Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← USAS Manual UTSI → ← TRMD Marine Shipping VIK →

USEA, United Maritime Corporation

Marine Shipping capital-intensive UnprofitableDistress / turnaround

A capital-intensive business, run on heavy physical assets that must be kept working and earn a return above what they cost to maintain.

Latest annual: FY2025 20-F · US listing is the ordinary share
USEA · United Maritime Corporation
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$5M
Vital signs · TTM, with 3-yr average
Revenue $5M 3-yr avg $3M
Operating margin −8.4% 3-yr avg 77.9%
ROIC −0% 3-yr avg 2%
Owner-earnings margin 28% 3-yr avg −163%
Free cash flow margin 28% 3-yr avg −1006%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

Situation
Unprofitable. No meaningful revenue yet; the record is the cash on hand against the burn. Distress / turnaround. Thin interest coverage, or operating cash burned against real debt, across the record. The balance sheet carries this situation; the debt schedule sets the clock.
What moves the needle
Whether the heavy assets earn more than they cost to keep. What decides it: the return on the capital sunk into them, how much of the capex is merely standing still versus growing, and what a downturn does to a fixed-cost base. Here the balance sheet is the defense and cyclicality the enemy. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Return on capital has rarely cleared the cost of capital (median 3%, above 15% in 0 of 3 years). Owner earnings, the cash-based check, have been thin too. This is price-taker territory, where the balance sheet and the cycle matter more than any multiple; the rest is in the 10-K.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2023–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMDec 2025
Income statement
$4M$0$5M$5MRevenueRevenue
$7M$5M($455K)($455K)Operating incomeOp. inc.
164.1%−8.4%−8.4%Operating marginOp. mgn
$221K($3M)($6M)($6M)Net incomeNet inc.
Cash flow & returns
($6M)$3M$2M$2MOperating cash flowOp. cash
$9M$10M$8M$8MDepreciationDeprec.
($16M)($3M)$605K$605KWorking capital & otherWC & other
$82M$249K$668K$668KCapexCapex
n/m12.3%12.3%Capex / revenueCapex/rev
($15M)$3M$2M$2MOwner earningsOwner earn.
−354.9%28.3%28.3%Owner earnings marginOE mgn
($88M)$3M$2M$2MFree cash flowFCF
n/m28.3%28.3%Free cash flow marginFCF mgn
$9M$3M$1M$1MDividends paidDiv. paid
$673K$469K$204KBuybacksBuybacks
5%3%-0%-0%ROICROIC
0%-6%-12%-12%Return on equityROE
−14%−10%−14%−14%Retained to equityRetained/eq
Balance sheet
$14M$6M$14M$14MCash & investmentsCash+inv
$252K$1M$1M$1MReceivablesReceiv.
$664K$650K$363K$363KInventoryInvent.
$3M$2M$2M$2MAccounts payablePayables
($2M)$264K($620K)($620K)Operating working capitalOper. WC
$19M$24M$33M$33MCurrent assetsCur. assets
$53M$34M$49M$49MCurrent liabilitiesCur. liab.
0.4×0.7×0.7×0.7×Current ratioCurr. ratio
$175M$172M$139M$139MTotal assetsAssets
$65M$79M$48M$48MTotal debtDebt
$51M$72M$34M$34MNet debt / (cash)Net debt
1.0×0.6×-0.1×-0.1×Interest coverageInt. cov.
$66M$60M$53M$53MShareholders’ equityEquity
Per share
8.4M8.7M8.9M9.1MShares out (diluted)Shares
$0.52$0.00$0.61$0.60Revenue / shareRev/sh
$0.03$-0.39$-0.70$-0.68EPS (diluted)EPS
$-1.83$0.35$0.17$0.17Owner earnings / shareOE/sh
$-10.52$0.35$0.17$0.17Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh
$1.12$0.30$0.13$0.12Dividends / shareDiv/sh
$9.78$0.03$0.08$0.07Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh
$7.88$6.90$5.97$5.83Book value / shareBVPS

The record, charted

FY2023–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.

Share count
9Mpeak FY2025
ROIC
−0%low FY2025

Owner earnings vs. net income

Owner earningsNet income

The accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.

$2Mowner earningsvs.($6M)net incomelow FY2023

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2025 the business turned a $6M loss into $2M of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.

FY2025FY2024FY2023
Reported net income($6M)($3M)$221K
Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back+$8M+$10M+$9M
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items+$605K−$3M−$16M
Cash from operations$2M$3M($6M)
Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume−$668K−$249K−$9M
Owner earnings$2M$3M($15M)
Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still−$73M
Free cash flow$2M$3M($88M)
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue28%-355%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 20-F · source on SEC EDGAR →

Will it survive?

  • Does not cover its interest
    Operating income ($455K) ÷ interest expense $8M
    What this means

    A full year of operating profit didn't cover the interest bill. This is the zombie zone: the business depends on refinancing, asset sales, or forbearance to service its debt.

  • Net debt against an operating loss
    Cash $14M − debt $48M
    What this means

    Netting $14M of cash and short-term investments against $48M of debt leaves $34M owed, with no operating profit this year to measure it against — understand that combination before anything else about the company. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.

  • Not enough data
    What this means

    The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

Is it a good business?

  • Below average through the cycle
    3-yr median, range -0%–5%; -0% latest = NOPAT ($359K) ÷ invested capital $87M
    Industry peers: median 4%
    What this means

    The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 3 years (it ran -0% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.

  • High
    Owner earnings $2M = operating cash $2M − maintenance capex $668K
    Industry peers: median 12%
    What this means

    What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 28% of revenue this year.

  • Loss, but cash-generative
    Net income ($6M) · cash from operations $2M
    What this means

    The company reported a net loss, so a conversion ratio isn't meaningful. What matters then is whether operations still threw off cash, here, they did.

How is the cash used?

  • Returns about half
    Dividends + buybacks $1M ÷ Owner Earnings $2M
    What this means

    Of $2M Owner Earnings, $1M (86%) went back to shareholders, $1M dividends, $204K buybacks. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.

  • Investing or harvesting? 0.09×
    Harvesting
    Capex $668K ÷ depreciation $8M
    What this means

    Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.

Graham’s defensive tests · 0 of 3 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size Miss
    Revenue ≥ $2B · $5M
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.

  • Strong liquidity Miss
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 0.68×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Conservative debt Miss
    Debt ≤ working capital · $48M vs ($16M) WC
    What this means

    Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $-0.34/share (latest year $-0.68), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $5.83/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Low contestability

The moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.

In its own filing Raised, but not as a competitor

The filing raises AI among its risks, but in other terms (security, regulation, energy or the like), not as a competitor to its product.

AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Current Position

as of fiscal year-end, Dec 31, 2025

Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.

Current assets$33M
  • Cash & short-term investments$14M
  • Receivables$1M
  • Inventory$363K
  • Other current assets$17M
Current liabilities$49M
  • Debt due within a year$14M
  • Accounts payable$2M
  • Other current liabilities$32M
Current ratio0.68×all current assets ÷ what's due · Graham looked for 2×
Quick ratio0.67×stricter: inventory excluded
Cash ratio0.29×strictest: cash alone against what's due
Working capital($16M)the cushion left after near-term bills
Debt due this year vs. cash$14M due · $14M cash cash alone won't cover the maturities; it leans on refinancing or operating cash · both figures from the Dec 31, 2025 balance sheet
Deeper floors
Tangible book value$53Mequity stripped of goodwill & intangibles
Net current asset value($49M)Graham's net-net: current assets less all liabilities
Debt incl. operating leases$48Mno operating-lease liability tagged this quarter, so debt alone

From the company's latest filing.

Peers, Marine Shipping

The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueGross marginOp. marginROICOwner earn. margin
KEXKirby$3.4B7.7%4%10%
MATXMatson$3.3B96%11.4%11%12%
TDWTidewater Inc.$1.4B-12.5%-6%3%
INSWInternational Seaways Inc. Common Stock$843M12.3%3%33%
PANLPangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd.$632M7.7%10%10%
LPGDorian LPG Ltd.$482M35.2%7%38%
GNKGenco Shipping & Trading Limited$342M-1.1%-0%31%
USEAUnited Maritime Corporation$5M-8.4%3%28%
Group median7.7%3%20%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Enter the US price, in dollars: the NYSE/Nasdaq quote you hold. United Maritime Corporation's US listing is the ordinary share itself. The record tables elsewhere on this page remain as filed.

Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what United Maritime Corporation has delivered.

$
Base

The assumptions

9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.

Enter a price above to run it.

Implied by the price
Owner-earnings growth · since FY2024−49%/yr
Owner-earnings yield
P/E (3-yr earnings ’23–’25)
P/B
Graham’s price gate

Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.

Against a high-grade bond: Graham’s yardstick bond yield%

Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.

Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.

Owner earnings $2M on 9M shares outstanding, the balance-sheet count at 2025-12-31; net debt $34M. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "United Maritime Corporation (USEA), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/USEA, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← USAS its page in the Manual UTSI →

Industry order: ← TRMD the Marine Shipping chapter VIK →