← All companies ← CAE Manual CAN → ← BMI Electronic Components & Instruments CGNX →
CAMT, Camtek Ltd.
Camtek is a developer and manufacturer of high-end inspection and metrology equipment for the semiconductor industry.
Camtek's systems inspect IC and measure IC features on wafers throughout the production process of semiconductor devices, covering the back-end-of-line (BEOL) of the front-end and mid-end and up to the beginning of assembly (Post Dicing).
Camtek's systems inspect wafers for the most demanding semiconductor market segments, including Advanced Packaging, Chiplets, HBM, Compound Semiconductors, Memory, CMOS Image Sensors, Power, RF and MEMS, serving the industry's leading global IDMs, OSATs, and foundries.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- Situation
- Cyclical. Margins collapse and recover repeatedly across the record; a single year, good or bad, misstates the through-cycle earning power.
- What moves the needle
- Gross margin has run about 49% and operating margin about 16% through the cycle, a solid spread between what it charges and what the product costs to make. The operating margin has swung widely — from −3.2% to 26% — on a steadier 49% gross margin, so what moves it sits below the gross line, in operating spend and one-off charges more than in the cost of the product itself. Inventory runs near 23% of sales, so how fast it turns back into cash — and the risk of writing it down when demand softens — sits alongside the margin. Read this kind of business on the installed base and the upgrade cycle. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has run high across the record (median 22%, above 15% in 8 of 10 years). Owner earnings agree: roughly 17% of revenue reaches owners as cash, though it swings. Whether these returns reflect real pricing power or an accounting artifact is the judgment the 10-K is for.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 20-F →Revenue spreads across 5 regions, the largest China at 49%.
- China49%$244M
- Asia Pacific34%$169M
- South Korea7%$37M
- United States6%$29M
- Europe4%$17M
From the segment footnote of the company's own 20-F. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMDec 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $79M | $93M | $123M | $134M | $156M | $270M | $321M | $315M | $429M | $496M | $496M | RevenueRevenue |
| 41% | 49% | 49% | 48% | 47% | 51% | 50% | 47% | 49% | 50% | 50% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| $2M | ($3M) | $20M | $22M | $23M | $71M | $81M | $65M | $108M | $128M | $128M | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 2.5% | −3.2% | 16.3% | 16.4% | 14.5% | 26.3% | 25.4% | 20.7% | 25.2% | 25.8% | 25.8% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| $5M | $14M | $19M | $22M | $22M | $60M | $80M | $79M | $119M | $51M | $51M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| 6% | — | 10% | 8% | 7% | 16% | 9% | 10% | 10% | 3% | 3% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| ($17M) | $2M | $17M | $25M | $26M | $61M | $58M | $79M | $122M | $142M | $142M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $2M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $3M | $4M | $6M | $11M | $12M | $12M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| ($24M) | ($14M) | ($4M) | $506K | $2M | ($2M) | ($26M) | ($5M) | ($7M) | $79M | $79M | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $1M | $3M | $2M | $1M | $2M | $4M | $8M | $8M | $10M | $14M | $14M | CapexCapex |
| 1.6% | 3.4% | 1.8% | 0.9% | 1.5% | 1.5% | 2.6% | 2.6% | 2.4% | 2.9% | 2.9% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| ($19M) | ($487K) | $15M | $23M | $23M | $58M | $54M | $74M | $112M | $127M | $127M | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| −23.5% | −0.5% | 11.8% | 17.4% | 15.0% | 21.6% | 16.7% | 23.3% | 26.1% | 25.7% | 25.7% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| ($19M) | ($2M) | $15M | $23M | $23M | $57M | $50M | $71M | $112M | $127M | $127M | Free cash flowFCF |
| −23.5% | −1.6% | 11.8% | 17.4% | 15.0% | 21.1% | 15.5% | 22.6% | 26.1% | 25.7% | 25.7% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| 4% | -7% | 39% | 21% | 17% | 115% | 31% | 16% | 23% | 28% | — | ROICROIC |
| 6% | 17% | 18% | 16% | 10% | 21% | 21% | 17% | 22% | 8% | 8% | Return on equityROE |
| 6% | 17% | 18% | 16% | 10% | 21% | 21% | 17% | 22% | 8% | 8% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $20M | $44M | $55M | $38M | $106M | $242M | $148M | $139M | $157M | $257M | $257M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| $22M | $23M | $32M | $31M | $41M | $58M | $81M | $87M | $99M | $91M | $91M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| $17M | $21M | $30M | $24M | $40M | $59M | $66M | $86M | $111M | $112M | $112M | InventoryInvent. |
| $10M | $11M | $16M | $11M | $27M | $34M | $32M | $42M | $47M | $34M | $34M | Accounts payablePayables |
| $28M | $34M | $46M | $44M | $54M | $83M | $114M | $131M | $164M | $169M | $169M | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| $86M | $91M | $119M | $148M | $262M | $520M | $557M | $547M | $620M | $897M | $897M | Current assetsCur. assets |
| $32M | $28M | $39M | $32M | $57M | $90M | $89M | $97M | $124M | $107M | $107M | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 2.7× | 3.3× | 3.1× | 4.7× | 4.6× | 5.8× | 6.3× | 5.7× | 5.0× | 8.3× | 8.3× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | $0 | $74M | $74M | $74M | $74M | GoodwillGoodwill |
| $106M | $113M | $142M | $170M | $288M | $584M | $677M | $788M | $892M | $1.3B | $1.3B | Total assetsAssets |
| 8.2× | -233.6× | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9861.8× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| $73M | $84M | $101M | $136M | $227M | $294M | $384M | $476M | $549M | $617M | $617M | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 35.4M | 36.0M | 36.7M | 38.4M | 40.4M | 45.0M | 48.2M | 48.9M | 49.4M | 50.0M | 45.8M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $2.24 | $2.60 | $3.35 | $3.49 | $3.86 | $5.99 | $6.65 | $6.45 | $8.69 | $9.93 | $10.82 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $0.13 | $0.39 | $0.51 | $0.57 | $0.54 | $1.34 | $1.66 | $1.61 | $2.40 | $1.02 | $1.11 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $-0.53 | $-0.01 | $0.40 | $0.61 | $0.58 | $1.29 | $1.11 | $1.51 | $2.27 | $2.55 | $2.78 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $-0.53 | $-0.04 | $0.40 | $0.61 | $0.58 | $1.26 | $1.03 | $1.46 | $2.27 | $2.55 | $2.78 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $0.04 | $0.09 | $0.06 | $0.03 | $0.06 | $0.09 | $0.17 | $0.17 | $0.20 | $0.29 | $0.31 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $2.07 | $2.34 | $2.76 | $3.55 | $5.63 | $6.52 | $7.96 | $9.74 | $11.13 | $12.35 | $13.46 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +18.0%/yr | +20.8%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | — | +34.6%/yr |
| EPS | +25.2%/yr | +13.5%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +25.8%/yr | +37.0%/yr |
| Book value / share | +21.9%/yr | +17.0%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2016–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedEach year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business turned $51M of profit into $127M of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | $51M | $119M | $79M | $80M | $60M |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$12M | +$11M | +$6M | +$4M | +$3M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | +$79M | −$7M | −$5M | −$26M | −$2M |
| Cash from operations | $142M | $122M | $79M | $58M | $61M |
| Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume | −$14M | −$10M | −$6M | −$4M | −$3M |
| Owner earnings | $127M | $112M | $74M | $54M | $58M |
| Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still | — | — | −$2M | −$4M | −$1M |
| Free cash flow | $127M | $112M | $71M | $50M | $57M |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 26% | 26% | 23% | 17% | 22% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- Can it pay its interest? 9861.8×ComfortableOperating income $128M ÷ interest expense $13K
What this means
Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient, it says solvent, not cheap.
- Net cashCash $178M + ST investments $79M − debt $4M
What this means
Cash and short-term investments exceed every dollar of debt by $253M, on net the company owes nothing, and can act from strength when others can't. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Long (60+ days)DSO 67 + DIO 167 − DPO 50 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.
Is it a good business?
- High through the cycle10-yr median, range -7%–115%; the latest year is left out — large non-operating charges put its operating line well above pretax profitIndustry peers: median -3%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 10 years, so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- High through the cycle10-yr median margin, range -24%–26%; latest $127M = operating cash $142M − maintenance capex $14MIndustry peers: median 7%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 26% of revenue this year, a 17% median across 10 years.
- Cash-backedCash from ops $142M ÷ net income $51M
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
- Investing or harvesting? 1.22×ExpandingCapex $14M ÷ depreciation $12M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 4 of 6 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size MissRevenue ≥ $2B · $496M
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity PassCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 8.35×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt PassDebt ≤ working capital · $4M vs $790M WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability PassA profit every year (10-yr record) · no losses
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record MissUninterrupted dividends · none paid
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth PassEarnings +33% over the record · +562%
What this means
At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $1653.45/share (latest year $1015.05), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $12347.47/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2016–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 10 of 10
What this means
Never lost money over the record, the earnings stability Graham insisted on.
- Operating margin 5% → 24% (3-yr avg ends)
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin widened — about 5% early to 24% lately, median 16% — pricing power intact or improving.
- Worst year 2017 · −3.2% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2017, understand why before trusting the good years.
- Share count +3.9%/yr
What this means
The share count is rising, dilution works against you on a per-share basis.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
The filing positions AI as something the company uses, not something it fears.
“Continued growth is expected with the enhancements of existing products, and the inclusion of emerging technologies such as AI, as well as rapid growth in automotive, electrical and autonomous vehicles and industrial electronics.”
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat, and the company is using it that way.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of fiscal year-end, Dec 31, 2025Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$257M
- Receivables$91M
- Inventory$112M
- Other current assets$437M
- Accounts payable$34M
- Other current liabilities$74M
From the company's latest filing.
How the cash was used, 2016–2025
Over the record, the business generated $514M of operating cash; how management split it reads as a cash builder, a large share of cash simply built up on the balance sheet.
- Reinvested$55M · 11%
- Retained (debt / cash)$458M · 89%
- Source of fundingOperating cash
Operating cash covered reinvestment and returns; over the span cash and short-term investments rose $237M.
- Net change in share count29.5%
The diluted count rose from 35M to 46M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.
- Dividend record—
No dividend line was reported in the filing data over the span; the record here neither confirms nor rules out a payout.
- Return on what it retained23%
Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out ($469M over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) grew $106M, so each retained $1 added about 0.23 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why Camtek Ltd. is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.
1 of the 4 tests turned up something to look into; the other 3 came back clean.
- Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?29.5%
Diluted shares grew 29.5% over 2016–2025. Owners were diluted on net; each share owns less of the business than it did. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.
- Is it less profitable than it was?
- Did reported profit become cash?
- Did receivables and inventory outpace sales?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
What an owner would ask, FY2025
read the 10-K →- How much of the revenue rides on one buyer?≈$74M · 15% of revenue on the largest customers (TTM)
“In 2024, three customers accounted for 15 %, 10 % and 10 % of total revenues, respectively.”verify →
The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.
Peers, Electronic Components & Instruments
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGNXCognex Corporation | $994M | 74% | 22.8% | 16% | 26% |
| TXG10x Genomics Inc. | $643M | 77% | -31.9% | -42% | -9% |
| BVSBioventus Inc. | $568M | 68% | 2.8% | -3% | 7% |
| ATRCAtriCure | $535M | 75% | -10.8% | -8% | -8% |
| GKOSGlaukos Corporation | $507M | 76% | -25.2% | -8% | -3% |
| CAMTCamtek Ltd. | $496M | 49% | 18.6% | 22% | 17% |
| IMAXImax Corporation | $410M | 54% | 12.3% | 11% | 16% |
| MLABMesa Laboratories Inc. | $249M | 60% | 6.8% | 1% | 19% |
| Group median | — | 71% | 4.8% | -1% | 11% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFEnter the US price, in dollars: the NYSE/Nasdaq quote you hold. Camtek Ltd.'s US listing is the ordinary share itself. The record tables elsewhere on this page remain as filed.
Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Camtek Ltd. has delivered.
Camtek Ltd.’s latest year runs above its own through-cycle margin — the reported figure may flatter a peak. So the tool opens on the through-cycle base, Graham’s averaging cutting both ways; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.
Through the cycle, Camtek Ltd. earns about $85M on its 17.1% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 25.7% margin runs above that; the reported figure may flatter a peak you'd be paying on. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year. It comes pre-checked here for that reason, the same rule that already normalizes a trough; clear it to price the year as filed.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings $127M on 0M shares outstanding (a weighted average, the only count this filer tags); net cash $253M. The if-converted diluted count is 46M, 91611% above the shares outstanding: the dilution overhang (convertibles, options) a buyer inherits. The base opens on the through-cycle figure (the latest year sits above the record’s own median, and Graham’s averaging cuts both ways); clear Normalize to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← CAE its page in the Manual CAN →
Industry order: ← BMI the Electronic Components & Instruments chapter CGNX →