← All companies ← MUFG Manual NA → ← MOVE IT Services & Consulting NRDS →
MWC, Micware Co. Ltd.
A software business, earning high margins on code once it is written.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What moves the needle
- Gross margin has run about 35% and operating margin about 11% through the cycle, a solid spread between what it charges and what the product costs to make. That margin has held in a narrow 10%–11% band over the years, so steadiness itself is the evidence — the lever is unit growth and cost discipline, not a moving line. The cash cycle has run negative through the cycle (a median of −9 days): the operation is paid before it pays, so working capital releases cash as the business grows rather than tying it up. Read this kind of business on retention and the cost of growth. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2024–2026
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2024’24 | 2025’25 | 2026’26 | TTMTTMFeb 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||
| ¥17.5B | ¥21.1B | ¥21.9B | ¥21.9B | RevenueRevenue |
| 30% | 35% | 37% | 37% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| ¥1.9B | ¥2.2B | ¥2.4B | ¥2.4B | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 10.8% | 10.2% | 10.8% | 10.8% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| ¥1.4B | ¥1.4B | ¥1.6B | ¥1.6B | Net incomeNet inc. |
| 28% | 33% | 30% | 30% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | ||||
| ¥403M | ¥2.2B | ¥2.1B | ¥2.1B | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| ¥424M | ¥442M | ¥429M | ¥429M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| (¥1.4B) | ¥433M | ¥26M | ¥26M | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| ¥181M | ¥595M | ¥269M | ¥269M | CapexCapex |
| 1.0% | 2.8% | 1.2% | 1.2% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| ¥222M | ¥1.8B | ¥1.8B | ¥1.8B | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 1.3% | 8.5% | 8.2% | 8.2% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| ¥222M | ¥1.6B | ¥1.8B | ¥1.8B | Free cash flowFCF |
| 1.3% | 7.7% | 8.2% | 8.2% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| — | 46% | 71% | 71% | ROICROIC |
| — | 21% | 20% | 20% | Return on equityROE |
| — | 21% | 20% | 20% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | ||||
| — | ¥7.7B | ¥8.3B | ¥8.3B | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| — | ¥1.5B | ¥1.8B | ¥1.8B | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| — | ¥49M | ¥19M | ¥19M | InventoryInvent. |
| — | ¥1.4B | ¥1.2B | ¥1.2B | Accounts payablePayables |
| — | ¥205M | ¥560M | ¥560M | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| — | ¥14.1B | ¥14.5B | ¥14.5B | Current assetsCur. assets |
| — | ¥7.3B | ¥8.8B | ¥8.8B | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| — | 1.9× | 1.7× | 1.7× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| — | ¥198M | ¥239M | ¥239M | GoodwillGoodwill |
| — | ¥23.0B | ¥24.4B | ¥24.4B | Total assetsAssets |
| — | ¥4.3B | ¥2.6B | ¥2.6B | Total debtDebt |
| — | (¥3.4B) | (¥5.7B) | (¥5.7B) | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| 52.0× | 41.3× | 47.8× | 47.8× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| — | ¥6.5B | ¥8.0B | ¥8.0B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | ||||
| 53.0M | 52.2M | 56.1M | 55.8M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| ¥330.25 | ¥404.64 | ¥390.50 | ¥392.20 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| ¥26.39 | ¥25.95 | ¥28.88 | ¥29.01 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| ¥4.19 | ¥34.24 | ¥32.20 | ¥32.34 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| ¥4.19 | ¥31.31 | ¥32.20 | ¥32.34 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| ¥3.41 | ¥11.40 | ¥4.79 | ¥4.81 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| — | ¥125.06 | ¥142.83 | ¥143.45 | Book value / shareBVPS |
The record, charted
FY2024–2026Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedEach year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2026 the business turned ¥1.6B of profit into ¥1.8B of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.
| FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | ¥1.6B | ¥1.4B | ¥1.4B |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +¥429M | +¥442M | +¥424M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | +¥26M | +¥433M | −¥1.4B |
| Cash from operations | ¥2.1B | ¥2.2B | ¥403M |
| Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume | −¥269M | −¥442M | −¥181M |
| Owner earnings | ¥1.8B | ¥1.8B | ¥222M |
| Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still | — | −¥153M | — |
| Free cash flow | ¥1.8B | ¥1.6B | ¥222M |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 8% | 8% | 1% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- Can it pay its interest? 47.8×ComfortableOperating income ¥2.4B ÷ interest expense ¥50M
What this means
Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient, it says solvent, not cheap.
- Net cashCash ¥8.3B − debt ¥2.6B
What this means
Cash and short-term investments exceed every dollar of debt by ¥5.7B, on net the company owes nothing, and can act from strength when others can't. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Negative, funded by othersDSO 29 + DIO 0 − DPO 32 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. A negative cycle is a quiet moat: suppliers and customers fund the operation (Buffett's “float”), the company grows on other people's money.
Is it a good business?
- Very high (≥25%)NOPAT ¥1.6B ÷ invested capital ¥2.3B (debt + equity − cash)Industry peers: median 18%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Solid through the cycle3-yr median margin, range 1%–8%; latest ¥1.8B = operating cash ¥2.1B − maintenance capex ¥269MIndustry peers: median 12%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 8% of revenue this year, a 8% median across 3 years.
- Cash-backedCash from ops ¥2.1B ÷ net income ¥1.6B
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
- Investing or harvesting? 0.63×HarvestingCapex ¥269M ÷ depreciation ¥429M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 1 of 2 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size —Revenue ≥ $2B (a dollar floor) · ¥21.9B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's floor is a dollar figure — about $2B of revenue as a conservative modern stand-in. This company reports in its home currency and we carry no exchange rate, so we show the figure and leave the size bar for you to apply rather than convert it with a number we don't have.
- Strong liquidity NearCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 1.66×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt PassDebt ≤ working capital · ¥2.6B vs ¥5.8B WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are ¥25.97/share (latest year ¥28.85), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is ¥142.65/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Elevated contestabilityThe product is software or information, the very thing capable AI now produces more cheaply, so the moat is more contestable than the record alone implies.
Despite the structural exposure, the filing positions AI as something it uses, not a threat to its product.
“He then joined Morpho, Inc. in April 2011, a Japanese company focusing on the development of image processing and AI technology, where he was a head of Administration Department.”
AI has collapsed the cost of building a capable substitute for the very thing this business sells. When a credible alternative can be assembled for a fraction of the incumbent's price, it is pricing power that erodes first, not revenue tomorrow. The live question is whether the moat survives that, not whether it held in the past. Whether that question is answerable at all is yours to decide, against your own circle of competence.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of fiscal year-end, Feb 28, 2026Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments¥8.3B
- Receivables¥1.8B
- Inventory¥19M
- Other current assets¥4.5B
- Accounts payable¥1.2B
- Other current liabilities¥7.5B
From the company's latest filing.
Peers, IT Services & Consulting
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XYZBlock Inc. | $24.2B | 34% | -0.7% | -1% | 4% |
| ADBEAdobe Inc. | $23.8B | 87% | 32.2% | 33% | 39% |
| MWCMicware Co. Ltd. | ¥21.9B | 35% | 10.8% | 71% | 8% |
| CTSHCognizant | $21.1B | — | 15.3% | 18% | 12% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing Inc. | $20.6B | 43% | 21.3% | 46% | 19% |
| INTUIntuit Inc. | $18.8B | 99% | 26.0% | 35% | 32% |
| LDOSLeidos Holdings Inc. | $17.1B | 14% | 7.5% | 10% | 7% |
| FLUTFlutter Entertainment plc | $16.4B | 48% | -0.4% | -0% | 8% |
| Group median | — | 43% | 13.0% | 25% | 10% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFEnter the US price, in dollars: the NYSE/Nasdaq quote you hold. Per the filing's own cover, “American depositary shares, each representing one ordinary”; Micware Co. Ltd. reports in JPY, so every figure in this tool is stated per ADS and translated at JPY 1 = $0.0062 (2026-07-17, reference rate) so your dollar quote reconciles exactly. The record tables elsewhere on this page remain as filed, in JPY.
Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Micware Co. Ltd. has delivered.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings $11M on 56M shares outstanding, per the 20-F cover, as of 2026-03-31; net cash $35M. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← MUFG its page in the Manual NA →
Industry order: ← MOVE the IT Services & Consulting chapter NRDS →