Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← SID Manual SII → ← SHOP Software SLP →

SIFY, Sify Technologies Limited

Software asset-light Capital build-out

Revenue is Telecom services (40%), Data center services (36%) and Digital Service (25%).

Latest annual: FY2025 20-F · figures as filed, in INR · 1 ADS = 1 ordinary share
SIFY · Sify Technologies Limited
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
₹39.9B
+11.9% YoY · 12% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 5-yr average
Revenue ₹39.9B 5-yr avg ₹32.1B
Gross margin 38% 5-yr avg 38%
Operating margin 5.7% 5-yr avg 8.2%
ROIC 4% 5-yr avg 6%
Owner-earnings margin 8% 5-yr avg 7%
Free cash flow margin −6% 5-yr avg −6%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What it is
A software business, earning high margins on code once it is written.
Situation
Capital build-out. Capital spending has surged to 28% of sales, today's earnings are charged less depreciation than tomorrow's will be.
What moves the needle
Gross margin has run about 37% and operating margin about 6.7% through the cycle, a solid spread between what it charges and what the product costs to make. The cash cycle has run negative through the cycle (a median of −13 days): the operation is paid before it pays, so working capital releases cash as the business grows rather than tying it up. Read this kind of business on retention and the cost of growth. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Return on capital has sat near the cost of capital (median 8%). The steadier read is owner earnings: roughly 5% of revenue reaches owners as cash, though it swings, and customers and suppliers fund the business through negative working capital. This is price-taker territory, where the balance sheet and the cycle matter more than any multiple; the rest is in the 10-K.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

Where the money comes from

read the 20-F →

Revenue spreads across 3 segments, the largest Telecom services at 40%.

Revenue by reportable segment, FY2025
  • Telecom services40%₹15.8B
  • Data center services36%₹14.2B
  • Digital Service25%₹9.9B
By geographyCountry of domicile92%Foreign countries8%

From the segment footnote of the company's own 20-F. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2016–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2016’162017’172018’182019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMMar 2025
Income statement
₹15.0B₹18.4B₹20.7B₹21.5B₹23.0B₹24.3B₹27.0B₹33.4B₹35.6B₹39.9B₹39.9BRevenueRevenue
39%36%35%37%37%40%41%36%37%38%38%Gross marginGross mgn
₹959M₹958M₹1.3B₹1.8B₹1.9B₹2.4B₹2.9B₹2.6B₹2.4B₹2.3B₹2.3BOperating incomeOp. inc.
6.4%5.2%6.2%8.1%8.2%9.8%10.6%7.9%6.7%5.7%5.7%Operating marginOp. mgn
₹438M₹642M₹923M₹1.1B₹705M₹1.5B₹1.3B₹675M₹169M(₹785M)(₹785M)Net incomeNet inc.
-0%0%0%0%31%4%32%34%52%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
₹2.4B₹1.7B₹2.1B₹1.4B₹5.0B₹7.0B₹2.2B₹8.1B₹5.9B₹8.6B₹8.6BOperating cash flowOp. cash
₹1.6B₹1.8B₹1.8B₹1.5B₹2.3B₹2.8B₹3.3B₹4.0B₹4.8B₹5.6B₹5.6BDepreciationDeprec.
₹406M(₹653M)(₹557M)(₹1.2B)₹2.0B₹2.6B(₹2.3B)₹3.5B₹992M₹3.8B₹3.8BWorking capital & otherWC & other
₹1.5B₹1.6B₹1.7B₹3.8B₹4.1B₹2.7B₹6.8B₹11.6B₹11.1B₹11.1B₹11.1BCapexCapex
9.9%8.7%8.1%17.6%17.7%10.9%25.2%34.8%31.2%27.8%27.8%Capex / revenueCapex/rev
₹958M₹152M₹452M(₹93M)₹2.8B₹4.3B(₹1.0B)₹4.1B₹1.2B₹3.0B₹3.0BOwner earningsOwner earn.
6.4%0.8%2.2%−0.4%12.0%17.7%−3.8%12.4%3.3%7.6%7.6%Owner earnings marginOE mgn
₹958M₹152M₹452M(₹2.4B)₹981M₹4.3B(₹4.6B)(₹3.5B)(₹5.2B)(₹2.4B)(₹2.4B)Free cash flowFCF
6.4%0.8%2.2%−10.9%4.3%17.7%−16.9%−10.5%−14.6%−6.1%−6.1%Free cash flow marginFCF mgn
₹170M₹170M₹209M₹218M₹224M₹0₹0₹0₹0₹23M₹0Dividends paidDiv. paid
10%12%11%8%13%8%5%3%4%4%ROICROIC
6%8%10%10%6%12%9%4%1%-4%-4%Return on equityROE
4%6%8%8%4%12%9%4%1%−4%−4%Retained to equityRetained/eq
Balance sheet
₹1.4B₹1.6B₹2.0B₹1.9B₹2.3B₹5.1B₹3.8B₹3.7B₹4.1B₹5.0B₹5.0BCash & investmentsCash+inv
₹8.8B₹10.7B₹12.6B₹12.1B₹9.7B₹14.1B₹14.6B₹14.1B₹14.8B₹14.8BReceivablesReceiv.
₹1.2B₹646M₹1.7B₹1.3B₹1.4B₹2.4B₹1.9B₹3.4B₹4.0B₹4.0BInventoryInvent.
₹6.4B₹7.4B₹8.1B₹9.1B₹9.2B₹11.3B₹12.8B₹14.0B₹17.2B₹17.2BAccounts payablePayables
₹3.6B₹4.0B₹6.2B₹4.3B₹1.9B₹5.1B₹3.7B₹3.5B₹1.6B₹1.6BOperating working capitalOper. WC
₹12.1B₹14.1B₹17.1B₹16.6B₹17.2B₹22.0B₹22.3B₹24.2B₹26.6B₹26.6BCurrent assetsCur. assets
₹11.4B₹12.2B₹14.4B₹16.5B₹16.9B₹21.1B₹22.1B₹23.6B₹27.7B₹27.7BCurrent liabilitiesCur. liab.
1.1×1.2×1.2×1.0×1.0×1.0×1.0×1.0×1.0×1.0×Current ratioCurr. ratio
₹15M₹15M₹15M₹15M₹15M₹15M₹0₹0₹0₹0GoodwillGoodwill
₹21.5B₹24.5B₹29.9B₹34.3B₹36.7B₹47.1B₹57.4B₹71.0B₹83.2B₹83.2BTotal assetsAssets
₹3.4B₹3.5B₹6.7B₹8.1B₹9.4B₹14.9B₹21.5B₹30.0B₹35.4B₹35.4BTotal debtDebt
₹1.8B₹1.5B₹4.7B₹5.8B₹4.3B₹11.1B₹17.9B₹25.9B₹30.4B₹30.4BNet debt / (cash)Net debt
1.7×2.2×2.6×2.4×1.8×2.5×2.6×1.6×1.1×0.8×0.8×Interest coverageInt. cov.
₹7.5B₹8.3B₹9.0B₹10.8B₹11.4B₹13.2B₹14.5B₹15.1B₹18.1B₹20.1B₹20.1BShareholders’ equityEquity
Per share
282M289M301M309M358M359M365M366M366M373M373MShares out (diluted)Shares
₹53.30₹63.78₹68.76₹69.81₹64.05₹67.73₹74.06₹91.37₹97.34₹106.88₹106.88Revenue / shareRev/sh
₹1.55₹2.22₹3.07₹3.46₹1.97₹4.27₹3.45₹1.84₹0.46₹-2.10₹-2.10EPS (diluted)EPS
₹3.40₹0.53₹1.50₹-0.30₹7.68₹12.01₹-2.85₹11.33₹3.17₹8.08₹8.08Owner earnings / shareOE/sh
₹3.40₹0.53₹1.50₹-7.63₹2.74₹12.01₹-12.49₹-9.58₹-14.17₹-6.56₹-6.56Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh
₹0.60₹0.59₹0.69₹0.71₹0.62₹0.00₹0.00₹0.00₹0.00₹0.06₹0.00Dividends / shareDiv/sh
₹5.26₹5.52₹5.55₹12.30₹11.34₹7.40₹18.64₹31.77₹30.38₹29.73₹29.73Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh
₹26.59₹28.60₹29.93₹34.92₹31.68₹36.67₹39.67₹41.43₹49.37₹53.95₹53.95Book value / shareBVPS

Share counts before 2025 are restated ×2 for a stock split, so per-share figures sit on one basis.

Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
9-yr5-yr
Revenue / share+8.0%/yr+10.8%/yr
Owner earnings / share+10.1%/yr+1.0%/yr
Dividends / share−22.6%/yr−37.3%/yr
Capital spending / share+21.2%/yr+21.3%/yr
Book value / share+8.2%/yr+11.2%/yr

The record, charted

FY2016–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked. Share counts on the current split basis.

Share count
373Mpeak FY2025
ROIC
4%low FY2024
Gross margin
38%low FY2018
Net debt ÷ owner earnings
10.1×peak FY2024

Owner earnings vs. net income

Owner earningsNet income

The accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.

₹3.0Bowner earningsvs.(₹785M)net incomelow FY2022

Where the cash went

ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetained

Each year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.

FY2016FY2025

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2025 the business earned ₹3.0B of owner earnings, the operating cash left after the ₹5.6B it takes just to hold its position. It put ₹5.5B more into growth; free cash flow, after that spending, was (₹2.4B).

FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Reported net income(₹785M)₹169M₹675M₹1.3B₹1.5B
Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back+₹5.6B+₹4.8B+₹4.0B+₹3.3B+₹2.8B
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items+₹3.8B+₹992M+₹3.5B−₹2.3B+₹2.6B
Cash from operations₹8.6B₹5.9B₹8.1B₹2.2B₹7.0B
Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume−₹5.6B−₹4.8B−₹4.0B−₹3.3B−₹2.7B
Owner earnings₹3.0B₹1.2B₹4.1B(₹1.0B)₹4.3B
Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still−₹5.5B−₹6.3B−₹7.6B−₹3.5B
Free cash flow(₹2.4B)(₹5.2B)(₹3.5B)(₹4.6B)₹4.3B
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue8%3%12%-4%18%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position (here about ₹5.6B, roughly its depreciation, the rate its assets wear out). The other ₹5.5B of its capital spending is growth it chose, not upkeep it owed; charged only with the maintenance it must do, the business earns well more than the year's free cash flow shows.

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 20-F · source on SEC EDGAR →
Material weakness in financial controls
“Remediation of Previously Disclosed Material Weaknesses A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial…”
Restated past financials
“Our Compensation/Nomination and Remuneration Committee assessed the applicability of the Clawback Policy in light of the restatement of the financial statements in Amendment No.1 to our annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2024.”

The figures below are only as sound as the controls that produced them. read the note →

Will it survive?

  • Does not cover its interest
    Operating income ₹2.3B ÷ interest expense ₹2.7B
    What this means

    A full year of operating profit didn't cover the interest bill. This is the zombie zone: the business depends on refinancing, asset sales, or forbearance to service its debt.

  • How heavy is the debt, net of cash? ₹30.4B · 13.5× operating profit
    Heavy net debt
    Cash ₹5.0B − debt ₹35.4B
    What this means

    Netting ₹5.0B of cash and short-term investments against ₹35.4B of debt leaves ₹30.4B owed, about 13.5× a year's operating profit (15.7× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.

  • Negative, funded by others
    DSO 136 + DIO 58 − DPO 252 days
    What this means

    Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. A negative cycle is a quiet moat: suppliers and customers fund the operation (Buffett's “float”), the company grows on other people's money.

Is it a good business?

  • Below average through the cycle
    9-yr median, range 3%–13%; 4% latest = NOPAT ₹1.8B ÷ invested capital ₹50.5B
    Industry peers: median 18%
    What this means

    The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 9 years (it ran 4% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.

  • Solid, recently turned positive
    latest ₹3.0B = operating cash ₹8.6B − maintenance capex ₹5.6B; positive each of the last 3 years, after an earlier loss stretch (10-yr median 3%)
    Industry peers: median 19%
    What this means

    What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 8% of revenue this year, a 3% median across 10 years. It chose to put ₹5.5B more into growth, so free cash flow this year was (₹2.4B) — the gap is investment, not weakness.

  • Loss, but cash-generative
    Net income (₹785M) · cash from operations ₹8.6B

    In the filing’s words The filing discloses a material weakness in its financial controls — the reported numbers here, and the record built on them, are only as reliable as the controls that produced them.

    What this means

    The company reported a net loss, so a conversion ratio isn't meaningful. What matters then is whether operations still threw off cash, here, they did.

How is the cash used?

  • Reinvests most of it
    Dividends + buybacks ₹0 ÷ Owner Earnings ₹3.0B
    What this means

    Of ₹3.0B Owner Earnings, ₹0 (0%) went back to shareholders, ₹0 dividends, ₹0 buybacks. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.

  • Investing or harvesting? 1.97×
    Expanding
    Capex ₹11.1B ÷ depreciation ₹5.6B
    What this means

    Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.

Graham’s defensive tests · 0 of 5 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size
    Revenue ≥ $2B (a dollar floor) · ₹39.9B
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's floor is a dollar figure — about $2B of revenue as a conservative modern stand-in. This company reports in its home currency and we carry no exchange rate, so we show the figure and leave the size bar for you to apply rather than convert it with a number we don't have.

  • Strong liquidity Miss
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 0.96×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Conservative debt Miss
    Debt ≤ working capital · ₹35.4B vs (₹1.1B) WC
    What this means

    Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.

  • Earnings stability Near
    A profit every year (10-yr record) · 1 loss year
    What this means

    Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.

  • Dividend record Miss
    Uninterrupted dividends · 6 of 10 yrs
    What this means

    An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.

  • Earnings growth Miss
    Earnings +33% over the record · −97%
    What this means

    At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are ₹0.04/share (latest year ₹-1.81), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is ₹46.32/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Durability & moat, 2016–2025

Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.

  • Profitable years 9 of 10
    What this means

    Lost money in 1 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.

  • Return on capital ≥ 15% 0 of 9 yrs
    What this means

    A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.

  • Operating margin 6% → 7% (3-yr avg ends)
    What this means

    Through the cycle the operating margin held roughly steady — about 6% early, 7% lately, median 7%.

  • Reinvestment, incremental ROIC 2%
    What this means

    Reinvested capital came back at only a modest incremental return — near the cost of capital, where extra growth adds little per dollar. The record shows whether it is a soft stretch or a thinning moat.

  • Owner earnings growth +16%/yr
    What this means

    Owner earnings grew about 16% a year over the record.

  • Worst year 2017 · 5.2% op. margin
    What this means

    Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.

  • Dividend record paid
    What this means

    Paid a dividend in 6 of the years on record.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Elevated contestability

The product is software or information, the very thing capable AI now produces more cheaply, so the moat is more contestable than the record alone implies.

In its own filing Raised, but not as a competitor

The filing raises AI among its risks, but in other terms (security, regulation, energy or the like), not as a competitor to its product; it frames AI mainly as a capability.

AI has collapsed the cost of building a capable substitute for the very thing this business sells. When a credible alternative can be assembled for a fraction of the incumbent's price, it is pricing power that erodes first, not revenue tomorrow. The live question is whether the moat survives that, not whether it held in the past. Whether that question is answerable at all is yours to decide, against your own circle of competence.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Current Position

as of fiscal year-end, Mar 31, 2025

Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.

Current assets₹26.6B
  • Cash & short-term investments₹5.0B
  • Receivables₹14.8B
  • Inventory₹4.0B
  • Other current assets₹2.8B
Current liabilities₹27.7B
  • Debt due within a year₹7.1B
  • Accounts payable₹17.2B
  • Other current liabilities₹3.3B
Current ratio0.96×all current assets ÷ what's due · Graham looked for 2×
Quick ratio0.82×stricter: inventory excluded
Cash ratio0.18×strictest: cash alone against what's due
Working capital(₹1.1B)the cushion left after near-term bills
Debt due this year vs. cash₹7.1B due · ₹5.0B cash cash alone won't cover the maturities; it leans on refinancing or operating cash · both figures from the Mar 31, 2025 balance sheet
Deeper floors
Tangible book value₹17.7Bequity stripped of goodwill & intangibles
Net current asset value(₹36.5B)Graham's net-net: current assets less all liabilities
Debt incl. operating leases₹39.2B₹3.8B of it operating leases
Deferred revenue₹2.8Bcustomer cash collected before delivery; operating float

From the company's latest filing.

How the cash was used, 2016–2025

Over the record, the business generated ₹44.7B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a reinvestor, most operating cash is plowed back into the business.

  • Reinvested₹55.9B · 125%
  • Dividends₹1.0B · 2%
  • Returned to owners₹1.0B

    6% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, ₹1.0B as dividends and ₹0 as buybacks.

  • Source of funding−₹12.2B

    Reinvestment and shareholder returns ran ₹12.2B beyond the operating cash the business generated, so the gap was financed off the balance sheet.

  • Net change in share count32.3%

    The diluted count rose from 282M to 373M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.

  • Dividend record₹0.06/sh

    Paid in 6 of the years on record, the per-share dividend shrinking about 23% a year. It was cut at least once along the way.

  • Return on what it retained40%

    Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out (₹5.6B over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) grew ₹2.3B, so each retained ₹1 added about 0.40 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.

Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.

Inverting the record

Invert: instead of why Sify Technologies Limited is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.

1 of the 3 tests turned up something to look into; the other 2 came back clean.

  • Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?32.3%

    Diluted shares grew 32.3% over 2016–2025. Owners were diluted on net; each share owns less of the business than it did. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.

And these came back clean
  • Is it less profitable than it was?
  • Did reported profit become cash?

Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.

What an owner would ask, FY2026

read the 10-K →
  • How much of the revenue rides on one buyer?
    ≈₹8.0B · 20% of revenue on the largest customer (TTM)
    “During the year under review revenue from one customer of the Group's data center and network services segment is 8,809 million which is more than 20 % of the Group's total revenue. 166 35.”verify →

The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.

Peers, Software

The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueGross marginOp. marginROICOwner earn. margin
METAMeta Platforms Inc.$201.0B82%40.5%25%45%
CRMSalesforce Inc.$41.5B74%3.7%3%22%
SIFYSify Technologies Limited₹39.9B37%7.3%8%5%
XYZBlock Inc.$24.2B34%-0.7%-1%4%
ADBEAdobe Inc.$23.8B87%32.2%33%39%
CTSHCognizant$21.1B15.3%18%12%
ADPAutomatic Data Processing Inc.$20.6B43%21.3%46%19%
FLUTFlutter Entertainment plc$16.4B48%-0.4%-0%8%
Group median48%11.3%13%15%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Enter the US price, in dollars: the NYSE/Nasdaq quote you hold. Per the filing's own cover, “ADSs (each representing one”; Sify Technologies Limited reports in INR, so every figure in this tool is stated per ADS and translated at INR 1 = $0.010 (2026-07-17, reference rate) so your dollar quote reconciles exactly. The record tables elsewhere on this page remain as filed, in INR.

Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Sify Technologies Limited has delivered.

Sify Technologies Limited’s latest year shows negative owner earnings, the mark of a build-out: total capital spending outruns the cash the business throws off today. So the tool opens on the steady-state base (maintenance capex in place of the build-out spend), the cash it would earn at rest; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.

$

Through the cycle, Sify Technologies Limited earns about $20M on its 4.8% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 7.6% margin runs above that; the reported figure may flatter a peak you'd be paying on. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year. It comes pre-checked here for that reason, the same rule that already normalizes a trough; clear it to price the year as filed.

Base

The assumptions

9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.

Enter a price above to run it.

Implied by the price
Owner-earnings growth · ’21→’25+6%/yr
Owner-earnings growth · ’16→’25+16%/yr
Owner-earnings yield
P/E (3-yr earnings ’23–’25)
P/B
Graham’s price gate

Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.

Against a high-grade bond: Graham’s yardstick bond yield%

Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.

Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.

Free cash flow ($25M) on 435M shares outstanding, per the 20-F cover, as of 2026-03-31; net debt $315M. The base opens on the through-cycle figure (the latest year sits above the record’s own median, and Graham’s averaging cuts both ways); clear Normalize to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. Capex ($115M) runs well above depreciation ($58M), so this is a build-out; Steady-state swaps total capex for maintenance (≈ depreciation), lifting the base to about $31M, the cash it would throw off if it stopped expanding. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Sify Technologies Limited (SIFY), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/SIFY, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← SID its page in the Manual SII →

Industry order: ← SHOP the Software chapter SLP →