Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← KGC Manual KMDA → ← KKRS Capital Markets & Asset Management LAZ →

KLAR, Klarna Group plc

Capital Markets & Asset Management financial Unprofitable

Revenue is led by Transaction revenue (60%) and Interest income (27%), with 2 more lines behind.

Latest annual: FY2025 20-F
KLAR · Klarna Group plc
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$3.5B
+24.8% YoY
Vital signs · TTM, with 3-yr average
Revenue $3.5B 3-yr avg $2.9B
Return on equity −11% 3-yr avg −7%
Return on tangible equity −19% 3-yr avg −9%
Equity / assets 13.3% 3-yr avg 14.2%

The business in brief

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What it is
A balance-sheet business, read on book value, net interest margin and credit losses rather than an earnings multiple.
Situation
Unprofitable. No sustained operating profit across the record; an earnings multiple has nothing to rest on. What the record does show is revenue, the gross-margin trajectory, and the burn against the cash on hand.
What moves the needle
Net interest margin, loan losses, and book value. A lender is read on the quality of its balance sheet, not an earnings multiple, and the worst year of credit losses matters more than the best.
Is it a good business?
Return on equity has sat below the cost of equity (median -11%, above 12% in only 0 of 3 years). The cycle and the loan book decide this one; weigh the recession years in the record, not the average, and read the 10-K.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

Where the money comes from

read the 20-F →

Transaction revenue is 60% of revenue, with Interest income the other meaningful line at 27%.

Revenue by product line, FY2025
  • Transaction revenue60%$2.1B
  • Interest income27%$937M
  • Consumer service revenue11%$397M
  • Gain on sale of consumer receivables2%$73M
By geographyUnited States35%Other countries28%Germany24%United Kingdom13%

From the segment footnote of the company's own 20-F. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2023–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMDec 2025
Income statement
$2.3B$2.8B$3.5B$3.5BRevenueRevenue
$211M$172M$270M$270MNet interest incomeNet int.
($244M)$21M($273M)($273M)Net incomeNet inc.
Cash flow & returns
0.2%-1.5%-1.5%Return on assetsROA
-11%1%-11%-11%Return on equityROE
−11%1%−11%−11%Retained to equityRetained/eq
-11%2%-19%-19%Return on tangible equityROTCE
Balance sheet
$13.8B$18.8B$18.8BTotal assetsAssets
$613M$685M$685MGoodwillGoodwill
$2.2B$2.1B$2.5B$2.5BShareholders’ equityEquity
Per share
362M364M371M371MShares out (diluted)Shares
$-0.67$0.06$-0.74$-0.74EPS (diluted)EPS
$6.07$5.73$6.76$6.76Book value / shareBVPS
$6.07$3.01$3.88$3.88Tangible book / shareTBVPS

The record, charted

FY2023–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.

Share count
371Mpeak FY2025
Revenue
$3.5Blow FY2023
III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 20-F · source on SEC EDGAR →

Is it a good business?

  • Loss on equity
    Net income ($273M) ÷ equity $2.5B
    Industry peers: median 5%
    What this means

    The bank's north star, what it earns on shareholders' capital. Cost of equity is roughly 10%, so a return durably above that builds value and below it destroys it. One year is noisy; the durability across a full credit cycle is what counts.

  • Loss
    Net income ÷ (equity − goodwill $685M − intangibles $383M)
    Industry peers: median 13%
    What this means

    The cleaner return, stripping out the goodwill paid for past acquisitions. This is the number a buyer of the whole bank actually earns on the hard capital.

  • Not enough data
    Industry peers: median 47%
    What this means

    Noninterest expense or revenue missing.

Is it sound?

  • Capital (equity / assets) 13.3%
    Well capitalized
    Equity $2.5B ÷ assets $18.8B
    What this means

    A plain-English leverage read: how much of the balance sheet is the owners' own money. This is a rough proxy; the regulatory figure is the CET1 ratio, which is risk-weighted and reported in the filing. The point is the same, how much loss the bank can absorb before depositors are at risk.

  • Funding
    Not enough data
    What this means

    Deposits or total assets missing.

  • Credit cost
    Not enough data
    What this means

    Provision or net interest income missing.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Low contestability

The moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.

AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Peers, Capital Markets & Asset Management

The same industry, side by side on the bank lens. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueROEROTCEEfficiencyNII / assets
KLARKlarna Group plc$3.5B-11%-11%1.4%
BKKTBakkt Inc.$2.3B-146%-252%0.5%
GDOTGreen DOT Corp$2.0B5%13%-0.1%
ATLCAtlanticus Holdings Corporation$2.0B42%42%55%21.3%
UPSTUpstart$1.0B-7%-8%0.0%
SOFISoFi Technologies$3.6B-6%-9%85%3.6%
OMFOneMain Holdings Inc.$4.9B23%48%39%15.3%
SYFSynchrony Financial$19.0B21%25%27%15.5%
Group median-0%2%2.5%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

price / tangible book

Enter the home-market price, not the US ADR quote. Klarna Group plc reports in USD, and every figure here (owner earnings, book value, the share count) is on that ordinary-share basis. Enter the price on the same basis: the local-exchange quote per ordinary share. A US ADR price in dollars bundles the ADR-to-ordinary ratio, so it will not reconcile with these figures and would throw the multiple off.

A bank is worth a multiple of its tangible book value, and the multiple it deserves is set by the return it earns on that book. Type today’s price; we show what you would be paying against what Klarna Group plc’s record justifies.

$
The assumptions

The justified multiple is (return on tangible equity − growth) ÷ (cost of equity − growth). A bank earning exactly its cost of equity is worth about one times tangible book; the premium above that prices each point of durable excess return. A higher cost of equity lowers the justified multiple for a bank.

Enter a price above to run it.

Price / tangible book
Justified by the return
Normalized return on tangible equity−11%
Price / book
Earnings yield
P/E (3-yr avg ’23–’25)
Graham’s price gate

Graham applied the same standards to financial enterprises (Intelligent Investor ch.14): the 15× multiple cap on averaged earnings, and P/E times price-to-book at most 22.5. The gate marks the bargain-hunter’s floor, not a verdict.

Tangible book $1.4B on 378M shares, a −11% normalized return on it. The dials set the multiple such a return would justify; your price sets the multiple you are paying. It assumes the bank keeps earning that return; a credit cycle, a rate shock or a bad acquisition changes it, which is what the record and the 10-K are for.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Klarna Group plc (KLAR), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/KLAR, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← KGC its page in the Manual KMDA →

Industry order: ← KKRS the Capital Markets & Asset Management chapter LAZ →