← All companies ← TROW Manual TRS → ← MTX Industrial Gases VHI →
TROX, Tronox Holdings
Tronox is the world's leading vertically integrated manufacturer of TiO 2 pigment.
The mining, beneficiation and smelting of titanium bearing mineral sands also creates meaningful quantities of co-products including zircon, pig iron and the rare-earth bearing mineral, monazite, which we also supply to customers around the world.
The following sets forth the percentage of our revenue derived from sales of our products by geographic region for the year ended December 31, 2025.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What it is
- Revenue is TiO2 (79%), Other products (11%) and Zircon (9%).
- Situation
- Unprofitable. No sustained operating profit across the record; an earnings multiple has nothing to rest on. What the record does show is revenue, the gross-margin trajectory, and the burn against the cash on hand. Distress / turnaround. Thin interest coverage, or operating cash burned against real debt, across the record. The balance sheet carries this situation; the debt schedule sets the clock. Cyclical. Margins collapse and recover repeatedly across the record; a single year, good or bad, misstates the through-cycle earning power.
- What moves the needle
- Gross margin has run about 23% and operating margin about 7.1% through the cycle, a thin spread that turns the result on volume and the cost of what it sells far more than on the price it sets. The margin is cyclical, swinging between −8.7% and 16% over the years, so the through-cycle figure carries more than any single year — and the balance sheet at the trough more than the peak. Inventory runs near 38% of sales, so how fast it turns back into cash — and the risk of writing it down when demand softens — sits alongside the margin. Read this kind of business on the spread and utilization. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has rarely cleared the cost of capital (median 3%, above 15% in 0 of 8 years). By owner earnings: roughly 4% of revenue reaches owners as cash, though it swings. The cycle and the balance sheet decide this one; the worst year tells more than the median, and the rest is in the 10-K.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 10-K →TiO2 is 79% of revenue, with Other products the other meaningful line at 11%.
- TiO279%$2.3B
- Other products11%$326M
- Zircon9%$274M
From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMMar 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $1.3B | $1.7B | $1.8B | $2.6B | $2.8B | $3.6B | $3.5B | $2.9B | $3.1B | $2.9B | $2.9B | RevenueRevenue |
| 10% | 23% | 27% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 55% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| 14% | 15% | 15% | 13% | 13% | 9% | 8% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 10% | SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev |
| 1% | 0% | 1% | 1% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 1% | R&D / revenueR&D/rev |
| ($53M) | $141M | $200M | $95M | $271M | $577M | $458M | $186M | $219M | ($253M) | ($233M) | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| −4.0% | 8.3% | 11.0% | 3.6% | 9.8% | 16.2% | 13.3% | 6.5% | 7.1% | −8.7% | −8.0% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| ($61M) | ($285M) | ($7M) | ($109M) | $969M | $286M | $497M | ($316M) | ($48M) | ($470M) | ($462M) | Net incomeNet inc. |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| $84M | $165M | $170M | $412M | $355M | $740M | $598M | $184M | $300M | $60M | $24M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $177M | $182M | $195M | $280M | $304M | $297M | $269M | $275M | $285M | $302M | $306M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| ($56M) | $237M | ($18M) | $241M | ($914M) | $154M | ($168M) | $221M | $63M | $228M | $176M | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $86M | $91M | $117M | $198M | $195M | $272M | $428M | $261M | $370M | $341M | $298M | CapexCapex |
| 6.6% | 5.4% | 6.4% | 7.5% | 7.1% | 7.6% | 12.4% | 9.2% | 12.0% | 11.8% | 10.2% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| ($2M) | $74M | $53M | $214M | $160M | $468M | $329M | ($77M) | $15M | ($281M) | ($274M) | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| −0.2% | 4.4% | 2.9% | 8.1% | 5.8% | 13.1% | 9.5% | −2.7% | 0.5% | −9.7% | −9.4% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| ($2M) | $74M | $53M | $214M | $160M | $468M | $170M | ($77M) | ($70M) | ($281M) | ($274M) | Free cash flowFCF |
| −0.2% | 4.4% | 2.9% | 8.1% | 5.8% | 13.1% | 4.9% | −2.7% | −2.3% | −9.7% | −9.4% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| $0 | $0 | $0 | $1.7B | $0 | $0 | — | — | — | — | $0 | AcquisitionsAcquis. |
| $46M | $23M | $23M | $27M | $40M | $65M | $87M | $89M | $80M | $48M | $56M | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| — | $0 | $0 | $288M | $0 | $0 | $50M | $0 | $0 | — | — | BuybacksBuybacks |
| -1% | — | 4% | — | 6% | 11% | 10% | 2% | 2% | -5% | -4% | ROICROIC |
| -6% | -34% | -1% | -15% | 57% | 14% | 21% | -16% | -3% | -33% | -36% | Return on equityROE |
| −11% | −37% | −4% | −18% | 55% | 11% | 17% | −21% | −7% | −37% | −40% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $248M | $1.1B | $1.0B | $302M | $619M | $228M | $164M | $273M | $151M | $199M | $126M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| $278M | $328M | $317M | $482M | $540M | $631M | $377M | $290M | $266M | $289M | $331M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| $499M | $473M | $479M | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.0B | $1.3B | $1.4B | $1.6B | $1.7B | $1.6B | InventoryInvent. |
| $136M | $165M | $133M | $342M | $356M | $438M | $486M | $461M | $499M | $481M | $419M | Accounts payablePayables |
| $641M | $636M | $663M | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.2B | $1.2B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.5B | $1.5B | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| $2.7B | $2.6B | $2.5B | $2.1B | $2.5B | $2.0B | $2.0B | $2.1B | $2.2B | $2.3B | $2.2B | Current assetsCur. assets |
| $564M | $353M | $300M | $702M | $805M | $822M | $850M | $753M | $874M | $919M | $895M | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 4.9× | 7.5× | 8.5× | 3.0× | 3.1× | 2.5× | 2.3× | 2.8× | 2.5× | 2.5× | 2.4× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| $5.0B | $4.9B | $4.6B | $5.3B | $6.6B | $6.0B | $6.3B | $6.1B | $6.0B | $6.2B | $6.1B | Total assetsAssets |
| $2.9B | $3.2B | $3.2B | $3.1B | $3.4B | $2.6B | $2.5B | $2.8B | $2.8B | $3.2B | $3.2B | Total debtDebt |
| $2.7B | $2.1B | $2.2B | $2.8B | $2.7B | $2.4B | $2.4B | $2.6B | $2.7B | $3.0B | $3.1B | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| -0.3× | 0.8× | 1.0× | 0.5× | 1.4× | 3.7× | 3.7× | 1.2× | 1.3× | -1.3× | -1.2× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| $1.0B | $829M | $683M | $748M | $1.7B | $2.0B | $2.4B | $1.9B | $1.8B | $1.4B | $1.3B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| 1.8% | 1.8% | — | — | −0.1% | 0.1% | — | 0.1% | — | — | 0.1% | Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 116M | 120M | 123M | 140M | 145M | 158M | 157M | 156M | 158M | 158M | 159M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $11.27 | $14.21 | $14.80 | $18.89 | $19.03 | $22.62 | $21.98 | $18.22 | $19.48 | $18.29 | $18.38 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $-0.53 | $-2.38 | $-0.06 | $-0.78 | $6.69 | $1.81 | $3.16 | $-2.02 | $-0.30 | $-2.97 | $-2.91 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $-0.02 | $0.62 | $0.43 | $1.53 | $1.10 | $2.96 | $2.09 | $-0.49 | $0.10 | $-1.77 | $-1.72 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $-0.02 | $0.62 | $0.43 | $1.53 | $1.10 | $2.96 | $1.08 | $-0.49 | $-0.44 | $-1.77 | $-1.72 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $0.40 | $0.19 | $0.19 | $0.19 | $0.28 | $0.41 | $0.55 | $0.57 | $0.51 | $0.30 | $0.35 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| $0.74 | $0.76 | $0.95 | $1.42 | $1.35 | $1.72 | $2.72 | $1.67 | $2.34 | $2.15 | $1.88 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $8.69 | $6.94 | $5.56 | $5.35 | $11.72 | $12.62 | $15.00 | $12.38 | $11.16 | $8.95 | $8.11 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +5.5%/yr | −0.8%/yr |
| Dividends / share | −2.9%/yr | +1.9%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +12.6%/yr | +9.8%/yr |
| Book value / share | +0.3%/yr | −5.3%/yr |
The year, in the company's words
the filing →Verbatim from the 10-K's management discussion. Each sentence is shown only because its subject, direction, and stated figures check out against the filed numbers on this page. The words are the company's; the arithmetic is the record's.
- Zircon-14.9%
“Zircon revenues decreased $48 million primarily due to a 14% decrease in average selling prices including mix and a 1% decrease in sales volumes.”
✓ figure matches the filed record
The record, charted
FY2016–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedBeyond op. cashEach year's outlays against its operating cash: the mix, and how it drifts. The hatched cap is spending beyond that year's operating cash — financed from the balance sheet or borrowing, not operations.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business turned a $470M loss into ($281M) of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | ($470M) | ($48M) | ($316M) | $497M | $286M |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$302M | +$285M | +$275M | +$269M | +$297M |
| Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost | — | — | +$4M | — | +$3M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | +$228M | +$63M | +$221M | −$168M | +$154M |
| Cash from operations | $60M | $300M | $184M | $598M | $740M |
| Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume | −$341M | −$285M | −$261M | −$269M | −$272M |
| Owner earnings | ($281M) | $15M | ($77M) | $329M | $468M |
| Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still | — | −$85M | — | −$159M | — |
| Free cash flow | ($281M) | ($70M) | ($77M) | $170M | $468M |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | -10% | 0% | -3% | 10% | 13% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- Can it pay its interest? -1.3×Does not cover its interestOperating income ($253M) ÷ interest expense $189M
What this means
A full year of operating profit didn't cover the interest bill. This is the zombie zone: the business depends on refinancing, asset sales, or forbearance to service its debt.
- Net debt against an operating lossCash $199M − debt $3.2B
What this means
Netting $199M of cash and short-term investments against $3.2B of debt leaves $3.0B owed, with no operating profit this year to measure it against — understand that combination before anything else about the company. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Long (60+ days)DSO 36 + DIO 456 − DPO 133 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.
Is it a good business?
- Below average through the cycle8-yr median, range -5%–11%; -5% latest = NOPAT ($200M) ÷ invested capital $4.4BIndustry peers: median 8%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 8 years (it ran -5% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Thin through the cycle10-yr median margin, range -10%–13%; latest ($281M) = operating cash $60M − maintenance capex $341MIndustry peers: median 5%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's -10% of revenue this year, a 3% median across 10 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $4M of SBC) leaves ($285M).
- Loss, but cash-generativeNet income ($470M) · cash from operations $60M
What this means
The company reported a net loss, so a conversion ratio isn't meaningful. What matters then is whether operations still threw off cash, here, they did.
How is the cash used?
- No surplus to allocate
What this means
The business didn't generate positive Owner Earnings this year, so any distributions came from the balance sheet or borrowing, not from operations.
- Investing or harvesting? 1.13×MaintainingCapex $341M ÷ depreciation $302M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 3 of 5 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size PassRevenue ≥ $2B · $2.9B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity PassCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 2.46×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt MissDebt ≤ working capital · $3.2B vs $1.3B WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability MissA profit every year (10-yr record) · 7 loss years
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record PassUninterrupted dividends · paid every year (10)
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth —Earnings +33% over the record · —
What this means
Earnings were negative early in the record, a growth rate isn't meaningful.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $-1.74/share (latest year $-2.95), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $8.89/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2016–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 3 of 10
What this means
Lost money in 7 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 0 of 10 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin 5% → 2% (3-yr avg ends)
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about 5% early to 2% lately, median 7% — competition or costs are biting in.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC −4%
What this means
Reinvested capital came back at a negative incremental return over this window — the invested base grew while operating profit did not. The filings show where it went.
- Worst year 2025 · −8.7% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2025, understand why before trusting the good years.
- Share count +3.5%/yr
What this means
The share count is rising, dilution works against you on a per-share basis.
- Dividend record paid
What this means
Paid a dividend in 10 of the years on record.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of the latest quarter, Mar 31, 2026Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$126M
- Receivables$331M
- Inventory$1.6B
- Other current assets$132M
- Debt due within a year$39M
- Accounts payable$419M
- Other current liabilities$437M
From the company's latest filing.
Debt maturity
the debt note, SEC EDGAR →Not how much it owes, but when it falls due, and against what. The ladder the company files, beside cash on hand and a year's owner earnings.
Bars scaled to the largest single year; “later” is everything due after 2030, shown apart since it dwarfs the years.
Against what the business has and earns
Cash on hand as of Mar 31, 2026 comes to $126M against the $39M due in the twelve months after the Dec 31, 2025 schedule: 3.2 times it.
Maturity schedule extracted from the company’s Dec 31, 2025 annual report and reconciled to the total the table states.
How the cash was used, 2016–2025
Over the record, the business generated $3.1B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a reinvestor, most operating cash is plowed back into the business.
- Reinvested$2.4B · 77%
- Dividends$528M · 17%
- Buybacks$338M · 11%
- Returned to owners$866M
91% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $528M as dividends and $338M as buybacks.
- Source of funding−$157M
Reinvestment and shareholder returns ran $157M beyond the operating cash the business generated, so the gap was financed off the balance sheet: debt rose from $2.9B to $3.2B, and cash and short-term investments drew down $122M.
- Average price paid for buybacks$32.82
Across the years where the filing reports a share count, 10M shares were bought for $338M, about $32.82 each.
- Net change in share count36.8%
The diluted count rose from 116M to 159M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.
- Dividend record$0.30/sh
Paid in 10 of the years on record, the per-share dividend shrinking about 3% a year. It was cut at least once along the way.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid.
- CEO pay ratio70:1
What the chief earns for every dollar the median employee makes, per the 2026 proxy. A high ratio alone settles nothing; some businesses are genuinely top-heavy in scarce skill. A runaway figure is where Buffett starts asking whether the board is doing its job.
- Stock-based compensation$4M
The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 0% of revenue. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why Tronox Holdings is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.
2 of the 6 tests turned up something to look into; the other 4 came back clean.
- Look hereIs it less profitable than it was?−4.0% vs 2.4%
The owner-earnings margin averaged 2.4% early in the record and −4.0% across the last three years, and the latest year has not recovered. Ask the filing whether that is a structural drift or a cyclical trough — price, mix, cost, or a competitor — and whether it is permanent.
- Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?36.8%
Diluted shares grew 36.8% over 2016–2025, even as the company spent $338M on buybacks. The repurchases were outrun by issuance — to staff, in a raise, or in a deal — and the filing says which; owners' slice still shrank. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.
- Did debt outgrow the business?
- Did reported profit become cash?
- Did receivables and inventory outpace sales?
- Are "one-time" charges a yearly habit?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
What an owner would ask, FY2025
read the 10-K →- Which reported numbers are a judgment call?Management names Pension & retirement, Income taxes as critical estimates
each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →
The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.
Peers, Industrial Gases
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVNTAvient | $3.3B | 27% | 6.5% | 7% | 5% |
| TROXTronox Holdings | $2.9B | 23% | 7.7% | 3% | 4% |
| NEUNewMarket Corp | $2.7B | 29% | 15.5% | 20% | 11% |
| ESIElement Solutions Inc. | $2.6B | 42% | 12.6% | 5% | 9% |
| VHIValhi Inc. | $2.1B | 22% | 10.1% | — | 3% |
| MTXMinerals Technologies Inc. | $2.1B | 25% | 12.2% | 9% | 7% |
| KROKronos Worldwide Inc | $1.9B | 21% | 7.7% | 11% | 3% |
| LXULSB Industries Inc. | $615M | 5% | -2.7% | -1% | -3% |
| Group median | — | 24% | 8.9% | 7% | 5% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFType today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Tronox Holdings has delivered.
Tronox Holdings’s latest year shows negative owner earnings, a cyclical trough. So the tool opens on the through-cycle base, the cash it would earn at rest; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.
Through the cycle, Tronox Holdings earns about $105M on its 3.6% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s −9.7% margin runs below that; the reported figure may understate a lean year. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings ($274M) on 160M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-04-20; net debt $3.1B. The base opens on the through-cycle figure (the latest year sits off the record’s own median, and Graham’s averaging cuts both ways); clear Normalize to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← TROW its page in the Manual TRS →
Industry order: ← MTX the Industrial Gases chapter VHI →