← All companies ← EXK Manual FINV → ← ESOA Construction & Engineering FIX →
FER, Ferrovial N.V.
Revenue is led by Construction division (79%) and Toll roads division (14%), with 3 more segments behind.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What it is
- A capital-intensive business, run on heavy physical assets that must be kept working and earn a return above what they cost to maintain.
- What moves the needle
- Operating margin has run about 7.3% through the cycle, a thin margin, where volume, cost discipline and the price it gets all bear on the result. The operating margin has swung widely — from 5.6% to 34% over the years — so the through-cycle figure carries more than any single year, and the worst year more than the best. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 20-F →Construction division is 79% of revenue, with Toll roads division the other meaningful segment at 14%.
- Construction division79%€7.7B
- Toll roads division14%€1.4B
- Corporation division5%€460M
- Energy and mobility infrastructures division4%€339M
- Airports division1%€111M
- Revenue adjustments-3%(€310M)
From the segment footnote of the company's own 20-F. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2022–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMDec 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||
| €7.6B | €8.5B | €9.1B | €9.6B | €9.6B | RevenueRevenue |
| €423M | €625M | €3.1B | — | €3.1B | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 5.6% | 7.3% | 34.0% | — | 32.3% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| €188M | €341M | €3.2B | €888M | €888M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| 14% | 25% | 4% | -7% | -7% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||
| €1.0B | €1.3B | €1.3B | €1.9B | €1.9B | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| €299M | €401M | €441M | €490M | €490M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| €515M | €521M | (€2.4B) | €548M | €548M | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| €132M | €136M | €130M | €156M | €156M | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| — | — | 239% | — | 190% | ROICROIC |
| 4% | 9% | 53% | 15% | 15% | Return on equityROE |
| 1% | 5% | 51% | 12% | 12% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||
| €5.1B | €4.8B | €4.8B | €4.3B | €4.3B | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| €1.6B | €1.7B | €2.2B | €2.2B | €2.2B | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| — | €458M | €492M | €540M | €540M | InventoryInvent. |
| €3.4B | €3.6B | €3.9B | €4.2B | €4.2B | Accounts payablePayables |
| (€1.8B) | (€1.5B) | (€1.2B) | (€1.4B) | (€1.4B) | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| — | €7.0B | €7.7B | €7.3B | €7.3B | Current assetsCur. assets |
| — | €5.8B | €6.3B | €6.5B | €6.5B | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| — | 1.2× | 1.2× | 1.1× | 1.1× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| €479M | €475M | €500M | €412M | €412M | GoodwillGoodwill |
| — | €26.3B | €29.0B | €27.4B | €27.4B | Total assetsAssets |
| (€5.1B) | (€4.8B) | (€4.8B) | (€4.3B) | (€4.3B) | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| €4.2B | €3.8B | €6.1B | €5.9B | €5.9B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | |||||
| 723M | 728M | 724M | 719M | 719M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| €10.44 | €11.69 | €12.63 | €13.39 | €13.39 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| €0.26 | €0.47 | €4.47 | €1.24 | €1.24 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| €0.18 | €0.19 | €0.18 | €0.22 | €0.22 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| €5.85 | €5.17 | €8.39 | €8.22 | €8.22 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 3-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +8.7%/yr | +8.7%/yr (3-yr) |
| EPS | +68.2%/yr | +68.2%/yr (3-yr) |
| Dividends / share | +6.0%/yr | +6.0%/yr (3-yr) |
| Book value / share | +12.0%/yr | +12.0%/yr (3-yr) |
The record, charted
FY2022–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedEach year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
“For further details regarding our remediation efforts with respect to the previously identified material weakness see "Item 15.”
The figures below are only as sound as the controls that produced them. read the note →
Will it survive?
- No meaningful interest burdenLittle or no interest expense reported
What this means
Little or no interest expense reported, the business isn't leaning on lenders to operate.
- Net cash, debt-freeCash €4.3B − debt €0
What this means
Cash and short-term investments exceed every dollar of debt by €4.3B, on net the company owes nothing, and can act from strength when others can't. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
Is it a good business?
- Not enough dataIndustry peers: median 8%
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
- Not enough dataIndustry peers: median 4%
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
- Cash-backedCash from ops €1.9B ÷ net income €888M
In the filing’s words The filing discloses a material weakness in its financial controls — the reported numbers here, and the record built on them, are only as reliable as the controls that produced them.
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
- Investing or harvesting? —Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
Graham’s defensive tests · 0 of 1 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size —Revenue ≥ $2B (a dollar floor) · €9.6B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's floor is a dollar figure — about $2B of revenue as a conservative modern stand-in. This company reports in its home currency and we carry no exchange rate, so we show the figure and leave the size bar for you to apply rather than convert it with a number we don't have.
- Strong liquidity MissCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 1.13×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are €2.07/share (latest year €1.23), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is €8.20/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2022–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 4 of 4
What this means
Never lost money over the record, the earnings stability Graham insisted on.
- Operating margin 7% (median, 3 yrs)
In the filing’s words The record and the words agree: the margin widened and the filing attributes the gain to its own pricing, not volume alone.
What this means
Over the 3 years on record the operating margin has run around 7% — too short a record to call a through-cycle trend, but that is the level the business earns at.
- Worst year 2022 · 5.6% op. margin
What this means
Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.
- Share count −0.2%/yr
What this means
Roughly flat share count, little dilution, little buyback.
- Dividend record rising
What this means
Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
The filing raises AI among its risks, but in other terms (security, regulation, energy or the like), not as a competitor to its product; it frames AI mainly as a capability.
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat, and the company is using it that way.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of fiscal year-end, Dec 31, 2025Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments€4.3B
- Receivables€2.2B
- Inventory€540M
- Other current assets€254M
- Accounts payable€4.2B
- Other current liabilities€2.3B
From the company's latest filing.
Peers, Construction & Engineering
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLRFluor Corporation | $15.5B | 3% | 1.2% | 8% | 0% |
| JJacobs Solutions | $12.0B | 25% | 4.4% | 6% | 5% |
| FERFerrovial N.V. | €9.6B | — | 7.3% | 190% | — |
| KBRKbr, Inc. | $7.8B | 12% | 6.4% | 13% | 4% |
| PRIMPrimoris Services | $7.6B | 11% | 4.5% | 12% | 2% |
| GVAGranite Construction | $4.4B | 11% | 2.2% | 4% | 1% |
| ROADConstruction Partners | $2.8B | 15% | 7.0% | 8% | 5% |
| STRLSterling Infrastructure | $2.5B | 15% | 7.6% | 16% | 8% |
| Group median | — | — | 5.4% | 10% | — |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFEnter the US price, in dollars: the NYSE/Nasdaq quote you hold. Ferrovial N.V.'s US listing is the ordinary share itself; figures in this tool are translated at EUR 1 = $1.145 (2026-07-17, reference rate); the dollar quote then reconciles exactly. The record tables elsewhere on this page remain as filed, in EUR.
Ferrovial N.V. is profitable, but its owner-earnings base could not be formed from this filing’s tagged data (operating cash flow or capital spending is missing), so the owner-earnings reverse-DCF has no base to grow. We read the price from both ends instead: type a price to see the profitability it demands, then set the mature margin you would believe and weigh the two against each other. Nothing leaves your browser unless you enter it in your notebook.
Revenue, delivered8%/yr’22→’25
Enter a price to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Two reads of one future. From your price: the owner earnings the company must reach, valued at a mature multiple and discounted back at your rate, expressed as the margin it implies on revenue grown at your rate. From your belief: the mature margin you would credit, set on the dial above. When the margin the price demands runs above the one you would believe, you are paying for a future taken on faith. For a deep cyclical at a trough, normalized through-cycle earnings are the better lens; this mode is for the genuinely unprofitable, and for the profitable business whose capital spending currently outruns its cash.
Manual order: ← EXK its page in the Manual FINV →
Industry order: ← ESOA the Construction & Engineering chapter FIX →