← All companies ← AGYS Manual AHR → ← AGL Health Care Providers & Services AIRS →
AHCO, AdaptHealth Corp.
AdaptHealth Corp. and subsidiaries is a national leader in providing patient-centered, healthcare-at-home solutions including home medical equipment, medical supplies, and related services.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What it is
- Revenue is led by Sleep Health (42%) and Respiratory Health (21%), with 2 more segments behind.
- Situation
- Unprofitable. No sustained operating profit across the record; an earnings multiple has nothing to rest on. What the record does show is revenue, the gross-margin trajectory, and the burn against the cash on hand. Cyclical. Margins collapse and recover repeatedly across the record; a single year, good or bad, misstates the through-cycle earning power. Serial acquirer. Goodwill and acquired intangibles are 61% of assets, with meaningful acquisition spending in 4 of the record's 8 years; much of what this business is was bought, at prices the record carries.
- What moves the needle
- Gross margin has run about 18% and operating margin about 6.4% through the cycle, a thin spread that turns the result on volume and the cost of what it sells far more than on the price it sets. The margin is cyclical, swinging between −19% and 9.2% over the years, so the through-cycle figure carries more than any single year — and the balance sheet at the trough more than the peak. Capital spending runs about 8.3% of sales, below what it charges for depreciation, so the return earned on what it sinks into that plant weighs as much as the margin. Read this kind of business on volume, payer mix and reimbursement. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has rarely cleared the cost of capital (median 4%, above 15% in 1 of 6 years). By owner earnings: roughly 7% of revenue reaches owners as cash, consistently. The cycle and the balance sheet decide this one; the worst year tells more than the median, and the rest is in the 10-K.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 10-K →Revenue spreads across 4 segments, the largest Sleep Health at 42%.
- Sleep Health42%$1.4B
- Respiratory Health21%$691M
- Diabetes Health18%$592M
- Wellness at Home18%$583M
From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2018–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMMar 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||
| $345M | $530M | $1.1B | $2.5B | $3.0B | $3.2B | $3.3B | $3.2B | $3.3B | RevenueRevenue |
| 15% | 17% | 15% | 18% | 20% | 20% | 21% | 19% | 18% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| 5% | 11% | 8% | 7% | 11% | 10% | 11% | 12% | 12% | SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev |
| $31M | $29M | $71M | $226M | $190M | ($598M) | $264M | $91M | $73M | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 9.0% | 5.5% | 6.8% | 9.2% | 6.4% | −18.7% | 8.1% | 2.8% | 2.2% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| $23M | ($21M) | ($162M) | $156M | $69M | ($679M) | $90M | ($71M) | ($80M) | Net incomeNet inc. |
| -10% | — | — | 17% | 26% | — | 31% | — | — | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||
| $68M | $60M | $196M | $276M | $374M | $481M | $542M | $602M | $600M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $48M | $63M | $82M | $258M | $351M | $383M | $365M | $382M | $394M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| ($4M) | $8M | $256M | ($164M) | ($69M) | $754M | $71M | $269M | $262M | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $10M | $21M | $40M | $203M | $391M | $337M | $306M | $382M | $408M | CapexCapex |
| 2.9% | 4.0% | 3.8% | 8.3% | 13.2% | 10.5% | 9.4% | 11.8% | 12.4% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $58M | $39M | $156M | $72M | ($18M) | $143M | $236M | $219M | $192M | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 16.9% | 7.4% | 14.8% | 2.9% | −0.6% | 4.5% | 7.2% | 6.8% | 5.8% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| $58M | $39M | $156M | $72M | ($18M) | $143M | $236M | $219M | $192M | Free cash flowFCF |
| 16.9% | 7.4% | 14.8% | 2.9% | −0.6% | 4.5% | 7.2% | 6.8% | 5.8% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| $86M | $64M | $769M | $1.6B | $19M | $20M | $10M | $42M | $127M | AcquisitionsAcquis. |
| — | $20M | $0 | $0 | $14M | $29M | $0 | $0 | — | BuybacksBuybacks |
| 22% | — | — | 5% | 3% | -13% | 5% | 2% | 2% | ROICROIC |
| 465% | — | -46% | 8% | 3% | -47% | 6% | -5% | -5% | Return on equityROE |
| 465% | — | −46% | 8% | 3% | −47% | 6% | −5% | −5% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||
| $947K | $77M | $100M | $150M | $46M | $77M | $110M | $106M | $48M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| $53M | $79M | $171M | $360M | $359M | $389M | $408M | $371M | $392M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| $8M | $13M | $59M | $123M | $128M | $114M | $140M | $151M | $159M | InventoryInvent. |
| $71M | $79M | $191M | $248M | $223M | $212M | $282M | $352M | $432M | Accounts payablePayables |
| ($10M) | $13M | $39M | $235M | $264M | $291M | $266M | $170M | $119M | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| $91M | $181M | $363M | $670M | $585M | $649M | $756M | $729M | $687M | Current assetsCur. assets |
| $136M | $154M | $422M | $500M | $456M | $537M | $567M | $712M | $743M | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 0.7× | 1.2× | 0.9× | 1.3× | 1.3× | 1.2× | 1.3× | 1.0× | 0.9× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| $202M | $267M | $999M | $3.5B | $3.5B | $2.7B | $2.7B | $2.5B | $2.6B | GoodwillGoodwill |
| $369M | $547M | $1.8B | $5.3B | $5.2B | $4.5B | $4.5B | $4.3B | $4.4B | Total assetsAssets |
| $134M | $397M | $785M | $2.2B | $2.2B | $2.1B | $2.0B | $1.7B | $1.8B | Total debtDebt |
| $133M | $320M | $685M | $2.1B | $2.1B | $2.1B | $1.9B | $1.6B | $1.8B | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| 4.2× | 0.7× | 1.7× | 2.4× | 1.7× | -4.6× | — | — | 0.6× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| $5M | ($39M) | $355M | $2.1B | $2.2B | $1.5B | $1.6B | $1.5B | $1.5B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| 0.3% | 2.1% | 1.8% | 1.0% | 0.8% | 0.7% | 0.5% | 0.7% | 0.7% | Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev |
| — | — | — | — | — | $831M | $13M | $128M | $128M | Goodwill written downGW imp. |
| Per share | |||||||||
| 11.9M | 22.6M | 52.5M | 133M | 139M | 134M | 136M | 135M | 136M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $29.02 | $23.48 | $20.13 | $18.45 | $21.37 | $23.81 | $24.06 | $24.01 | $24.21 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $1.95 | $-0.95 | $-3.08 | $1.17 | $0.50 | $-5.05 | $0.67 | $-0.52 | $-0.59 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $4.91 | $1.73 | $2.97 | $0.54 | $-0.13 | $1.07 | $1.74 | $1.62 | $1.41 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $4.91 | $1.73 | $2.97 | $0.54 | $-0.13 | $1.07 | $1.74 | $1.62 | $1.41 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $0.84 | $0.95 | $0.76 | $1.53 | $2.82 | $2.51 | $2.26 | $2.83 | $3.00 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $0.42 | $-1.72 | $6.76 | $15.50 | $15.48 | $10.85 | $11.59 | $11.24 | $11.10 | Book value / shareBVPS |
The diluted share count moved ×1.9 into 2019 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.
The diluted share count moved ×2.33 into 2020 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.
The diluted share count moved ×2.53 into 2021 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.
| 7-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | −2.7%/yr | +3.6%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | −14.6%/yr | −11.4%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +19.0%/yr | +30.2%/yr |
| Book value / share | +59.9%/yr | +10.7%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2018–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedBeyond op. cashEach year's outlays against its operating cash: the mix, and how it drifts. The hatched cap is spending beyond that year's operating cash — financed from the balance sheet or borrowing, not operations.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business turned a $71M loss into $219M of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | ($71M) | $90M | ($679M) | $69M | $156M |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$382M | +$365M | +$383M | +$351M | +$258M |
| Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost | +$22M | +$15M | +$22M | +$22M | +$25M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | +$269M | +$71M | +$754M | −$69M | −$164M |
| Cash from operations | $602M | $542M | $481M | $374M | $276M |
| Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow | −$382M | −$306M | −$337M | −$391M | −$203M |
| Owner earnings | $219M | $236M | $143M | ($18M) | $72M |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 7% | 7% | 4% | -1% | 3% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position . The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $22M), owner earnings is nearer $198M.
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- Does not cover its interestOperating income $91M ÷ interest expense $130M
What this means
A full year of operating profit didn't cover the interest bill. This is the zombie zone: the business depends on refinancing, asset sales, or forbearance to service its debt.
- How heavy is the debt, net of cash? $1.6B · 17.9× operating profitHeavy net debtCash $106M − debt $1.7B
What this means
Netting $106M of cash and short-term investments against $1.7B of debt leaves $1.6B owed, about 17.9× a year's operating profit (19.1× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- TightDSO 42 + DIO 21 − DPO 49 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.
Is it a good business?
- Below average through the cycle6-yr median, range -13%–22%; 2% latest = NOPAT $72M ÷ invested capital $3.1BIndustry peers: median 5%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 6 years (it ran 2% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Solid through the cycle8-yr median margin, range -1%–17%; latest $219M = operating cash $602M − maintenance capex $382MIndustry peers: median 5%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 7% of revenue this year, a 7% median across 8 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $22M of SBC) leaves $198M.
- Loss, but cash-generativeNet income ($71M) · cash from operations $602M
What this means
The company reported a net loss, so a conversion ratio isn't meaningful. What matters then is whether operations still threw off cash, here, they did.
How is the cash used?
- Reinvests most of itDividends + buybacks $0 ÷ Owner Earnings $219M
What this means
Of $219M Owner Earnings, $0 (0%) went back to shareholders, $0 dividends, $0 buybacks. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.
- Investing or harvesting? 1.00×MaintainingCapex $382M ÷ depreciation $382M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 1 of 5 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size PassRevenue ≥ $2B · $3.2B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity MissCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 1.02×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt MissDebt ≤ working capital · $1.7B vs $17M WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability MissA profit every year (8-yr record) · 4 loss years
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record MissUninterrupted dividends · none paid
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth —Earnings +33% over the record · —
What this means
Earnings were negative early in the record, a growth rate isn't meaningful.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $-1.62/share (latest year $-0.52), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $11.16/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2018–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 4 of 8
What this means
Lost money in 4 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 1 of 8 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin 7% → −3% (3-yr avg ends)
In the filing’s words Input costs rose and the filing says it could not fully pass them on — which is where this margin compressed.
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about 7% early to −3% lately, median 6% — competition or costs are biting in.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC −4%
What this means
Reinvested capital came back at a negative incremental return over this window — the invested base grew while operating profit did not. The filings show where it went.
- Owner earnings growth +25%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings grew about 25% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2023 · −18.7% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2023, understand why before trusting the good years.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Moderate contestabilityAI is likely to reshape costs and some products here without clearly contesting or sparing the core moat; how the company itself frames it is the tell.
Its FY2025 10-K names artificial intelligence as a competitive threat, in language that was not in the prior year's filing.
“Our existing competitors, new entrants, technology companies or other third parties may leverage AI to the benefit of their business or operations or may incorporate AI into their products and services more quickly or more effectively than we do, which could cause competitive harm and negatively impact our results of o…”
The question is whether a moat the record shows as durable outlasts a technology that lowers the cost of part of what the firm sells. The durability is read in the record above, the filing's own framing of AI beside it; the industry label decides nothing on its own.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of the latest quarter, Mar 31, 2026Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$48M
- Receivables$392M
- Inventory$159M
- Other current assets$88M
- Debt due within a year$24M
- Accounts payable$432M
- Other current liabilities$287M
From the company's latest filing.
How the cash was used, 2018–2025
Over the record, the business generated $2.6B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a reinvestor, most operating cash is plowed back into the business.
- Reinvested$1.7B · 65%
- Buybacks$63M · 2%
- Retained (debt / cash)$843M · 32%
- Returned to owners$63M
7% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $0 as dividends and $63M as buybacks.
- Source of fundingOperating cash
Operating cash covered reinvestment and returns; over the span debt rose $1.7B and cash and short-term investments rose $47M.
- Average price paid for buybacks—
Buybacks ran $63M over the span, but the filings don't tag the share count needed to deduce the average price paid.
- Net change in share count1041.0%
The diluted count rose from 12M to 136M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.
- Dividend record—
No dividend line was reported in the filing data over the span; the record here neither confirms nor rules out a payout.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Acquisitions & goodwill
from the balance sheet & the 8-year cash-flow recordGoodwill grows only when a company acquires and falls only when it concedes it overpaid. The size of that bet, the cash put into buying rather than building, and how much has already been written off.
$972M written down across 3 years (2023, 2024, 2025): goodwill the company has already conceded it overpaid for, charged against earnings. That is roughly 37% of the cash it put into acquisitions over the span. A write-down costs no cash (the cash went out when the deal was signed), but it is management marking its own past judgment to market.
Goodwill, acquired intangibles and equity from the latest balance sheet; acquisition spend and write-downs summed across the 8-year record, from the company's own filings.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.
| Fiscal year | Chief executive | Pay, as filed | “Actually paid” | Owner earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Mr. Griggs | $3.9M | $2.7M | $72M |
| 2021 | Mr. McGee | $8.1M | −$21.0M | $72M |
| 2022 | Mr. Griggs | $4.7M | $4.3M | ($18M) |
| 2023 | Mr. Barasch | $2.3M | $2.0M | $143M |
| 2023 | Mr. Griggs | $10.4M | $1.9M | $143M |
| 2024 | Mr. Barasch | $2.1M | $2.1M | $236M |
| 2024 | Ms. Foster | $8.4M | $8.3M | $236M |
| 2025 | Ms. Foster | $10.3M | $9.6M | $219M |
Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.
- Insider ownership2%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
- Stock-based compensation$22M
The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 1% of revenue, equal to 24% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why AdaptHealth Corp. is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2018–2025.
4 of the 5 tests turned up something to look into; the other 1 came back clean.
- Look hereIs it less profitable than it was?6.2% vs 13.0%
The owner-earnings margin averaged 13.0% early in the record and 6.2% across the last three years, and the latest year has not recovered. Ask the filing whether that is a structural drift or a cyclical trough — price, mix, cost, or a competitor — and whether it is permanent.
- Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?1041.0%
Diluted shares grew 1041.0% over 2018–2025, even as the company spent $63M on buybacks. The repurchases were outrun by issuance — to staff, in a raise, or in a deal — and the filing says which; owners' slice still shrank. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.
- Look hereDid debt outgrow the business?$134M → $1.8B
Debt rose from $134M to $1.8B while owner earnings went from about $84M to $199M — about 1.6 years of owner earnings in debt then, about 9.1 now: measured against what the business earns, the balance sheet carries more debt than it did. Debt raised for buybacks or deals rather than growth is the kind that bites in a downturn.
- Look hereAre "one-time" charges a yearly habit?4 of 8 years
Management took an impairment or write-down in 4 of the last 8 years, $977M in all. Taken across the majority of the record, the "one-time" label is wearing thin — ask whether these are past deals coming due rather than genuinely isolated events. Read it beside the goodwill the company still carries.
- Did receivables and inventory outpace sales?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
What an owner would ask, FY2025
read the 10-K →- Which reported numbers are a judgment call?Management names Revenue recognition, Pension & retirement, Contingencies as critical estimates
each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →
The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.
Peers, Health Care Providers & Services
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EHCEncompass Health | $5.9B | — | 15.0% | 10% | 13% |
| PACSPACS Group Inc. | $5.3B | — | 6.3% | 21% | 5% |
| ENSGEnsign Group | $5.0B | 20% | 7.7% | 17% | 5% |
| ACHCAcadia Healthcare Company Inc. | $3.3B | — | 13.1% | 5% | 11% |
| AHCOAdaptHealth Corp. | $3.2B | 18% | 6.6% | 4% | 7% |
| BKDBrookdale Senior Living Inc. | $3.2B | — | -1.3% | -1% | -1% |
| HIMSHims & Hers Health | $2.3B | 75% | -10.2% | -9% | 9% |
| RDNTRadNet | $2.0B | 13% | 4.9% | 4% | 5% |
| Group median | — | 19% | 6.4% | 5% | 6% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFType today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what AdaptHealth Corp. has delivered.
Through the cycle, AdaptHealth Corp. earns about $227M on its 7.0% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 6.8% margin runs in line with that. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings $192M on 136M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-05-01; net debt $1.8B. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← AGYS its page in the Manual AHR →
Industry order: ← AGL the Health Care Providers & Services chapter AIRS →