← All companies ← MTC Manual MUFG → ← MTCH Software NABL →
MTLS, Materialise NV
We are a leading provider of additive manufacturing and medical software tools and of sophisticated 3D printing services.
With our knowledge, products and services, we empower our customers to use additive manufacturing technology more effectively, in general, and we enable certain specific and significant applications of additive manufacturing, in particular.
The customers of our general software tools and 3D printing services are active in a wide variety of industries, including healthcare, automotive, aerospace, art and design and consumer products.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What it is
- Revenue is led by Manufacturing (40%) and Medical devices and services (31%), with 2 more lines behind.
- What moves the needle
- Gross margin has run about 56% and operating margin about 0.3% through the cycle, a wide spread between price and the cost of what it sells — whether that advantage is durable pricing power or a margin that can erode is the question the record is for. Read this kind of business on retention and the cost of growth. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has rarely cleared the cost of capital (median 2%, above 15% in 0 of 10 years). The steadier read is owner earnings: roughly 7% of revenue reaches owners as cash, consistently. This is price-taker territory, where the balance sheet and the cycle matter more than any multiple; the rest is in the 10-K.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 20-F →Revenue spreads across 4 lines, the largest Manufacturing at 40%.
- Manufacturing40%€107M
- Medical devices and services31%€83M
- Software (non-medical)16%€44M
- Software (medical)13%€34M
From the segment footnote of the company's own 20-F. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2015–2024
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2015’15 | 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | TTMTTMDec 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| €102M | €114M | €143M | €185M | €197M | €170M | €205M | €232M | €256M | €267M | €267M | RevenueRevenue |
| — | 59% | 56% | 55% | 56% | 55% | 58% | 55% | 57% | 57% | 57% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| (€4M) | €107K | €392K | €5M | €7M | (€5M) | €12M | (€3M) | €6M | €9M | €9M | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| −3.8% | 0.1% | 0.3% | 2.8% | 3.5% | −2.7% | 5.9% | −1.2% | 2.2% | 3.5% | 3.5% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| (€3M) | (€3M) | (€2M) | €3M | €2M | (€7M) | €13M | (€2M) | €7M | €13M | €13M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| — | — | — | 12% | — | — | 4% | — | 1% | 5% | 5% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| — | — | — | — | €28M | €30M | €26M | €22M | €20M | €31M | €31M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| — | — | — | — | €14M | €15M | €16M | €15M | €15M | €15M | €15M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| — | — | — | — | €12M | €22M | (€3M) | €9M | (€2M) | €3M | €3M | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| — | — | — | — | €13M | €11M | €8M | €22M | €9M | €25M | €25M | CapexCapex |
| — | — | — | — | 6.8% | 6.5% | 3.9% | 9.3% | 3.6% | 9.2% | 9.2% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| — | — | — | — | €15M | €19M | €18M | €7M | €11M | €16M | €16M | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| — | — | — | — | 7.6% | 11.1% | 8.7% | 3.2% | 4.3% | 6.0% | 6.0% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| — | — | — | — | €15M | €19M | €18M | €680K | €11M | €7M | €7M | Free cash flowFCF |
| — | — | — | — | 7.6% | 11.1% | 8.7% | 0.3% | 4.3% | 2.6% | 2.6% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| -6% | 0% | 0% | 4% | 3% | -3% | 11% | -1% | 3% | 5% | 5% | ROICROIC |
| -3% | -4% | -3% | 2% | 1% | -5% | 6% | -1% | 3% | 5% | 5% | Return on equityROE |
| −3% | −4% | −3% | 2% | 1% | −5% | 6% | −1% | 3% | 5% | 5% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| €51M | €56M | €43M | €116M | €129M | €112M | €196M | €141M | €128M | €102M | €102M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| €23M | €27M | €36M | €37M | €41M | €31M | €42M | €51M | €53M | €53M | €53M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| €5M | €8M | €11M | €10M | €13M | €10M | €11M | €16M | €17M | — | €17M | InventoryInvent. |
| €28M | €35M | €47M | €47M | €54M | €41M | €53M | €67M | €70M | €53M | €70M | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| €84M | €96M | €97M | €169M | €191M | €161M | €258M | €216M | €206M | €191M | €191M | Current assetsCur. assets |
| €38M | €48M | €63M | €73M | €84M | €84M | €91M | €106M | €105M | €102M | €102M | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 2.2× | 2.0× | 1.6× | 2.3× | 2.3× | 1.9× | 2.8× | 2.0× | 2.0× | 1.9× | 1.9× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| €10M | €9M | €18M | €17M | €20M | €19M | €19M | €44M | €43M | €43M | €43M | GoodwillGoodwill |
| €144M | €162M | €235M | €313M | €349M | €326M | €413M | €411M | €397M | €396M | €396M | Total assetsAssets |
| €17M | €28M | €82M | €92M | €105M | €91M | €73M | €76M | €59M | €23M | €49M | Total debtDebt |
| (€34M) | (€28M) | €39M | (€23M) | (€24M) | (€21M) | (€123M) | (€65M) | (€68M) | (€79M) | (€54M) | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| — | 0.0× | 0.1× | 1.1× | 1.9× | -0.8× | 3.0× | -0.6× | 1.5× | 3.2× | 3.2× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| €83M | €79M | €77M | €136M | €140M | €133M | €233M | €229M | €237M | €249M | €249M | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 47.2M | 47.3M | 47.3M | 49.8M | 52.9M | 53.4M | 56.7M | 59.1M | 59.1M | 59.1M | 59.1M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| €2.16 | €2.42 | €3.01 | €3.71 | €3.72 | €3.19 | €3.62 | €3.93 | €4.34 | €4.52 | €4.52 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| €-0.06 | €-0.06 | €-0.04 | €0.06 | €0.03 | €-0.13 | €0.23 | €-0.04 | €0.11 | €0.23 | €0.23 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| — | — | — | — | €0.28 | €0.36 | €0.32 | €0.12 | €0.18 | €0.27 | €0.27 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| — | — | — | — | €0.28 | €0.36 | €0.32 | €0.01 | €0.18 | €0.12 | €0.12 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| — | — | — | — | €0.25 | €0.21 | €0.14 | €0.37 | €0.16 | €0.42 | €0.42 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| €1.76 | €1.67 | €1.63 | €2.73 | €2.64 | €2.50 | €4.10 | €3.88 | €4.01 | €4.21 | €4.21 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +8.5%/yr | +4.0%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | −0.7%/yr (5-yr) | −0.7%/yr |
| EPS | — | +50.0%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +10.4%/yr (5-yr) | +10.4%/yr |
| Book value / share | +10.2%/yr | +9.8%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2015–2024Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedEach year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2024 the business earned €16M of owner earnings, the operating cash left after the €15M it takes just to hold its position. It put €9M more into growth; free cash flow, after that spending, was €7M.
| FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | €13M | €7M | (€2M) | €13M | (€7M) |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +€15M | +€15M | +€15M | +€16M | +€15M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | +€3M | −€2M | +€9M | −€3M | +€22M |
| Cash from operations | €31M | €20M | €22M | €26M | €30M |
| Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume | −€15M | −€9M | −€15M | −€8M | −€11M |
| Owner earnings | €16M | €11M | €7M | €18M | €19M |
| Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still | −€9M | — | −€7M | — | — |
| Free cash flow | €7M | €11M | €680K | €18M | €19M |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 6% | 4% | 3% | 9% | 11% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position (here about €15M, roughly its depreciation, the rate its assets wear out). The other €9M of its capital spending is growth it chose, not upkeep it owed; charged only with the maintenance it must do, the business earns well more than the year's free cash flow shows.
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- AdequateOperating income €9M ÷ interest expense €3M
What this means
Comfortable in a normal year, but below the margin of safety Graham looked for. Worth checking how stable the coverage has been across a full cycle.
- Net cashCash €102M − debt €49M
What this means
Cash and short-term investments exceed every dollar of debt by €54M, on net the company owes nothing, and can act from strength when others can't. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
Is it a good business?
- Below average through the cycle10-yr median, range -6%–11%; 5% latest = NOPAT €9M ÷ invested capital €195MIndustry peers: median -1%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 10 years (it ran 5% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Solid through the cycle6-yr median margin, range 3%–11%; latest €16M = operating cash €31M − maintenance capex €15MIndustry peers: median 7%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 6% of revenue this year, a 6% median across 6 years. It chose to put €9M more into growth, so free cash flow this year was €7M — the gap is investment, not weakness.
- Cash-backedCash from ops €31M ÷ net income €13M
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
- Investing or harvesting? 1.60×ExpandingCapex €25M ÷ depreciation €15M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 1 of 4 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size —Revenue ≥ $2B (a dollar floor) · €267M
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's floor is a dollar figure — about $2B of revenue as a conservative modern stand-in. This company reports in its home currency and we carry no exchange rate, so we show the figure and leave the size bar for you to apply rather than convert it with a number we don't have.
- Strong liquidity NearCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 1.86×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt PassDebt ≤ working capital · €49M vs €88M WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability MissA profit every year (10-yr record) · 5 loss years
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record MissUninterrupted dividends · none paid
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth —Earnings +33% over the record · —
What this means
Earnings were negative early in the record, a growth rate isn't meaningful.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are €0.10/share (latest year €0.23), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is €4.21/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2015–2024
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 5 of 10
What this means
Lost money in 5 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 0 of 10 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin −1% → 1% (3-yr avg ends)
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin widened — about −1% early to 1% lately, median 0% — pricing power intact or improving.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC 5%
What this means
Reinvested capital came back at only a modest incremental return — near the cost of capital, where extra growth adds little per dollar. The record shows whether it is a soft stretch or a thinning moat.
- Owner earnings growth −4%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings shrank about 4% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2015 · −3.8% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2015, understand why before trusting the good years.
- Share count +2.5%/yr
What this means
The share count is rising, dilution works against you on a per-share basis.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Elevated contestabilityThe product is software or information, the very thing capable AI now produces more cheaply, so the moat is more contestable than the record alone implies.
The filing raises AI among its risks, but in other terms (security, regulation, energy or the like), not as a competitor to its product; it frames AI mainly as a capability.
AI has collapsed the cost of building a capable substitute for the very thing this business sells. When a credible alternative can be assembled for a fraction of the incumbent's price, it is pricing power that erodes first, not revenue tomorrow. The live question is whether the moat survives that, not whether it held in the past. Whether that question is answerable at all is yours to decide, against your own circle of competence.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of fiscal year-end, Dec 31, 2024Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments€102M
- Receivables€53M
- Inventory€17M
- Other current assets€18M
- Debt due within a year€26M
- Other current liabilities€77M
From the company's latest filing.
How the cash was used, 2019–2024
Over the record, the business generated €158M of operating cash; how management split it reads as a reinvestor, most operating cash is plowed back into the business.
- Reinvested€88M · 56%
- Retained (debt / cash)€70M · 44%
- Source of fundingOperating cash
Operating cash covered reinvestment and returns; over the span debt fell €56M and cash and short-term investments fell €27M.
- Net change in share count11.6%
The diluted count rose from 53M to 59M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.
- Dividend record—
No dividend line was reported in the filing data over the span; the record here neither confirms nor rules out a payout.
- Return on what it retained−23%
Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out (€26M over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) fell €6M, so each retained €1 gave back about 0.23 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why Materialise NV is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2015–2024.
3 of the 5 tests turned up something to look into; the other 2 came back clean.
- Look hereIs it less profitable than it was?4.5% vs 9.1%
The owner-earnings margin averaged 9.1% early in the record and 4.5% across the last three years, and the latest year has not recovered. Ask the filing whether that is a structural drift or a cyclical trough — price, mix, cost, or a competitor — and whether it is permanent.
- Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?11.6%
Diluted shares grew 11.6% over 2019–2024. Owners were diluted on net; each share owns less of the business than it did. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.
- Look hereDid debt outgrow the business?€17M → €49M
Debt rose from €17M to €49M while owner earnings went from about €17M to €11M — about 1.0 year of owner earnings in debt then, about 4.3 now: measured against what the business earns, the balance sheet carries more debt than it did. Debt raised for buybacks or deals rather than growth is the kind that bites in a downturn.
- Did reported profit become cash?
- Did receivables and inventory outpace sales?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
Peers, Software
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCSIConsensus Cloud Solutions Inc. | $350M | 83% | 43.0% | 24% | 30% |
| DOMODomo, Inc. | $319M | 73% | -34.5% | — | -8% |
| MTLSMaterialise NV | €267M | 56% | 1.2% | 2% | 7% |
| CRNCCerence Inc. | $252M | 70% | 1.3% | -1% | 12% |
| AIC3.ai Inc. | $250M | 67% | -80.5% | -36% | -37% |
| WEAVWeave Communications Inc. | $239M | 63% | -35.0% | -111% | -10% |
| PDFSPDF Solutions Inc. | $219M | 61% | 0.0% | 0% | 7% |
| XZOExzeo Group Inc. | $217M | 40% | 28.4% | — | 35% |
| Group median | — | 65% | 0.6% | -0% | 7% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFEnter the US price, in dollars: the NYSE/Nasdaq quote you hold. Per the filing's own cover, “American Depositary Shares , each representing one Ordinary”; Materialise NV reports in EUR, so every figure in this tool is stated per ADS and translated at EUR 1 = $1.145 (2026-07-17, reference rate) so your dollar quote reconciles exactly. The record tables elsewhere on this page remain as filed, in EUR.
Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Materialise NV has delivered.
Through the cycle, Materialise NV earns about $21M on its 6.8% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 6.0% margin runs in line with that. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Free cash flow $8M on 59M shares outstanding, per the 20-F cover, as of 2025-12-31; net cash $61M. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. Capex ($28M) runs well above depreciation ($18M), so this is a build-out; Steady-state swaps total capex for maintenance (≈ depreciation), lifting the base to about $18M, the cash it would throw off if it stopped expanding. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← MTC its page in the Manual MUFG →
Industry order: ← MTCH the Software chapter NABL →