← All companies ← GOTU Manual GRAB → ← GPOR Oil & Gas Producers GRNT →
GPRK, Geopark Ltd
An oil and gas business, whose fortunes rise and fall with a price it does not set.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- Situation
- Cyclical. Margins collapse and recover repeatedly across the record; a single year, good or bad, misstates the through-cycle earning power.
- What moves the needle
- Operating margin has run about 27% through the cycle, a wide margin for the work it does — whether that reflects a durable edge or one that can fade is what the record weighs. The margin is cyclical, swinging between −28% and 43% over the years, so the through-cycle figure carries more than any single year — and the balance sheet at the trough more than the peak. Capital spending runs about 20% of sales, well above depreciation, so the return earned on what it sinks into that plant weighs as much as the margin. Read this kind of business on the commodity price, and the cost to lift a barrel. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on concentrated dependence, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has run high across the record (median 21%, above 15% in 7 of 10 years). Owner earnings agree: roughly 23% of revenue reaches owners as cash, consistently. Whether these returns reflect real pricing power or an accounting artifact is the judgment the 10-K is for.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMDec 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $193M | $330M | $601M | $629M | $394M | $689M | $1.0B | $757M | $661M | $493M | $493M | RevenueRevenue |
| ($29M) | $79M | $256M | $211M | ($111M) | $186M | $429M | $271M | $274M | $111M | $111M | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| −14.9% | 23.9% | 42.7% | 33.5% | −28.1% | 27.0% | 40.9% | 35.8% | 41.4% | 22.4% | 22.4% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| ($49M) | ($24M) | $72M | $58M | ($233M) | $61M | $224M | $111M | $96M | $50M | $50M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| — | — | 59% | — | — | 52% | 43% | 48% | — | -2% | -2% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| $83M | $142M | $256M | $235M | $169M | $217M | $467M | $301M | $471M | $15M | $15M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $76M | $75M | $92M | $106M | $118M | $89M | $97M | $121M | $131M | $117M | $117M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| $56M | $92M | $92M | $72M | $284M | $67M | $146M | $69M | $244M | ($152M) | ($152M) | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $39M | $106M | $125M | $126M | $75M | $129M | $169M | $199M | $191M | $98M | $98M | CapexCapex |
| 20.4% | 32.0% | 20.8% | 20.1% | 19.1% | 18.8% | 16.1% | 26.3% | 28.9% | 20.0% | 20.0% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $44M | $67M | $164M | $109M | $93M | $128M | $371M | $180M | $340M | ($84M) | ($84M) | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 22.6% | 20.4% | 27.3% | 17.3% | 23.7% | 18.6% | 35.3% | 23.8% | 51.5% | −17.0% | −17.0% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| $44M | $37M | $131M | $109M | $93M | $88M | $299M | $102M | $280M | ($84M) | ($84M) | Free cash flowFCF |
| 22.6% | 11.1% | 21.9% | 17.3% | 23.7% | 12.7% | 28.5% | 13.5% | 42.3% | −17.0% | −17.0% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| — | $0 | $0 | $2M | $5M | $7M | $24M | $30M | $30M | $24M | $24M | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| $2M | $0 | $2M | $71M | $4M | $12M | $36M | $31M | $44M | $0 | — | BuybacksBuybacks |
| -6% | 10% | 28% | 23% | -18% | 18% | 50% | 26% | 31% | 16% | 19% | ROICROIC |
| -46% | -29% | 51% | 43% | — | — | 194% | 63% | 47% | 20% | 37% | Return on equityROE |
| — | −29% | 51% | 42% | — | — | 173% | 46% | 33% | 10% | 19% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $76M | $156M | $129M | $111M | $202M | $101M | $129M | $133M | $297M | $100M | $100M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| $18M | $20M | $16M | $44M | $47M | $71M | $72M | $65M | $40M | $39M | $39M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| $4M | $6M | $9M | $11M | $13M | $11M | $14M | $14M | $11M | $12M | $12M | InventoryInvent. |
| $52M | $96M | $131M | $131M | $100M | $128M | $142M | $138M | $280M | $111M | $111M | Accounts payablePayables |
| ($30M) | ($71M) | ($106M) | ($76M) | ($40M) | ($46M) | ($55M) | ($59M) | ($229M) | ($60M) | ($60M) | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| $121M | $215M | $260M | $226M | $292M | $233M | $238M | $270M | $430M | $220M | $220M | Current assetsCur. assets |
| $100M | $166M | $218M | $215M | $197M | $204M | $229M | $231M | $369M | $137M | $137M | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 1.2× | 1.3× | 1.2× | 1.1× | 1.5× | 1.1× | 1.0× | 1.2× | 1.2× | 1.6× | 1.6× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| $641M | $786M | $863M | $852M | $960M | $896M | $974M | $1.0B | $1.2B | $1.0B | $1.0B | Total assetsAssets |
| $359M | $426M | $447M | $437M | $785M | $674M | $498M | $501M | $514M | $554M | $554M | Total debtDebt |
| $283M | $270M | $318M | $326M | $583M | $573M | $369M | $368M | $217M | $453M | $453M | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| -0.8× | 1.5× | 6.5× | 5.1× | -1.7× | 2.9× | 7.5× | 5.9× | 5.3× | 1.4× | 1.4× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| $106M | $85M | $143M | $133M | ($109M) | ($62M) | $116M | $176M | $203M | $246M | $133M | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 59.8M | 60.1M | 60.6M | 60.2M | 60.7M | 60.9M | 59.3M | 56.8M | 52.5M | 51.5M | 51.7M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $3.22 | $5.49 | $9.92 | $10.44 | $6.49 | $11.31 | $17.69 | $13.31 | $12.59 | $9.56 | $9.53 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $-0.82 | $-0.40 | $1.19 | $0.96 | $-3.84 | $1.00 | $3.78 | $1.95 | $1.84 | $0.96 | $0.96 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $0.73 | $1.12 | $2.71 | $1.81 | $1.54 | $2.10 | $6.25 | $3.17 | $6.48 | $-1.62 | $-1.62 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $0.73 | $0.61 | $2.17 | $1.81 | $1.54 | $1.44 | $5.03 | $1.79 | $5.33 | $-1.62 | $-1.62 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| — | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.04 | $0.08 | $0.12 | $0.41 | $0.52 | $0.57 | $0.47 | $0.47 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| $0.66 | $1.76 | $2.06 | $2.10 | $1.24 | $2.12 | $2.85 | $3.50 | $3.64 | $1.91 | $1.90 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $1.77 | $1.41 | $2.36 | $2.21 | $-1.80 | $-1.02 | $1.95 | $3.10 | $3.87 | $4.77 | $2.57 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +12.8%/yr | +8.1%/yr |
| Dividends / share | — | +42.4%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +12.6%/yr | +9.0%/yr |
| Book value / share | +11.7%/yr | — |
The record, charted
FY2016–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedEach year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business reported $50M of profit but ($84M) of owner earnings: $133M less than the profit line, taken out by capital spending and the timing of cash.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | $50M | $96M | $111M | $224M | $61M |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$117M | +$131M | +$121M | +$97M | +$89M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | −$152M | +$244M | +$69M | +$146M | +$67M |
| Cash from operations | $15M | $471M | $301M | $467M | $217M |
| Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume | −$98M | −$131M | −$121M | −$97M | −$89M |
| Owner earnings | ($84M) | $340M | $180M | $371M | $128M |
| Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still | — | −$61M | −$78M | −$72M | −$40M |
| Free cash flow | ($84M) | $280M | $102M | $299M | $88M |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | -17% | 52% | 24% | 35% | 19% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .
Much of fiscal 2025's profit didn't arrive as operating cash; it sits in “working capital & other” above. That can be a real inventory or timing swing, or profit that doesn't run through operating cash at all: a heavy tax year, equity-method earnings, or investment income booked through investing. For a year like this, owner earnings understates the cash earned; the full cash-flow statement carries the rest.
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- ThinOperating income $111M ÷ interest expense $76M
What this means
Operating profit covers interest, but with little room. A bad year, a refinancing at higher rates, or a revenue wobble closes the gap fast.
- How heavy is the debt, net of cash? $453M · 4.1× operating profitHeavy net debtCash $100M − debt $554M
What this means
Netting $100M of cash and short-term investments against $554M of debt leaves $453M owed, about 4.1× a year's operating profit (5.0× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
Is it a good business?
- High through the cycle10-yr median, range -18%–50%; 19% latest = NOPAT $111M ÷ invested capital $586MIndustry peers: median 10%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 10 years (it ran 19% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- High through the cycle10-yr median margin, range -17%–52%; latest ($84M) = operating cash $15M − maintenance capex $98MIndustry peers: median 25%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's -17% of revenue this year, a 23% median across 10 years.
- Thinly cash-backedCash from ops $15M ÷ net income $50M
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- No surplus to allocate
What this means
The business didn't generate positive Owner Earnings this year, so any distributions came from the balance sheet or borrowing, not from operations.
- Investing or harvesting? 0.84×MaintainingCapex $98M ÷ depreciation $117M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 0 of 5 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size MissRevenue ≥ $2B · $493M
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity NearCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 1.60×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt MissDebt ≤ working capital · $554M vs $82M WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability MissA profit every year (10-yr record) · 3 loss years
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record MissUninterrupted dividends · 7 of 10 yrs
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth —Earnings +33% over the record · —
What this means
Earnings were negative early in the record, a growth rate isn't meaningful.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $1.66/share (latest year $0.96), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $2.57/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2016–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 7 of 10
What this means
Lost money in 3 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 7 of 10 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin 17% → 33% (3-yr avg ends)
In the filing’s words The filing ties gains to its own pricing, but names price competition too — pricing power that is real yet contested, not unopposed. The margin shows who is winning.
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin widened — about 17% early to 33% lately, median 27% — pricing power intact or improving.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC 53%
What this means
Every extra dollar the business reinvested came back at a high incremental return — the lens GBM read for a moat that reinvests rather than merely harvests. The record and the 10-K are where you check whether the rate holds.
- Owner earnings growth +10%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings grew about 10% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2020 · −28.1% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2020, understand why before trusting the good years.
- Share count −1.6%/yr
What this means
The share count is shrinking, buybacks are quietly growing your slice of the business.
- Dividend record rising
What this means
Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.
- How management talks about it Promotional
What this means
The record is compounding, but the filing leans on a promoter’s vocabulary rather than the per-share, return-on-capital terms an owner uses. The results back the talk here; the register is still worth noting.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
The filing raises AI among its risks, but in other terms (security, regulation, energy or the like), not as a competitor to its product; it frames AI mainly as a capability.
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat, and the company is using it that way.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of fiscal year-end, Dec 31, 2025Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$100M
- Receivables$39M
- Inventory$12M
- Other current assets$68M
- Debt due within a year$18M
- Accounts payable$111M
- Other current liabilities$8M
From the company's latest filing.
How the cash was used, 2016–2025
Over the record, the business generated $2.4B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a reinvestor, most operating cash is plowed back into the business.
- Reinvested$1.3B · 53%
- Dividends$123M · 5%
- Buybacks$202M · 9%
- Retained (debt / cash)$773M · 33%
- Returned to owners$325M
23% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $123M as dividends and $202M as buybacks.
- Average price paid for buybacks—
Buybacks ran $202M over the span, but the filings don't tag the share count needed to deduce the average price paid.
- Net change in share count−13.5%
The diluted count fell from 60M to 52M, so the buybacks outran the stock issued to staff.
- Dividend record$0.47/sh
Paid in 7 of the years on record. It was cut at least once along the way.
- Return on what it retained129%
Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out ($42M over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) grew $54M, so each retained $1 added about 1.29 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why Geopark Ltd is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.
1 of the 5 tests turned up something to look into; the other 4 came back clean.
- Look hereIs it less profitable than it was?19.4% vs 23.4%
The owner-earnings margin averaged 23.4% early in the record and 19.4% across the last three years, and the latest year has not recovered. Ask the filing whether that is a structural drift or a cyclical trough — price, mix, cost, or a competitor — and whether it is permanent.
- Did the share count rise anyway?
- Did debt outgrow the business?
- Did reported profit become cash?
- Did receivables and inventory outpace sales?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
Peers, Oil & Gas Producers
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTITetra Technologies Inc. | $631M | 28% | 8.6% | 13% | -1% |
| WTIW&T Offshore Inc. | $501M | — | 13.8% | 3% | 16% |
| GPRKGeopark Ltd | $493M | — | 30.2% | 21% | 23% |
| GRNTGranite Ridge Resources Inc. | $450M | — | 19.3% | 9% | 56% |
| BSMBlack Stone Minerals L.P. Common | $422M | — | 50.6% | — | 65% |
| REPXRiley Exploration Permian Inc. | $392M | — | 21.7% | 10% | 31% |
| TXOTXO Partners L.P. Common | $363M | — | -5.7% | — | 25% |
| EGYVAALCO Energy Inc. | $359M | — | 27.2% | 18% | 23% |
| Group median | — | — | 20.5% | 11% | 24% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFEnter the home-market price, not the US ADR quote. Geopark Ltd reports in USD, and every figure here (owner earnings, book value, the share count) is on that ordinary-share basis. Enter the price on the same basis: the local-exchange quote per ordinary share. A US ADR price in dollars bundles the ADR-to-ordinary ratio, so it will not reconcile with these figures and would throw the multiple off.
Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Geopark Ltd has delivered.
Geopark Ltd’s latest year shows negative owner earnings, a cyclical trough. So the tool opens on the through-cycle base, the cash it would earn at rest; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings ($84M) on 52M shares outstanding, per the 20-F cover, as of 2025-12-31; net debt $453M. The base opens on the through-cycle figure (the latest year sits off the record’s own median, and Graham’s averaging cuts both ways); clear Normalize to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← GOTU its page in the Manual GRAB →
Industry order: ← GPOR the Oil & Gas Producers chapter GRNT →