← All companies ← KEN Manual KGC → ← KEN Electric Utilities NEE →
KEP, Korea Electric Power Corporation
Korea Electric Power Corporation, KEPCO, is South Korea's predominant electric utility. It generates electricity and owns the transmission and distribution network that carries power to homes and businesses across the country, and it earns its money selling that electricity. The South Korean government is its controlling shareholder and oversees the rates it is allowed to charge.
Our capital expenditures relate primarily to the construction of new generation units, maintenance of existing generation units and expansion of our transmission and distribution systems.
Our capital expenditures generally follow budgets established under the Basic Plan, which contains projections relating to the supply and demand of electricity of Korea based on which we plan the construction of additional generation units and transmission systems.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- Situation
- Regulated utility. Returns are set by regulation on an approved rate base; the capital spending regulators approve becomes the growth, recovered through allowed rates. Cyclical. Margins collapse and recover repeatedly across the record; a single year, good or bad, misstates the through-cycle earning power.
- What moves the needle
- The outcome turns on a single relationship: the gap between what it costs to make power and what the regulator permits the company to charge for it. Because the government both controls the company and sets its prices, the question is not demand — a national grid does not lose its customers — but whether tariffs are allowed to track the price of the oil and gas burned to generate the electricity. When fuel outruns the rate, a capital-heavy utility can lose money on the very electricity it sells, and a debt load of this size sharpens the loss. The figures for margins and debt are in the record below.
Drafted from the company's filings and reviewed by hand; every number is shown in full in the sections below.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2015–2024
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2015’15 | 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | TTMTTMDec 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| ₩58.58T | ₩59.76T | ₩59.34T | ₩60.03T | ₩58.57T | ₩57.93T | ₩60.01T | ₩70.55T | ₩87.48T | ₩92.58T | ₩92.58T | RevenueRevenue |
| — | 24% | 12% | 3% | 1% | 11% | −6% | −43% | −3% | 11% | 11% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| ₩20.28T | ₩12.30T | ₩5.32T | (₩685.1B) | (₩1.71T) | ₩4.10T | (₩5.72T) | (₩32.24T) | (₩4.25T) | ₩8.46T | ₩8.46T | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 34.6% | 20.6% | 9.0% | −1.1% | −2.9% | 7.1% | −9.5% | −45.7% | −4.9% | 9.1% | 9.1% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| ₩13.29T | ₩7.05T | ₩1.30T | (₩1.31T) | (₩2.35T) | ₩1.99T | (₩5.30T) | (₩24.47T) | (₩4.82T) | ₩3.49T | ₩3.49T | Net incomeNet inc. |
| 28% | 32% | — | — | — | 31% | — | — | — | 32% | 32% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| ₩16.94T | ₩16.52T | ₩11.25T | ₩6.68T | ₩8.21T | ₩13.21T | ₩4.49T | (₩23.48T) | ₩1.52T | ₩15.88T | ₩15.88T | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| ₩8.34T | ₩8.96T | ₩9.77T | ₩10.02T | ₩11.13T | ₩11.55T | ₩11.94T | ₩12.46T | ₩13.03T | ₩14.00T | ₩14.00T | DepreciationDeprec. |
| (₩4.69T) | ₩511.0B | ₩177.5B | (₩2.03T) | (₩569.8B) | (₩331.6B) | (₩2.15T) | (₩11.47T) | (₩6.69T) | (₩1.61T) | (₩1.61T) | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| ₩14.05T | ₩12.03T | ₩12.54T | ₩12.27T | ₩14.00T | ₩13.28T | ₩12.69T | ₩12.35T | ₩13.91T | ₩14.22T | ₩14.22T | CapexCapex |
| 24.0% | 20.1% | 21.1% | 20.4% | 23.9% | 22.9% | 21.1% | 17.5% | 15.9% | 15.4% | 15.4% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| ₩8.60T | ₩7.56T | ₩1.48T | (₩5.59T) | (₩2.92T) | (₩72.8B) | (₩8.20T) | (₩35.82T) | (₩12.39T) | ₩1.66T | ₩1.66T | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 14.7% | 12.6% | 2.5% | −9.3% | −5.0% | −0.1% | −13.7% | −50.8% | −14.2% | 1.8% | 1.8% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| ₩2.89T | ₩4.49T | (₩1.29T) | (₩5.59T) | (₩5.79T) | (₩72.8B) | (₩8.20T) | (₩35.82T) | (₩12.39T) | ₩1.66T | ₩1.66T | Free cash flowFCF |
| 4.9% | 7.5% | −2.2% | −9.3% | −9.9% | −0.1% | −13.7% | −50.8% | −14.2% | 1.8% | 1.8% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| ₩409.9B | ₩2.09T | ₩1.34T | ₩599.4B | ₩99.4B | ₩81.3B | ₩812.2B | ₩42.3B | ₩45.3B | ₩126.9B | ₩126.9B | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| 20% | 10% | 2% | -2% | -3% | 3% | -8% | -60% | -13% | 9% | 9% | Return on equityROE |
| 19% | 7% | −0% | −3% | −4% | 3% | −10% | −60% | −14% | 8% | 8% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| ₩3.78T | ₩5.72T | ₩4.33T | ₩3.72T | ₩3.40T | ₩4.83T | ₩4.50T | ₩7.52T | ₩7.45T | ₩5.88T | ₩5.88T | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| — | ₩7.79T | ₩7.93T | ₩7.79T | ₩7.70T | ₩7.92T | ₩8.12T | ₩10.46T | ₩11.99T | ₩12.22T | ₩12.22T | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| — | ₩5.48T | ₩6.00T | ₩7.19T | ₩7.05T | ₩6.74T | ₩7.61T | ₩9.93T | ₩8.88T | ₩9.77T | ₩9.77T | InventoryInvent. |
| — | ₩5.59T | ₩6.00T | ₩6.41T | ₩6.65T | ₩6.26T | ₩8.15T | ₩11.98T | ₩9.09T | ₩9.41T | ₩9.41T | Accounts payablePayables |
| — | ₩7.68T | ₩7.93T | ₩8.58T | ₩8.10T | ₩8.40T | ₩7.58T | ₩8.41T | ₩11.77T | ₩12.57T | ₩12.57T | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| — | ₩19.71T | ₩19.14T | ₩19.75T | ₩19.48T | ₩20.56T | ₩22.05T | ₩29.75T | ₩29.54T | ₩29.26T | ₩29.26T | Current assetsCur. assets |
| — | ₩24.74T | ₩23.42T | ₩21.84T | ₩24.23T | ₩25.88T | ₩31.73T | ₩44.52T | ₩61.25T | ₩63.97T | ₩63.97T | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| — | 0.8× | 0.8× | 0.9× | 0.8× | 0.8× | 0.7× | 0.7× | 0.5× | 0.5× | 0.5× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| — | ₩2.6B | ₩2.6B | ₩2.6B | ₩98.0B | ₩98.2B | ₩105.6B | ₩100.1B | ₩99.2B | ₩99.2B | ₩99.2B | GoodwillGoodwill |
| — | ₩177.84T | ₩181.79T | ₩185.25T | ₩197.60T | ₩203.14T | ₩211.12T | ₩234.80T | ₩239.71T | ₩246.81T | ₩246.81T | Total assetsAssets |
| 6.7× | 5.0× | 1.7× | -0.3× | -0.6× | 1.4× | -1.8× | -6.8× | -0.8× | 1.1× | 1.1× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| ₩67.94T | ₩71.72T | ₩71.68T | ₩69.74T | ₩67.50T | ₩69.30T | ₩63.78T | ₩40.55T | ₩35.85T | ₩39.92T | ₩39.92T | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 642M | 642M | 642M | 642M | 642M | 642M | 642M | 642M | 642M | 642M | 642M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| ₩91253.90 | ₩93094.13 | ₩92428.67 | ₩93514.67 | ₩91232.65 | ₩90233.45 | ₩93482.45 | ₩109890.92 | ₩136263.71 | ₩144210.97 | ₩144210.97 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| ₩20700.73 | ₩10979.71 | ₩2023.04 | ₩-2047.73 | ₩-3653.66 | ₩3103.10 | ₩-8262.96 | ₩-38112.50 | ₩-7512.18 | ₩5439.09 | ₩5439.09 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| ₩13399.07 | ₩11775.68 | ₩2299.48 | ₩-8702.57 | ₩-4541.24 | ₩-113.43 | ₩-12766.05 | ₩-55804.33 | ₩-19294.24 | ₩2585.94 | ₩2585.94 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| ₩4506.82 | ₩6996.91 | ₩-2003.33 | ₩-8702.57 | ₩-9014.42 | ₩-113.43 | ₩-12766.05 | ₩-55804.33 | ₩-19294.24 | ₩2585.94 | ₩2585.94 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| ₩638.48 | ₩3253.19 | ₩2087.95 | ₩933.68 | ₩154.77 | ₩126.64 | ₩1265.12 | ₩65.97 | ₩70.60 | ₩197.68 | ₩197.68 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| ₩21885.78 | ₩18737.48 | ₩19527.51 | ₩19108.34 | ₩21808.63 | ₩20688.53 | ₩19762.36 | ₩19232.97 | ₩21665.34 | ₩22144.60 | ₩22144.60 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| ₩105835.32 | ₩111725.40 | ₩111659.59 | ₩108641.48 | ₩105140.33 | ₩107944.79 | ₩99351.78 | ₩63158.36 | ₩55836.52 | ₩62176.74 | ₩62176.74 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +5.2%/yr | +9.6%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | −16.7%/yr | — |
| EPS | −13.8%/yr | — |
| Dividends / share | −12.2%/yr | +5.0%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +0.1%/yr | +0.3%/yr |
| Book value / share | −5.7%/yr | −10.0%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2015–2024Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedEach year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2024 the business reported ₩3.49T of profit but ₩1.66T of owner earnings: ₩1.83T less than the profit line, taken out by capital spending and the timing of cash.
| FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | ₩3.49T | (₩4.82T) | (₩24.47T) | (₩5.30T) | ₩1.99T |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +₩14.00T | +₩13.03T | +₩12.46T | +₩11.94T | +₩11.55T |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | −₩1.61T | −₩6.69T | −₩11.47T | −₩2.15T | −₩331.6B |
| Cash from operations | ₩15.88T | ₩1.52T | (₩23.48T) | ₩4.49T | ₩13.21T |
| Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow | −₩14.22T | −₩13.91T | −₩12.35T | −₩12.69T | −₩13.28T |
| Owner earnings | ₩1.66T | (₩12.39T) | (₩35.82T) | (₩8.20T) | (₩72.8B) |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 2% | -14% | -51% | -14% | 0% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- ThinOperating income ₩8.46T ÷ interest expense ₩7.54T
What this means
Operating profit covers interest, but with little room. A bad year, a refinancing at higher rates, or a revenue wobble closes the gap fast.
- Debt under-captured — leverage unknown, not low
What this means
This company pays far more interest than its tagged debt implies (the rest sits under segment dimensions the data source strips), so its net cash or net debt cannot be read honestly: the gap is unknown, not zero, and 'net cash' here would be exactly the fiction the figure is meant to prevent. Judge it on the record and owner earnings instead.
- TightDSO 48 + DIO 44 − DPO 42 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.
Is it a good business?
- Debt under-capturedIndustry peers: median 7%
What this means
This company's interest bill implies far more debt than its filings tag at the consolidated level (the rest sits under segment dimensions the data source strips), so invested capital, and the return on it, cannot be read honestly. Judge this one on Owner Earnings and the record instead.
- Positive this year, negative across the cyclelatest ₩1.66T = operating cash ₩15.88T − maintenance capex ₩14.22T (positive this year), after an earlier loss stretch (10-yr median -5%)Industry peers: median 11%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 2% of revenue this year, a -5% median across 10 years.
- Cash-backedCash from ops ₩15.88T ÷ net income ₩3.49T
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Reinvests most of itDividends + buybacks ₩126.9B ÷ Owner Earnings ₩1.66T
What this means
Of ₩1.66T Owner Earnings, ₩126.9B (8%) went back to shareholders, ₩126.9B dividends, ₩0 buybacks. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.
- Investing or harvesting? 1.02×MaintainingCapex ₩14.22T ÷ depreciation ₩14.00T
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 1 of 4 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size —Revenue ≥ $2B (a dollar floor) · ₩92.58T
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's floor is a dollar figure — about $2B of revenue as a conservative modern stand-in. This company reports in its home currency and we carry no exchange rate, so we show the figure and leave the size bar for you to apply rather than convert it with a number we don't have.
- Strong liquidity MissCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 0.46×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt —Debt ≤ working capital · —
What this means
The filings tag only a fraction of the debt this company's interest bill implies (much of it sits under segment dimensions the data source strips), so this test can't be run honestly.
- Earnings stability MissA profit every year (10-yr record) · 5 loss years
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record PassUninterrupted dividends · paid every year (10)
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth MissEarnings +33% over the record · −219%
What this means
At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are ₩-13395.20/share (latest year ₩5439.09), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is ₩62176.74/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2015–2024
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 5 of 10
What this means
Lost money in 5 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Operating margin 21% → −14% (3-yr avg ends)
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about 21% early to −14% lately, median −1% — competition or costs are biting in.
- Worst year 2022 · −45.7% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2022, understand why before trusting the good years.
- Share count +0.0%/yr
What this means
Roughly flat share count, little dilution, little buyback.
- Dividend record paid
What this means
Paid a dividend in 10 of the years on record.
- How management talks about it Owner’s terms
What this means
Returns have thinned, but the filing discusses it in an owner’s vocabulary rather than selling past it — candor about a hard stretch counts for more than an adjective.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
The filing raises AI among its risks, but in other terms (security, regulation, energy or the like), not as a competitor to its product; it frames AI mainly as a capability.
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat, and the company is using it that way.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of fiscal year-end, Dec 31, 2024Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments₩5.88T
- Receivables₩12.22T
- Inventory₩9.77T
- Other current assets₩1.39T
- Debt due within a year₩9.12T
- Accounts payable₩9.41T
- Other current liabilities₩45.43T
From the company's latest filing.
How the cash was used, 2015–2024
Over the record, the business generated ₩71.23T of operating cash; how management split it reads as a reinvestor, most operating cash is plowed back into the business.
- Reinvested₩131.32T · 184%
- Dividends₩5.65T · 8%
- Returned to owners₩5.65T
₩5.65T as dividends and ₩0 as buybacks.
- Source of funding−₩65.74T
Reinvestment and shareholder returns ran ₩65.74T beyond the operating cash the business generated, so the gap was financed off the balance sheet.
- Net change in share count0.0%
The diluted count barely moved (642M to 642M): buybacks roughly offset the stock issued to staff.
- Dividend record₩197.68/sh
Paid in 10 of the years on record, the per-share dividend shrinking about 12% a year. It was cut at least once along the way.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Peers, Electric Utilities
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KEPKorea Electric Power Corporation | ₩92.58T | 3% | 3.0% | — | -3% |
| ETEnergy Transfer LP Common | $85.5B | 25% | 10.3% | 8% | 8% |
| NRGNRG Energy | $30.3B | 24% | 7.6% | 13% | 9% |
| SOSouthern Company (The) | $29.6B | — | 22.8% | 6% | 12% |
| NEENextEra Energy Inc. | $27.4B | — | 28.2% | 6% | — |
| CEGConstellation Energy | $22.7B | — | 5.0% | 8% | -17% |
| AEPAmerican Electric Power Company Inc. | $21.7B | — | 19.2% | 6% | 26% |
| VSTVistra | $17.6B | — | 10.8% | 7% | 17% |
| Group median | — | 24% | 10.6% | — | 9% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFEnter the US price, in dollars: the NYSE/Nasdaq quote you hold. Per the filing's own cover, “American depositary shares, each representing one-half of share of common”; Korea Electric Power Corporation reports in KRW, so every figure in this tool is stated per ADS and translated at KRW 1 = $0.0007 (2026-07-17, reference rate) so your dollar quote reconciles exactly. The record tables elsewhere on this page remain as filed, in KRW.
Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Korea Electric Power Corporation has delivered.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings $1.1B on 1284M shares outstanding, per the 20-F cover, as of 2025-12-31; net debt $4.3B. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← KEN its page in the Manual KGC →
Industry order: ← KEN the Electric Utilities chapter NEE →