Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← CWAN Manual CWCO → ← CVBF Banks CZFS →

CWBC, Community West Bancshares

Banks financial

The Bank is regulated by the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation and its primary Federal regulator is the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Today, the Bank operates full-service Banking Centers in California from Greater Sacramento in the north, throughout the San Joaquin Valley and west to the Central Coast.

Community West Bancshares is regulated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System ("Federal Reserve").

Latest annual: FY2025 10-K
CWBC · Community West Bancshares
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$147M
+25.6% YoY · 13% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · FY2025, with 5-yr average
Revenue $147M 5-yr avg $104M
Return on equity 9% 5-yr avg 10%
Return on tangible equity 13% 5-yr avg 14%
Efficiency ratio 62% 5-yr avg 64%
Equity / assets 11.1% 5-yr avg 9.4%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What moves the needle
Net interest margin, loan losses, and book value. A lender is read on the quality of its balance sheet, not an earnings multiple, and the worst year of credit losses matters more than the best. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Return on equity has sat below the cost of equity (median 9%, above 12% in only 2 of 10 years). It runs at a 62% efficiency ratio, about average. The cycle and the loan book decide this one; weigh the recession years in the record, not the average, and read the 10-K.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2016–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2016’162017’172018’182019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25
Income statement
$55M$67M$73M$77M$78M$82M$85M$89M$117M$147MRevenueRevenue
$46M$56M$63M$64M$64M$73M$80M$82M$110M$136MNet interest incomeNet int.
$10M$11M$10M$13M$14M$9M$5M$7M$6M$10MNoninterest incomeFee inc.
($6M)($1M)$50K$1M($3M)$4M$995K$309K$11M$4MCredit-loss provisionProvision
$15M$14M$21M$21M$20M$28M$27M$26M$8M$38MNet incomeNet inc.
31%41%24%28%25%25%24%25%30%27%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
1.1%0.8%1.4%1.3%1.0%1.2%1.1%1.0%0.2%1.0%Return on assetsROA
9%7%10%9%8%11%16%12%2%9%Return on equityROE
8%5%8%7%6%9%12%10%−0%7%Retained to equityRetained/eq
12%9%13%12%11%15%23%17%3%13%Return on tangible equityROTCE
71%66%62%60%61%59%57%62%81%62%Efficiency ratioEffic.
Balance sheet
$1.4B$1.7B$1.5B$1.6B$2.0B$2.5B$2.4B$2.4B$3.5B$3.7BTotal assetsAssets
$1.3B$1.4B$1.3B$1.3B$1.7B$2.1B$2.1B$2.0B$2.9B$3.1BDepositsDeposits
$40M$54M$54M$54M$54M$54M$54M$54M$97M$97MGoodwillGoodwill
$164M$210M$220M$228M$245M$248M$171M$207M$363M$410MShareholders’ equityEquity
Per share
11.4M12.7M13.8M13.5M12.6M12.3M11.7M11.8M17.2M19.1MShares out (diluted)Shares
$1.33$1.10$1.54$1.59$1.62$2.31$2.27$2.17$0.45$2.00EPS (diluted)EPS
$0.24$0.24$0.31$0.43$0.44$0.47$0.48$0.48$0.48$0.48Dividends / shareDiv/sh
$14.34$16.47$15.89$16.88$19.48$20.18$14.56$17.62$21.11$21.48Book value / shareBVPS
$10.71$12.01$11.82$12.76$15.11$15.76$9.97$13.04$14.94$15.97Tangible book / shareTBVPS

The diluted share count moved ×1.46 into 2024 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.

Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
9-yr5-yr
Revenue / share+5.3%/yr+4.3%/yr
Owner earnings / share+8.9%/yr+12.3%/yr
EPS+4.7%/yr+4.3%/yr
Dividends / share+8.1%/yr+1.8%/yr
Capital spending / share+6.4%/yr+2.1%/yr
Book value / share+4.6%/yr+2.0%/yr

The record, charted

FY2016–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.

Share count
19Mpeak FY2025
Revenue
$147Mlow FY2016
III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 10-K · source on SEC EDGAR →

Is it a good business?

  • Below the cost of equity
    Net income $38M ÷ equity $410M
    Industry peers: median 12%
    What this means

    The bank's north star, what it earns on shareholders' capital. Cost of equity is roughly 10%, so a return durably above that builds value and below it destroys it. One year is noisy; the durability across a full credit cycle is what counts.

  • Solid
    Net income ÷ (equity − goodwill $97M − intangibles $8M)
    Industry peers: median 14%
    What this means

    The cleaner return, stripping out the goodwill paid for past acquisitions. This is the number a buyer of the whole bank actually earns on the hard capital.

  • Efficient (<65%)
    Noninterest expense $90M ÷ (net interest income + fees)
    Industry peers: median 48%
    What this means

    The share of revenue eaten by running costs; lower is better, and below about 60% marks a genuinely efficient operation. A low ratio held for years is the operational side of a moat.

Is it sound?

  • Capital (equity / assets) 11.1%
    Well capitalized
    Equity $410M ÷ assets $3.7B
    What this means

    A plain-English leverage read: how much of the balance sheet is the owners' own money. This is a rough proxy; the regulatory figure is the CET1 ratio, which is risk-weighted and reported in the filing. The point is the same, how much loss the bank can absorb before depositors are at risk.

  • Deposit-funded
    Deposits $3.1B ÷ assets $3.7B
    What this means

    Low-cost, sticky deposits are a bank's real moat, the cheap raw material it lends out at a spread. A bank funded mostly by deposits earns more durably than one that rents its money in the wholesale market.

  • Credit cost (provision / NII) 3%
    Low
    Provision for credit losses $4M ÷ net interest income $136M
    What this means

    What the bank set aside this year against loans going bad, as a share of its lending income. This swings hard with the cycle, low in good years and spiking in recessions, so read it across the record, not in one year. Disciplined underwriting shows up as low, stable provisions through a downturn.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Low contestability

The moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.

In its own filing Raised, but not as a competitor

The filing raises AI among its risks, but in other terms (security, regulation, energy or the like), not as a competitor to its product.

AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Management, ownership & pay

read the proxy →

From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.

Fiscal yearChief executivePay, as filed“Actually paid”Owner earnings
2021James J. Kim$528k$764k$42M
2021James M. Ford$536k$765k$42M
2022James J. Kim$863k$857k$23M
2023James J. Kim$934k$932k$27M
2024James J. Kim$1.1M$1.1M$20M
2025James J. Kim$1.3M$1.4M$44M

Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.

  • Insider ownership9%

    The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.

  • Stock-based compensation$1M

    The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 1% of revenue, equal to 2% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.

What an owner would ask, FY2025

read the 10-K →
  • Which reported numbers are a judgment call?
    Management names Credit & receivables, Acquisitions as critical estimates

    each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →

The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.

Peers, Banks

The same industry, side by side on the bank lens. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueROEROTCEEfficiencyNII / assets
FCBCFirst Community Bankshares Inc. (VA)$168M10%14%58%3.6%
FSBCFive Star Bancorp$158M17%17%41%3.1%
MCBSMetroCity Bankshares Inc.$156M18%18%40%3.4%
BSRRSierra Bancorp$155M11%12%61%3.2%
CWBCCommunity West Bancshares$147M9%12%62%3.3%
BWBBridgewater Bancshares Inc.$143M12%12%47%3.0%
CBANColony Bankcorp Inc.$132M9%10%72%2.9%
UNTYUnity Bancorp Inc.$132M15%15%48%3.5%
Group median11%13%53%3.3%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

price / tangible book

A bank is worth a multiple of its tangible book value, and the multiple it deserves is set by the return it earns on that book. Type today’s price; we show what you would be paying against what Community West Bancshares’s record justifies.

$
The assumptions

Tangible book / share, delivered1%/yr’20→’25

The justified multiple is (return on tangible equity − growth) ÷ (cost of equity − growth). A bank earning exactly its cost of equity is worth about one times tangible book; the premium above that prices each point of durable excess return. A higher cost of equity lowers the justified multiple for a bank.

Enter a price above to run it.

Price / tangible book
Justified by the return
Normalized return on tangible equity12%
Price / book
Earnings yield
P/E (3-yr avg ’23–’25)
Graham’s price gate

Graham applied the same standards to financial enterprises (Intelligent Investor ch.14): the 15× multiple cap on averaged earnings, and P/E times price-to-book at most 22.5. The gate marks the bargain-hunter’s floor, not a verdict.

Tangible book $304M on 27M shares, a 12% normalized return on it. The dials set the multiple such a return would justify; your price sets the multiple you are paying. It assumes the bank keeps earning that return; a credit cycle, a rate shock or a bad acquisition changes it, which is what the record and the 10-K are for.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Community West Bancshares (CWBC), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/CWBC, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← CWAN its page in the Manual CWCO →

Industry order: ← CVBF the Banks chapter CZFS →