← All companies ← GE Manual GEGGL → ← ENTG Containers & Packaging GPK →
GEF, Greif
We are a leading global producer of industrial packaging products and services with operations in over 35 countries.
We produce and sell containerboard, corrugated sheets, corrugated containers and other corrugated products to customers in North America in industries such as packaging, automotive, food and building products.
We sell our industrial packaging products on a global basis to customers in industries such as chemicals, paints and pigments, food and beverage, petroleum, industrial coatings, agriculture, pharmaceutical and minerals, among others.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What it is
- Revenue is led by Durable Metal Solutions (37%) and Sustainable Fiber Solutions (29%), with 2 more segments behind.
- What moves the needle
- Gross margin has run about 20% and operating margin about 8.7% through the cycle, a thin spread that turns the result on volume and the cost of what it sells far more than on the price it sets. That margin has held in a narrow 6.8%–11% band over the years, so steadiness itself is the evidence — the lever is unit growth and cost discipline, not a moving line. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has sat near the cost of capital (median 8%). By owner earnings: roughly 6% of revenue reaches owners as cash, consistently. This is price-taker territory, where the balance sheet and the cycle matter more than any multiple; the rest is in the 10-K.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 10-K →The biggest segment, Durable Metal Solutions, is also where the profit is made: 37% of revenue and 40% of segment operating profit.
- Durable Metal Solutions37%$1.6B40% of profit
- Sustainable Fiber Solutions29%$1.2B26% of profit
- Customized Polymer Solutions26%$1.1B12% of profit
- Integrated Solutions9%$375M23% of profit
From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2024
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | TTMTTMOct 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||||||
| $3.3B | $3.6B | $3.9B | $4.6B | $4.5B | $5.6B | $6.3B | $4.2B | $4.4B | $5.4B | RevenueRevenue |
| 21% | 20% | 20% | 21% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 22% | 21% | 20% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| 11% | 10% | 10% | 11% | 11% | 10% | 9% | 12% | 14% | 12% | SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev |
| $226M | $300M | $371M | $399M | $305M | $585M | $621M | $427M | $338M | $465M | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 6.8% | 8.2% | 9.6% | 8.7% | 6.8% | 10.5% | 9.8% | 10.2% | 7.8% | 8.5% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| $75M | $119M | $209M | $171M | $109M | $391M | $377M | $359M | $269M | $269M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| 47% | 36% | 26% | 29% | 37% | 15% | 27% | 21% | 8% | 9% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | ||||||||||
| $301M | $305M | $253M | $390M | $455M | $396M | $658M | $650M | $356M | $356M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $128M | $121M | $127M | $206M | $243M | $234M | $217M | $231M | $261M | $261M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| $98M | $66M | ($83M) | $12M | $103M | ($229M) | $64M | $60M | ($174M) | ($174M) | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $100M | $97M | $140M | $157M | $131M | $141M | $176M | $214M | $187M | $187M | CapexCapex |
| 3.0% | 2.7% | 3.6% | 3.4% | 2.9% | 2.5% | 2.8% | 5.1% | 4.3% | 3.4% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $201M | $208M | $113M | $233M | $323M | $255M | $481M | $436M | $170M | $170M | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 6.0% | 5.7% | 2.9% | 5.1% | 7.2% | 4.6% | 7.6% | 10.4% | 3.9% | 3.1% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| $201M | $208M | $113M | $233M | $323M | $255M | $481M | $436M | $170M | $170M | Free cash flowFCF |
| 6.0% | 5.7% | 2.9% | 5.1% | 7.2% | 4.6% | 7.6% | 10.4% | 3.9% | 3.1% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| $400K | $0 | $0 | $1.9B | $0 | $0 | — | — | — | $0 | AcquisitionsAcquis. |
| $99M | $99M | $100M | $104M | $104M | $106M | $111M | $117M | $121M | $121M | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| $5M | $0 | $0 | — | $0 | $0 | $71M | $64M | $0 | — | BuybacksBuybacks |
| 7% | 10% | 14% | 7% | 5% | 14% | 13% | 8% | 7% | — | ROICROIC |
| 8% | 12% | 19% | 15% | 9% | 26% | 21% | 18% | 13% | 9% | Return on equityROE |
| −3% | 2% | 10% | 6% | 0% | 19% | 15% | 12% | 7% | 5% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | ||||||||||
| $104M | $142M | $94M | $77M | $106M | $125M | $147M | $181M | $198M | $286M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| $399M | $447M | $457M | $664M | $637M | $890M | $749M | $659M | $639M | $707M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| $277M | $76M | $76M | $109M | $80M | $107M | $87M | $83M | $87M | $96M | InventoryInvent. |
| $372M | $399M | $404M | $435M | $451M | $705M | $561M | $498M | $459M | $501M | Accounts payablePayables |
| $305M | $124M | $129M | $338M | $266M | $292M | $275M | $244M | $268M | $302M | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| $912M | $995M | $977M | $1.2B | $1.3B | $1.7B | $1.5B | $1.4B | $1.5B | $1.6B | Current assetsCur. assets |
| $659M | $688M | $670M | $825M | $1.0B | $1.3B | $1.0B | $939M | $1.0B | $1.2B | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 1.4× | 1.4× | 1.5× | 1.5× | 1.3× | 1.3× | 1.4× | 1.5× | 1.5× | 1.3× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| $786M | $785M | $776M | $1.5B | $1.5B | $1.5B | $1.5B | $1.4B | $1.7B | $1.7B | GoodwillGoodwill |
| $3.2B | $3.2B | $3.2B | $5.4B | $5.5B | $5.8B | $5.5B | $6.0B | $6.6B | $5.6B | Total assetsAssets |
| $975M | $953M | $903M | $2.7B | $2.5B | $2.2B | $1.9B | $2.2B | $2.7B | $714M | Total debtDebt |
| $871M | $811M | $809M | $2.7B | $2.4B | $2.1B | $1.8B | $2.0B | $2.5B | $428M | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| $947M | $1.0B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.2B | $1.5B | $1.8B | $1.9B | $2.1B | $2.9B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
The record, charted
FY2016–2024Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedBeyond op. cashEach year's outlays against its operating cash: the mix, and how it drifts. The hatched cap is spending beyond that year's operating cash — financed from the balance sheet or borrowing, not operations.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2024 the business reported $269M of profit but $170M of owner earnings: $99M less than the profit line, taken out by capital spending and the timing of cash.
| FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | $269M | $359M | $377M | $391M | $109M |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$261M | +$231M | +$217M | +$234M | +$243M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | −$174M | +$60M | +$64M | −$229M | +$103M |
| Cash from operations | $356M | $650M | $658M | $396M | $455M |
| Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow | −$187M | −$214M | −$176M | −$141M | −$131M |
| Owner earnings | $170M | $436M | $481M | $255M | $323M |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 4% | 10% | 8% | 5% | 7% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .
Much of fiscal 2024's profit didn't arrive as operating cash; it sits in “working capital & other” above. That can be a real inventory or timing swing, or profit that doesn't run through operating cash at all: a heavy tax year, equity-method earnings, or investment income booked through investing. For a year like this, owner earnings understates the cash earned; the full cash-flow statement carries the rest.
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- Can it pay its interest? 153.5×ComfortableOperating income $338M ÷ interest expense $2M
What this means
Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient, it says solvent, not cheap.
- How heavy is the debt, net of cash? $658M · 1.9× operating profitModest net debtCash $257M − debt $915M
What this means
Netting $257M of cash and short-term investments against $915M of debt leaves $658M owed, about 1.9× a year's operating profit (2.7× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- TightDSO 55 + DIO 10 − DPO 45 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.
Is it a good business?
- Solid through the cycle9-yr median, range 5%–14%; 9% latest = NOPAT $312M ÷ invested capital $3.6BIndustry peers: median 9%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 9 years (it ran 9% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Solid through the cycle9-yr median margin, range 3%–10%; latest $170M = operating cash $356M − maintenance capex $187MIndustry peers: median 6%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 4% of revenue this year, a 6% median across 9 years.
- Cash-backedCash from ops $356M ÷ net income $269M
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Returns about halfDividends + buybacks $121M ÷ Owner Earnings $170M
What this means
Of $170M Owner Earnings, $121M (71%) went back to shareholders, $121M dividends, $0 buybacks. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.
- Investing or harvesting? 0.71×HarvestingCapex $187M ÷ depreciation $261M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 4 of 6 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size PassRevenue ≥ $2B · $4.4B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity MissCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 1.27×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt MissDebt ≤ working capital · $915M vs $301M WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability PassA profit every year (9-yr record) · no losses
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record PassUninterrupted dividends · paid every year (9)
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth PassEarnings +33% over the record · +149%
What this means
At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $7.26/share (latest year $5.83), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $63.18/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2016–2024
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 9 of 9
What this means
Never lost money over the record, the earnings stability Graham insisted on.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 0 of 9 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin 8% → 9% (3-yr avg ends)
In the filing’s words The filing claims pricing power in its strongest form — price raised, volume held — yet the margin here has not widened to match. The claim leads the record; weigh them together.
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin held roughly steady — about 8% early, 9% lately, median 9%.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC 8%
What this means
Reinvested capital came back at only a modest incremental return — near the cost of capital, where extra growth adds little per dollar. The record shows whether it is a soft stretch or a thinning moat.
- Owner earnings growth +5%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings grew about 5% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2020 · 6.8% op. margin
What this means
Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.
- Dividend record rising
What this means
Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of the latest quarter, Mar 31, 2026Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$286M
- Receivables$707M
- Inventory$96M
- Other current assets$475M
- Debt due within a year$13M
- Accounts payable$501M
- Other current liabilities$713M
From the company's latest filing.
How the cash was used, 2016–2024
Over the record, the business generated $3.8B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a balanced allocator, splitting cash between the business, owners, and the balance sheet.
- Reinvested$1.3B · 36%
- Dividends$960M · 26%
- Buybacks$140M · 4%
- Retained (debt / cash)$1.3B · 35%
- Returned to owners$1.1B
45% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $960M as dividends and $140M as buybacks.
- Average price paid for buybacks$415.84
Across the years where the filing reports a share count, 0M shares were bought for $71M, about $415.84 each.
- Net change in share count—
No continuous share count across the span.
- Dividend recordPays
Paid in 9 of the years on record. It was never cut over the span.
- Return on what it retained19%
Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out ($978M over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) grew $188M, so each retained $1 added about 0.19 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Acquisitions & goodwill
from the balance sheet & the 9-year cash-flow recordGoodwill grows only when a company acquires and falls only when it concedes it overpaid. The size of that bet, the cash put into buying rather than building, and how much has already been written off.
$13M written down across 1 year (2017): goodwill the company has already conceded it overpaid for, charged against earnings. A write-down costs no cash (the cash went out when the deal was signed), but it is management marking its own past judgment to market.
Goodwill, acquired intangibles and equity from the latest balance sheet; acquisition spend and write-downs summed across the 9-year record, from the company's own filings.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.
| Fiscal year | Pay, as filed | “Actually paid” | Owner earnings |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | $8.1M | $19.2M | $255M |
| 2022 | $4.6M | $8.7M | $481M |
| 2022 | $14.2M | $7.9M | $481M |
| 2023 | $4.4M | $3.1M | $436M |
| 2024 | $8.5M | $10.6M | $170M |
| 2025 | $9.4M | $13.8M | — |
Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.
- Insider ownership3.5%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why Greif is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2024.
1 of the 5 tests turned up something to look into; the other 4 came back clean.
- Look hereAre "one-time" charges a yearly habit?9 of 9 years
Management took an impairment or write-down in 9 of the last 9 years, $223M in all. A charge taken almost every year is not one-time; it is the business — past deals coming due, and an admission the assets were worth less than what was paid. Munger's rule: when the "one-time" keeps happening, it is the business. Read it beside the goodwill the company still carries.
- Is it less profitable than it was?
- Did debt outgrow the business?
- Did reported profit become cash?
- Did receivables and inventory outpace sales?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
Peers, Containers & Packaging
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BALLBall Corp. | $13.2B | 46% | 8.8% | 9% | 6% |
| CCKCrown Holdings Inc. | $12.4B | — | 11.5% | 10% | 5% |
| SLGNSilgan Holdings | $6.5B | 16% | 9.3% | 9% | 7% |
| SNASnap-on | $4.7B | 53% | 25.8% | 17% | 17% |
| GEFGreif | $4.4B | 20% | 8.7% | 8% | 6% |
| GTLSChart Industries | $4.3B | 30% | 7.3% | 5% | 5% |
| VMIValmont Industries Inc. | $4.1B | 26% | 9.0% | 11% | 6% |
| ACAArcosa Inc. Common Stock | $2.9B | 19% | 8.9% | 6% | 6% |
| Group median | — | 26% | 8.9% | 9% | 6% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFType today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Greif has delivered.
Through the cycle, Greif earns about $249M on its 5.7% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 3.9% margin runs below that; the reported figure may understate a lean year. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings $170M on 46M shares outstanding (a weighted cover-text, the only count this filer tags); net debt $428M. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← GE its page in the Manual GEGGL →
Industry order: ← ENTG the Containers & Packaging chapter GPK →