Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← SEIC Manual SENEA → ← PRVA Health Care Providers & Services SGRY →

SEM, Select Medical Holdings

We began operations in 1997 and, based on the number of facilities, are one of the largest operators of critical illness recovery hospitals, rehabilitation hospitals, and outpatient rehabilitation clinics in the United States.

The results of Concentra are presented as discontinued operations and, as such, have been excluded from both continuing operations and segment results for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2024, and 2025.

For the years ended December 31, 2023, 2024, and 2025, approximately 37%, 33%, and 32%, respectively, of the revenue of our critical illness recovery hospital segment came from Medicare reimbursement.

Latest annual: FY2025 10-K
SEM · Select Medical Holdings
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$5.5B
+5.1% YoY · −0% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 5-yr average
Revenue $5.5B 5-yr avg $5.3B
Operating margin 5.8% 5-yr avg 6.3%
ROIC 4% 5-yr avg 7%
Owner-earnings margin 4% 5-yr avg 4%
Free cash flow margin 3% 5-yr avg 4%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What it is
Revenue is Non-Medicare (61%), Medicare (29%) and Other revenue (10%).
What moves the needle
Operating margin has run about 7.1% through the cycle, a thin margin, where volume, cost discipline and the price it gets all bear on the result. The operating margin has swung widely — from 3.1% to 12% over the years — so the through-cycle figure carries more than any single year, and the worst year more than the best. Read this kind of business on volume, payer mix and reimbursement. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Return on capital has sat near the cost of capital (median 7%). By owner earnings: roughly 5% of revenue reaches owners as cash, consistently. This is price-taker territory, where the balance sheet and the cycle matter more than any multiple; the rest is in the 10-K.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

Where the money comes from

read the 10-K →

Non-Medicare is 61% of revenue, with Medicare the other meaningful line at 29%.

Revenue by product line, FY2025
  • Non-Medicare61%$3.4B
  • Medicare29%$1.6B
  • Other revenue10%$538M

From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2016–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2016’162017’172018’182019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMMar 2026
Income statement
$4.2B$4.4B$5.1B$5.5B$5.5B$6.2B$4.6B$4.8B$5.2B$5.5B$5.5BRevenueRevenue
3%3%2%2%2%2%3%4%4%3%3%SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev
$300M$356M$417M$472M$568M$714M$145M$267M$268M$336M$322MOperating incomeOp. inc.
7.1%8.2%8.2%8.7%10.3%11.5%3.1%5.5%5.2%6.2%5.8%Operating marginOp. mgn
$115M$177M$138M$148M$259M$402M$159M$243M$214M$146M$134MNet incomeNet inc.
32%30%30%30%24%10%11%17%28%29%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
$347M$238M$494M$445M$1.0B$401M$285M$582M$518M$346M$388MOperating cash flowOp. cash
$145M$160M$202M$213M$206M$203M$206M$209M$204M$140M$143MDepreciationDeprec.
$68M($118M)$131M$58M$536M($235M)($118M)$86M($738K)$43M$94MWorking capital & otherWC & other
$162M$233M$167M$157M$146M$181M$190M$229M$222M$229M$236MCapexCapex
3.8%5.3%3.3%2.9%2.6%2.9%4.1%4.7%4.3%4.2%4.3%Capex / revenueCapex/rev
$185M$78M$327M$288M$882M$221M$94M$353M$296M$206M$245MOwner earningsOwner earn.
4.4%1.8%6.4%5.3%15.9%3.6%2.0%7.3%5.7%3.8%4.4%Owner earnings marginOE mgn
$185M$5M$327M$288M$882M$221M$94M$353M$296M$117M$152MFree cash flowFCF
4.4%0.1%6.4%5.3%15.9%3.6%2.0%7.3%5.7%2.2%2.8%Free cash flow marginFCF mgn
$472M$27M$523M$94M$21M$82M$27M$30M$13M$9M$9MAcquisitionsAcquis.
$0$0$0$0$51M$65M$64M$65M$31M$31MDividends paidDiv. paid
6%10%7%9%10%12%3%5%7%7%4%ROICROIC
14%22%17%19%24%36%14%19%13%9%8%Return on equityROE
14%22%19%24%32%8%14%9%7%6%Retained to equityRetained/eq
Balance sheet
$99M$123M$175M$336M$577M$74M$98M$53M$60M$27M$26MCash & investmentsCash+inv
$574M$692M$707M$763M$897M$889M$941M$724M$821M$864M$949MReceivablesReceiv.
$127M$128M$147M$146M$177M$234M$187M$154M$142M$157M$166MAccounts payablePayables
$447M$564M$560M$617M$720M$655M$755M$570M$679M$707M$783MOperating working capitalOper. WC
$763M$921M$993M$1.2B$1.6B$1.1B$1.3B$1.3B$1.0B$1.0B$1.1BCurrent assetsCur. assets
$572M$605M$705M$914M$1.4B$1.3B$1.2B$1.2B$978M$984M$970MCurrent liabilitiesCur. liab.
1.3×1.5×1.4×1.3×1.1×0.9×1.1×1.0×1.0×1.0×1.1×Current ratioCurr. ratio
$2.8B$2.8B$3.3B$3.4B$3.4B$3.4B$2.3B$2.3B$2.3B$2.4B$2.4BGoodwillGoodwill
$4.9B$5.1B$6.0B$7.3B$7.7B$7.4B$7.7B$7.7B$5.6B$5.9B$6.0BTotal assetsAssets
$2.7B$2.7B$3.3B$3.4B$3.4B$3.6B$3.8B$3.6B$1.7B$1.8B$3.5BTotal debtDebt
$2.6B$2.6B$3.1B$3.1B$2.8B$3.5B$3.7B$3.5B$1.6B$1.8B$3.4BNet debt / (cash)Net debt
1.8×2.3×2.1×2.4×3.7×5.2×0.9×1.3×2.1×2.9×2.7×Interest coverageInt. cov.
$816M$823M$803M$771M$1.1B$1.1B$1.1B$1.3B$1.7B$1.7B$1.8BShareholders’ equityEquity
0.4%0.4%0.5%0.5%0.5%0.5%0.8%0.9%1.9%0.3%0.3%Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev
Per share
128M129M130M130M130M130M125M123M125M123M121MShares out (diluted)Shares
$32.96$33.81$39.01$41.86$42.62$47.64$36.98$39.20$41.63$44.46$45.76Revenue / shareRev/sh
$0.90$1.37$1.06$1.14$2.00$3.09$1.28$1.98$1.72$1.19$1.11EPS (diluted)EPS
$1.45$0.60$2.51$2.21$6.79$1.69$0.76$2.87$2.37$1.68$2.03Owner earnings / shareOE/sh
$1.45$0.04$2.51$2.21$6.79$1.69$0.76$2.87$2.37$0.96$1.26Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh
$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.39$0.52$0.52$0.52$0.26$0.26Dividends / shareDiv/sh
$1.26$1.81$1.28$1.21$1.13$1.39$1.53$1.86$1.78$1.87$1.95Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh
$6.37$6.38$6.17$5.92$8.17$8.52$9.00$10.47$13.49$13.91$14.55Book value / shareBVPS
Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
9-yr5-yr
Revenue / share+3.4%/yr+0.8%/yr
Owner earnings / share+1.7%/yr−24.4%/yr
EPS+3.1%/yr−9.8%/yr
Capital spending / share+4.5%/yr+10.6%/yr
Book value / share+9.1%/yr+11.2%/yr

The record, charted

FY2016–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.

Share count
123Mpeak FY2019
ROIC
7%low FY2022
Net debt ÷ owner earnings
8.6×peak FY2022

Owner earnings vs. net income

Owner earningsNet income

The accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.

$206Mowner earningsvs.$146Mnet incomelow FY2017

Where the cash went

ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedBeyond op. cash

Each year's outlays against its operating cash: the mix, and how it drifts. The hatched cap is spending beyond that year's operating cash — financed from the balance sheet or borrowing, not operations.

FY2016FY2025

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2025 the business earned $206M of owner earnings, the operating cash left after the $140M it takes just to hold its position. It put $89M more into growth; free cash flow, after that spending, was $117M.

Reported net income$146M
Owner earnings$206M · 4% of revenue
FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Reported net income$146M$214M$243M$159M$402M
Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back+$140M+$204M+$209M+$206M+$203M
Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost+$17M+$101M+$44M+$38M+$31M
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items+$43M−$738K+$86M−$118M−$235M
Cash from operations$346M$518M$582M$285M$401M
Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume−$140M−$222M−$229M−$190M−$181M
Owner earnings$206M$296M$353M$94M$221M
Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still−$89M
Free cash flow$117M$296M$353M$94M$221M
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue4%6%7%2%4%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position (here about $140M, roughly its depreciation, the rate its assets wear out). The other $89M of its capital spending is growth it chose, not upkeep it owed; charged only with the maintenance it must do, the business earns well more than the year's free cash flow shows. The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $17M), owner earnings is nearer $189M.

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 10-K · source on SEC EDGAR →

Will it survive?

  • Adequate
    Operating income $336M ÷ interest expense $118M
    What this means

    Comfortable in a normal year, but below the margin of safety Graham looked for. Worth checking how stable the coverage has been across a full cycle.

  • How heavy is the debt, net of cash? $3.4B · 10.2× operating profit
    Heavy net debt
    Cash $27M − debt $3.5B
    What this means

    Netting $27M of cash and short-term investments against $3.5B of debt leaves $3.4B owed, about 10.2× a year's operating profit (10.3× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.

  • Not enough data
    What this means

    The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

Is it a good business?

  • Below average through the cycle
    10-yr median, range 3%–12%; 5% latest = NOPAT $240M ÷ invested capital $5.1B
    Industry peers: median 9%
    What this means

    The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 10 years (it ran 5% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.

  • Thin through the cycle
    10-yr median margin, range 2%–16%; latest $206M = operating cash $346M − maintenance capex $140M
    Industry peers: median 4%
    What this means

    What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 4% of revenue this year, a 4% median across 10 years. It chose to put $89M more into growth, so free cash flow this year was $117M — the gap is investment, not weakness. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $17M of SBC) leaves $189M.

  • Cash-backed
    Cash from ops $346M ÷ net income $146M
    What this means

    How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.

How is the cash used?

  • Reinvests most of it
    Dividends + buybacks $31M ÷ Owner Earnings $206M
    What this means

    Of $206M Owner Earnings, $31M (15%) went back to shareholders, $31M dividends, $0 buybacks. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.

  • Investing or harvesting? 1.63×
    Expanding
    Capex $229M ÷ depreciation $140M
    What this means

    Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.

Graham’s defensive tests · 3 of 6 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size Pass
    Revenue ≥ $2B · $5.5B
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.

  • Strong liquidity Miss
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 1.04×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Conservative debt Miss
    Debt ≤ working capital · $3.5B vs $41M WC
    What this means

    Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.

  • Earnings stability Pass
    A profit every year (10-yr record) · no losses
    What this means

    Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.

  • Dividend record Miss
    Uninterrupted dividends · 5 of 10 yrs
    What this means

    An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.

  • Earnings growth Pass
    Earnings +33% over the record · +40%
    What this means

    At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $1.62/share (latest year $1.18), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $13.75/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Durability & moat, 2016–2025

Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.

  • Profitable years 10 of 10
    What this means

    Never lost money over the record, the earnings stability Graham insisted on.

  • Return on capital ≥ 15% 0 of 10 yrs
    What this means

    A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.

  • Operating margin 8% → 6% (3-yr avg ends)

    In the filing’s words The filing attributes gains to higher prices, but the margin in the record has not followed — the claim outruns the result here.

    What this means

    Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about 8% early to 6% lately, median 7% — competition or costs are biting in.

  • Reinvestment, incremental ROIC returns capital
    What this means

    The capital base barely grew: this business returns cash through dividends and buybacks rather than reinvesting. Judge it on the cash returned, not on compounding.

  • Owner earnings growth +7%/yr
    What this means

    Owner earnings grew about 7% a year over the record.

  • Worst year 2022 · 3.1% op. margin
    What this means

    Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.

  • Share count −0.5%/yr
    What this means

    Roughly flat share count, little dilution, little buyback.

  • Dividend record paid
    What this means

    Paid a dividend in 5 of the years on record.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Moderate contestability

AI is likely to reshape costs and some products here without clearly contesting or sparing the core moat; how the company itself frames it is the tell.

In its own filing Raised, but not as a competitor

The filing raises AI among its risks, but in other terms (security, regulation, energy or the like), not as a competitor to its product; it frames AI mainly as a capability.

The question is whether a moat the record shows as durable outlasts a technology that lowers the cost of part of what the firm sells. The durability is read in the record above, the filing's own framing of AI beside it; the industry label decides nothing on its own.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Current Position

as of the latest quarter, Mar 31, 2026

Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.

Current assets$1.1B
  • Cash & short-term investments$26M
  • Receivables$949M
  • Other current assets$137M
Current liabilities$970M
  • Debt due within a year$17M
  • Accounts payable$166M
  • Other current liabilities$786M
Current ratio1.15×all current assets ÷ what's due · Graham looked for 2×
Quick ratio1.15×stricter: inventory excluded
Cash ratio0.03×strictest: cash alone against what's due
Working capital$142Mthe cushion left after near-term bills
Debt due this year vs. cash$17M due · $26M cash covered by cash on hand, no refinancing forced · both figures from the Mar 31, 2026 balance sheet
Revenue, latest quarter vs. a year ago+5.0%the freshest read on whether the business is still growing
Current ratio, recent quarters1.1× → 1.1×
Deeper floors
Tangible book value($722M)equity stripped of goodwill & intangibles
Net current asset value($2.8B)Graham's net-net: current assets less all liabilities
Debt incl. operating leases$4.6B$1.1B of it operating leases; with finance leases, “total fixed claims” below reaches $4.5B (annual-report basis)

From the company's latest filing.

Debt by another name. What the business owes on the property, aircraft, stores and equipment it rents rather than owns is a fixed claim due on a schedule; added back to the debt, it is the true leverage. That ladder, operating and finance leases together, and what it adds to the debt on the page above.

Operating leasesFinance leases
'26$251M
'27$216M
'28$166M
'29$133M
'30$108M
later$768M

Lease payments by year, scaled to the largest; “later” is everything beyond year five, shown apart. These are the contractual cash payments, before the interest the filing imputes back out to the balance-sheet liability.

Due in the next 12 months$251Ma fixed cash payment, owed whether or not the business has a good year
Total lease payments$1.6Bevery year plus the tail, undiscounted: the full cash the leases will take
On the balance sheet$1.1Bthe present value of those payments, the recognised lease liability

True leverage: debt plus leases

On-balance-sheet debt$3.5B
Lease obligations (present value)$1.1B
Total fixed claims on the business$4.5B

Counting the leases the way Buffett does, the fixed claims on this business come to $4.5B, of which the leases are 24%. The lease wall above and the debt schedule together are the calendar of what must be paid, and when.

Lease ladder read from the ASC 842 tags in the company’s Dec 31, 2025 annual report and reconciled: the yearly buckets sum to the undiscounted total, which less the imputed interest equals the balance-sheet liability; a ladder that doesn’t tie out is withheld.

How the cash was used, 2016–2025

Over the record, the business generated $4.7B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a balanced allocator, splitting cash between the business, owners, and the balance sheet.

  • Reinvested$1.9B · 41%
  • Dividends$275M · 6%
  • Retained (debt / cash)$2.5B · 53%
  • Returned to owners$275M

    9% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $275M as dividends and $0 as buybacks.

  • Source of fundingOperating cash

    Operating cash covered reinvestment and returns; over the span debt rose $764M and cash and short-term investments fell $73M.

  • Net change in share count−5.7%

    The diluted count fell from 128M to 121M, so the buybacks outran the stock issued to staff.

  • Dividend record$0.26/sh

    Paid in 5 of the years on record. It was cut at least once along the way.

  • Return on what it retained5%

    Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out ($1.7B over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) grew $88M, so each retained $1 added about 0.05 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.

Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.

Acquisitions & goodwill

from the balance sheet & the 10-year cash-flow record

Goodwill grows only when a company acquires and falls only when it concedes it overpaid. The size of that bet, the cash put into buying rather than building, and how much has already been written off.

Goodwill & intangibles$2.5B42% of all assets; the premium carried on the balance sheet for businesses acquired
Against book equityexceeds itgoodwill alone is larger than the company’s entire book equity; stripped of the acquisition premium, there is no net book worth
Cash spent acquiring$1.3Bover 10 years buying other businesses, against $1.9B of capital spent building

None written down over the record; the goodwill is still carried at full cost. That is the deals holding their value on the books so far; whether they keep doing so is the test an owner watches, since the write-down, when it comes, is the admission the price was too high.

Goodwill, acquired intangibles and equity from the latest balance sheet; acquisition spend and write-downs summed across the 10-year record, from the company's own filings.

Management, ownership & pay

read the proxy →

From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.

Fiscal yearChief executivePay, as filed“Actually paid”Owner earnings
2021David Chernow and Thomas Mullin$11.7M$13.5M$221M
2022David Chernow and Thomas Mullin$8.8M$5.6M$94M
2023David Chernow and Thomas Mullin$10.7M$10.3M$353M
2024David Chernow and Thomas Mullin$10.3M$14.6M$296M
2025David Chernow and Thomas Mullin$6.5M$5.3M$206M
2025David Chernow and Thomas Mullin$3.0M$2.3M$206M

Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.

  • Insider ownership16%

    The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.

  • CEO pay ratio30:1

    What the chief earns for every dollar the median employee makes, per the 2026 proxy. A high ratio alone settles nothing; some businesses are genuinely top-heavy in scarce skill. A runaway figure is where Buffett starts asking whether the board is doing its job.

  • Stock-based compensation$17M

    The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 0% of revenue, equal to 5% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.

Inverting the record

Invert: instead of why Select Medical Holdings is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.

1 of the 5 tests turned up something to look into; the other 4 came back clean.

  • Look hereDid receivables and inventory outpace sales?14% → 17% of sales

    Receivables and inventory grew from $574M to $949M while revenue grew 31%: working capital is climbing faster than sales (14% of revenue then, 17% now). That can mean customers paying slower, stock building up, or revenue pulled forward. The filing's cash-flow and receivables notes say which.

And these came back clean
  • Is it less profitable than it was?
  • Did the share count rise anyway?
  • Did debt outgrow the business?
  • Did reported profit become cash?

Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.

What an owner would ask, FY2025

read the 10-K →
  • Which reported numbers are a judgment call?
    Management names Revenue recognition, Credit & receivables, Acquisitions, Insurance reserves as critical estimates

    each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →

The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.

Peers, Health Care Providers & Services

The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueGross marginOp. marginROICOwner earn. margin
THCTenet Healthcare$21.3B11.7%18%4%
DGXQuest Diagnostics$11.0B35%14.6%10%12%
ARDTArdent Health Inc.$6.3B5.3%14%
AGLagilon health inc.$5.9B-5.4%-52%-5%
OPCHOption Care Health Inc.$5.6B22%4.6%9%4%
SEMSelect Medical Holdings$5.5B7.6%7%5%
FTREFortrea Holdings Inc.$2.7B1.1%1%5%
MDPediatrix Medical Group Inc.$1.9B10.1%8%11%
Group median6.5%8%5%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Select Medical Holdings has delivered.

$

Through the cycle, Select Medical Holdings earns about $264M on its 4.8% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 3.8% margin runs below that; the reported figure may understate a lean year. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.

Base

The assumptions

9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.

Enter a price above to run it.

Implied by the price
Owner-earnings growth · ’21→’25+12%/yr
Owner-earnings growth · ’16→’25+9%/yr
Owner-earnings yield
P/E (3-yr earnings ’23–’25)
P/B
Graham’s price gate

Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.

Against a high-grade bond: Graham’s yardstick bond yield%

Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.

Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.

Free cash flow $152M on 124M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-03-31; net debt $3.4B. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. Capex ($236M) runs well above depreciation ($143M), so this is a build-out; Steady-state swaps total capex for maintenance (≈ depreciation), lifting the base to about $247M, the cash it would throw off if it stopped expanding. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Select Medical Holdings (SEM), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/SEM, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← SEIC its page in the Manual SENEA →

Industry order: ← PRVA the Health Care Providers & Services chapter SGRY →