Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← MUFG Manual NA → ← MOVE IT Services & Consulting NRDS →

MWC, Micware Co. Ltd.

A software business, earning high margins on code once it is written.

Latest annual: FY2026 20-F · figures as filed, in JPY · 1 ADS = 1 ordinary share
MWC · Micware Co. Ltd.
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2026
¥21.9B
+3.7% YoY
Vital signs · TTM, with 3-yr average
Revenue ¥21.9B 3-yr avg ¥20.2B
Gross margin 37% 3-yr avg 34%
Operating margin 10.8% 3-yr avg 10.6%
ROIC 71% 3-yr avg 59%
Owner-earnings margin 8% 3-yr avg 6%
Free cash flow margin 8% 3-yr avg 6%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What moves the needle
Gross margin has run about 35% and operating margin about 11% through the cycle, a solid spread between what it charges and what the product costs to make. That margin has held in a narrow 10%–11% band over the years, so steadiness itself is the evidence — the lever is unit growth and cost discipline, not a moving line. The cash cycle has run negative through the cycle (a median of −9 days): the operation is paid before it pays, so working capital releases cash as the business grows rather than tying it up. Read this kind of business on retention and the cost of growth. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2024–2026

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2024’242025’252026’26TTMTTMFeb 2026
Income statement
¥17.5B¥21.1B¥21.9B¥21.9BRevenueRevenue
30%35%37%37%Gross marginGross mgn
¥1.9B¥2.2B¥2.4B¥2.4BOperating incomeOp. inc.
10.8%10.2%10.8%10.8%Operating marginOp. mgn
¥1.4B¥1.4B¥1.6B¥1.6BNet incomeNet inc.
28%33%30%30%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
¥403M¥2.2B¥2.1B¥2.1BOperating cash flowOp. cash
¥424M¥442M¥429M¥429MDepreciationDeprec.
(¥1.4B)¥433M¥26M¥26MWorking capital & otherWC & other
¥181M¥595M¥269M¥269MCapexCapex
1.0%2.8%1.2%1.2%Capex / revenueCapex/rev
¥222M¥1.8B¥1.8B¥1.8BOwner earningsOwner earn.
1.3%8.5%8.2%8.2%Owner earnings marginOE mgn
¥222M¥1.6B¥1.8B¥1.8BFree cash flowFCF
1.3%7.7%8.2%8.2%Free cash flow marginFCF mgn
46%71%71%ROICROIC
21%20%20%Return on equityROE
21%20%20%Retained to equityRetained/eq
Balance sheet
¥7.7B¥8.3B¥8.3BCash & investmentsCash+inv
¥1.5B¥1.8B¥1.8BReceivablesReceiv.
¥49M¥19M¥19MInventoryInvent.
¥1.4B¥1.2B¥1.2BAccounts payablePayables
¥205M¥560M¥560MOperating working capitalOper. WC
¥14.1B¥14.5B¥14.5BCurrent assetsCur. assets
¥7.3B¥8.8B¥8.8BCurrent liabilitiesCur. liab.
1.9×1.7×1.7×Current ratioCurr. ratio
¥198M¥239M¥239MGoodwillGoodwill
¥23.0B¥24.4B¥24.4BTotal assetsAssets
¥4.3B¥2.6B¥2.6BTotal debtDebt
(¥3.4B)(¥5.7B)(¥5.7B)Net debt / (cash)Net debt
52.0×41.3×47.8×47.8×Interest coverageInt. cov.
¥6.5B¥8.0B¥8.0BShareholders’ equityEquity
Per share
53.0M52.2M56.1M55.8MShares out (diluted)Shares
¥330.25¥404.64¥390.50¥392.20Revenue / shareRev/sh
¥26.39¥25.95¥28.88¥29.01EPS (diluted)EPS
¥4.19¥34.24¥32.20¥32.34Owner earnings / shareOE/sh
¥4.19¥31.31¥32.20¥32.34Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh
¥3.41¥11.40¥4.79¥4.81Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh
¥125.06¥142.83¥143.45Book value / shareBVPS

The record, charted

FY2024–2026

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.

Share count
56Mpeak FY2026
Gross margin
37%low FY2024

Owner earnings vs. net income

Owner earningsNet income

The accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.

¥1.8Bowner earningsvs.¥1.6Bnet incomelow FY2024

Where the cash went

ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetained

Each year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.

FY2024FY2026

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2026 the business turned ¥1.6B of profit into ¥1.8B of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.

Reported net income¥1.6B
Owner earnings¥1.8B · 8% of revenue
FY2026FY2025FY2024
Reported net income¥1.6B¥1.4B¥1.4B
Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back+¥429M+¥442M+¥424M
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items+¥26M+¥433M−¥1.4B
Cash from operations¥2.1B¥2.2B¥403M
Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume−¥269M−¥442M−¥181M
Owner earnings¥1.8B¥1.8B¥222M
Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still−¥153M
Free cash flow¥1.8B¥1.6B¥222M
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue8%8%1%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2026 20-F · source on SEC EDGAR →

Will it survive?

  • Comfortable
    Operating income ¥2.4B ÷ interest expense ¥50M
    What this means

    Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient, it says solvent, not cheap.

  • Net cash
    Cash ¥8.3B − debt ¥2.6B
    What this means

    Cash and short-term investments exceed every dollar of debt by ¥5.7B, on net the company owes nothing, and can act from strength when others can't. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.

  • Negative, funded by others
    DSO 29 + DIO 0 − DPO 32 days
    What this means

    Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. A negative cycle is a quiet moat: suppliers and customers fund the operation (Buffett's “float”), the company grows on other people's money.

Is it a good business?

  • Very high (≥25%)
    NOPAT ¥1.6B ÷ invested capital ¥2.3B (debt + equity − cash)
    Industry peers: median 18%
    What this means

    The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.

  • Solid through the cycle
    3-yr median margin, range 1%–8%; latest ¥1.8B = operating cash ¥2.1B − maintenance capex ¥269M
    Industry peers: median 12%
    What this means

    What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 8% of revenue this year, a 8% median across 3 years.

  • Cash-backed
    Cash from ops ¥2.1B ÷ net income ¥1.6B
    What this means

    How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.

How is the cash used?

  • Not enough data
    What this means

    The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

  • Investing or harvesting? 0.63×
    Harvesting
    Capex ¥269M ÷ depreciation ¥429M
    What this means

    Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.

Graham’s defensive tests · 1 of 2 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size
    Revenue ≥ $2B (a dollar floor) · ¥21.9B
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's floor is a dollar figure — about $2B of revenue as a conservative modern stand-in. This company reports in its home currency and we carry no exchange rate, so we show the figure and leave the size bar for you to apply rather than convert it with a number we don't have.

  • Strong liquidity Near
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 1.66×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Conservative debt Pass
    Debt ≤ working capital · ¥2.6B vs ¥5.8B WC
    What this means

    Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are ¥25.97/share (latest year ¥28.85), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is ¥142.65/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Elevated contestability

The product is software or information, the very thing capable AI now produces more cheaply, so the moat is more contestable than the record alone implies.

In its own filing Framed as a capability

Despite the structural exposure, the filing positions AI as something it uses, not a threat to its product.

“He then joined Morpho, Inc. in April 2011, a Japanese company focusing on the development of image processing and AI technology, where he was a head of Administration Department.”

AI has collapsed the cost of building a capable substitute for the very thing this business sells. When a credible alternative can be assembled for a fraction of the incumbent's price, it is pricing power that erodes first, not revenue tomorrow. The live question is whether the moat survives that, not whether it held in the past. Whether that question is answerable at all is yours to decide, against your own circle of competence.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Current Position

as of fiscal year-end, Feb 28, 2026

Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.

Current assets¥14.5B
  • Cash & short-term investments¥8.3B
  • Receivables¥1.8B
  • Inventory¥19M
  • Other current assets¥4.5B
Current liabilities¥8.8B
  • Accounts payable¥1.2B
  • Other current liabilities¥7.5B
Current ratio1.66×all current assets ÷ what's due · Graham looked for 2×
Quick ratio1.65×stricter: inventory excluded
Cash ratio0.94×strictest: cash alone against what's due
Working capital¥5.8Bthe cushion left after near-term bills
Deeper floors
Tangible book value¥7.8Bequity stripped of goodwill & intangibles
Net current asset value(¥1.3B)Graham's net-net: current assets less all liabilities
Debt incl. operating leases¥3.8B¥1.2B of it operating leases
Deferred revenue¥764Mcustomer cash collected before delivery; operating float

From the company's latest filing.

Peers, IT Services & Consulting

The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueGross marginOp. marginROICOwner earn. margin
XYZBlock Inc.$24.2B34%-0.7%-1%4%
ADBEAdobe Inc.$23.8B87%32.2%33%39%
MWCMicware Co. Ltd.¥21.9B35%10.8%71%8%
CTSHCognizant$21.1B15.3%18%12%
ADPAutomatic Data Processing Inc.$20.6B43%21.3%46%19%
INTUIntuit Inc.$18.8B99%26.0%35%32%
LDOSLeidos Holdings Inc.$17.1B14%7.5%10%7%
FLUTFlutter Entertainment plc$16.4B48%-0.4%-0%8%
Group median43%13.0%25%10%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Enter the US price, in dollars: the NYSE/Nasdaq quote you hold. Per the filing's own cover, “American depositary shares, each representing one ordinary”; Micware Co. Ltd. reports in JPY, so every figure in this tool is stated per ADS and translated at JPY 1 = $0.0062 (2026-07-17, reference rate) so your dollar quote reconciles exactly. The record tables elsewhere on this page remain as filed, in JPY.

Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Micware Co. Ltd. has delivered.

$
Base

The assumptions

9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.

Enter a price above to run it.

Implied by the price
Owner-earnings growth · since FY2024+185%/yr
Owner-earnings yield
P/E (3-yr earnings ’24–’26)
P/B
Graham’s price gate

Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.

Against a high-grade bond: Graham’s yardstick bond yield%

Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.

Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.

Owner earnings $11M on 56M shares outstanding, per the 20-F cover, as of 2026-03-31; net cash $35M. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Micware Co. Ltd. (MWC), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/MWC, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← MUFG its page in the Manual NA →

Industry order: ← MOVE the IT Services & Consulting chapter NRDS →