← All companies ← SUZ Manual SVREW → ← SBSW Gold & Precious Metals TGB →
SVM, Silvercorp Metals Inc.
Silvercorp operates several silver-lead-zinc mines at the Ying Mining District in Henan Province, China and the GC silver-lead-zinc mine in Guangdong Province, China. 3.2 Three Year History Silvercorp has been acquiring, exploring, developing, and operating mineral properties in China since 2003.
Production at the SGX Mine at the Ying Mining District commenced on April 1, 2006, and since that time, several of the Company's other properties at the Ying Mining District in Henan Province, China also commenced production.
On April 23, 2025, the Company announced its construction plan for the El Domo Project in Ecuador, targeting production by the end of 2026 with an estimated cost of approximately $240.5 million, compared to the $247.6 million estimate in the 2021 feasibility study.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What it is
- Revenue is Henan Luoning (88%) and GC Mine (12%).
- What moves the needle
- Gross margin has run about 41% and operating margin about 35% through the cycle, a solid spread between what it charges and what the product costs to make. The cash cycle has run negative through the cycle (a median of −72 days): the operation is paid before it pays, so working capital releases cash as the business grows rather than tying it up. Read this kind of business on the commodity price and the cost position. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has run in the teens (median 16%, above 15% in 5 of 9 years). Owner earnings agree: roughly 40% of revenue reaches owners as cash, consistently, and customers and suppliers fund the business through negative working capital. Returns like these are solid but short of clear franchise economics; whether they hold is what the 10-K settles, not the multiple.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 20-F →Henan Luoning is 88% of revenue, with GC Mine the other meaningful segment at 12%.
- Henan Luoning88%$264M
- GC Mine12%$35M
From the segment footnote of the company's own 20-F. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2017–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMMar 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||||||
| $163M | $170M | $171M | $159M | $192M | $218M | $208M | $215M | $299M | $299M | RevenueRevenue |
| 54% | 52% | 42% | 37% | 44% | 39% | 34% | 37% | 41% | 41% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| $73M | $75M | $70M | $52M | $72M | $63M | $34M | $64M | $103M | $103M | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 44.8% | 44.4% | 41.1% | 32.8% | 37.3% | 28.7% | 16.2% | 29.7% | 34.5% | 34.5% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| $44M | $47M | $40M | $34M | $46M | $31M | $21M | $36M | $58M | $58M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| 31% | 29% | 34% | 21% | 22% | 31% | 41% | 36% | 31% | 31% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | ||||||||||
| $77M | $68M | $70M | $77M | $86M | $107M | $86M | $92M | $139M | $139M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $18M | $18M | $20M | $21M | $21M | $25M | $2M | $27M | $31M | $31M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| $16M | $3M | $11M | $22M | $18M | $52M | $63M | $28M | $49M | $49M | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $8M | $6M | $6M | $7M | $9M | $11M | $13M | $12M | $6M | $6M | CapexCapex |
| 4.9% | 3.6% | 3.7% | 4.7% | 4.7% | 4.9% | 6.4% | 5.4% | 2.1% | 2.1% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $69M | $62M | $64M | $70M | $77M | $97M | $84M | $80M | $132M | $132M | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 42.5% | 36.3% | 37.6% | 44.0% | 40.1% | 44.4% | 40.3% | 37.2% | 44.3% | 44.3% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| $69M | $62M | $64M | $70M | $77M | $97M | $72M | $80M | $132M | $132M | Free cash flowFCF |
| 42.5% | 36.3% | 37.6% | 44.0% | 40.1% | 44.4% | 34.8% | 37.2% | 44.3% | 44.3% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| $2M | $3M | $4M | $4M | $4M | $4M | $4M | $4M | $5M | $5M | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| 27% | 19% | 16% | 14% | 16% | 11% | 6% | 12% | 21% | 21% | ROICROIC |
| 17% | 14% | 11% | 9% | 10% | 6% | 4% | 7% | 8% | 8% | Return on equityROE |
| 16% | 13% | 10% | 8% | 9% | 5% | 3% | 6% | 8% | 8% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | ||||||||||
| $73M | $49M | $67M | $66M | $119M | $113M | $146M | $153M | $364M | $364M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| $1M | $676K | $467K | $1M | $1M | $4M | $2M | $2M | $1M | $1M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| $9M | $11M | $11M | $8M | $10M | $9M | $8M | $7M | $8M | $8M | InventoryInvent. |
| $30M | $25M | $30M | $23M | $30M | $40M | $37M | $42M | $64M | $64M | Accounts payablePayables |
| ($20M) | ($14M) | ($19M) | ($14M) | ($19M) | ($27M) | ($27M) | ($32M) | ($55M) | ($55M) | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| $111M | $123M | $135M | $158M | $221M | $232M | $219M | $202M | $387M | $387M | Current assetsCur. assets |
| $40M | $32M | $38M | $28M | $37M | $46M | $41M | $47M | $77M | $77M | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 2.8× | 3.8× | 3.6× | 5.7× | 5.9× | 5.0× | 5.3× | 4.3× | 5.1× | 5.1× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| $398M | $477M | $499M | $513M | $653M | $724M | $677M | $703M | $1.1B | $1.1B | Total assetsAssets |
| 96.4× | 168.0× | 111.1× | 25.2× | 36.1× | 5.8× | 10.4× | 300.1× | 15.4× | 15.4× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| $263M | $329M | $347M | $369M | $468M | $512M | $489M | $507M | $703M | $703M | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | ||||||||||
| 167M | 168M | 168M | 172M | 175M | 177M | 177M | 177M | 204M | 204M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $0.98 | $1.01 | $1.01 | $0.92 | $1.10 | $1.23 | $1.18 | $1.22 | $1.47 | $1.47 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $0.26 | $0.28 | $0.24 | $0.20 | $0.27 | $0.17 | $0.12 | $0.21 | $0.29 | $0.29 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $0.42 | $0.37 | $0.38 | $0.41 | $0.44 | $0.55 | $0.47 | $0.45 | $0.65 | $0.65 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $0.42 | $0.37 | $0.38 | $0.41 | $0.44 | $0.55 | $0.41 | $0.45 | $0.65 | $0.65 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $0.01 | $0.02 | $0.02 | $0.02 | $0.02 | $0.02 | $0.03 | $0.03 | $0.02 | $0.02 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| $0.05 | $0.04 | $0.04 | $0.04 | $0.05 | $0.06 | $0.08 | $0.07 | $0.03 | $0.03 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $1.57 | $1.96 | $2.06 | $2.15 | $2.67 | $2.90 | $2.77 | $2.87 | $3.44 | $3.44 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 8-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +5.2%/yr | +9.6%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | +5.7%/yr | +9.8%/yr |
| EPS | +1.1%/yr | +7.4%/yr |
| Dividends / share | +12.5%/yr | −0.6%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | −5.5%/yr | −6.7%/yr |
| Book value / share | +10.3%/yr | +9.9%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2017–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedEach year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business turned $58M of profit into $132M of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | $58M | $36M | $21M | $31M | $46M |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$31M | +$27M | +$2M | +$25M | +$21M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | +$49M | +$28M | +$63M | +$52M | +$18M |
| Cash from operations | $139M | $92M | $86M | $107M | $86M |
| Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume | −$6M | −$12M | −$2M | −$11M | −$9M |
| Owner earnings | $132M | $80M | $84M | $97M | $77M |
| Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still | — | — | −$12M | — | — |
| Free cash flow | $132M | $80M | $72M | $97M | $77M |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 44% | 37% | 40% | 44% | 40% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- Can it pay its interest? 15.4×ComfortableOperating income $103M ÷ interest expense $7M
What this means
Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient, it says solvent, not cheap.
- Net cashCash $364M − debt $4M
What this means
Cash and short-term investments exceed every dollar of debt by $360M, on net the company owes nothing, and can act from strength when others can't. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Negative, funded by othersDSO 1 + DIO 17 − DPO 133 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. A negative cycle is a quiet moat: suppliers and customers fund the operation (Buffett's “float”), the company grows on other people's money.
Is it a good business?
- High through the cycle9-yr median, range 6%–27%; 21% latest = NOPAT $71M ÷ invested capital $343MIndustry peers: median -9%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 9 years (it ran 21% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- High through the cycle9-yr median margin, range 36%–44%; latest $132M = operating cash $139M − maintenance capex $6MIndustry peers: median -8%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 44% of revenue this year, a 40% median across 9 years.
- Cash-backedCash from ops $139M ÷ net income $58M
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Reinvests most of itDividends + buybacks $5M ÷ Owner Earnings $132M
What this means
Of $132M Owner Earnings, $5M (4%) went back to shareholders, $5M dividends, $0 buybacks. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.
- Investing or harvesting? 0.20×HarvestingCapex $6M ÷ depreciation $31M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 4 of 6 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size MissRevenue ≥ $2B · $299M
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity PassCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 5.05×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt PassDebt ≤ working capital · $4M vs $310M WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability PassA profit every year (9-yr record) · no losses
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record PassUninterrupted dividends · paid every year (9)
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth MissEarnings +33% over the record · −12%
What this means
At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $0.18/share (latest year $0.27), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $3.23/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2017–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 9 of 9
What this means
Never lost money over the record, the earnings stability Graham insisted on.
- Operating margin 43% → 27% (3-yr avg ends)
In the filing’s words The words explain the slip: the filing names price competition rather than pricing actions of its own — a business that looks to take its price, not set it.
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about 43% early to 27% lately, median 35% — competition or costs are biting in.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC returns capital
What this means
The capital base barely grew: this business returns cash through dividends and buybacks rather than reinvesting. Judge it on the cash returned, not on compounding.
- Owner earnings growth +6%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings grew about 6% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2023 · 16.2% op. margin
What this means
Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.
- Share count +2.5%/yr
What this means
The share count is rising, dilution works against you on a per-share basis.
- Dividend record rising
What this means
Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.
- How management talks about it Owner’s terms
What this means
The record and the register agree: capital is compounding and the filing reasons in an owner’s terms — per-share value, return on capital, the long term — not a promoter’s.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of fiscal year-end, Mar 31, 2025Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$364M
- Receivables$1M
- Inventory$8M
- Other current assets$14M
- Debt due within a year$4M
- Accounts payable$64M
- Other current liabilities$8M
From the company's latest filing.
How the cash was used, 2017–2025
Over the record, the business generated $802M of operating cash; how management split it reads as a cash builder, a large share of cash simply built up on the balance sheet.
- Reinvested$79M · 10%
- Dividends$36M · 4%
- Retained (debt / cash)$688M · 86%
- Returned to owners$36M
5% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $36M as dividends and $0 as buybacks.
- Source of fundingOperating cash
Operating cash covered reinvestment and returns; over the span cash and short-term investments rose $291M.
- Net change in share count22.0%
The diluted count rose from 167M to 204M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.
- Dividend record$0.02/sh
Paid in 9 of the years on record, the per-share dividend growing about 12% a year. It was never cut over the span.
- Return on what it retained11%
Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out ($321M over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) grew $34M, so each retained $1 added about 0.11 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why Silvercorp Metals Inc. is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2017–2025.
1 of the 4 tests turned up something to look into; the other 3 came back clean.
- Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?22.0%
Diluted shares grew 22.0% over 2017–2025. Owners were diluted on net; each share owns less of the business than it did. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.
- Is it less profitable than it was?
- Did reported profit become cash?
- Did receivables and inventory outpace sales?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
Peers, Gold & Precious Metals
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDECoeur Mining Inc. | $2.1B | 79% | 4.3% | 2% | 2% |
| SVMSilvercorp Metals Inc. | $299M | 41% | 34.5% | 16% | 40% |
| MPMP Materials | $224M | — | -10.4% | -4% | -3% |
| MUXMcEwen Inc. | $198M | 77% | -43.0% | -9% | -7% |
| IAUXi-80 Gold Corp. | $95M | — | -177.0% | -15% | -157% |
| UECUranium Energy Corp. | $67M | 31% | -103.9% | -12% | -168% |
| IDRIdaho Strategic Resources Inc. | $42M | 6% | -2.6% | -9% | -8% |
| URGUr Energy Inc Common Shares (Canada) | $27M | -9% | -167.4% | -32% | -105% |
| Group median | — | 36% | -26.7% | -9% | -7% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFEnter the home-market price, not the US ADR quote. Silvercorp Metals Inc. reports in USD, and every figure here (owner earnings, book value, the share count) is on that ordinary-share basis. Enter the price on the same basis: the local-exchange quote per ordinary share. A US ADR price in dollars bundles the ADR-to-ordinary ratio, so it will not reconcile with these figures and would throw the multiple off.
Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Silvercorp Metals Inc. has delivered.
Through the cycle, Silvercorp Metals Inc. earns about $121M on its 40.3% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 44.3% margin runs in line with that. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings $132M on 218M shares outstanding, per the 40-F cover, as of 2025-03-31; net cash $360M. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← SUZ its page in the Manual SVREW →
Industry order: ← SBSW the Gold & Precious Metals chapter TGB →