← All companies ← CRGO Manual CSAN → ← CLFD Communications Equipment CSCO →
CRNT, Ceragon Networks Ltd.
Our research and development department provides us with the ability to design and develop most of the aspects of our proprietary solutions, from chip-level, including both ASICs and RFICs, to full system integration.
Our research and development projects currently in process include extensions to our leading IP-based networking product lines and development of new technologies to support future product concepts.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- Situation
- Unprofitable. No sustained operating profit across the record; an earnings multiple has nothing to rest on. What the record does show is revenue, the gross-margin trajectory, and the burn against the cash on hand. Cyclical. Margins collapse and recover repeatedly across the record; a single year, good or bad, misstates the through-cycle earning power.
- What moves the needle
- Gross margin has run about 34% and operating margin about 2.6% through the cycle, a spread the cycle sets more than the company does. The margin is cyclical, swinging between −3.7% and 10% over the years, so the through-cycle figure carries more than any single year — and the balance sheet at the trough more than the peak. Inventory runs near 18% of sales, so how fast it turns back into cash — and the risk of writing it down when demand softens — sits alongside the margin. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has run in the teens (median 19%, above 15% in 4 of 7 years). Owner earnings agree: roughly 4% of revenue reaches owners as cash, though it swings. Returns like these are solid but short of clear franchise economics; whether they hold is what the 10-K settles, not the multiple.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 20-F →Revenue spreads across 6 regions, the largest India at 34%.
- India34%$117M
- North America33%$113M
- EMEA15%$49M
- Latin America9%$30M
- Asia Pacific9%$30M
- Israel1%$4M
From the segment footnote of the company's own 20-F. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMDec 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $294M | $332M | $344M | $286M | $263M | $291M | $295M | $347M | $394M | $339M | $339M | RevenueRevenue |
| 34% | 32% | 34% | 34% | 29% | 30% | 32% | 35% | 35% | 34% | 34% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| $19M | $23M | $26M | $7M | ($8M) | $5M | ($11M) | $21M | $39M | $7M | $7M | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 6.6% | 7.0% | 7.6% | 2.6% | −2.9% | 1.7% | −3.7% | 6.1% | 9.8% | 2.1% | 2.1% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| $11M | $16M | $23M | ($2M) | ($17M) | ($15M) | ($20M) | $6M | $24M | ($2M) | ($2M) | Net incomeNet inc. |
| 13% | 10% | — | — | — | — | — | 51% | 12% | — | — | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| $26M | $17M | $22M | ($13M) | $17M | ($15M) | ($5M) | $31M | $26M | $32M | $32M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $10M | $9M | $8M | $10M | $13M | $12M | $11M | $10M | $12M | $14M | $14M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| $4M | ($8M) | ($8M) | ($20M) | $21M | ($12M) | $4M | $15M | ($10M) | $19M | $19M | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $8M | $9M | $10M | $12M | $6M | $9M | $10M | $10M | $15M | $14M | $14M | CapexCapex |
| 2.8% | 2.6% | 3.0% | 4.1% | 2.3% | 3.2% | 3.5% | 2.9% | 3.7% | 4.0% | 4.0% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $18M | $9M | $15M | ($25M) | $11M | ($24M) | ($15M) | $21M | $12M | $18M | $18M | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 6.0% | 2.6% | 4.3% | −8.6% | 4.2% | −8.4% | −5.2% | 6.0% | 2.9% | 5.3% | 5.3% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| $18M | $9M | $12M | ($25M) | $11M | ($24M) | ($15M) | $21M | $12M | $18M | $18M | Free cash flowFCF |
| 6.0% | 2.6% | 3.5% | −8.6% | 4.2% | −8.4% | −5.2% | 6.0% | 2.9% | 5.3% | 5.3% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| 21% | 19% | 21% | — | -5% | — | -9% | 10% | 26% | — | — | ROICROIC |
| 10% | 12% | 14% | -1% | -12% | -11% | -16% | 5% | 14% | -1% | -1% | Return on equityROE |
| 10% | 12% | 14% | −1% | −12% | −11% | −16% | 5% | 14% | −1% | −1% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $36M | $26M | $36M | $24M | $27M | $17M | $23M | $28M | $35M | $38M | $39M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| $107M | $114M | $123M | $119M | $107M | $108M | $100M | $104M | $150M | $100M | $100M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| $46M | $54M | $54M | $62M | $51M | $61M | $72M | $69M | $60M | $62M | $62M | InventoryInvent. |
| $68M | $75M | $79M | $60M | $64M | $69M | $67M | $67M | $91M | $71M | $71M | Accounts payablePayables |
| $85M | $92M | $98M | $121M | $94M | $100M | $105M | $106M | $118M | $90M | $90M | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| $206M | $211M | $225M | $216M | $200M | $203M | $211M | $218M | $261M | $225M | $225M | Current assetsCur. assets |
| $111M | $105M | $110M | $104M | $100M | $116M | $133M | $133M | $151M | $120M | $120M | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 1.9× | 2.0× | 2.0× | 2.1× | 2.0× | 1.8× | 1.6× | 1.6× | 1.7× | 1.9× | 1.9× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | $0 | $8M | $8M | $11M | $11M | GoodwillGoodwill |
| $244M | $254M | $283M | $290M | $272M | $293M | $289M | $299M | $345M | $317M | $317M | Total assetsAssets |
| 5.1× | 4.8× | 5.7× | 1.9× | -1.8× | 1.0× | -2.2× | 2.8× | 6.5× | 1.4× | 1.4× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| $116M | $134M | $160M | $160M | $146M | $137M | $120M | $134M | $166M | $173M | $173M | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 78.6M | 79.9M | 81.0M | 80.3M | 81.1M | 83.4M | 84.1M | 85.5M | 88.5M | 89.8M | 90.6M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $3.74 | $4.15 | $4.24 | $3.56 | $3.24 | $3.49 | $3.51 | $4.06 | $4.46 | $3.77 | $3.74 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $0.15 | $0.19 | $0.28 | $-0.03 | $-0.21 | $-0.18 | $-0.23 | $0.07 | $0.27 | $-0.02 | $-0.02 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $0.22 | $0.11 | $0.18 | $-0.31 | $0.14 | $-0.29 | $-0.18 | $0.24 | $0.13 | $0.20 | $0.20 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $0.22 | $0.11 | $0.15 | $-0.31 | $0.14 | $-0.29 | $-0.18 | $0.24 | $0.13 | $0.20 | $0.20 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $0.10 | $0.11 | $0.13 | $0.14 | $0.07 | $0.11 | $0.12 | $0.12 | $0.16 | $0.15 | $0.15 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $1.48 | $1.67 | $1.97 | $2.00 | $1.80 | $1.64 | $1.42 | $1.57 | $1.88 | $1.92 | $1.91 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +0.1%/yr | +3.1%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | −1.2%/yr | +7.8%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +4.3%/yr | +15.1%/yr |
| Book value / share | +3.0%/yr | +1.3%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2016–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedEach year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business turned a $2M loss into $18M of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | ($2M) | $24M | $6M | ($20M) | ($15M) |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$14M | +$12M | +$10M | +$11M | +$12M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | +$19M | −$10M | +$15M | +$4M | −$12M |
| Cash from operations | $32M | $26M | $31M | ($5M) | ($15M) |
| Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow | −$14M | −$15M | −$10M | −$10M | −$9M |
| Owner earnings | $18M | $12M | $21M | ($15M) | ($24M) |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 5% | 3% | 6% | -5% | -8% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- ThinOperating income $7M ÷ interest expense $5M
What this means
Operating profit covers interest, but with little room. A bad year, a refinancing at higher rates, or a revenue wobble closes the gap fast.
- Net cashCash $38M + ST investments $535K − debt $10M
What this means
Cash and short-term investments exceed every dollar of debt by $29M, on net the company owes nothing, and can act from strength when others can't. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Long (60+ days)DSO 107 + DIO 100 − DPO 115 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.
Is it a good business?
- High through the cycle7-yr median, range -9%–26%; the latest year is left out — large non-operating charges put its operating line well above pretax profitIndustry peers: median -8%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 7 years, so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Solid, recently turned positivelatest $18M = operating cash $32M − maintenance capex $14M; positive each of the last 3 years, after an earlier loss stretch (10-yr median 3%)Industry peers: median -2%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 5% of revenue this year, a 3% median across 10 years.
- Loss, but cash-generativeNet income ($2M) · cash from operations $32M
What this means
The company reported a net loss, so a conversion ratio isn't meaningful. What matters then is whether operations still threw off cash, here, they did.
How is the cash used?
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
- Investing or harvesting? 0.95×MaintainingCapex $14M ÷ depreciation $14M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 1 of 6 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size MissRevenue ≥ $2B · $339M
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity NearCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 1.87×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt PassDebt ≤ working capital · $10M vs $105M WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability MissA profit every year (10-yr record) · 5 loss years
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record MissUninterrupted dividends · none paid
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth MissEarnings +33% over the record · −44%
What this means
At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $0.11/share (latest year $-0.02), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $1.95/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2016–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 5 of 10
What this means
Lost money in 5 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Operating margin 7% → 6% (3-yr avg ends)
In the filing’s words The margin has held, but the filing names price competition — the pressure is present even where the margin has absorbed it so far.
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about 7% early to 6% lately, median 3% — competition or costs are biting in.
- Owner earnings growth +1%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings grew about 1% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2022 · −3.7% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2022, understand why before trusting the good years.
- Share count +1.5%/yr
What this means
The share count is rising, dilution works against you on a per-share basis.
- How management talks about it Promotional
What this means
Results have held roughly flat while the filing leans on a promoter’s vocabulary — watch whether the words are doing work the numbers are not.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
Its FY2025 10-K names artificial intelligence as a competitive threat, in language that was not in the prior year's filing.
“If our competitors adopt AI/ML more quickly or more successfully than we do, our competitive position could be impaired.”
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat, and the company is using it that way.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of fiscal year-end, Dec 31, 2025Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$39M
- Receivables$100M
- Inventory$62M
- Other current assets$25M
- Debt due within a year$8M
- Accounts payable$71M
- Other current liabilities$41M
From the company's latest filing.
How the cash was used, 2016–2025
Over the record, the business generated $138M of operating cash; how management split it reads as a reinvestor, most operating cash is plowed back into the business.
- Reinvested$103M · 74%
- Retained (debt / cash)$36M · 26%
- Net change in share count15.3%
The diluted count rose from 79M to 91M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.
- Dividend record—
No dividend line was reported in the filing data over the span; the record here neither confirms nor rules out a payout.
- Return on what it retained13%
Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out ($24M over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) grew $3M, so each retained $1 added about 0.13 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why Ceragon Networks Ltd. is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.
1 of the 4 tests turned up something to look into; the other 3 came back clean.
- Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?15.3%
Diluted shares grew 15.3% over 2016–2025. Owners were diluted on net; each share owns less of the business than it did. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.
- Is it less profitable than it was?
- Did reported profit become cash?
- Did receivables and inventory outpace sales?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
What an owner would ask, FY2025
read the 10-K →- How much of the revenue rides on one buyer?≈$26M · 8% of revenue on the largest customer (TTM)
“Major customer data as a percentage of total revenues: In 2025, the Company had revenues from a customer that represents a group of affiliated companies, equaling 20.7 %, a single customer that accounted for 19.6 %, and a single customer that accounted for 7.6 % of total revenues.”verify →
The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.
Peers, Communications Equipment
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIOTPowerFleet Inc. | $444M | 50% | -7.1% | -8% | -2% |
| HLITHarmonic Inc. | $361M | 50% | 3.5% | 3% | 2% |
| CRNTCeragon Networks Ltd. | $339M | 34% | 4.3% | 19% | 4% |
| PLPlanet Labs PBC | $308M | 49% | -77.3% | -40% | -40% |
| AMSCAmerican Superconductor Corporation | $299M | 15% | -23.0% | -31% | -15% |
| NSSCNAPCO Security Technologies Inc. | $182M | 43% | 13.4% | 23% | 9% |
| CLFDClearfield Inc. | $150M | 40% | 8.1% | 9% | 6% |
| BKSYBlackSky Technology Inc. | $107M | — | -95.8% | -36% | -64% |
| Group median | — | 43% | -1.8% | -3% | -0% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFEnter the US price, in dollars: the NYSE/Nasdaq quote you hold. Ceragon Networks Ltd.'s US listing is the ordinary share itself. The record tables elsewhere on this page remain as filed.
Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Ceragon Networks Ltd. has delivered.
Ceragon Networks Ltd.’s latest year runs above its own through-cycle margin — the reported figure may flatter a peak. So the tool opens on the through-cycle base, Graham’s averaging cutting both ways; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.
Through the cycle, Ceragon Networks Ltd. earns about $12M on its 3.6% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 5.3% margin runs above that; the reported figure may flatter a peak you'd be paying on. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year. It comes pre-checked here for that reason, the same rule that already normalizes a trough; clear it to price the year as filed.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings $18M on 88M shares outstanding, per the 20-F cover, as of 2025-12-31; net cash $29M. The base opens on the through-cycle figure (the latest year sits above the record’s own median, and Graham’s averaging cuts both ways); clear Normalize to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← CRGO its page in the Manual CSAN →
Industry order: ← CLFD the Communications Equipment chapter CSCO →