Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← RHI Manual RHP → ← QFIN Capital Markets & Asset Management RILY →

RHLD, Resolute Holdings Management, Inc.

Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. is a Nevada corporation that was originally formed as a Delaware corporation on September 27, 2024 and was recently redomiciled to the State of Nevada on March 2, 2026.

Resolute Holdings applies a differentiated approach of value creation through the systematic deployment of the Resolute Operating System ("ROS") to drive performance at businesses it manages with the intention of creating value at both the underlying managed businesses and at Resolute Holdings.

Resolute Holdings also applies its M&A and capital markets expertise to drive inorganic growth of its managed businesses.

Latest annual: FY2025 10-K
RHLD · Resolute Holdings Management, Inc.
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$462M
+9.9% YoY
Vital signs · TTM, with 2-yr average
Revenue $766M 2-yr avg $441M
Gross margin 47% 2-yr avg 54%
Operating margin 14.6% 2-yr avg 30.5%
Owner-earnings margin 6% 2-yr avg 38%
Free cash flow margin 6% 2-yr avg 38%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What moves the needle
Pricing power. What decides it: whether it can raise prices with inflation and not lose the customer, whether the brand still earns its place on the shelf, and whether volume holds when a cheaper rival appears. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The year, in the company's words

the filing →

Verbatim from the 10-K's management discussion. Each sentence is shown only because its subject, direction, and stated figures check out against the filed numbers on this page. The words are the company's; the arithmetic is the record's.

  • Operating income+13.2%
    “Income from Operations and Operating Margin Income from operations for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased $16.7 million, or 13%, to $143.3 million. The increase was due to an increase in revenue and gross margin, offset by an increase in operating expenses.”
    ✓ figure matches the filed record

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2025 the business turned a $6M loss into $189M of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.

FY2025FY2024
Reported net income($6M)($2M)
Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back+$9M+$9M
Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost+$27M+$20M
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items+$167M+$125M
Cash from operations$196M$152M
Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow−$7M−$7M
Owner earnings$189M$145M
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue41%34%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position . The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $27M), owner earnings is nearer $162M.

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 10-K · source on SEC EDGAR →

Will it survive?

  • Comfortable
    Operating income $143M ÷ interest expense $13M
    What this means

    Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient, it says solvent, not cheap.

  • Net cash
    Cash $161M + ST investments $44M − debt $185M
    What this means

    Cash and short-term investments exceed every dollar of debt by $21M, on net the company owes nothing, and can act from strength when others can't. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.

  • Long (60+ days)
    DSO 35 + DIO 80 − DPO 22 days
    What this means

    Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.

Is it a good business?

  • Not enough data
    Industry peers: median -8%
    What this means

    The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

  • High
    Owner earnings $189M = operating cash $196M − maintenance capex $7M
    Industry peers: median -8%
    What this means

    What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 41% of revenue this year. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $27M of SBC) leaves $162M.

  • Loss, but cash-generative
    Net income ($6M) · cash from operations $196M
    What this means

    The company reported a net loss, so a conversion ratio isn't meaningful. What matters then is whether operations still threw off cash, here, they did.

How is the cash used?

  • Reinvests most of it
    Dividends + buybacks $4M ÷ Owner Earnings $189M
    What this means

    Of $189M Owner Earnings, $4M (2%) went back to shareholders, $0 dividends, $4M buybacks. But the buybacks barely exceed stock issued to employees ($27M SBC), net of dilution, little was truly returned. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.

  • Investing or harvesting? 0.81×
    Maintaining
    Capex $7M ÷ depreciation $9M
    What this means

    Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.

Graham’s defensive tests · 2 of 3 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size Miss
    Revenue ≥ $2B · $462M
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.

  • Strong liquidity Pass
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 3.84×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Conservative debt Pass
    Debt ≤ working capital · $185M vs $220M WC
    What this means

    Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $-0.50/share (latest year $-0.72), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $0.79/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Low contestability

The moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.

AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Current Position

as of the latest quarter, Mar 31, 2026

Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.

Current assets$938M
  • Cash & short-term investments$157M
  • Receivables$312M
  • Inventory$411M
  • Other current assets$58M
Current liabilities$589M
  • Debt due within a year$9M
  • Accounts payable$100M
  • Other current liabilities$480M
Current ratio1.59×all current assets ÷ what's due · Graham looked for 2×
Quick ratio0.89×stricter: inventory excluded
Cash ratio0.27×strictest: cash alone against what's due
Working capital$349Mthe cushion left after near-term bills
Debt due this year vs. cash$9M due · $157M cash covered by cash on hand, no refinancing forced · both figures from the Mar 31, 2026 balance sheet
Revenue, latest quarter vs. a year ago+292.5%the freshest read on whether the business is still growing
Current ratio, recent quarters3.3× → 1.6×
Deeper floors
Tangible book value($4.6B)equity stripped of goodwill & intangibles
Net current asset value($2.2B)Graham's net-net: current assets less all liabilities
Debt incl. operating leases$2.2B$11M of it operating leases
Deferred revenue$165Mcustomer cash collected before delivery; operating float

From the company's latest filing.

Management, ownership & pay

read the proxy →

From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid.

  • Insider ownership52.8%

    The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.

  • Stock-based compensation$27M

    The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 6% of revenue, equal to 19% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.

Peers, nearest by economic model

No close industry peers in the catalog yet, so these are the nearest by economic model (consumer & brand), compared on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueGross marginOp. marginROICOwner earn. margin
TVTXTravere Therapeutics$491M97%-83.6%-35%-20%
NATRNature's Sunshine Products Inc.$480M73%4.3%12%4%
KRTKarat Packaging Inc.$468M34%8.9%24%7%
TPBTurning Point Brands Inc.$463M49%20.4%15%9%
RHLDResolute Holdings Management, Inc.$462M56%31.0%41%
ZLABZai Lab Limited$457M65%-338.0%-103%-281%
PARPAR Technology Corporation$456M22%-15.1%-8%-8%
TARSTarsus Pharmaceuticals Inc.$451M-65.9%-41%-46%
Group median56%-5.4%-2%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. has delivered.

$
Base

The assumptions

9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.

Enter a price above to run it.

Implied by the price
Owner-earnings growth · since FY2024+31%/yr
Owner-earnings yield
P/E (2-yr earnings ’24–’25)
P/B
Graham’s price gate

Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.

Against a high-grade bond: Graham’s yardstick bond yield%

Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.

Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.

Free cash flow $47M on 8M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-05-06; net debt $2.0B. The if-converted diluted count is 9M, 4% above the shares outstanding: the dilution overhang (convertibles, options) a buyer inherits. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. Capex ($14M) runs well above depreciation ($23M), so this is a build-out; Steady-state swaps total capex for maintenance (≈ depreciation), lifting the base to about $54M, the cash it would throw off if it stopped expanding. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. (RHLD), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/RHLD, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← RHI its page in the Manual RHP →

Industry order: ← QFIN the Capital Markets & Asset Management chapter RILY →