← All companies ← YSXT Manual YXT → ← XPO Hotels & Resorts
YTRA, Yatra Online Inc.
A logistics business, moving goods across a network of assets and partners.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- Situation
- Unprofitable. No sustained operating profit across the record; an earnings multiple has nothing to rest on. What the record does show is revenue, the gross-margin trajectory, and the burn against the cash on hand.
- What moves the needle
- Operating margin has run around −20% through the cycle on a 60% gross margin, the operating line in the red even at its best — so the lever is whether the spending below the gross line can come down enough to clear a profit: revenue growth against the cost curve, and the cash runway until it does. The cash cycle has run negative through the cycle (a median of −257 days): the operation is paid before it pays, so working capital releases cash as the business grows rather than tying it up. Read this kind of business on volume, density and yield. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMMar 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| ₹8.3B | ₹9.4B | ₹12.2B | ₹9.4B | ₹7.3B | ₹1.3B | ₹2.0B | ₹3.8B | ₹4.2B | ₹8.0B | ₹8.0B | RevenueRevenue |
| 50% | 55% | 60% | 54% | 60% | — | — | 83% | 79% | 49% | 49% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| (₹1.2B) | (₹1.9B) | (₹3.4B) | (₹2.6B) | (₹625M) | (₹1.5B) | (₹431M) | ₹80M | (₹159M) | (₹90M) | (₹90M) | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| −14.4% | −19.9% | −27.4% | −27.5% | −8.6% | −115.6% | −21.7% | 2.1% | −3.8% | −1.1% | −1.1% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| (₹1.2B) | (₹5.9B) | (₹4.0B) | (₹1.1B) | (₹834M) | (₹1.2B) | (₹478M) | (₹289M) | (₹351M) | (₹107M) | (₹107M) | Net incomeNet inc. |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| (₹460M) | (₹1.6B) | (₹882M) | (₹3.5B) | (₹550M) | ₹765M | (₹972M) | (₹2.0B) | (₹1.4B) | (₹291M) | (₹291M) | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| ₹234M | ₹276M | ₹426M | ₹582M | ₹666M | ₹749M | ₹308M | ₹190M | ₹198M | ₹309M | ₹309M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| ₹525M | ₹4.0B | ₹2.7B | (₹3.0B) | (₹383M) | ₹1.2B | (₹803M) | (₹1.9B) | (₹1.3B) | (₹493M) | (₹493M) | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| ₹69M | ₹65M | ₹223M | ₹30M | ₹16M | ₹1M | ₹9M | ₹20M | ₹20M | ₹63M | ₹63M | CapexCapex |
| 0.8% | 0.7% | 1.8% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.8% | 0.8% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| (₹529M) | (₹1.7B) | (₹1.1B) | (₹3.6B) | (₹566M) | ₹764M | (₹981M) | (₹2.0B) | (₹1.5B) | (₹354M) | (₹354M) | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| −6.3% | −17.7% | −9.0% | −38.2% | −7.8% | 60.1% | −49.3% | −51.8% | −34.7% | −4.4% | −4.4% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| (₹529M) | (₹1.7B) | (₹1.1B) | (₹3.6B) | (₹566M) | ₹764M | (₹981M) | (₹2.0B) | (₹1.5B) | (₹354M) | (₹354M) | Free cash flowFCF |
| −6.3% | −17.7% | −9.0% | −38.2% | −7.8% | 60.1% | −49.3% | −51.8% | −34.7% | −4.4% | −4.4% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| -276% | -188% | — | -49% | -56% | -102% | -54% | -41% | -7% | -2% | -2% | Return on equityROE |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| ₹390M | ₹1.6B | ₹2.5B | ₹1.6B | ₹920M | ₹1.8B | ₹869M | ₹573M | ₹1.9B | ₹613M | ₹613M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| — | ₹2.0B | ₹4.0B | ₹4.9B | ₹2.4B | ₹870M | ₹1.9B | ₹3.1B | ₹4.6B | ₹5.6B | ₹5.6B | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| — | ₹3.1B | ₹5.0B | ₹5.3B | ₹2.9B | ₹2.2B | ₹2.4B | ₹2.2B | ₹2.6B | ₹3.0B | ₹3.0B | Accounts payablePayables |
| — | (₹1.2B) | (₹1.1B) | (₹344M) | (₹491M) | (₹1.3B) | (₹460M) | ₹885M | ₹2.0B | ₹2.6B | ₹2.6B | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| — | ₹7.6B | ₹8.9B | ₹9.7B | ₹6.1B | ₹4.1B | ₹4.2B | ₹5.5B | ₹11.0B | ₹10.2B | ₹10.2B | Current assetsCur. assets |
| — | ₹5.8B | ₹10.8B | ₹9.9B | ₹6.4B | ₹3.5B | ₹4.2B | ₹5.8B | ₹4.4B | ₹4.9B | ₹4.9B | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| — | 1.3× | 0.8× | 1.0× | 1.0× | 1.2× | 1.0× | 0.9× | 2.5× | 2.1× | 2.1× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| — | ₹654M | ₹961M | — | — | — | — | — | ₹528M | ₹1.3B | ₹1.3B | GoodwillGoodwill |
| — | ₹9.6B | ₹11.6B | ₹12.6B | ₹8.8B | ₹5.7B | ₹5.5B | ₹6.8B | ₹12.5B | ₹13.2B | ₹13.2B | Total assetsAssets |
| -10.8× | -12.4× | -22.0× | -9.8× | -3.2× | -12.5× | -4.3× | 0.2× | -0.6× | -0.8× | -0.8× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| ₹441M | ₹3.1B | (₹225M) | ₹2.4B | ₹1.5B | ₹1.2B | ₹890M | ₹708M | ₹5.4B | ₹5.4B | ₹5.4B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 21.0M | 24.8M | 34.3M | 43.5M | 46.5M | 57.8M | 62.4M | 63.0M | 63.1M | 62.1M | 62.1M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| ₹397.84 | ₹377.18 | ₹357.09 | ₹214.92 | ₹156.19 | ₹22.01 | ₹31.91 | ₹60.76 | ₹66.39 | ₹128.14 | ₹128.14 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| ₹-58.10 | ₹-237.89 | ₹-116.41 | ₹-26.37 | ₹-17.94 | ₹-20.38 | ₹-7.66 | ₹-4.59 | ₹-5.56 | ₹-1.72 | ₹-1.72 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| ₹-25.20 | ₹-66.71 | ₹-32.22 | ₹-82.04 | ₹-12.18 | ₹13.23 | ₹-15.74 | ₹-31.47 | ₹-23.03 | ₹-5.70 | ₹-5.70 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| ₹-25.20 | ₹-66.71 | ₹-32.22 | ₹-82.04 | ₹-12.18 | ₹13.23 | ₹-15.74 | ₹-31.47 | ₹-23.03 | ₹-5.70 | ₹-5.70 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| ₹3.27 | ₹2.62 | ₹6.51 | ₹0.69 | ₹0.34 | ₹0.02 | ₹0.14 | ₹0.31 | ₹0.32 | ₹1.01 | ₹1.01 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| ₹21.03 | ₹126.48 | ₹-6.56 | ₹54.19 | ₹32.10 | ₹20.04 | ₹14.28 | ₹11.23 | ₹85.38 | ₹87.05 | ₹87.05 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | −11.8%/yr | −3.9%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | −12.3%/yr | +24.6%/yr |
| Book value / share | +17.1%/yr | +22.1%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2016–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business reported a ₹107M loss but (₹354M) of owner earnings: ₹247M less than the profit line, taken out by capital spending and the timing of cash.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | (₹107M) | (₹351M) | (₹289M) | (₹478M) | (₹1.2B) |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +₹309M | +₹198M | +₹190M | +₹308M | +₹749M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | −₹493M | −₹1.3B | −₹1.9B | −₹803M | +₹1.2B |
| Cash from operations | (₹291M) | (₹1.4B) | (₹2.0B) | (₹972M) | ₹765M |
| Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow | −₹63M | −₹20M | −₹20M | −₹9M | −₹1M |
| Owner earnings | (₹354M) | (₹1.5B) | (₹2.0B) | (₹981M) | ₹764M |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | -4% | -35% | -52% | -49% | 60% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
“As a result of this assessment, management concluded that there were material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting, as described below, existing as of March 31, 2025, and hence, the internal control over financial reporting was not…”
The figures below are only as sound as the controls that produced them. read the note →
Will it survive?
- Can it pay its interest? -0.8×Does not cover its interestOperating income (₹90M) ÷ interest expense ₹107M
What this means
A full year of operating profit didn't cover the interest bill. This is the zombie zone: the business depends on refinancing, asset sales, or forbearance to service its debt.
- Debt under-captured — leverage unknown, not low
What this means
This company pays far more interest than its tagged debt implies (the rest sits under segment dimensions the data source strips), so its net cash or net debt cannot be read honestly: the gap is unknown, not zero, and 'net cash' here would be exactly the fiction the figure is meant to prevent. Judge it on the record and owner earnings instead.
- Negative, funded by othersDSO 256 + DIO 0 − DPO 267 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. A negative cycle is a quiet moat: suppliers and customers fund the operation (Buffett's “float”), the company grows on other people's money. (Little or no inventory, a services / asset-light model, so the inventory leg is ~0.)
Is it a good business?
- Debt under-capturedIndustry peers: median 9%
What this means
This company's interest bill implies far more debt than its filings tag at the consolidated level (the rest sits under segment dimensions the data source strips), so invested capital, and the return on it, cannot be read honestly. Judge this one on Owner Earnings and the record instead.
- Consumes cash through the cycle10-yr median margin, range -52%–60%; latest (₹354M) = operating cash (₹291M) − maintenance capex ₹63MIndustry peers: median 2%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's -4% of revenue this year, a -18% median across 10 years.
- Are earnings backed by cash? (₹291M)Loss, and burning cashNet income (₹107M) · cash from operations (₹291M)
In the filing’s words The filing discloses a material weakness in its financial controls — the reported numbers here, and the record built on them, are only as reliable as the controls that produced them.
What this means
The company reported a net loss, so a conversion ratio isn't meaningful. What matters then is whether operations still threw off cash, here, they did not.
How is the cash used?
- No surplus to allocate
What this means
The business didn't generate positive Owner Earnings this year, so any distributions came from the balance sheet or borrowing, not from operations.
- Investing or harvesting? 0.20×HarvestingCapex ₹63M ÷ depreciation ₹309M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 1 of 3 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size —Revenue ≥ $2B (a dollar floor) · ₹8.0B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's floor is a dollar figure — about $2B of revenue as a conservative modern stand-in. This company reports in its home currency and we carry no exchange rate, so we show the figure and leave the size bar for you to apply rather than convert it with a number we don't have.
- Strong liquidity PassCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 2.09×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt —Debt ≤ working capital · —
What this means
The filings tag only a fraction of the debt this company's interest bill implies (much of it sits under segment dimensions the data source strips), so this test can't be run honestly.
- Earnings stability MissA profit every year (10-yr record) · 10 loss years
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record MissUninterrupted dividends · 1 of 10 yrs
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth —Earnings +33% over the record · —
What this means
Earnings were negative early in the record, a growth rate isn't meaningful.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are ₹-4.01/share (latest year ₹-1.72), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is ₹87.05/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2016–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 0 of 10
What this means
Lost money in 10 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Operating margin −21% → −1% (3-yr avg ends)
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin widened — about −21% early to −1% lately, median −20% — pricing power intact or improving.
- Worst year 2021 · −115.6% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2021, understand why before trusting the good years.
- Dividend record paid
What this means
Paid a dividend in 1 of the years on record.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of fiscal year-end, Mar 31, 2025Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments₹613M
- Receivables₹5.6B
- Other current assets₹4.0B
- Accounts payable₹3.0B
- Other current liabilities₹1.9B
From the company's latest filing.
Peers, Hotels & Resorts
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GXOGXO Logistics | $13.2B | — | 1.9% | 4% | 2% |
| EXPDExpeditors International of Washington, Inc. | $11.1B | — | 10.0% | 66% | 7% |
| YTRAYatra Online Inc. | ₹8.0B | 58% | -17.2% | — | -13% |
| RXORXO Inc. | $5.7B | — | 1.4% | 4% | 0% |
| BCOBrinks Company (The) | $5.3B | 23% | 8.1% | 11% | 6% |
| HUBGHub Group | $3.9B | 12% | 3.6% | 9% | 3% |
| GBTGGlobal Business Travel Group Inc. | $2.7B | — | -5.5% | -7% | -12% |
| RLGTRadiant Logistics Inc. | $903M | — | 2.5% | 10% | 1% |
| Group median | — | 23% | 2.2% | — | 1% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFEnter the US price, in dollars: the NYSE/Nasdaq quote you hold. Yatra Online Inc.'s US listing is the ordinary share itself; figures in this tool are translated at INR 1 = $0.010 (2026-07-17, reference rate); the dollar quote then reconciles exactly. The record tables elsewhere on this page remain as filed, in INR.
Yatra Online Inc. is profitable, but owner earnings are negative this year because capital spending currently outruns operating cash, a build-out, so the owner-earnings reverse-DCF has no positive base to grow. We read the price from both ends instead: type a price to see the steady-state profitability it demands, then set the mature margin you would believe and weigh the two against each other. Nothing leaves your browser unless you enter it in your notebook.
Revenue, delivered14%/yr’20→’25
Enter a price to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Two reads of one future. From your price: the owner earnings the company must reach, valued at a mature multiple and discounted back at your rate, expressed as the margin it implies on revenue grown at your rate. From your belief: the mature margin you would credit, set on the dial above. When the margin the price demands runs above the one you would believe, you are paying for a future taken on faith. For a deep cyclical at a trough, normalized through-cycle earnings are the better lens; this mode is for the genuinely unprofitable, and for the profitable business whose capital spending currently outruns its cash.
Manual order: ← YSXT its page in the Manual YXT →
Industry order: ← XPO the Hotels & Resorts chapter