← All companies ← PB Manual PBFS → ← MPC Refining & Marketing PSX →
PBF, PBF Energy
PBF Energy is an independent oil refiner. It buys crude oil, runs it through its refineries, and sells the refined fuels — gasoline, diesel and the like — to wholesale buyers and fuel distributors, with a single large customer accounting for a meaningful share of sales. Its profit is the spread between what it pays for the crude going in and what the finished products fetch going out.
We sell our products throughout the Northeast, Midwest, Gulf Coast and West Coast of the United States, as well as in other regions of the United States, Canada and Mexico and are able to ship products to other international destinations.
Our six oil refineries are all engaged in the refining of crude oil and other feedstocks into petroleum products, and represent the Refining segment.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- Situation
- Cyclical. Margins collapse and recover repeatedly across the record; a single year, good or bad, misstates the through-cycle earning power.
- What moves the needle
- The first question is whether this is a franchise or a commodity, and a refiner sits near the commodity end: it sets neither the price of the crude it buys nor the price of the fuel it sells, so the outcome rides on the refining margin between the two — the crack spread — over which it has no say. With no pricing power to lean on, the tests that matter are the cost position and reliable uptime: whether the plants run cheaply and keep running, since any edge would have to show up in the margin rather than in the price. The bad case is plain — a thin or inverted spread while a unit is down (the Martinez refinery fire is the filing's own reminder of that hazard), against heavy fixed costs and debt that must be served whatever the spread does, plus a reliance on one large buyer and the capital the refineries demand each year. See the record below for the margins, the returns on capital, and the leverage.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has sat near the cost of capital (median 9%). Owner earnings, the cash-based check, have been thin too. The cycle and the balance sheet decide this one; the worst year tells more than the median, and the rest is in the 10-K.
Drafted from the company's filings and reviewed by hand; every number is shown in full in the sections below.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMMar 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $15.9B | $21.8B | $27.2B | $24.5B | $15.1B | $27.3B | $46.8B | $38.3B | $33.1B | $29.3B | $30.2B | RevenueRevenue |
| 4% | 4% | 2% | 4% | — | 3% | 10% | — | −1% | — | — | Gross marginGross mgn |
| 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 2% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev |
| $499M | $732M | $358M | $649M | ($1.4B) | $597M | $4.2B | $3.0B | ($699M) | ($54M) | $757M | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 3.1% | 3.4% | 1.3% | 2.6% | −9.4% | 2.2% | 8.9% | 7.7% | −2.1% | −0.2% | 2.5% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| $171M | $416M | $128M | $319M | ($1.4B) | $231M | $2.9B | $2.1B | ($534M) | ($159M) | $442M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| 45% | 43% | 21% | 25% | — | 5% | 17% | 25% | — | — | 22% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| $652M | $686M | $838M | $934M | ($632M) | $477M | $4.8B | $1.3B | $43M | ($78M) | $260M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $144M | $208M | $208M | $258M | $326M | $221M | $262M | $314M | $358M | $372M | $360M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| $314M | $36M | $476M | $319M | $401M | ($10M) | $1.6B | ($1.2B) | $175M | ($330M) | ($578M) | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $299M | $307M | $318M | $405M | $196M | $249M | $633M | $660M | $391M | $705M | $944M | CapexCapex |
| 1.9% | 1.4% | 1.2% | 1.7% | 1.3% | 0.9% | 1.4% | 1.7% | 1.2% | 2.4% | 3.1% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $508M | $478M | $630M | $675M | ($828M) | $228M | $4.5B | $1.0B | ($348M) | ($450M) | ($100M) | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 3.2% | 2.2% | 2.3% | 2.8% | −5.5% | 0.8% | 9.6% | 2.7% | −1.0% | −1.5% | −0.3% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| $353M | $379M | $521M | $529M | ($828M) | $228M | $4.1B | $679M | ($348M) | ($783M) | ($684M) | Free cash flowFCF |
| 2.2% | 1.7% | 1.9% | 2.2% | −5.5% | 0.8% | 8.8% | 1.8% | −1.0% | −2.7% | −2.3% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| — | — | — | $0 | $1.2B | $0 | $0 | — | — | — | $0 | AcquisitionsAcquis. |
| $117M | $132M | $139M | $144M | — | — | — | — | — | — | $144M | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| $743K | $1M | $8M | $5M | $2M | $0 | $156M | $533M | $329M | $0 | — | BuybacksBuybacks |
| 8% | 11% | 7% | 11% | -24% | 12% | 83% | 37% | -9% | -1% | 8% | ROICROIC |
| 8% | 18% | 5% | 11% | -85% | 12% | 58% | 33% | -10% | -3% | 8% | Return on equityROE |
| 3% | 12% | −0% | 6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $786M | $573M | $597M | $815M | $1.6B | $1.3B | $2.2B | $1.8B | $536M | $528M | $542M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| $1.9B | $2.2B | $1.9B | $2.1B | $1.7B | $2.5B | $2.8B | $3.2B | $2.6B | $2.6B | $3.1B | InventoryInvent. |
| $536M | $579M | $488M | $601M | $407M | $912M | $855M | $959M | $736M | $801M | $862M | Accounts payablePayables |
| $1.3B | $1.6B | $1.4B | $1.5B | $1.3B | $1.6B | $1.9B | $2.2B | $1.9B | $1.8B | $2.2B | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| $3.4B | $3.8B | $3.2B | $3.8B | $3.9B | $5.2B | $6.5B | $6.6B | $4.5B | $4.5B | $5.8B | Current assetsCur. assets |
| $2.1B | $2.4B | $2.1B | $2.5B | $2.5B | $3.8B | $5.2B | $4.2B | $3.6B | $3.7B | $4.4B | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 1.7× | 1.6× | 1.5× | 1.5× | 1.6× | 1.4× | 1.3× | 1.6× | 1.3× | 1.2× | 1.3× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| $7.6B | $8.1B | $8.0B | $9.1B | $10.5B | $11.6B | $13.5B | $14.4B | $12.7B | $13.0B | $14.7B | Total assetsAssets |
| $2.1B | $2.2B | $1.9B | $2.1B | $4.7B | $4.3B | $1.4B | $1.2B | $1.5B | $2.1B | $2.8B | Total debtDebt |
| $1.4B | $1.6B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $3.0B | $3.0B | ($769M) | ($538M) | $921M | $1.6B | $2.3B | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| 3.3× | 4.7× | 2.1× | 4.1× | -5.5× | 1.9× | 16.9× | 46.3× | -9.7× | -0.3× | 4.0× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| $2.0B | $2.3B | $2.7B | $3.0B | $1.6B | $1.9B | $4.9B | $6.5B | $5.5B | $5.3B | $5.5B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 104M | 114M | 119M | 122M | 121M | 123M | 127M | 131M | 117M | 115M | 121M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $153.66 | $191.28 | $228.89 | $201.13 | $125.28 | $222.23 | $369.15 | $293.66 | $282.77 | $255.25 | $250.21 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $1.65 | $3.65 | $1.08 | $2.62 | $-11.54 | $1.88 | $22.68 | $16.40 | $-4.56 | $-1.38 | $3.66 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $4.90 | $4.20 | $5.31 | $5.54 | $-6.86 | $1.86 | $35.55 | $7.85 | $-2.97 | $-3.91 | $-0.83 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $3.41 | $3.33 | $4.38 | $4.34 | $-6.86 | $1.86 | $32.62 | $5.20 | $-2.97 | $-6.82 | $-5.67 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $1.13 | $1.16 | $1.17 | $1.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | $1.19 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| $2.88 | $2.69 | $2.67 | $3.32 | $1.63 | $2.03 | $4.99 | $5.05 | $3.34 | $6.14 | $7.83 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $19.55 | $20.52 | $22.53 | $24.94 | $13.62 | $15.71 | $38.86 | $49.72 | $47.34 | $46.29 | $45.78 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +5.8%/yr | +15.3%/yr |
| Dividends / share | +1.3%/yr (3-yr) | +1.3%/yr (3-yr) |
| Capital spending / share | +8.8%/yr | +30.4%/yr |
| Book value / share | +10.1%/yr | +27.7%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2016–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedEach year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business earned ($450M) of owner earnings, the operating cash left after the $372M it takes just to hold its position. It put $334M more into growth; free cash flow, after that spending, was ($783M).
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | ($159M) | ($534M) | $2.1B | $2.9B | $231M |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$372M | +$358M | +$314M | +$262M | +$221M |
| Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost | +$39M | +$44M | +$52M | +$54M | +$36M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | −$330M | +$175M | −$1.2B | +$1.6B | −$10M |
| Cash from operations | ($78M) | $43M | $1.3B | $4.8B | $477M |
| Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume | −$372M | −$391M | −$314M | −$262M | −$249M |
| Owner earnings | ($450M) | ($348M) | $1.0B | $4.5B | $228M |
| Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still | −$334M | — | −$345M | −$371M | — |
| Free cash flow | ($783M) | ($348M) | $679M | $4.1B | $228M |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | -2% | -1% | 3% | 10% | 1% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position (here about $372M, roughly its depreciation, the rate its assets wear out). The other $334M of its capital spending is growth it chose, not upkeep it owed; charged only with the maintenance it must do, the business earns well more than the year's free cash flow shows. The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $39M), owner earnings is nearer ($489M).
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- Can it pay its interest? -0.3×Does not cover its interestOperating income ($54M) ÷ interest expense $182M
What this means
A full year of operating profit didn't cover the interest bill. This is the zombie zone: the business depends on refinancing, asset sales, or forbearance to service its debt.
- Net debt against an operating lossCash $528M − debt $2.2B
What this means
Netting $528M of cash and short-term investments against $2.2B of debt leaves $1.7B owed, with no operating profit this year to measure it against — understand that combination before anything else about the company. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
Is it a good business?
- Solid through the cycle10-yr median, range -24%–83%; -1% latest = NOPAT ($43M) ÷ invested capital $7.0BIndustry peers: median 7%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 10 years (it ran -1% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Thin through the cycle10-yr median margin, range -5%–10%; latest ($450M) = operating cash ($78M) − maintenance capex $372MIndustry peers: median 2%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's -2% of revenue this year, a 2% median across 10 years. It chose to put $334M more into growth, so free cash flow this year was ($783M) — the gap is investment, not weakness. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $39M of SBC) leaves ($489M).
- Are earnings backed by cash? ($78M)Loss, and burning cashNet income ($159M) · cash from operations ($78M)
In the filing’s words And the filing leans heavily on adjusted, non-GAAP earnings — steering you off the GAAP figure just where the cash is not backing it. Read the reconciliation in the notes before taking the adjusted number.
What this means
The company reported a net loss, so a conversion ratio isn't meaningful. What matters then is whether operations still threw off cash, here, they did not.
How is the cash used?
- No surplus to allocate
What this means
The business didn't generate positive Owner Earnings this year, so any distributions came from the balance sheet or borrowing, not from operations.
- Investing or harvesting? 1.90×ExpandingCapex $705M ÷ depreciation $372M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 2 of 6 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size PassRevenue ≥ $2B · $29.3B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity MissCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 1.21×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt MissDebt ≤ working capital · $2.2B vs $783M WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability MissA profit every year (10-yr record) · 3 loss years
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record MissUninterrupted dividends · 4 of 10 yrs
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth PassEarnings +33% over the record · +103%
What this means
At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $4.12/share (latest year $-1.35), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $45.39/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2016–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 7 of 10
What this means
Lost money in 3 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 2 of 10 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin 3% → 2% (3-yr avg ends)
In the filing’s words The margin has held, but the filing names price competition — the pressure is present even where the margin has absorbed it so far.
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about 3% early to 2% lately, median 2% — competition or costs are biting in.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC 8%
What this means
Reinvested capital came back at only a modest incremental return — near the cost of capital, where extra growth adds little per dollar. The record shows whether it is a soft stretch or a thinning moat.
- Worst year 2020 · −9.4% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2020, understand why before trusting the good years.
- Share count +1.2%/yr
What this means
The share count is rising, dilution works against you on a per-share basis.
- Dividend record rising
What this means
Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
The filing raises AI among its risks, but in other terms (security, regulation, energy or the like), not as a competitor to its product.
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of the latest quarter, Mar 31, 2026Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$542M
- Inventory$3.1B
- Other current assets$2.2B
- Accounts payable$862M
- Other current liabilities$3.6B
From the company's latest filing.
Debt maturity
the debt note, SEC EDGAR →Not how much it owes, but when it falls due, and against what. The ladder the company files, beside cash on hand and a year's owner earnings.
Bars scaled to the largest single year.
Maturity schedule extracted from the company’s Dec 31, 2025 annual report and reconciled to the balance-sheet debt.
Lease obligations
the lease note, SEC EDGAR →Debt by another name. What the business owes on the property, aircraft, stores and equipment it rents rather than owns is a fixed claim due on a schedule; added back to the debt, it is the true leverage. That ladder, operating and finance leases together, and what it adds to the debt on the page above.
Lease payments by year, scaled to the largest; “later” is everything beyond year five, shown apart. These are the contractual cash payments, before the interest the filing imputes back out to the balance-sheet liability.
True leverage: debt plus leases
Counting the leases the way Buffett does, the fixed claims on this business come to $3.0B, of which the leases are 26%. The lease wall above and the debt schedule together are the calendar of what must be paid, and when.
Lease ladder read from the ASC 842 tags in the company’s Dec 31, 2025 annual report and reconciled: the yearly buckets sum to the undiscounted total, which less the imputed interest equals the balance-sheet liability; a ladder that doesn’t tie out is withheld.
How the cash was used, 2016–2025
Over the record, the business generated $9.0B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a balanced allocator, splitting cash between the business, owners, and the balance sheet.
- Reinvested$4.2B · 46%
- Dividends$532M · 6%
- Buybacks$1.0B · 11%
- Retained (debt / cash)$3.3B · 37%
- Returned to owners$1.6B
24% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $532M as dividends and $1.0B as buybacks.
- Average price paid for buybacks—
Buybacks ran $1.0B over the span, but the filings don't tag the share count needed to deduce the average price paid.
- Net change in share count16.4%
The diluted count rose from 104M to 121M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.
- Dividend record$1.18/sh
Paid in 4 of the years on record, the per-share dividend growing about 1% a year. It was never cut over the span.
- Return on what it retained−18%
Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out ($2.6B over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) fell $463M, so each retained $1 gave back about 0.18 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.
| Fiscal year | Pay, as filed | “Actually paid” | Owner earnings |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | $7.3M | $12.4M | $228M |
| 2022 | $13.1M | $38.0M | $4.5B |
| 2023 | $12.2M | $16.2M | $1.0B |
| 2023 | $12.2M | $13.9M | $1.0B |
| 2024 | $8.8M | $2.6M | ($348M) |
| 2025 | $7.9M | $3.9M | ($450M) |
Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.
- Insider ownership5.5%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
- Stock-based compensation$39M
The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 0% of revenue. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why PBF Energy is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.
3 of the 6 tests turned up something to look into; the other 3 came back clean.
- Look hereIs it less profitable than it was?0.0% vs 2.6%
The owner-earnings margin averaged 2.6% early in the record and 0.0% across the last three years, and the latest year has not recovered. Ask the filing whether that is a structural drift or a cyclical trough — price, mix, cost, or a competitor — and whether it is permanent.
- Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?16.4%
Diluted shares grew 16.4% over 2016–2025, even as the company spent $1.0B on buybacks. The repurchases were outrun by issuance — to staff, in a raise, or in a deal — and the filing says which; owners' slice still shrank. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.
- Look hereDid debt outgrow the business?$2.1B → $2.8B
Debt rose from $2.1B to $2.8B while owner earnings went from about $539M to $76M — about 4.0 years of owner earnings in debt then, about 37 now: measured against what the business earns, the balance sheet carries more debt than it did. Debt raised for buybacks or deals rather than growth is the kind that bites in a downturn.
- Did reported profit become cash?
- Did receivables and inventory outpace sales?
- Are "one-time" charges a yearly habit?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
What an owner would ask, FY2025
read the 10-K →- Which reported numbers are a judgment call?Management names Income taxes, Contingencies as critical estimates
each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →
The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.
Peers, Refining & Marketing
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COPConocoPhillips | $51.8B | 57% | 29.3% | 13% | 14% |
| PBFPBF Energy | $29.3B | 4% | 2.4% | 9% | 2% |
| SUNSunoco LP Common | $25.2B | 8% | 2.8% | — | 2% |
| SUNCSunocoCorp LLC Common | $25.2B | 9% | 3.5% | — | 2% |
| HESHess Corporation | $12.9B | — | 2.9% | 1% | -5% |
| DKDelek US Holdings | $10.7B | 4% | 1.9% | 7% | 2% |
| IEPIcahn Enterprises L.P. | $9.7B | — | -5.4% | 2% | 3% |
| CVICVR Energy Inc. | $7.2B | 5% | 2.5% | 9% | 3% |
| Group median | — | 7% | 2.6% | 8% | 2% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFType today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what PBF Energy has delivered.
PBF Energy’s latest year shows negative owner earnings, the mark of a build-out: total capital spending outruns the cash the business throws off today. So the tool opens on the steady-state base (maintenance capex in place of the build-out spend), the cash it would earn at rest; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.
Through the cycle, PBF Energy earns about $662M on its 2.3% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s −1.5% margin runs below that; the reported figure may understate a lean year. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Free cash flow ($684M) on 117M shares outstanding (a weighted basic average, the only count this filer tags); net debt $2.3B. The base opens on the steady-state figure (the latest year is negative on total capex mid-build-out); clear Steady-state to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. Capex ($944M) runs well above depreciation ($360M), so this is a build-out; Steady-state swaps total capex for maintenance (≈ depreciation), lifting the base to about ($112M), the cash it would throw off if it stopped expanding. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← PB its page in the Manual PBFS →
Industry order: ← MPC the Refining & Marketing chapter PSX →