as a competitive threat, in language that was not in the prior year's filing.

“The increased use of AI may impact our industry and the markets in which we compete, and the development and use of AI presents potential competitive and other risks.”

The question is whether a moat the record shows as durable outlasts a technology that lowers the cost of part of what the firm sells. The durability is read in the record above, the filing's own framing of AI beside it; the industry label decides nothing on its own.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Current Position

as of the latest quarter, Mar 31, 2026

Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.

Current assets$791M
  • Cash & short-term investments$53M
  • Receivables$307M
  • Inventory$374M
  • Other current assets$58M
Current liabilities$301M
  • Debt due within a year$35M
  • Accounts payable$168M
  • Other current liabilities$98M
Current ratio2.63×all current assets ÷ what's due · Graham looked for 2×
Quick ratio1.39×stricter: inventory excluded
Cash ratio0.18×strictest: cash alone against what's due
Working capital$490Mthe cushion left after near-term bills
Debt due this year vs. cash$35M due · $53M cash covered by cash on hand, no refinancing forced · both figures from the Mar 31, 2026 balance sheet
Revenue, latest quarter vs. a year ago+3.8%the freshest read on whether the business is still growing
Current ratio, recent quarters2.5× → 2.6×
Deeper floors
Tangible book value($45M)equity stripped of goodwill & intangibles
Net current asset value($351M)Graham's net-net: current assets less all liabilities
Debt incl. operating leases$848M$116M of it operating leases
Deferred revenue$7Mcustomer cash collected before delivery; operating float

From the company's latest filing.

How the cash was used, 2018–2025

Over the record, the business generated $304M of operating cash; how management split it reads as a balanced allocator, splitting cash between the business, owners, and the balance sheet.

  • Reinvested$68M · 22%
  • Buybacks$40M · 13%
  • Retained (debt / cash)$196M · 65%
  • Returned to owners$40M

    17% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $0 as dividends and $40M as buybacks.

  • Source of fundingOperating cash

    Operating cash covered reinvestment and returns; over the span debt rose $732M and cash and short-term investments rose $41M.

  • Average price paid for buybacks$33.33

    Across the years where the filing reports a share count, 1M shares were bought for $40M, about $33.33 each. Year to year the price paid ranged from $17.93 (2022) to $139.89 (2019); its heaviest year, 2025, paid $30.57 ($24M).

  • Net change in share count407.2%

    The diluted count rose from 9M to 47M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.

  • Dividend record

    No dividend line was reported in the filing data over the span; the record here neither confirms nor rules out a payout.

Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.

Acquisitions & goodwill

from the balance sheet & the 8-year cash-flow record

Goodwill grows only when a company acquires and falls only when it concedes it overpaid. The size of that bet, the cash put into buying rather than building, and how much has already been written off.

Goodwill & intangibles$694M40% of all assets; the premium carried on the balance sheet for businesses acquired
Against book equity72%goodwill is this share of book equity; the rest is the company’s own retained and paid-in capital
Cash spent acquiring$618Mover 8 years buying other businesses, against $68M of capital spent building

$2M written down across 1 year (2020): goodwill the company has already conceded it overpaid for, charged against earnings. A write-down costs no cash (the cash went out when the deal was signed), but it is management marking its own past judgment to market.

Goodwill, acquired intangibles and equity from the latest balance sheet; acquisition spend and write-downs summed across the 8-year record, from the company's own filings.

Management, ownership & pay

read the proxy →

From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid.

  • Stock-based compensation$5M

    The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 0% of revenue, equal to 6% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.

Inverting the record

Invert: instead of why Distribution Solutions Group Inc. is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2018–2025.

4 of the 6 tests turned up something to look into; the other 2 came back clean.

  • Look hereIs it less profitable than it was?3.7% vs 5.3%

    The owner-earnings margin averaged 5.3% early in the record and 3.7% across the last three years, and the latest year has not recovered. Ask the filing whether that is a structural drift or a cyclical trough — price, mix, cost, or a competitor — and whether it is permanent.

  • Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?407.2%

    Diluted shares grew 407.2% over 2018–2025, even as the company spent $40M on buybacks. The repurchases were outrun by issuance — to staff, in a raise, or in a deal — and the filing says which; owners' slice still shrank. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.

  • Look hereDid debt outgrow the business?$0 → $732M

    Debt rose from $0 to $732M while owner earnings went from about $19M to $64M — under 0.1 years of owner earnings in debt then, about 11 now: measured against what the business earns, the balance sheet carries more debt than it did. Debt raised for buybacks or deals rather than growth is the kind that bites in a downturn.

  • Look hereDid receivables and inventory outpace sales?26% → 34% of sales

    Receivables and inventory grew from $91M to $680M while revenue grew 471%: working capital is climbing faster than sales (26% of revenue then, 34% now). That can mean customers paying slower, stock building up, or revenue pulled forward. The filing's cash-flow and receivables notes say which.

And these came back clean
  • Did reported profit become cash?
  • Are "one-time" charges a yearly habit?

Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.

Peers, Trading Companies & Distributors

The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueGross marginOp. marginROICOwner earn. margin
SITESiteOne Landscape$4.7B5.3%12%5%
RYZRyerson Holding Corporation$4.6B18%3.7%12%2%
AITApplied Industrial$4.6B29%8.4%13%7%
MSMMSC Industrial Direct Company Inc.$3.8B42%12.0%15%8%
SCSCScanSource$3.0B12%2.8%8%2%
BXCBluelinx Holdings Inc.$3.0B15%2.2%11%2%
DSGRDistribution Solutions Group Inc.$2.0B35%2.9%6%3%
GICGlobal Industrial Company$1.4B34%7.0%38%5%
Group median29%4.5%12%4%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Distribution Solutions Group Inc. has delivered.

$

Through the cycle, Distribution Solutions Group Inc. earns about $55M on its 2.8% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 3.2% margin runs in line with that. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.

Base

The assumptions

9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.

Enter a price above to run it.

Implied by the price
Owner-earnings growth · ’18→’25+23%/yr
Owner-earnings yield
P/E (3-yr earnings ’23–’25)
P/B
Graham’s price gate

Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.

Against a high-grade bond: Graham’s yardstick bond yield%

Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.

Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.

Owner earnings $50M on 46M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-04-24; net debt $679M. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Distribution Solutions Group Inc. (DSGR), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/DSGR, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← DRVN its page in the Manual DSP →

Industry order: ← CTOS the Trading Companies & Distributors chapter DXPE →