← All companies ← TXRH Manual TYL → ← TDY Aerospace & Defense VOYG →
TXT, Textron
Textron Inc. is a multi-industry company that leverages its global network of aircraft, defense, industrial and finance businesses to provide customers with innovative products and services around the world.
Our segments include numerous separately incorporated subsidiaries.
Total revenues for 2025 were $14.8 billion and are presented below by segment and customer type.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What it is
- Revenue is led by Textron Aviation (40%) and Bell (29%), with 2 more segments behind.
- What moves the needle
- Gross margin has run about 17% and operating margin about 7.7% through the cycle, a thin spread that turns the result on volume and the cost of what it sells far more than on the price it sets. Inventory runs near 29% of sales, so how fast it turns back into cash — and the risk of writing it down when demand softens — sits alongside the margin. Read this kind of business on the backlog and program execution. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 10-K →Revenue spreads across 6 segments, the largest Textron Aviation at 40%.
- Textron Aviation40%$6.0B
- Bell29%$4.3B
- Industrial22%$3.2B
- Textron Systems8%$1.2B
- Finance1%$75M
- Textron eAviation0%$27M
From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2015–2026
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2015’15 | 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2026’26 | TTMTTMApr 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $13.9B | $13.8B | $14.2B | $14.0B | $13.6B | $11.7B | $12.9B | $13.7B | $13.7B | $14.8B | $15.2B | RevenueRevenue |
| 18% | 18% | 17% | 17% | 16% | 13% | — | — | — | — | 30% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| 10% | 10% | 9% | 9% | 8% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 8% | 8% | 8% | SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev |
| 5% | 5% | 4% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 4% | 4% | 4% | 3% | R&D / revenueR&D/rev |
| $853M | $1.3B | $937M | $1.6B | $1.1B | $448M | $1.2B | $1.1B | $942M | $1.1B | $2.4B | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 6.1% | 9.7% | 6.6% | 11.1% | 8.2% | 3.8% | 9.0% | 7.9% | 6.9% | 7.7% | 15.8% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| $600M | $962M | $307M | $1.2B | $815M | $309M | $861M | $921M | $824M | $921M | $934M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| 29% | 3% | 60% | 12% | 13% | -10% | 15% | 15% | 13% | 19% | 20% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| $1.2B | $925M | $936M | $1.1B | $1.0B | $768M | $1.5B | $1.3B | $1.0B | $1.3B | $1.3B | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $459M | $449M | $447M | $437M | $416M | $391M | $397M | $395M | $382M | $401M | $405M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| $149M | ($486M) | $182M | ($552M) | ($217M) | $68M | $230M | ($50M) | ($192M) | ($10M) | ($20M) | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $429M | $446M | $423M | $369M | $339M | $317M | $354M | $402M | $364M | $383M | $460M | CapexCapex |
| 3.1% | 3.2% | 3.0% | 2.6% | 2.5% | 2.7% | 2.8% | 2.9% | 2.7% | 2.6% | 3.0% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $779M | $479M | $513M | $738M | $675M | $451M | $1.1B | $864M | $650M | $929M | $859M | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 5.6% | 3.5% | 3.6% | 5.3% | 5.0% | 3.9% | 8.8% | 6.3% | 4.7% | 6.3% | 5.7% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| $779M | $479M | $513M | $738M | $675M | $451M | $1.1B | $864M | $650M | $929M | $859M | Free cash flowFCF |
| 5.6% | 3.5% | 3.6% | 5.3% | 5.0% | 3.9% | 8.8% | 6.3% | 4.7% | 6.3% | 5.7% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| $1.6B | $186M | $331M | $23M | $2M | $15M | $202M | $1M | $13M | $1M | $1M | AcquisitionsAcquis. |
| $28M | $22M | $21M | $20M | $18M | $18M | $17M | $16M | $12M | $18M | $18M | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| $340M | $241M | $582M | $1.8B | $503M | $183M | $867M | $1.2B | $1.1B | $822M | — | BuybacksBuybacks |
| 14% | 17% | 5% | 24% | 15% | 5% | 12% | 13% | 11% | 12% | 12% | Return on equityROE |
| 13% | 17% | 5% | 23% | 14% | 5% | 12% | 13% | 11% | 11% | 11% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $822M | $1.0B | $1.3B | $1.1B | $1.4B | $2.3B | $2.0B | $2.2B | $1.4B | $2.0B | $1.6B | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| $3.9B | $4.5B | $4.2B | $3.8B | $4.1B | $3.5B | $3.5B | $3.9B | $4.1B | $4.3B | $4.6B | InventoryInvent. |
| $3.9B | $4.5B | $4.2B | $3.8B | $4.1B | $3.5B | $3.5B | $3.9B | $4.1B | $4.3B | $5.6B | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| $14.6B | $15.4B | $15.3B | $14.3B | $15.0B | $15.4B | $16.3B | $16.9B | $16.8B | $18.1B | $18.1B | Total assetsAssets |
| 4.5× | 7.7× | 5.4× | 9.3× | 6.5× | 2.7× | 8.1× | — | — | — | 18.6× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| $4.3B | $5.6B | $5.6B | $5.2B | $5.5B | $5.8B | $7.1B | $7.0B | $7.2B | $7.9B | $8.0B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 282M | 272M | 269M | 253M | 233M | 229M | 215M | 202M | 190M | 180M | 176M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $49.25 | $50.62 | $52.83 | $55.17 | $58.57 | $50.88 | $59.86 | $67.81 | $72.00 | $82.10 | $86.21 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $2.13 | $3.53 | $1.14 | $4.83 | $3.50 | $1.35 | $4.01 | $4.56 | $4.33 | $5.11 | $5.30 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $2.76 | $1.76 | $1.91 | $2.91 | $2.90 | $1.97 | $5.28 | $4.28 | $3.42 | $5.15 | $4.88 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $2.76 | $1.76 | $1.91 | $2.91 | $2.90 | $1.97 | $5.28 | $4.28 | $3.42 | $5.15 | $4.88 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $0.10 | $0.08 | $0.08 | $0.08 | $0.08 | $0.08 | $0.08 | $0.08 | $0.06 | $0.10 | $0.10 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| $1.52 | $1.64 | $1.57 | $1.46 | $1.46 | $1.38 | $1.65 | $1.99 | $1.91 | $2.12 | $2.61 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $15.16 | $20.47 | $21.01 | $20.50 | $23.71 | $25.53 | $33.09 | $34.63 | $37.85 | $43.69 | $45.42 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 11-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +4.8%/yr | +10.0%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | +5.8%/yr | +21.2%/yr |
| EPS | +8.3%/yr | +30.5%/yr |
| Dividends / share | +0.0%/yr | +4.9%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +3.1%/yr | +8.9%/yr |
| Book value / share | +10.1%/yr | +11.3%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2015–2026Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedBeyond op. cashEach year's outlays against its operating cash: the mix, and how it drifts. The hatched cap is spending beyond that year's operating cash — financed from the balance sheet or borrowing, not operations.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2026 the business turned $921M of profit into $929M of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.
| FY2026 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | $921M | $824M | $921M | $861M | $309M |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$401M | +$382M | +$395M | +$397M | +$391M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | −$10M | −$192M | −$50M | +$230M | +$68M |
| Cash from operations | $1.3B | $1.0B | $1.3B | $1.5B | $768M |
| Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow | −$383M | −$364M | −$402M | −$354M | −$317M |
| Owner earnings | $929M | $650M | $864M | $1.1B | $451M |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 6% | 5% | 6% | 9% | 4% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- Can it pay its interest? 16.5×ComfortableOperating income $2.3B ÷ interest expense $142M
What this means
Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient, it says solvent, not cheap.
- Debt under-captured — leverage unknown, not low
What this means
This company pays far more interest than its tagged debt implies (the rest sits under segment dimensions the data source strips), so its net cash or net debt cannot be read honestly: the gap is unknown, not zero, and 'net cash' here would be exactly the fiction the figure is meant to prevent. Judge it on the record and owner earnings instead.
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
Is it a good business?
- Debt under-capturedIndustry peers: median 9%
What this means
This company's interest bill implies far more debt than its filings tag at the consolidated level (the rest sits under segment dimensions the data source strips), so invested capital, and the return on it, cannot be read honestly. Judge this one on Owner Earnings and the record instead.
- Thin through the cycle10-yr median margin, range 3%–9%; latest $929M = operating cash $1.3B − maintenance capex $383MIndustry peers: median 7%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 6% of revenue this year, a 5% median across 10 years.
- Cash-backedCash from ops $1.3B ÷ net income $921M
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Returns most of itDividends + buybacks $840M ÷ Owner Earnings $929M
What this means
Of $929M Owner Earnings, $840M (90%) went back to shareholders, $18M dividends, $822M buybacks. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.
- Investing or harvesting? 0.96×MaintainingCapex $383M ÷ depreciation $401M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 4 of 4 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size PassRevenue ≥ $2B · $14.8B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity —Current ratio ≥ 2× · —
What this means
Current assets / liabilities not in the data yet.
- Earnings stability PassA profit every year (10-yr record) · no losses
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record PassUninterrupted dividends · paid every year (10)
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth PassEarnings +33% over the record · +43%
What this means
At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $5.11/share (latest year $5.30), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $45.29/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2015–2026
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 10 of 10
What this means
Never lost money over the record, the earnings stability Graham insisted on.
- Operating margin 7% → 7% (3-yr avg ends)
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin held roughly steady — about 7% early, 7% lately, median 8%.
- Owner earnings growth +2%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings grew about 2% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2021 · 3.8% op. margin
What this means
Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.
- Share count −4.0%/yr
What this means
The share count is shrinking, buybacks are quietly growing your slice of the business.
- Dividend record paid
What this means
Paid a dividend in 10 of the years on record.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
The filing raises AI among its risks, but in other terms (security, regulation, energy or the like), not as a competitor to its product.
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
How the cash was used, 2015–2026
Over the record, the business generated $11.0B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a cash returner, paying most of what it earns straight back to owners.
- Reinvested$3.8B · 35%
- Dividends$190M · 2%
- Buybacks$7.6B · 69%
- Returned to owners$7.8B
108% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $190M as dividends and $7.6B as buybacks.
- Source of funding−$589M
Reinvestment and shareholder returns ran $589M beyond the operating cash the business generated, so the gap was financed off the balance sheet.
- Average price paid for buybacks$61.49
Across the years where the filing reports a share count, 124M shares were bought for $7.6B, about $61.49 each. Year to year the price paid ranged from $34.94 (2016) to $87.04 (2024); its heaviest year, 2018, paid $61.28 ($1.8B).
- Net change in share count−37.5%
The diluted count fell from 282M to 176M, so the buybacks outran the stock issued to staff.
- Dividend record$0.10/sh
Paid in 10 of the years on record, the per-share dividend growing about 0% a year. It was cut at least once along the way.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.
| Fiscal year | Chief executive | Pay, as filed | “Actually paid” | Owner earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Mr. Donnelly | $18.6M | $45.8M | $451M |
| 2022 | Mr. Donnelly | $15.4M | $18.7M | $1.1B |
| 2023 | Mr. Donnelly | $20.4M | $28.0M | $864M |
| 2024 | Mr. Donnelly | $19.6M | $15.8M | $650M |
| 2025 | Mr. Donnelly | $21.2M | $24.0M | — |
Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.
- Insider ownership1.9%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why Textron is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2015–2026.
1 of the 5 tests turned up something to look into; the other 4 came back clean.
- Look hereAre "one-time" charges a yearly habit?6 of 10 years
Management took an impairment or write-down in 6 of the last 10 years, $232M in all. Taken across the majority of the record, the "one-time" label is wearing thin — ask whether these are past deals coming due rather than genuinely isolated events. Read it beside the goodwill the company still carries.
- Is it less profitable than it was?
- Did the share count rise anyway?
- Did reported profit become cash?
- Did receivables and inventory outpace sales?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
What an owner would ask, FY2026
read the 10-K →- Which reported numbers are a judgment call?Management names Revenue recognition, Pension & retirement as critical estimates
each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →
The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.
Peers, Aerospace & Defense
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HONHoneywell International Inc. | $37.4B | 35% | 21.5% | 23% | 14% |
| TXTTextron | $14.8B | 17% | 7.8% | 16% | 5% |
| ADNTAdient plc Ordinary Shares | $14.5B | 6% | 0.1% | 0% | 1% |
| BWABorgWarner Inc. | $14.3B | 19% | 8.1% | 9% | 7% |
| HIIHuntington Ingalls | $12.5B | 64% | 7.5% | 16% | 7% |
| WABWabtec | $11.2B | 30% | 11.6% | 6% | 11% |
| TDGTransDigm | $8.8B | 57% | 42.3% | 14% | 20% |
| SAROStandardAero Inc. | $6.1B | 14% | 7.5% | 9% | -0% |
| Group median | — | 25% | 7.9% | 12% | 7% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFType today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Textron has delivered.
Textron’s latest year runs above its own through-cycle margin — the reported figure may flatter a peak. So the tool opens on the through-cycle base, Graham’s averaging cutting both ways; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.
Through the cycle, Textron earns about $757M on its 5.1% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 6.3% margin runs above that; the reported figure may flatter a peak you'd be paying on. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year. It comes pre-checked here for that reason, the same rule that already normalizes a trough; clear it to price the year as filed.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Free cash flow $859M on 174M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-04-17; net cash $1.6B. The base opens on the through-cycle figure (the latest year sits above the record’s own median, and Graham’s averaging cuts both ways); clear Normalize to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. Capex ($460M) runs well above depreciation ($405M), so this is a build-out; Steady-state swaps total capex for maintenance (≈ depreciation), lifting the base to about $936M, the cash it would throw off if it stopped expanding. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← TXRH its page in the Manual TYL →
Industry order: ← TDY the Aerospace & Defense chapter VOYG →