← All companies ← ALL Manual ALLY → ← ALIT Commercial Services & Supplies AMTM →
ALLE, Allegion
Allegion plc is a leading global provider of security products and solutions that keep people and assets safe and secure in the places they live, learn, work and connect.
We offer an extensive and versatile portfolio of security and access control products and solutions across a range of market-leading brands.
Our experts around the world deliver high-quality hardware, software, services and systems, and we use our deep expertise to serve as trusted partners to end-users who seek customized solutions to their security needs.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What it is
- Revenue is Allegion Americas (79%) and Allegion International (21%).
- Situation
- Serial acquirer. Goodwill and acquired intangibles are 52% of assets, with meaningful acquisition spending in 4 of the record's 10 years; much of what this business is was bought, at prices the record carries.
- What moves the needle
- Gross margin has run about 43% and operating margin about 19% through the cycle, a solid spread between what it charges and what the product costs to make. That margin has stayed fairly steady relative to where it runs (15%–21% over the years), so unit growth and cost discipline, not a moving line, are the lever. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has run high across the record (median 23%, above 15% in 10 of 10 years). Owner earnings agree: roughly 15% of revenue reaches owners as cash, consistently. Whether these returns reflect real pricing power or an accounting artifact is the judgment the 10-K is for.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 10-K →Allegion Americas is 79% of revenue, with Allegion International the other meaningful segment at 21%.
- Allegion Americas79%$3.2B
- Allegion International21%$849M
From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMMar 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $2.2B | $2.4B | $2.7B | $2.9B | $2.7B | $2.9B | $3.3B | $3.7B | $3.8B | $4.1B | $4.2B | RevenueRevenue |
| 44% | 45% | 43% | 44% | 43% | 42% | 40% | 43% | 44% | 45% | 45% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| 25% | 24% | 24% | 24% | 23% | 24% | 22% | 24% | 24% | 24% | 24% | SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev |
| 2% | 2% | 2% | 2% | 2% | 3% | 2% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 3% | R&D / revenueR&D/rev |
| $434M | $493M | $526M | $565M | $404M | $530M | $586M | $708M | $781M | $860M | $858M | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 19.4% | 20.5% | 19.2% | 19.8% | 14.8% | 18.5% | 17.9% | 19.4% | 20.7% | 21.1% | 20.6% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| $229M | $273M | $435M | $402M | $314M | $483M | $458M | $540M | $598M | $644M | $634M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| 22% | 30% | 8% | 15% | 14% | 8% | 11% | 12% | 14% | 16% | 17% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| $378M | $347M | $458M | $488M | $490M | $489M | $460M | $601M | $675M | $784M | $781M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $61M | $62M | $82M | $78M | $78M | $79M | $95M | $109M | $116M | $130M | $135M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| $70M | ($4M) | ($79M) | ($12M) | $77M | ($97M) | ($118M) | ($75M) | ($67M) | ($20M) | ($18M) | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $43M | $49M | $49M | $66M | $47M | $45M | $64M | $84M | $92M | $98M | $98M | CapexCapex |
| 1.9% | 2.0% | 1.8% | 2.3% | 1.7% | 1.6% | 2.0% | 2.3% | 2.4% | 2.4% | 2.4% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $335M | $298M | $409M | $423M | $443M | $443M | $396M | $516M | $583M | $686M | $683M | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 15.0% | 12.4% | 15.0% | 14.8% | 16.3% | 15.5% | 12.1% | 14.1% | 15.5% | 16.9% | 16.4% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| $335M | $298M | $409M | $423M | $443M | $443M | $396M | $516M | $583M | $686M | $683M | Free cash flowFCF |
| 15.0% | 12.4% | 15.0% | 14.8% | 16.3% | 15.5% | 12.1% | 14.1% | 15.5% | 16.9% | 16.4% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| $31M | $21M | $373M | $5M | $13M | $7M | $923M | $32M | $137M | $592M | $657M | AcquisitionsAcquis. |
| $46M | $61M | $79M | $101M | $117M | $129M | $144M | $159M | $167M | $175M | $179M | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| $85M | $60M | $67M | $226M | $209M | $413M | $61M | $60M | $220M | $80M | — | BuybacksBuybacks |
| 27% | 24% | 27% | 26% | 20% | 27% | 19% | 22% | 22% | 20% | 19% | ROICROIC |
| 202% | 68% | 67% | 53% | 38% | 64% | 49% | 41% | 40% | 31% | 30% | Return on equityROE |
| 162% | 53% | 55% | 40% | 24% | 47% | 33% | 29% | 29% | 23% | 22% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $312M | $466M | $284M | $355M | $480M | $398M | $288M | $468M | $504M | $356M | $309M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| $260M | $297M | $325M | $330M | — | — | — | — | — | — | $512M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| $221M | $240M | $280M | $270M | $283M | $380M | $479M | $439M | $423M | $519M | $537M | InventoryInvent. |
| $180M | $188M | $235M | $221M | $220M | $259M | $281M | $259M | $258M | $245M | $272M | Accounts payablePayables |
| $301M | $348M | $370M | $379M | $63M | $121M | $198M | $179M | $165M | $274M | $778M | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| $829M | $1.0B | $932M | $1.0B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.2B | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.4B | Current assetsCur. assets |
| $430M | $461M | $521M | $507M | $522M | $601M | $704M | $1.1B | $697M | $755M | $746M | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 1.9× | 2.2× | 1.8× | 2.0× | 2.2× | 1.9× | 1.7× | 1.3× | 2.0× | 1.8× | 1.9× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| $717M | $761M | $883M | $873M | $819M | $804M | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.5B | $1.9B | $1.9B | GoodwillGoodwill |
| $2.2B | $2.5B | $2.8B | $3.0B | $3.1B | $3.1B | $4.0B | $4.3B | $4.5B | $5.2B | $5.3B | Total assetsAssets |
| $1.5B | $1.5B | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.4B | $2.1B | $2.0B | $2.0B | $2.0B | $2.0B | Total debtDebt |
| $1.2B | $1.0B | $1.2B | $1.1B | $949M | $1.0B | $1.8B | $1.5B | $1.5B | $1.6B | $1.7B | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| 6.8× | 4.7× | 9.7× | 10.1× | 7.9× | 10.6× | 7.7× | 7.6× | 7.7× | 8.5× | 8.5× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| $113M | $402M | $651M | $757M | $829M | $759M | $942M | $1.3B | $1.5B | $2.1B | $2.1B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| 0.7% | 0.7% | 0.7% | 0.7% | 0.8% | 0.8% | 0.7% | 0.7% | 0.7% | 0.7% | 0.7% | Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev |
| — | — | — | $6M | $88M | — | — | $8M | — | — | — | Goodwill written downGW imp. |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 96.9M | 96.0M | 95.7M | 94.3M | 92.8M | 90.5M | 88.3M | 88.3M | 87.6M | 86.6M | 86.6M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $23.10 | $25.09 | $28.54 | $30.27 | $29.31 | $31.68 | $37.05 | $41.35 | $43.06 | $46.97 | $48.03 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $2.36 | $2.85 | $4.54 | $4.26 | $3.39 | $5.34 | $5.19 | $6.12 | $6.82 | $7.43 | $7.32 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $3.46 | $3.10 | $4.27 | $4.48 | $4.78 | $4.90 | $4.48 | $5.85 | $6.65 | $7.92 | $7.88 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $3.46 | $3.10 | $4.27 | $4.48 | $4.78 | $4.90 | $4.48 | $5.85 | $6.65 | $7.92 | $7.88 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $0.47 | $0.63 | $0.83 | $1.07 | $1.26 | $1.43 | $1.63 | $1.80 | $1.91 | $2.02 | $2.07 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| $0.44 | $0.51 | $0.51 | $0.70 | $0.51 | $0.50 | $0.72 | $0.95 | $1.05 | $1.13 | $1.13 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $1.17 | $4.18 | $6.80 | $8.03 | $8.94 | $8.39 | $10.67 | $14.93 | $17.13 | $23.88 | $24.26 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +8.2%/yr | +9.9%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | +9.6%/yr | +10.6%/yr |
| EPS | +13.6%/yr | +17.0%/yr |
| Dividends / share | +17.5%/yr | +9.9%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +11.1%/yr | +17.4%/yr |
| Book value / share | +39.8%/yr | +21.7%/yr |
The year, in the company's words
the filing →Verbatim from the 10-K's management discussion. Each sentence is shown only because its subject, direction, and stated figures check out against the filed numbers on this page. The words are the company's; the arithmetic is the record's.
- Revenue+7.8%
“Net Revenues Net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2025, increased by 7.8%, or $295.1 million, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024, due to the following: Pricing 3.1 % Volume 1.0 % Acquisitions / divestitures 3.1 % Currency exchange rates 0.6 % Total 7.8 % The increase in Net revenues was driven by improved pricing, favorable impact from acquisitions / divestitures, higher volumes and favorable foreign currency exchange rate movements.”
✓ figure matches the filed record
The record, charted
FY2016–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedBeyond op. cashEach year's outlays against its operating cash: the mix, and how it drifts. The hatched cap is spending beyond that year's operating cash — financed from the balance sheet or borrowing, not operations.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business turned $644M of profit into $686M of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | $644M | $598M | $540M | $458M | $483M |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$130M | +$116M | +$109M | +$95M | +$79M |
| Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost | +$30M | +$28M | +$26M | +$25M | +$23M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | −$20M | −$67M | −$75M | −$118M | −$97M |
| Cash from operations | $784M | $675M | $601M | $460M | $489M |
| Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow | −$98M | −$92M | −$84M | −$64M | −$45M |
| Owner earnings | $686M | $583M | $516M | $396M | $443M |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 17% | 15% | 14% | 12% | 15% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position . The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $30M), owner earnings is nearer $656M.
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- ComfortableOperating income $860M ÷ interest expense $101M
What this means
Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient, it says solvent, not cheap.
- How heavy is the debt, net of cash? $1.6B · 1.9× operating profitModest net debtCash $356M − debt $2.0B
What this means
Netting $356M of cash and short-term investments against $2.0B of debt leaves $1.6B owed, about 1.9× a year's operating profit (2.3× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Long (60+ days)DSO 30 + DIO 85 − DPO 40 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.
Is it a good business?
- High through the cycle10-yr median, range 19%–27%; 20% latest = NOPAT $720M ÷ invested capital $3.7BIndustry peers: median 4%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 10 years (it ran 20% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Solid through the cycle10-yr median margin, range 12%–17%; latest $686M = operating cash $784M − maintenance capex $98MIndustry peers: median 21%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 17% of revenue this year, a 15% median across 10 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $30M of SBC) leaves $656M.
- Cash-backedCash from ops $784M ÷ net income $644M
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Reinvests most of itDividends + buybacks $255M ÷ Owner Earnings $686M
What this means
Of $686M Owner Earnings, $255M (37%) went back to shareholders, $175M dividends, $80M buybacks. Net of $30M stock comp, the real buyback was about $50M. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.
- Investing or harvesting? 0.76×HarvestingCapex $98M ÷ depreciation $130M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 4 of 6 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size PassRevenue ≥ $2B · $4.1B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity NearCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 1.84×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt MissDebt ≤ working capital · $2.0B vs $636M WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability PassA profit every year (10-yr record) · no losses
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record PassUninterrupted dividends · paid every year (10)
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth PassEarnings +33% over the record · +90%
What this means
At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $6.91/share (latest year $7.49), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $24.06/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2016–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 10 of 10
What this means
Never lost money over the record, the earnings stability Graham insisted on.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 10 of 10 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin 20% → 20% (3-yr avg ends)
In the filing’s words The filing claims pricing power in its strongest form — price raised, volume held — yet the margin here has not widened to match. The claim leads the record; weigh them together.
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin held roughly steady — about 20% early, 20% lately, median 19%.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC 17%
What this means
Every extra dollar the business reinvested came back at a high incremental return — the lens GBM read for a moat that reinvests rather than merely harvests. The record and the 10-K are where you check whether the rate holds.
- Owner earnings growth +8%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings grew about 8% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2020 · 14.8% op. margin
What this means
Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.
- Share count −1.2%/yr
What this means
The share count is shrinking, buybacks are quietly growing your slice of the business.
- Dividend record rising
What this means
Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Moderate contestabilityAI is likely to reshape costs and some products here without clearly contesting or sparing the core moat; how the company itself frames it is the tell.
The filing positions AI as something the company uses, not something it fears.
“Further, we expect continued growth in connected security products and solutions as end-users continue to adopt newer technologies, including mobile solutions and artificial intelligence, in their facilities and single and multi-family homes.”
The question is whether a moat the record shows as durable outlasts a technology that lowers the cost of part of what the firm sells. The durability is read in the record above, the filing's own framing of AI beside it; the industry label decides nothing on its own.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of the latest quarter, Mar 31, 2026Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$309M
- Receivables$512M
- Inventory$537M
- Other current assets$65M
- Debt due within a year$300K
- Accounts payable$272M
- Other current liabilities$474M
From the company's latest filing.
Debt maturity
the debt note, SEC EDGAR →Not how much it owes, but when it falls due, and against what. The ladder the company files, beside cash on hand and a year's owner earnings.
Bars scaled to the largest single year; “later” is everything due after 2030, shown apart since it dwarfs the years.
Against what the business has and earns
Cash on hand as of Mar 31, 2026 plus a year’s owner earnings comes to $995M against the $200K due in the twelve months after the Dec 31, 2025 schedule: 4973 times it.
Maturity schedule extracted from the company’s Dec 31, 2025 annual report and reconciled to the total the table states.
How the cash was used, 2016–2025
Over the record, the business generated $5.2B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a balanced allocator, splitting cash between the business, owners, and the balance sheet.
- Reinvested$637M · 12%
- Dividends$1.2B · 23%
- Buybacks$1.5B · 29%
- Retained (debt / cash)$1.9B · 36%
- Returned to owners$2.7B
59% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $1.2B as dividends and $1.5B as buybacks.
- Average price paid for buybacks$82.72
Across the years where the filing reports a share count, 5M shares were bought for $438M, about $82.72 each. Year to year the price paid ranged from $65.46 (2016) to $98.26 (2019), and 2019, near the top of that range, was also its heaviest buyback year ($226M).
- Net change in share count−10.6%
The diluted count fell from 97M to 87M, so the buybacks outran the stock issued to staff.
- Dividend record$2.02/sh
Paid in 10 of the years on record, the per-share dividend growing about 17% a year. It was never cut over the span.
- Return on what it retained14%
Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out ($1.7B over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) grew $248M, so each retained $1 added about 0.14 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Acquisitions & goodwill
from the balance sheet & the 10-year cash-flow recordGoodwill grows only when a company acquires and falls only when it concedes it overpaid. The size of that bet, the cash put into buying rather than building, and how much has already been written off.
$102M written down across 3 years (2019, 2020, 2023): goodwill the company has already conceded it overpaid for, charged against earnings. A write-down costs no cash (the cash went out when the deal was signed), but it is management marking its own past judgment to market.
Goodwill, acquired intangibles and equity from the latest balance sheet; acquisition spend and write-downs summed across the 10-year record, from the company's own filings.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.
| Fiscal year | Chief executive | Pay, as filed | “Actually paid” | Owner earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Mr. Stone | $7.7M | $9.0M | $443M |
| 2022 | Mr. Stone | $7.9M | $3.2M | $396M |
| 2022 | Mr. Stone | $9.3M | $9.6M | $396M |
| 2023 | Mr. Stone | $9.0M | $11.7M | $516M |
| 2024 | Mr. Stone | $8.5M | $8.1M | $583M |
| 2025 | Mr. Stone | $9.2M | $19.5M | $686M |
Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.
- Insider ownership<1%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
- CEO pay ratio128:1
What the chief earns for every dollar the median employee makes, per the 2026 proxy. A high ratio alone settles nothing; some businesses are genuinely top-heavy in scarce skill. A runaway figure is where Buffett starts asking whether the board is doing its job.
- Stock-based compensation$30M
The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 1% of revenue, equal to 3% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why Allegion is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.
None of the 6 tests turned up a mark; each came back clean. A clean panel says only that these particular ways of being wrong are not written into the record.
- Is it less profitable than it was?
- Did the share count rise anyway?
- Did debt outgrow the business?
- Did reported profit become cash?
- Did receivables and inventory outpace sales?
- Are "one-time" charges a yearly habit?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
What an owner would ask, FY2025
read the 10-K →- How much of the revenue rides on one buyer?≈$1.1B · 26% of revenue on the largest customers (TTM)
“Our 10 largest customers represented approximately 26% of our total Net revenues in 2025.”verify →
- Which reported numbers are a judgment call?Management names Income taxes, Acquisitions, Contingencies as critical estimates
each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →
The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.
Peers, Commercial Services & Supplies
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPNGlobal Payments Inc. | $7.7B | 59% | 16.0% | 4% | 25% |
| EQPTEquipmentShare.com Inc | $4.4B | 28% | 6.8% | 6% | -1% |
| AKAMAkamai | $4.2B | 64% | 17.7% | 9% | 26% |
| ALLEAllegion | $4.1B | 44% | 19.4% | 23% | 15% |
| CSGPCoStar Group Inc. | $3.2B | 79% | 17.7% | 9% | 21% |
| FTAIFTAI Aviation Ltd. | $2.5B | 55% | -8.2% | -1% | -12% |
| CTOSCustom Truck One Source Inc. | $1.9B | 24% | 7.0% | 4% | 11% |
| CTEVClaritev Corporation | $965M | — | 9.9% | -1% | 22% |
| Group median | — | 55% | 13.0% | 5% | 18% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFType today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Allegion has delivered.
Through the cycle, Allegion earns about $609M on its 15.0% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 16.9% margin runs in line with that. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings $683M on 86M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-04-24; net debt $1.7B. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← ALL its page in the Manual ALLY →
Industry order: ← ALIT the Commercial Services & Supplies chapter AMTM →