← All companies ← SLGL Manual SMFG → ← SII Capital Markets & Asset Management SLNHP →
SLMT, Brera Holdings PLC
An asset-light business: the value sits in intellectual property and people, not plant, so the question is how durable the advantage is, not how high the margin.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What moves the needle
- Operating margin has run around −220% through the cycle on a 88% gross margin, the operating line in the red even at its best — so the lever is whether the spending below the gross line can come down enough to clear a profit: revenue growth against the cost curve, and the cash runway until it does. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2020–2024
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | TTMTTMDec 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||
| €215K | €420K | €162K | €1M | €3M | €3M | RevenueRevenue |
| (€10K) | (€7K) | (€1M) | (€5M) | (€6M) | (€7M) | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| −4.7% | −1.7% | −755.3% | −468.1% | −220.4% | −270.2% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| €3K | (€87K) | €1M | €4M | €4M | €4M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| — | — | — | 1% | -1% | -1% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | ||||||
| €29K | €27K | (€917K) | (€2M) | (€3M) | (€5M) | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| €1K | €69K | €96K | €24K | €112K | €112K | DepreciationDeprec. |
| €25K | €45K | (€2M) | (€7M) | (€8M) | (€8M) | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| — | €16K | €1K | €200K | €199K | €198K | CapexCapex |
| — | 3.9% | 0.7% | 17.4% | 7.9% | 7.8% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| — | €10K | (€919K) | (€2M) | (€3M) | (€5M) | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| — | 2.5% | −565.6% | −212.8% | −128.3% | −184.8% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| — | €10K | (€919K) | (€3M) | (€3M) | (€5M) | Free cash flowFCF |
| — | 2.5% | −565.6% | −228.2% | −131.7% | −188.3% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| €96 | €187 | €183 | — | — | €183 | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| — | — | — | -495% | -227% | -81% | ROICROIC |
| — | — | — | 151% | 111% | 39% | Return on equityROE |
| Balance sheet | ||||||
| — | €27K | €347K | €2M | €2M | €658K | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| — | €122K | €32K | €98K | €9K | €262K | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| — | €297K | €613K | €4M | €3M | €7M | Accounts payablePayables |
| — | (€176K) | (€581K) | (€4M) | (€3M) | (€7M) | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| — | €221K | €825K | €3M | €3M | €3M | Current assetsCur. assets |
| — | €534K | €1M | €4M | €4M | €10M | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| — | 0.4× | 0.8× | 0.7× | 0.7× | 0.3× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| — | — | — | €592K | €242K | €10M | GoodwillGoodwill |
| — | €598K | €1M | €8M | €10M | €28M | Total assetsAssets |
| — | €25K | €22K | €424K | — | €54K | Total debtDebt |
| — | (€2K) | (€325K) | (€2M) | — | (€604K) | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| -27.3× | -2.6× | -245.9× | -1372.3× | — | -1739.9× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| (€167K) | (€254K) | (€131K) | €3M | €4M | €9M | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2024 the business earned (€3M) of owner earnings, the operating cash left after the €112K it takes just to hold its position. It put €87K more into growth; free cash flow, after that spending, was (€3M).
| FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | €4M | €4M | €1M | (€87K) |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +€112K | +€24K | +€96K | +€69K |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | −€8M | −€7M | −€2M | +€45K |
| Cash from operations | (€3M) | (€2M) | (€917K) | €27K |
| Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume | −€112K | −€24K | −€1K | −€16K |
| Owner earnings | (€3M) | (€2M) | (€919K) | €10K |
| Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still | −€87K | −€176K | — | — |
| Free cash flow | (€3M) | (€3M) | (€919K) | €10K |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | -128% | -213% | -566% | 2% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position (here about €112K, roughly its depreciation, the rate its assets wear out). The other €87K of its capital spending is growth it chose, not upkeep it owed; charged only with the maintenance it must do, the business earns well more than the year's free cash flow shows.
Much of fiscal 2024's profit didn't arrive as operating cash; it sits in “working capital & other” above. That can be a real inventory or timing swing, or profit that doesn't run through operating cash at all: a heavy tax year, equity-method earnings, or investment income booked through investing. For a year like this, owner earnings understates the cash earned; the full cash-flow statement carries the rest.
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- Can it pay its interest? -1739.9×Does not cover its interestOperating income (€7M) ÷ interest expense €4K
What this means
A full year of operating profit didn't cover the interest bill. This is the zombie zone: the business depends on refinancing, asset sales, or forbearance to service its debt.
- Net cashCash €658K − debt €54K
What this means
Cash and short-term investments exceed every dollar of debt by €604K, on net the company owes nothing, and can act from strength when others can't. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- How long is cash tied up? -38572dNegative, funded by othersDSO 38 + DIO 89 − DPO 38699 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. A negative cycle is a quiet moat: suppliers and customers fund the operation (Buffett's “float”), the company grows on other people's money.
Is it a good business?
- Below averageNOPAT (€7M) ÷ invested capital €8M (debt + equity − cash)Industry peers: median -46%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Owner-earnings margin -213%Consumes cash through the cycle4-yr median margin, range -566%–2%; latest (€5M) = operating cash (€5M) − maintenance capex €112KIndustry peers: median 6%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's -185% of revenue this year, a -213% median across 4 years.
- Are earnings backed by cash? -1.29×Thinly cash-backedCash from ops (€5M) ÷ net income €4M
In the filing’s words Read against the cash, reported earnings have run ahead of the operating cash the business generated over the record — about 81% of assets a year, among the widest gaps in the catalogue. For an inventory- or content-heavy grower that can be cash tied up in real assets as it expands; elsewhere it can mean the earnings lean on accounting estimates — the cash-flow statement against the income statement is where to tell which.
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- No surplus to allocate
What this means
The business didn't generate positive Owner Earnings this year, so any distributions came from the balance sheet or borrowing, not from operations.
- Investing or harvesting? 1.77×ExpandingCapex €198K ÷ depreciation €112K
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 0 of 4 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size —Revenue ≥ $2B (a dollar floor) · €3M
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's floor is a dollar figure — about $2B of revenue as a conservative modern stand-in. This company reports in its home currency and we carry no exchange rate, so we show the figure and leave the size bar for you to apply rather than convert it with a number we don't have.
- Strong liquidity MissCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 0.28×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt MissDebt ≤ working capital · €54K vs (€7M) WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability NearA profit every year (5-yr record) · 1 loss year
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record MissUninterrupted dividends · 3 of 5 yrs
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are €4.13/share (latest year €4.34), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is €11.06/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2020–2024
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 4 of 5
What this means
Lost money in 1 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Operating margin −3% → −344% (2-yr avg ends)
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about −3% early to −344% lately, median −220% — competition or costs are biting in.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC returns capital
What this means
The capital base barely grew: this business returns cash through dividends and buybacks rather than reinvesting. Judge it on the cash returned, not on compounding.
- Worst year 2022 · −755.3% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2022, understand why before trusting the good years.
- Share count +0.0%/yr
What this means
Roughly flat share count, little dilution, little buyback.
- Dividend record rising
What this means
Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
The filing raises AI among its risks, but in other terms (security, regulation, energy or the like), not as a competitor to its product; it frames AI mainly as a capability.
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat, and the company is using it that way.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of fiscal year-end, Jun 30, 2025Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments€658K
- Receivables€262K
- Inventory€16K
- Other current assets€2M
- Debt due within a year€6K
- Accounts payable€7M
- Other current liabilities€3M
Its current ratio is below 1, which usually reads as strain; here it is likely structural strength. This business collects from customers before it pays suppliers (a negative cash-conversion cycle), so the balance sheet is funded by that float, the way Costco's and Amazon's are. The low ratio can be the edge, not the risk; the cash-conversion cycle and the debt due above say which.
From the company's latest filing.
Acquisitions & goodwill
from the balance sheet & the 5-year cash-flow recordGoodwill grows only when a company acquires and falls only when it concedes it overpaid. The size of that bet, the cash put into buying rather than building, and how much has already been written off.
None written down over the record; the goodwill is still carried at full cost. That is the deals holding their value on the books so far; whether they keep doing so is the test an owner watches, since the write-down, when it comes, is the admission the price was too high.
Goodwill, acquired intangibles and equity from the latest balance sheet; acquisition spend and write-downs summed across the 5-year record, from the company's own filings.
What an owner would ask, FY2025
read the 10-K →- How much of the revenue rides on one buyer?≈€252K · 10% of revenue on the largest customers (TTM)
“Concentration Risk Two customers accounted for over 10% of the Company's total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2025.”verify →
The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.
Peers, Capital Markets & Asset Management
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENVAEnova International Inc. | $3.2B | 50% | 21.6% | 10% | 56% |
| CHYMChime Financial Inc. | $2.2B | 88% | -18.4% | -88% | 2% |
| MSTRStrategy Inc Common Stock Class A | $477M | 80% | -13.0% | -2% | 6% |
| WLTHWealthfront Corporation | $365M | 90% | 37.2% | -46% | — |
| LPROOpen Lending Corporation | $93M | 77% | 53.2% | 45% | 50% |
| SBETSharplink Inc. | $28M | 31% | -294.4% | -308% | -117% |
| SLMTBrera Holdings PLC | €3M | — | -220.4% | -81% | -171% |
| ZSQRZ Squared Inc. | $1M | 87% | -956.9% | -287% | — |
| Group median | — | — | -15.7% | -63% | 4% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFEnter the home-market price, not the US ADR quote. Brera Holdings PLC reports in EUR, and every figure here (owner earnings, book value, the share count) is on that EUR, ordinary-share basis. Enter the price on the same basis: the local-exchange quote per ordinary share in EUR. A US ADR price in dollars bundles the ADR-to-ordinary ratio and the exchange rate, so it will not reconcile with these figures and would throw the multiple off.
Brera Holdings PLC is profitable, but owner earnings are negative this year because capital spending currently outruns operating cash, a build-out, so the owner-earnings reverse-DCF has no positive base to grow. We read the price from both ends instead: type a price to see the steady-state profitability it demands, then set the mature margin you would believe and weigh the two against each other. Nothing leaves your browser unless you enter it in your notebook.
Revenue, delivered81%/yr’20→’24
Enter a price to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Two reads of one future. From your price: the owner earnings the company must reach, valued at a mature multiple and discounted back at your rate, expressed as the margin it implies on revenue grown at your rate. From your belief: the mature margin you would credit, set on the dial above. When the margin the price demands runs above the one you would believe, you are paying for a future taken on faith. For a deep cyclical at a trough, normalized through-cycle earnings are the better lens; this mode is for the genuinely unprofitable, and for the profitable business whose capital spending currently outruns its cash.
Manual order: ← SLGL its page in the Manual SMFG →
Industry order: ← SII the Capital Markets & Asset Management chapter SLNHP →