← All companies ← BILI Manual BIP → Agricultural Inputs CF →
BIOX, Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp.
A chemicals business, converting feedstocks into products at a spread the cycle moves.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- Situation
- Unprofitable. No sustained operating profit across the record; an earnings multiple has nothing to rest on. What the record does show is revenue, the gross-margin trajectory, and the burn against the cash on hand. Cyclical. Margins collapse and recover repeatedly across the record; a single year, good or bad, misstates the through-cycle earning power.
- What moves the needle
- Gross margin has run about 42% and operating margin about 12% through the cycle, a spread the cycle sets more than the company does. The margin is cyclical, swinging between −0.7% and 23% over the years, so the through-cycle figure carries more than any single year — and the balance sheet at the trough more than the peak. Inventory runs near 26% of sales, so how fast it turns back into cash — and the risk of writing it down when demand softens — sits alongside the margin. Read this kind of business on the spread and utilization. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on concentrated dependence, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 20-F →Argentina is 78% of revenue, so this is largely a single-region business.
- Argentina78%$232M
- Latin America8%$24M
- ROW8%$22M
- Brazil6%$18M
- EMEA3%$8M
From the segment footnote of the company's own 20-F. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMDec 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||||||
| $41M | $134M | $161M | $173M | $210M | $335M | $420M | $465M | $335M | $295M | RevenueRevenue |
| 26% | 42% | 46% | 46% | 43% | 38% | 44% | 40% | 39% | 39% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| $207K | $16M | $32M | $39M | $38M | $40M | $54M | $46M | ($2M) | ($5M) | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 0.5% | 11.8% | 20.0% | 22.6% | 18.3% | 11.9% | 12.9% | 9.9% | −0.7% | −1.6% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| ($6M) | ($11M) | ($18M) | $3M | ($7M) | ($7M) | $19M | $4M | ($55M) | ($56M) | Net incomeNet inc. |
| — | — | — | 40% | — | — | -6% | 47% | — | — | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | ||||||||||
| ($1M) | $18M | $30M | $9M | ($6M) | ($18M) | $3M | $42M | $50M | $82M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $584K | $2M | $2M | $2M | $3M | $4M | $5M | $6M | $6M | $6M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| $4M | $27M | $46M | $4M | ($2M) | ($14M) | ($21M) | $32M | $99M | $132M | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $608K | $3M | $2M | $2M | $3M | $3M | $11M | $10M | $6M | $4M | CapexCapex |
| 1.5% | 2.1% | 1.3% | 1.0% | 1.3% | 1.0% | 2.7% | 2.1% | 1.7% | 1.2% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| ($2M) | $16M | $28M | $8M | ($9M) | ($21M) | ($2M) | $36M | $44M | $78M | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| −4.4% | 12.1% | 17.2% | 4.4% | −4.3% | −6.3% | −0.5% | 7.7% | 13.2% | 26.6% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| ($2M) | $16M | $28M | $8M | ($9M) | ($21M) | ($9M) | $32M | $44M | $78M | Free cash flowFCF |
| −4.4% | 11.7% | 17.2% | 4.4% | −4.3% | −6.3% | −2.1% | 6.9% | 13.2% | 26.6% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| $14K | — | — | — | — | — | $452K | $175K | $72K | $72K | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| — | — | — | $31K | $4M | — | $3M | $734K | $927K | — | BuybacksBuybacks |
| -7% | -81% | -39% | 7% | -10% | -6% | 6% | 1% | -21% | -74% | Return on equityROE |
| −7% | — | — | — | — | — | 6% | 1% | −21% | −74% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | ||||||||||
| — | $7M | $8M | $56M | $47M | $39M | $60M | $56M | $35M | $13M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| — | $53M | $59M | $74M | $89M | $112M | $158M | $207M | $166M | $158M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| — | $19M | $27M | $29M | $61M | $126M | $140M | $126M | $88M | $65M | InventoryInvent. |
| — | $28M | $41M | $57M | $72M | $126M | $151M | $169M | $96M | $89M | Accounts payablePayables |
| — | $45M | $46M | $46M | $78M | $112M | $148M | $165M | $157M | $134M | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| — | $85M | $98M | $165M | $211M | $298M | $397M | $409M | $308M | $294M | Current assetsCur. assets |
| — | $119M | $116M | $131M | $168M | $223M | $299M | $329M | $338M | $329M | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| — | 0.7× | 0.8× | 1.3× | 1.3× | 1.3× | 1.3× | 1.2× | 0.9× | 0.9× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| — | $14M | $30M | $26M | $29M | $36M | $112M | $112M | $112M | $36M | GoodwillGoodwill |
| — | $197M | $242M | $298M | $395M | $518M | $818M | $853M | $764M | $560M | Total assetsAssets |
| — | $91M | $104M | $105M | $125M | $145M | $168M | $179M | $158M | $124M | Total debtDebt |
| — | $84M | $95M | $49M | $78M | $107M | $108M | $123M | $123M | $112M | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| 0.0× | 0.9× | 1.4× | 1.9× | 1.8× | 2.2× | 2.3× | 1.7× | -0.1× | -0.1× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| $84M | $14M | $47M | $46M | $68M | $127M | $299M | $315M | $265M | $76M | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | ||||||||||
| 28.1M | 28.1M | 30.5M | 36.1M | 39.2M | 42.3M | 62.1M | 62.8M | 63.2M | 63.5M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $1.47 | $4.75 | $5.27 | $4.79 | $5.34 | $7.92 | $6.76 | $7.40 | $5.30 | $4.65 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $-0.21 | $-0.39 | $-0.60 | $0.09 | $-0.18 | $-0.17 | $0.30 | $0.07 | $-0.88 | $-0.89 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $-0.07 | $0.57 | $0.91 | $0.21 | $-0.23 | $-0.50 | $-0.04 | $0.57 | $0.70 | $1.23 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $-0.07 | $0.56 | $0.91 | $0.21 | $-0.23 | $-0.50 | $-0.14 | $0.51 | $0.70 | $1.23 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | $0.01 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| $0.02 | $0.10 | $0.07 | $0.05 | $0.07 | $0.08 | $0.18 | $0.16 | $0.09 | $0.06 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $2.98 | $0.49 | $1.55 | $1.28 | $1.73 | $3.01 | $4.80 | $5.01 | $4.20 | $1.20 | Book value / shareBVPS |
The diluted share count moved ×1.47 into 2023 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +15.4%/yr | +2.0%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | — | +26.9%/yr |
| Dividends / share | +9.8%/yr | −60.4%/yr (2-yr) |
| Capital spending / share | +17.0%/yr | +14.4%/yr |
| Book value / share | +3.9%/yr | +26.8%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2016–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedEach year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business turned a $55M loss into $44M of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | ($55M) | $4M | $19M | ($7M) | ($7M) |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$6M | +$6M | +$5M | +$4M | +$3M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | +$99M | +$32M | −$21M | −$14M | −$2M |
| Cash from operations | $50M | $42M | $3M | ($18M) | ($6M) |
| Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume | −$6M | −$6M | −$5M | −$3M | −$3M |
| Owner earnings | $44M | $36M | ($2M) | ($21M) | ($9M) |
| Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still | — | −$4M | −$7M | — | — |
| Free cash flow | $44M | $32M | ($9M) | ($21M) | ($9M) |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 13% | 8% | -1% | -6% | -4% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- Can it pay its interest? -0.1×Does not cover its interestOperating income ($5M) ÷ interest expense $32M
What this means
A full year of operating profit didn't cover the interest bill. This is the zombie zone: the business depends on refinancing, asset sales, or forbearance to service its debt.
- Net debt against an operating lossCash $11M + ST investments $2M − debt $124M
What this means
Netting $13M of cash and short-term investments against $124M of debt leaves $112M owed, with no operating profit this year to measure it against — understand that combination before anything else about the company. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Long (60+ days)DSO 196 + DIO 132 − DPO 182 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.
Is it a good business?
- Below averageNOPAT ($4M) ÷ invested capital $190M (debt + equity − cash)Industry peers: median 1%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Thin through the cycle9-yr median margin, range -6%–17%; latest $78M = operating cash $82M − maintenance capex $4MIndustry peers: median 5%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 27% of revenue this year, a 4% median across 9 years.
- Loss, but cash-generativeNet income ($56M) · cash from operations $82M
What this means
The company reported a net loss, so a conversion ratio isn't meaningful. What matters then is whether operations still threw off cash, here, they did.
How is the cash used?
- Reinvests most of itDividends + buybacks $999K ÷ Owner Earnings $78M
What this means
Of $78M Owner Earnings, $999K (1%) went back to shareholders, $72K dividends, $927K buybacks. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.
- Investing or harvesting? 0.60×HarvestingCapex $4M ÷ depreciation $6M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 0 of 5 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size MissRevenue ≥ $2B · $295M
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity MissCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 0.90×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt MissDebt ≤ working capital · $124M vs ($34M) WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability MissA profit every year (9-yr record) · 6 loss years
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record MissUninterrupted dividends · 4 of 9 yrs
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth —Earnings +33% over the record · —
What this means
Earnings were negative early in the record, a growth rate isn't meaningful.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $-0.17/share (latest year $-0.89), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $1.21/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2016–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 3 of 9
What this means
Lost money in 6 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 2 of 8 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin 11% → 7% (3-yr avg ends)
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about 11% early to 7% lately, median 12% — competition or costs are biting in.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC 4%
What this means
Reinvested capital came back at only a modest incremental return — near the cost of capital, where extra growth adds little per dollar. The record shows whether it is a soft stretch or a thinning moat.
- Owner earnings growth +21%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings grew about 21% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2025 · −0.7% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2025, understand why before trusting the good years.
- Dividend record rising
What this means
Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
The filing raises AI among its risks, but in other terms (security, regulation, energy or the like), not as a competitor to its product; it frames AI mainly as a capability.
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat, and the company is using it that way.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of fiscal year-end, Dec 31, 2025Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$13M
- Receivables$158M
- Inventory$65M
- Other current assets$59M
- Debt due within a year$90M
- Accounts payable$89M
- Other current liabilities$149M
From the company's latest filing.
How the cash was used, 2016–2025
Over the record, the business generated $127M of operating cash; how management split it reads as a balanced allocator, splitting cash between the business, owners, and the balance sheet.
- Reinvested$40M · 32%
- Dividends$713K · 1%
- Buybacks$8M · 6%
- Retained (debt / cash)$78M · 61%
- Returned to owners$9M
9% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $713K as dividends and $8M as buybacks.
- Average price paid for buybacks—
Buybacks ran $8M over the span, but the filings don't tag the share count needed to deduce the average price paid.
- Net change in share count125.9%
The diluted count rose from 28M to 63M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.
- Dividend record$0.00/sh
Paid in 4 of the years on record, the per-share dividend growing about 32% a year. It was cut at least once along the way.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Acquisitions & goodwill
from the balance sheet & the 9-year cash-flow recordGoodwill grows only when a company acquires and falls only when it concedes it overpaid. The size of that bet, the cash put into buying rather than building, and how much has already been written off.
None written down over the record; the goodwill is still carried at full cost. That is the deals holding their value on the books so far; whether they keep doing so is the test an owner watches, since the write-down, when it comes, is the admission the price was too high.
Goodwill, acquired intangibles and equity from the latest balance sheet; acquisition spend and write-downs summed across the 9-year record, from the company's own filings.
Peers, Agricultural Inputs
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECVTEcovyst Inc. | $724M | 27% | 11.8% | 4% | 12% |
| REXREX American Resources Corporation | $650M | 11% | 6.8% | 13% | 8% |
| LXULSB Industries Inc. | $615M | 5% | -2.7% | -1% | -3% |
| UANCVR Partners LP Common | $606M | 19% | 12.0% | — | 11% |
| LXFRLuxfer Holdings PLC | $385M | 24% | 7.8% | 10% | 5% |
| BIOXBioceres Crop Solutions Corp. | $295M | 42% | 11.9% | -2% | 4% |
| GPREGreen Plains Inc. | $189M | — | -32.4% | -7% | -31% |
| GEVOGevo Inc. | $161M | -37% | -291.7% | -22% | -267% |
| Group median | — | 19% | 7.3% | -1% | 5% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFEnter the home-market price, not the US ADR quote. Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp. reports in USD, and every figure here (owner earnings, book value, the share count) is on that ordinary-share basis. Enter the price on the same basis: the local-exchange quote per ordinary share. A US ADR price in dollars bundles the ADR-to-ordinary ratio, so it will not reconcile with these figures and would throw the multiple off.
Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp. has delivered.
Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp.’s latest year runs above its own through-cycle margin — the reported figure may flatter a peak. So the tool opens on the through-cycle base, Graham’s averaging cutting both ways; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.
Through the cycle, Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp. earns about $13M on its 4.4% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 26.6% margin runs above that; the reported figure may flatter a peak you'd be paying on. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year. It comes pre-checked here for that reason, the same rule that already normalizes a trough; clear it to price the year as filed.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings $78M on 63M shares outstanding, per the 20-F cover, as of 2025-06-30; net debt $112M. The base opens on the through-cycle figure (the latest year sits above the record’s own median, and Graham’s averaging cuts both ways); clear Normalize to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← BILI its page in the Manual BIP →
Industry order: the Agricultural Inputs chapter CF →