Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← RH Manual RHLD → ← NSP Staffing & Employment Services

RHI, Robert Half Inc.

Staffing & Employment Services diversified Cyclical

Robert Half Inc. provides specialized talent solutions and business consulting services through the Robert Half and Protiviti company names.

Believes that direct ownership of offices allows it to better monitor and protect the image of its trade names, promote a more consistent and higher level of quality and service throughout its network of offices, and improve profitability by centralizing many of its administrative functions.

Has also broadened the scope of its services by expanding product offerings to include administrative and customer support, technology, financial project, consulting, legal, and marketing and creative talent solutions.

Latest annual: FY2025 10-K
RHI · Robert Half Inc.
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$5.4B
−7.2% YoY · 1% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 5-yr average
Revenue $5.3B 5-yr avg $6.3B
Gross margin 37% 5-yr avg 40%
Operating margin 1.4% 5-yr avg 7.5%
ROIC 5% 5-yr avg 43%
Owner-earnings margin 4% 5-yr avg 8%
Free cash flow margin 4% 5-yr avg 8%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What it is
Revenue is Contract Talent Solutions (56%), Protiviti (36%) and Permanent Placement Talent Solutions (8%).
Situation
Cyclical. Margins collapse and recover repeatedly across the record; a single year, good or bad, misstates the through-cycle earning power.
What moves the needle
Gross margin has run about 41% and operating margin about 10% through the cycle, a solid spread between what it charges and what the product costs to make. The operating margin has swung widely — from 1.4% to 12% — on a steadier 41% gross margin, so what moves it sits below the gross line, in operating spend and one-off charges more than in the cost of the product itself. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Return on capital has run high across the record (median 45%, above 15% in 9 of 10 years), though buybacks and expensed R&D and brands shrink the capital base, so the figure overstates the underlying economics. The steadier read is owner earnings: roughly 8% of revenue reaches owners as cash, consistently. Whether these returns reflect real pricing power or an accounting artifact is the judgment the 10-K is for.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

Where the money comes from

read the 10-K →

Revenue spreads across 3 segments, the largest Contract Talent Solutions at 56%.

Revenue by reportable segment, FY2025
  • Contract Talent Solutions56%$3.0B
  • Protiviti36%$1.9B
  • Permanent Placement Talent Solutions8%$440M
By geographyUnited States78%International22%

From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2016–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2016’162017’172018’182019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMMar 2026
Income statement
$5.3B$5.3B$5.8B$6.1B$5.1B$6.5B$7.2B$6.4B$5.8B$5.4B$5.3BRevenueRevenue
41%41%42%42%39%42%43%40%39%37%37%Gross marginGross mgn
31%31%31%32%33%30%29%33%35%36%36%SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev
$554M$517M$589M$622M$422M$806M$891M$465M$241M$76M$74MOperating incomeOp. inc.
10.6%9.8%10.2%10.2%8.3%12.5%12.3%7.3%4.2%1.4%1.4%Operating marginOp. mgn
$343M$291M$434M$454M$306M$599M$658M$411M$252M$133M$129MNet incomeNet inc.
38%44%27%27%27%26%27%29%30%32%36%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
$442M$453M$572M$520M$597M$603M$684M$637M$410M$320M$267MOperating cash flowOp. cash
$63M$64M$64M$64M$62M$52M$47M$51M$52M$50M$49MDepreciationDeprec.
$36M$98M$74M$932K$228M($48M)($22M)$174M$107M$137M$47MWorking capital & otherWC & other
$83M$41M$42M$59M$33M$37M$61M$46M$56M$53M$49MCapexCapex
1.6%0.8%0.7%1.0%0.7%0.6%0.8%0.7%1.0%1.0%0.9%Capex / revenueCapex/rev
$359M$412M$530M$460M$563M$567M$623M$591M$354M$267M$218MOwner earningsOwner earn.
6.8%7.8%9.1%7.6%11.0%8.8%8.6%9.2%6.1%5.0%4.1%Owner earnings marginOE mgn
$359M$412M$530M$460M$563M$567M$623M$591M$354M$267M$218MFree cash flowFCF
6.8%7.8%9.1%7.6%11.0%8.8%8.6%9.2%6.1%5.0%4.1%Free cash flow marginFCF mgn
$2M$1M$0$0$16M$0$19M$1M$264K$11M$11MAcquisitionsAcquis.
$114M$121M$136M$146M$156M$171M$189M$206M$220M$238M$239MDividends paidDiv. paid
$176M$232M$354M$278M$159M$288M$320M$255M$276M$92MBuybacksBuybacks
42%36%55%52%49%79%72%39%20%6%5%ROICROIC
32%26%41%40%25%43%42%26%18%10%11%Return on equityROE
21%15%28%27%12%31%30%13%2%−8%−9%Retained to equityRetained/eq
Balance sheet
$260M$295M$277M$270M$574M$619M$659M$732M$538M$464M$278MCash & investmentsCash+inv
$703M$732M$794M$833M$714M$985M$1.0B$861M$772M$748M$776MReceivablesReceiv.
$136M$127M$168M$124M$131M$184M$168M$157M$167M$159M$146MAccounts payablePayables
$568M$605M$626M$709M$583M$801M$850M$704M$605M$589M$631MOperating working capitalOper. WC
$1.3B$1.4B$1.5B$1.6B$1.8B$2.3B$2.3B$2.3B$2.1B$2.1B$2.0BCurrent assetsCur. assets
$680M$748M$820M$941M$1.0B$1.4B$1.2B$1.2B$1.3B$1.4B$1.3BCurrent liabilitiesCur. liab.
1.9×1.9×1.8×1.7×1.8×1.7×1.9×1.9×1.7×1.5×1.6×Current ratioCurr. ratio
$210M$211M$210M$210M$223M$223M$238M$238M$237M$251M$251MGoodwillGoodwill
$1.8B$1.9B$1.9B$2.3B$2.6B$3.0B$3.0B$3.0B$2.9B$2.9B$2.7BTotal assetsAssets
$1M$840K$657K$500K$239K$0$200KTotal debtDebt
($259M)($294M)($276M)($270M)($574M)($619M)($278M)Net debt / (cash)Net debt
$1.1B$1.1B$1.1B$1.1B$1.2B$1.4B$1.6B$1.6B$1.4B$1.3B$1.2BShareholders’ equityEquity
Per share
129M125M122M116M113M112M109M106M103M100M99.9MShares out (diluted)Shares
$40.77$42.17$47.70$52.18$45.09$57.84$66.30$60.26$56.25$53.62$53.32Revenue / shareRev/sh
$2.67$2.33$3.57$3.90$2.70$5.36$6.03$3.88$2.44$1.33$1.30EPS (diluted)EPS
$2.79$3.30$4.36$3.95$4.97$5.07$5.70$5.57$3.44$2.66$2.18Owner earnings / shareOE/sh
$2.79$3.30$4.36$3.95$4.97$5.07$5.70$5.57$3.44$2.66$2.18Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh
$0.89$0.97$1.12$1.25$1.38$1.53$1.73$1.94$2.14$2.37$2.39Dividends / shareDiv/sh
$0.64$0.33$0.35$0.51$0.29$0.33$0.56$0.43$0.55$0.53$0.49Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh
$8.44$8.85$8.74$9.82$10.64$12.36$14.37$14.97$13.38$12.72$12.32Book value / shareBVPS
Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
9-yr5-yr
Revenue / share+3.1%/yr+3.5%/yr
Owner earnings / share−0.5%/yr−11.8%/yr
EPS−7.5%/yr−13.3%/yr
Dividends / share+11.6%/yr+11.5%/yr
Capital spending / share−2.1%/yr+12.5%/yr
Book value / share+4.7%/yr+3.6%/yr

The record, charted

FY2016–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.

Share count
100Mpeak FY2016
ROIC
6%low FY2025
Gross margin
37%low FY2025

Owner earnings vs. net income

Owner earningsNet income

The accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.

$267Mowner earningsvs.$133Mnet incomelow FY2025

Where the cash went

ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedBeyond op. cash

Each year's outlays against its operating cash: the mix, and how it drifts. The hatched cap is spending beyond that year's operating cash — financed from the balance sheet or borrowing, not operations.

FY2016FY2025

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2025 the business turned $133M of profit into $267M of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.

Reported net income$133M
Owner earnings$267M · 5% of revenue
FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Reported net income$133M$252M$411M$658M$599M
Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back+$50M+$52M+$51M+$47M+$52M
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items+$137M+$107M+$174M−$22M−$48M
Cash from operations$320M$410M$637M$684M$603M
Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow−$53M−$56M−$46M−$61M−$37M
Owner earnings$267M$354M$591M$623M$567M
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue5%6%9%9%9%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 10-K · source on SEC EDGAR →

Will it survive?

  • No meaningful interest burden
    Little or no interest expense reported
    What this means

    Little or no interest expense reported, the business isn't leaning on lenders to operate.

  • Net cash
    Cash $464M − debt $200K
    What this means

    Cash and short-term investments exceed every dollar of debt by $464M, on net the company owes nothing, and can act from strength when others can't. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.

  • Tight
    DSO 51 + DIO 0 − DPO 17 days
    What this means

    Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash. (Little or no inventory, a services / asset-light model, so the inventory leg is ~0.)

Is it a good business?

  • Very high (≥25%) through the cycle
    10-yr median, range 6%–79%; 6% latest = NOPAT $52M ÷ invested capital $812M
    Industry peers: median 14%
    What this means

    The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 10 years (it ran 6% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.

  • Solid through the cycle
    10-yr median margin, range 5%–11%; latest $267M = operating cash $320M − maintenance capex $53M
    Industry peers: median 7%
    What this means

    What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 5% of revenue this year, a 8% median across 10 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $41M of SBC) leaves $225M.

  • Cash-backed
    Cash from ops $320M ÷ net income $133M
    What this means

    How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.

How is the cash used?

  • Returned more than it generated
    Dividends + buybacks $330M ÷ Owner Earnings $267M
    What this means

    The company returned more than it generated: against $267M of Owner Earnings, $330M (124%) went back to shareholders, $238M dividends, $92M buybacks — the excess came from the balance sheet or borrowing, not the year's operations. Net of $41M stock comp, the real buyback was about $51M. Sustained, that pattern draws down cash or adds debt; the net-debt line above shows where it stands.

  • Investing or harvesting? 1.06×
    Maintaining
    Capex $53M ÷ depreciation $50M
    What this means

    Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.

Graham’s defensive tests · 4 of 6 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size Pass
    Revenue ≥ $2B · $5.4B
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.

  • Strong liquidity Near
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 1.53×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Conservative debt Pass
    Debt ≤ working capital · $200K vs $735M WC
    What this means

    Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.

  • Earnings stability Pass
    A profit every year (10-yr record) · no losses
    What this means

    Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.

  • Dividend record Pass
    Uninterrupted dividends · paid every year (10)
    What this means

    An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.

  • Earnings growth Miss
    Earnings +33% over the record · −26%
    What this means

    At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $2.59/share (latest year $1.30), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $12.47/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Durability & moat, 2016–2025

Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.

  • Profitable years 10 of 10
    What this means

    Never lost money over the record, the earnings stability Graham insisted on.

  • Return on capital ≥ 15% 6 of 6 yrs
    What this means

    A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.

  • Operating margin 10% → 4% (3-yr avg ends)

    In the filing’s words The words explain the slip: the filing names price competition rather than pricing actions of its own — a business that looks to take its price, not set it.

    What this means

    Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about 10% early to 4% lately, median 10% — competition or costs are biting in.

  • Reinvestment, incremental ROIC returns capital
    What this means

    The capital base barely grew: this business returns cash through dividends and buybacks rather than reinvesting. Judge it on the cash returned, not on compounding.

  • Owner earnings growth −2%/yr
    What this means

    Owner earnings shrank about 2% a year over the record.

  • Worst year 2025 · 1.4% op. margin
    What this means

    Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.

  • Share count −2.7%/yr
    What this means

    The share count is shrinking, buybacks are quietly growing your slice of the business.

  • Dividend record rising
    What this means

    Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Elevated contestability

The product is software or information, the very thing capable AI now produces more cheaply, so the moat is more contestable than the record alone implies.

In its own filing Raised, but not as a competitor

The filing raises AI among its risks, but in other terms (security, regulation, energy or the like), not as a competitor to its product; it frames AI mainly as a capability.

The moat the record shows, a high return on capital held across years, was earned before AI collapsed the cost of building a capable substitute for the very thing this business sells. When a credible alternative can be assembled for a fraction of the incumbent's price, it is pricing power that erodes first, not revenue tomorrow. The live question is whether the moat survives that, not whether it held in the past. Whether that question is answerable at all is yours to decide, against your own circle of competence.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Current Position

as of the latest quarter, Mar 31, 2026

Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.

Current assets$2.0B
  • Cash & short-term investments$278M
  • Receivables$776M
  • Other current assets$915M
Current liabilities$1.3B
  • Accounts payable$146M
  • Other current liabilities$1.1B
Current ratio1.55×all current assets ÷ what's due · Graham looked for 2×
Quick ratio1.55×stricter: inventory excluded
Cash ratio0.22×strictest: cash alone against what's due
Working capital$701Mthe cushion left after near-term bills
Revenue, latest quarter vs. a year ago−3.8%the freshest read on whether the business is still growing
Current ratio, recent quarters1.8× → 1.6×
Deeper floors
Tangible book value$976Mequity stripped of goodwill & intangibles
Net current asset value$497MGraham's net-net: current assets less all liabilities
Debt incl. operating leases$252M$252M of it operating leases

From the company's latest filing.

How the cash was used, 2016–2025

Over the record, the business generated $5.2B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a cash returner, paying most of what it earns straight back to owners.

  • Reinvested$512M · 10%
  • Dividends$1.7B · 32%
  • Buybacks$2.4B · 46%
  • Retained (debt / cash)$600M · 11%
  • Returned to owners$4.1B

    87% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $1.7B as dividends and $2.4B as buybacks.

  • Average price paid for buybacks

    Buybacks ran $2.4B over the span, but the filings don't tag the share count needed to deduce the average price paid.

  • Net change in share count−22.4%

    The diluted count fell from 129M to 100M, so the buybacks outran the stock issued to staff.

  • Dividend record$2.37/sh

    Paid in 10 of the years on record, the per-share dividend growing about 12% a year. It was never cut over the span.

Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.

Management, ownership & pay

read the proxy →

From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.

Fiscal yearChief executivePay, as filed“Actually paid”Owner earnings
2021Mr. M. Keith Waddell$9.0M$31.5M$567M
2022Mr. M. Keith Waddell$9.4M−$946k$623M
2023Mr. M. Keith Waddell$8.1M$15.2M$591M
2024Mr. M. Keith Waddell$7.0M$3.4M$354M
2025Mr. M. Keith Waddell$6.2M−$4.9M$267M

Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.

  • CEO pay ratio147:1

    What the chief earns for every dollar the median employee makes, per the 2026 proxy. A high ratio alone settles nothing; some businesses are genuinely top-heavy in scarce skill. A runaway figure is where Buffett starts asking whether the board is doing its job.

  • Stock-based compensation$41M

    The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 1% of revenue, equal to 54% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.

Inverting the record

Invert: instead of why Robert Half Inc. is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.

1 of the 5 tests turned up something to look into; the other 4 came back clean.

  • Look hereIs it less profitable than it was?6.8% vs 7.9%

    The owner-earnings margin averaged 7.9% early in the record and 6.8% across the last three years, and the latest year has not recovered. Ask the filing whether that is a structural drift or a cyclical trough — price, mix, cost, or a competitor — and whether it is permanent.

And these came back clean
  • Did the share count rise anyway?
  • Did debt outgrow the business?
  • Did reported profit become cash?
  • Did receivables and inventory outpace sales?

Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.

Peers, Staffing & Employment Services

The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueGross marginOp. marginROICOwner earn. margin
MANManpowerGroup$18.0B17%2.9%14%2%
NSPInsperity Inc.$6.8B3.8%4%
MMSMaximus$5.4B23%9.7%16%8%
RHIRobert Half Inc.$5.4B41%10.0%45%8%
KELYAKelly Services Inc.$4.3B19%0.7%2%1%
ASGNEverforth, Inc.$4.0B29%8.1%9%7%
KFYKorn Ferry$2.9B10.0%14%10%
AMNAMN Healthcare Services$2.7B33%9.2%13%8%
Group median26%8.6%14%8%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Robert Half Inc. has delivered.

$

Through the cycle, Robert Half Inc. earns about $442M on its 8.2% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 5.0% margin runs below that; the reported figure may understate a lean year. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.

Base

The assumptions

9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.

Enter a price above to run it.

Implied by the price
Owner-earnings growth · ’21→’25−15%/yr
Owner-earnings growth · ’16→’25−2%/yr
Owner-earnings yield
P/E (3-yr earnings ’23–’25)
P/B
Graham’s price gate

Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.

Against a high-grade bond: Graham’s yardstick bond yield%

Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.

Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.

Owner earnings $218M on 102M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-04-30; net cash $278M. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Robert Half Inc. (RHI), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/RHI, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← RH its page in the Manual RHLD →

Industry order: ← NSP the Staffing & Employment Services chapter