← All companies ← EQIX Manual EQR → ← DXPE Trading Companies & Distributors FAST →
EQPT, EquipmentShare.com Inc
EquipmentShare is a vertically integrated platform that combines proprietary technology, a connected equipment fleet, and a nationwide footprint to serve the construction industry.
More than a rental company, EquipmentShare delivers jobsite visibility and control through its cloud-based platform ("T3"), which integrates embedded telematics hardware, software applications, and real-time data to support both customers and internal operations.
The T3 platform is original equipment manufacturer ("OEM")-agnostic and gives us and our rental customers the ability to track mixed fleets, maximize utilization, reduce unplanned downtime, streamline maintenance, and improve jobsite security and operator accountability.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- Situation
- Distress / turnaround. Thin interest coverage, or operating cash burned against real debt, across the record. The balance sheet carries this situation; the debt schedule sets the clock.
- What moves the needle
- Gross margin has run about 28% and operating margin about 6.8% through the cycle, a solid spread between what it charges and what the product costs to make. That margin has held in a narrow 5.8%–10% band over the years, so steadiness itself is the evidence — the lever is unit growth and cost discipline, not a moving line. Capital spending runs about 42% of sales, well above depreciation, so the return earned on what it sinks into that plant weighs as much as the margin. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2023–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMMar 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||
| $2.6B | $3.8B | $4.4B | $4.7B | RevenueRevenue |
| 30% | 25% | 28% | 29% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| 20% | 19% | 22% | 22% | SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev |
| $250M | $218M | $297M | $308M | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 9.8% | 5.8% | 6.8% | 6.6% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| $17M | $3M | $40M | $59M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| 19% | 50% | 26% | 2% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | ||||
| $279M | $282M | $264M | $115M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $295M | $332M | $365M | $390M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| ($36M) | ($57M) | ($145M) | ($356M) | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $1.1B | $1.6B | $1.8B | $1.8B | CapexCapex |
| 42.9% | 42.1% | 40.6% | 39.0% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| ($16M) | ($50M) | ($101M) | ($275M) | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| −0.6% | −1.3% | −2.3% | −5.9% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| ($819M) | ($1.3B) | ($1.5B) | ($1.7B) | Free cash flowFCF |
| −32.0% | −34.6% | −34.6% | −36.5% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| $0 | $6M | $48M | $54M | AcquisitionsAcquis. |
| $5M | $9M | $37M | $37M | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| — | 4% | 6% | 8% | ROICROIC |
| 3% | 1% | 8% | 5% | Return on equityROE |
| 2% | −1% | 1% | 2% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | ||||
| $316M | $407M | $306M | $329M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| — | $563M | $748M | $818M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| — | $331M | $401M | $427M | InventoryInvent. |
| — | $91M | $95M | $73M | Accounts payablePayables |
| — | $803M | $1.1B | $1.2B | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| — | $1.4B | $1.7B | $1.9B | Current assetsCur. assets |
| — | $658M | $880M | $758M | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| — | 2.1× | 2.0× | 2.5× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| — | $4.8B | $6.0B | $6.4B | Total assetsAssets |
| — | $2.5B | $3.3B | $3.1B | Total debtDebt |
| — | $2.1B | $3.0B | $2.8B | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| 1.2× | 0.8× | 1.0× | 1.1× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| $588M | $549M | $528M | $1.2B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.5% | Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev |
| Per share | ||||
| 225M | 231M | 226M | 226M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $11.36 | $16.29 | $19.38 | $20.58 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $0.08 | $0.01 | $0.18 | $0.26 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $-0.07 | $-0.22 | $-0.45 | $-1.22 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $-3.64 | $-5.65 | $-6.71 | $-7.52 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $0.02 | $0.04 | $0.16 | $0.16 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| $4.88 | $6.87 | $7.88 | $8.03 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $2.61 | $2.38 | $2.34 | $5.31 | Book value / shareBVPS |
Share counts before 2025 are restated ×3 for a stock split, so per-share figures sit on one basis.
The record, charted
FY2023–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked. Share counts on the current split basis.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedBeyond op. cashEach year's outlays against its operating cash: the mix, and how it drifts. The hatched cap is spending beyond that year's operating cash — financed from the balance sheet or borrowing, not operations.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business earned ($101M) of owner earnings, the operating cash left after the $365M it takes just to hold its position. It put $1.4B more into growth; free cash flow, after that spending, was ($1.5B).
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | $40M | $3M | $17M |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$365M | +$332M | +$295M |
| Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost | +$4M | +$4M | +$3M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | −$145M | −$57M | −$36M |
| Cash from operations | $264M | $282M | $279M |
| Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume | −$365M | −$332M | −$295M |
| Owner earnings | ($101M) | ($50M) | ($16M) |
| Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still | −$1.4B | −$1.3B | −$803M |
| Free cash flow | ($1.5B) | ($1.3B) | ($819M) |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | -2% | -1% | -1% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position (here about $365M, roughly its depreciation, the rate its assets wear out). The other $1.4B of its capital spending is growth it chose, not upkeep it owed; charged only with the maintenance it must do, the business earns well more than the year's free cash flow shows. The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $4M), owner earnings is nearer ($105M).
Much of fiscal 2025's profit didn't arrive as operating cash; it sits in “working capital & other” above. That can be a real inventory or timing swing, or profit that doesn't run through operating cash at all: a heavy tax year, equity-method earnings, or investment income booked through investing. For a year like this, owner earnings understates the cash earned; the full cash-flow statement carries the rest.
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- ThinOperating income $297M ÷ interest expense $285M
What this means
Operating profit covers interest, but with little room. A bad year, a refinancing at higher rates, or a revenue wobble closes the gap fast.
- How heavy is the debt, net of cash? $3.0B · 10.0× operating profitHeavy net debtCash $306M − debt $3.3B
What this means
Netting $306M of cash and short-term investments against $3.3B of debt leaves $3.0B owed, about 10.0× a year's operating profit (11.0× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Long (60+ days)DSO 62 + DIO 47 − DPO 11 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.
Is it a good business?
- Below averageNOPAT $220M ÷ invested capital $3.5B (debt + equity − cash)Industry peers: median 9%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Consumes cash through the cycle3-yr median margin, range -2%–-1%; latest ($101M) = operating cash $264M − maintenance capex $365MIndustry peers: median 21%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's -2% of revenue this year, a -1% median across 3 years. It chose to put $1.4B more into growth, so free cash flow this year was ($1.5B) — the gap is investment, not weakness. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $4M of SBC) leaves ($105M).
- Cash-backedCash from ops $264M ÷ net income $40M
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- No surplus to allocate
What this means
The business didn't generate positive Owner Earnings this year, so any distributions came from the balance sheet or borrowing, not from operations.
- Investing or harvesting? 4.88×ExpandingCapex $1.8B ÷ depreciation $365M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 1 of 3 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size PassRevenue ≥ $2B · $4.4B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity NearCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 1.97×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt MissDebt ≤ working capital · $3.3B vs $850M WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $0.25/share (latest year $0.51), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $6.68/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Moderate contestabilityAI is likely to reshape costs and some products here without clearly contesting or sparing the core moat; how the company itself frames it is the tell.
Its FY2025 10-K names artificial intelligence as a competitive threat.
“We cannot control the availability or pricing of such third-party AI technologies, especially in a highly competitive environment, and we may be unable to negotiate favorable economic terms with the applicable providers.”
The question is whether a moat the record shows as durable outlasts a technology that lowers the cost of part of what the firm sells. The durability is read in the record above, the filing's own framing of AI beside it; the industry label decides nothing on its own.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of the latest quarter, Mar 31, 2026Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$329M
- Receivables$818M
- Inventory$427M
- Other current assets$296M
- Debt due within a year$5M
- Accounts payable$73M
- Other current liabilities$680M
From the company's latest filing.
Lease obligations
the lease note, SEC EDGAR →Debt by another name. What the business owes on the property, aircraft, stores and equipment it rents rather than owns is a fixed claim due on a schedule; added back to the debt, it is the true leverage. That ladder, operating and finance leases together, and what it adds to the debt on the page above.
Lease payments by year, scaled to the largest; “later” is everything beyond year five, shown apart. These are the contractual cash payments, before the interest the filing imputes back out to the balance-sheet liability.
True leverage: debt plus leases
Counting the leases the way Buffett does, the fixed claims on this business come to $4.2B, of which the leases are 22%. The lease wall above and the debt schedule together are the calendar of what must be paid, and when.
Lease ladder read from the ASC 842 tags in the company’s Dec 31, 2025 annual report and reconciled: the yearly buckets sum to the undiscounted total, which less the imputed interest equals the balance-sheet liability; a ladder that doesn’t tie out is withheld.
Management, ownership & pay
From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid.
- Stock-based compensation$4M
The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 0% of revenue, equal to 1% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.
Peers, Trading Companies & Distributors
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| URIUnited Rentals | $16.1B | 40% | 24.4% | 11% | 31% |
| GPNGlobal Payments Inc. | $7.7B | 59% | 16.0% | 4% | 25% |
| EQPTEquipmentShare.com Inc | $4.4B | 28% | 6.8% | 6% | -1% |
| AKAMAkamai | $4.2B | 64% | 17.7% | 9% | 26% |
| ALLEAllegion | $4.1B | 44% | 19.4% | 23% | 15% |
| CSGPCoStar Group Inc. | $3.2B | 79% | 17.7% | 9% | 21% |
| FTAIFTAI Aviation Ltd. | $2.5B | 55% | -8.2% | -1% | -12% |
| CTOSCustom Truck One Source Inc. | $1.9B | 24% | 7.0% | 4% | 11% |
| Group median | — | 49% | 16.9% | 8% | 18% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFEquipmentShare.com Inc is profitable, but owner earnings are negative this year because capital spending currently outruns operating cash, a build-out, so the owner-earnings reverse-DCF has no positive base to grow. We read the price from both ends instead: type a price to see the steady-state profitability it demands, then set the mature margin you would believe and weigh the two against each other. Nothing leaves your browser unless you enter it in your notebook.
Enter a price to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Two reads of one future. From your price: the owner earnings the company must reach, valued at a mature multiple and discounted back at your rate, expressed as the margin it implies on revenue grown at your rate. From your belief: the mature margin you would credit, set on the dial above. When the margin the price demands runs above the one you would believe, you are paying for a future taken on faith. For a deep cyclical at a trough, normalized through-cycle earnings are the better lens; this mode is for the genuinely unprofitable, and for the profitable business whose capital spending currently outruns its cash.
Manual order: ← EQIX its page in the Manual EQR →
Industry order: ← DXPE the Trading Companies & Distributors chapter FAST →