Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← SLGL Manual SMFG → ← SII Capital Markets & Asset Management SLNHP →

SLMT, Brera Holdings PLC

An asset-light business: the value sits in intellectual property and people, not plant, so the question is how durable the advantage is, not how high the margin.

Latest annual: FY2024 20-F · figures as filed, in EUR
SLMT · Brera Holdings PLC
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2024
€3M
+119.7% YoY · 85% 4-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 5-yr average
Revenue €3M 5-yr avg €893K
Operating margin −270.2% 5-yr avg −290.0%
ROIC −81% 5-yr avg −361%
Owner-earnings margin −185% 5-yr avg −226%
Free cash flow margin −188% 5-yr avg −231%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What moves the needle
Operating margin has run around −220% through the cycle on a 88% gross margin, the operating line in the red even at its best — so the lever is whether the spending below the gross line can come down enough to clear a profit: revenue growth against the cost curve, and the cash runway until it does. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2020–2024

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2020’202021’212022’222023’232024’24TTMTTMDec 2024
Income statement
€215K€420K€162K€1M€3M€3MRevenueRevenue
(€10K)(€7K)(€1M)(€5M)(€6M)(€7M)Operating incomeOp. inc.
−4.7%−1.7%−755.3%−468.1%−220.4%−270.2%Operating marginOp. mgn
€3K(€87K)€1M€4M€4M€4MNet incomeNet inc.
1%-1%-1%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
€29K€27K(€917K)(€2M)(€3M)(€5M)Operating cash flowOp. cash
€1K€69K€96K€24K€112K€112KDepreciationDeprec.
€25K€45K(€2M)(€7M)(€8M)(€8M)Working capital & otherWC & other
€16K€1K€200K€199K€198KCapexCapex
3.9%0.7%17.4%7.9%7.8%Capex / revenueCapex/rev
€10K(€919K)(€2M)(€3M)(€5M)Owner earningsOwner earn.
2.5%−565.6%−212.8%−128.3%−184.8%Owner earnings marginOE mgn
€10K(€919K)(€3M)(€3M)(€5M)Free cash flowFCF
2.5%−565.6%−228.2%−131.7%−188.3%Free cash flow marginFCF mgn
€96€187€183€183Dividends paidDiv. paid
-495%-227%-81%ROICROIC
151%111%39%Return on equityROE
Balance sheet
€27K€347K€2M€2M€658KCash & investmentsCash+inv
€122K€32K€98K€9K€262KReceivablesReceiv.
€297K€613K€4M€3M€7MAccounts payablePayables
(€176K)(€581K)(€4M)(€3M)(€7M)Operating working capitalOper. WC
€221K€825K€3M€3M€3MCurrent assetsCur. assets
€534K€1M€4M€4M€10MCurrent liabilitiesCur. liab.
0.4×0.8×0.7×0.7×0.3×Current ratioCurr. ratio
€592K€242K€10MGoodwillGoodwill
€598K€1M€8M€10M€28MTotal assetsAssets
€25K€22K€424K€54KTotal debtDebt
(€2K)(€325K)(€2M)(€604K)Net debt / (cash)Net debt
-27.3×-2.6×-245.9×-1372.3×-1739.9×Interest coverageInt. cov.
(€167K)(€254K)(€131K)€3M€4M€9MShareholders’ equityEquity

Owner earnings vs. net income

Owner earningsNet income

The accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.

(€3M)owner earningsvs.€4Mnet incomelow FY2024

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2024 the business earned (€3M) of owner earnings, the operating cash left after the €112K it takes just to hold its position. It put €87K more into growth; free cash flow, after that spending, was (€3M).

FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Reported net income€4M€4M€1M(€87K)
Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back+€112K+€24K+€96K+€69K
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items−€8M−€7M−€2M+€45K
Cash from operations(€3M)(€2M)(€917K)€27K
Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume−€112K−€24K−€1K−€16K
Owner earnings(€3M)(€2M)(€919K)€10K
Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still−€87K−€176K
Free cash flow(€3M)(€3M)(€919K)€10K
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue-128%-213%-566%2%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position (here about €112K, roughly its depreciation, the rate its assets wear out). The other €87K of its capital spending is growth it chose, not upkeep it owed; charged only with the maintenance it must do, the business earns well more than the year's free cash flow shows.

Much of fiscal 2024's profit didn't arrive as operating cash; it sits in “working capital & other” above. That can be a real inventory or timing swing, or profit that doesn't run through operating cash at all: a heavy tax year, equity-method earnings, or investment income booked through investing. For a year like this, owner earnings understates the cash earned; the full cash-flow statement carries the rest.

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2024 20-F · source on SEC EDGAR →

Will it survive?

  • Does not cover its interest
    Operating income (€7M) ÷ interest expense €4K
    What this means

    A full year of operating profit didn't cover the interest bill. This is the zombie zone: the business depends on refinancing, asset sales, or forbearance to service its debt.

  • Net cash
    Cash €658K − debt €54K
    What this means

    Cash and short-term investments exceed every dollar of debt by €604K, on net the company owes nothing, and can act from strength when others can't. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.

  • Negative, funded by others
    DSO 38 + DIO 89 − DPO 38699 days
    What this means

    Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. A negative cycle is a quiet moat: suppliers and customers fund the operation (Buffett's “float”), the company grows on other people's money.

Is it a good business?

  • Below average
    NOPAT (€7M) ÷ invested capital €8M (debt + equity − cash)
    Industry peers: median -46%
    What this means

    The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.

  • Consumes cash through the cycle
    4-yr median margin, range -566%–2%; latest (€5M) = operating cash (€5M) − maintenance capex €112K
    Industry peers: median 6%
    What this means

    What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's -185% of revenue this year, a -213% median across 4 years.

  • Thinly cash-backed
    Cash from ops (€5M) ÷ net income €4M

    In the filing’s words Read against the cash, reported earnings have run ahead of the operating cash the business generated over the record — about 81% of assets a year, among the widest gaps in the catalogue. For an inventory- or content-heavy grower that can be cash tied up in real assets as it expands; elsewhere it can mean the earnings lean on accounting estimates — the cash-flow statement against the income statement is where to tell which.

    What this means

    How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.

How is the cash used?

  • No surplus to allocate
    What this means

    The business didn't generate positive Owner Earnings this year, so any distributions came from the balance sheet or borrowing, not from operations.

  • Investing or harvesting? 1.77×
    Expanding
    Capex €198K ÷ depreciation €112K
    What this means

    Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.

Graham’s defensive tests · 0 of 4 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size
    Revenue ≥ $2B (a dollar floor) · €3M
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's floor is a dollar figure — about $2B of revenue as a conservative modern stand-in. This company reports in its home currency and we carry no exchange rate, so we show the figure and leave the size bar for you to apply rather than convert it with a number we don't have.

  • Strong liquidity Miss
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 0.28×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Conservative debt Miss
    Debt ≤ working capital · €54K vs (€7M) WC
    What this means

    Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.

  • Earnings stability Near
    A profit every year (5-yr record) · 1 loss year
    What this means

    Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.

  • Dividend record Miss
    Uninterrupted dividends · 3 of 5 yrs
    What this means

    An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are €4.13/share (latest year €4.34), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is €11.06/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Durability & moat, 2020–2024

Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.

  • Profitable years 4 of 5
    What this means

    Lost money in 1 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.

  • Operating margin −3% → −344% (2-yr avg ends)
    What this means

    Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about −3% early to −344% lately, median −220% — competition or costs are biting in.

  • Reinvestment, incremental ROIC returns capital
    What this means

    The capital base barely grew: this business returns cash through dividends and buybacks rather than reinvesting. Judge it on the cash returned, not on compounding.

  • Worst year 2022 · −755.3% op. margin
    What this means

    Operations went underwater in 2022, understand why before trusting the good years.

  • Share count +0.0%/yr
    What this means

    Roughly flat share count, little dilution, little buyback.

  • Dividend record rising
    What this means

    Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Low contestability

The moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.

In its own filing Raised, but not as a competitor

The filing raises AI among its risks, but in other terms (security, regulation, energy or the like), not as a competitor to its product; it frames AI mainly as a capability.

AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat, and the company is using it that way.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Current Position

as of fiscal year-end, Jun 30, 2025

Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.

Current assets€3M
  • Cash & short-term investments€658K
  • Receivables€262K
  • Inventory€16K
  • Other current assets€2M
Current liabilities€10M
  • Debt due within a year€6K
  • Accounts payable€7M
  • Other current liabilities€3M
Current ratio0.28×all current assets ÷ what's due · Graham looked for 2×
Quick ratio0.28×stricter: inventory excluded
Cash ratio0.07×strictest: cash alone against what's due
Working capital(€7M)the cushion left after near-term bills

Its current ratio is below 1, which usually reads as strain; here it is likely structural strength. This business collects from customers before it pays suppliers (a negative cash-conversion cycle), so the balance sheet is funded by that float, the way Costco's and Amazon's are. The low ratio can be the edge, not the risk; the cash-conversion cycle and the debt due above say which.

Debt due this year vs. cash€6K due · €658K cash covered by cash on hand, no refinancing forced · both figures from the Jun 30, 2025 balance sheet
Cash runway0.1 yrsthe business is consuming cash; this is how long the cash on hand lasts at that rate
Deeper floors
Tangible book value(€16M)equity stripped of goodwill & intangibles
Net current asset value(€16M)Graham's net-net: current assets less all liabilities
Debt incl. operating leases€619K€565K of it operating leases
Deferred revenue€291Kcustomer cash collected before delivery; operating float

From the company's latest filing.

Acquisitions & goodwill

from the balance sheet & the 5-year cash-flow record

Goodwill grows only when a company acquires and falls only when it concedes it overpaid. The size of that bet, the cash put into buying rather than building, and how much has already been written off.

Goodwill & intangibles€25M90% of all assets; the premium carried on the balance sheet for businesses acquired
Against book equityexceeds itgoodwill alone is larger than the company’s entire book equity; stripped of the acquisition premium, there is no net book worth
Cash spent acquiring€0over 5 years buying other businesses, against €417K of capital spent building

None written down over the record; the goodwill is still carried at full cost. That is the deals holding their value on the books so far; whether they keep doing so is the test an owner watches, since the write-down, when it comes, is the admission the price was too high.

Goodwill, acquired intangibles and equity from the latest balance sheet; acquisition spend and write-downs summed across the 5-year record, from the company's own filings.

What an owner would ask, FY2025

read the 10-K →
  • How much of the revenue rides on one buyer?
    ≈€252K · 10% of revenue on the largest customers (TTM)
    “Concentration Risk Two customers accounted for over 10% of the Company's total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2025.”verify →

The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.

Peers, Capital Markets & Asset Management

The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueGross marginOp. marginROICOwner earn. margin
ENVAEnova International Inc.$3.2B50%21.6%10%56%
CHYMChime Financial Inc.$2.2B88%-18.4%-88%2%
MSTRStrategy Inc Common Stock Class A$477M80%-13.0%-2%6%
WLTHWealthfront Corporation$365M90%37.2%-46%
LPROOpen Lending Corporation$93M77%53.2%45%50%
SBETSharplink Inc.$28M31%-294.4%-308%-117%
SLMTBrera Holdings PLC€3M-220.4%-81%-171%
ZSQRZ Squared Inc.$1M87%-956.9%-287%
Group median-15.7%-63%4%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Enter the home-market price, not the US ADR quote. Brera Holdings PLC reports in EUR, and every figure here (owner earnings, book value, the share count) is on that EUR, ordinary-share basis. Enter the price on the same basis: the local-exchange quote per ordinary share in EUR. A US ADR price in dollars bundles the ADR-to-ordinary ratio and the exchange rate, so it will not reconcile with these figures and would throw the multiple off.

Brera Holdings PLC is profitable, but owner earnings are negative this year because capital spending currently outruns operating cash, a build-out, so the owner-earnings reverse-DCF has no positive base to grow. We read the price from both ends instead: type a price to see the steady-state profitability it demands, then set the mature margin you would believe and weigh the two against each other. Nothing leaves your browser unless you enter it in your notebook.

The assumptions

Revenue, delivered81%/yr’20→’24

Enter a price to run it.

Owner earnings it must reach
Margin the price demands
Owner-earnings margin today−188%

Two reads of one future. From your price: the owner earnings the company must reach, valued at a mature multiple and discounted back at your rate, expressed as the margin it implies on revenue grown at your rate. From your belief: the mature margin you would credit, set on the dial above. When the margin the price demands runs above the one you would believe, you are paying for a future taken on faith. For a deep cyclical at a trough, normalized through-cycle earnings are the better lens; this mode is for the genuinely unprofitable, and for the profitable business whose capital spending currently outruns its cash.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Brera Holdings PLC (SLMT), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/SLMT, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← SLGL its page in the Manual SMFG →

Industry order: ← SII the Capital Markets & Asset Management chapter SLNHP →