← All companies ← SB Manual SBS → ← SB Marine Shipping SFL →
SBLK, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
We are a leading global shipping company that owns and operates a modern and diverse fleet of dry bulk vessels.
Our vessels transport a broad range of major and minor bulk commodities, including iron ore, minerals and grain, bauxite, fertilizers and steel products, along worldwide shipping routes.
In accordance with the scope of the GHG strategy set for 2030 and 2050 by the IMO, we monitor the performance of our vessels through telemetry and advanced data management systems and take action to improve the energy efficiency of our fleet both operationally and technically.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- Situation
- Cyclical. Margins collapse and recover repeatedly across the record; a single year, good or bad, misstates the through-cycle earning power.
- What moves the needle
- Operating margin has run about 13% through the cycle, a solid margin the cost base and competition set as much as the price does. The margin is cyclical, swinging between −49% and 52% over the years, so the through-cycle figure carries more than any single year — and the balance sheet at the trough more than the peak. Capital spending runs about 9.1% of sales, below what it charges for depreciation, so the return earned on what it sinks into that plant weighs as much as the margin. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on cyclicality & demand, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has run in the teens (median 13%, above 15% in 4 of 8 years). Owner earnings agree: roughly 17% of revenue reaches owners as cash, though it swings. Returns like these are solid but short of clear franchise economics; whether they hold is what the 10-K settles, not the multiple.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMDec 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $222M | $332M | $652M | $821M | $693M | $1.4B | $1.4B | $949M | $1.3B | $1.0B | $1.0B | RevenueRevenue |
| ($109M) | $39M | $132M | $74M | $84M | $739M | $608M | $238M | $383M | $137M | $137M | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| −49.2% | 11.7% | 20.2% | 9.0% | 12.1% | 51.8% | 42.3% | 25.1% | 30.3% | 13.1% | 13.1% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| ($154M) | ($10M) | $58M | ($16M) | $10M | $681M | $566M | $174M | $305M | $84M | ($435M) | Net incomeNet inc. |
| — | — | 0% | — | 2% | 0% | 0% | 0% | -0% | 0% | — | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| ($33M) | $83M | $169M | $89M | $171M | $767M | $770M | $336M | $471M | $296M | $296M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $82M | $83M | $103M | $124M | $142M | $153M | $157M | $138M | $164M | $168M | $168M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| $39M | $10M | $8M | ($20M) | $19M | ($66M) | $47M | $24M | $2M | $43M | $562M | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $396M | $144M | $329M | $347M | $72M | $130M | $25M | $18M | $55M | $84M | $84M | CapexCapex |
| 178.4% | 43.3% | 50.4% | 42.3% | 10.4% | 9.1% | 1.8% | 1.9% | 4.4% | 8.1% | 8.1% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| ($115M) | $181K | $66M | ($36M) | $98M | $637M | $744M | $318M | $416M | $212M | $212M | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| −51.9% | 0.1% | 10.2% | −4.4% | 14.2% | 44.6% | 51.8% | 33.5% | 32.9% | 20.3% | 20.3% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| ($429M) | ($61M) | ($160M) | ($259M) | $98M | $637M | $744M | $318M | $416M | $212M | $212M | Free cash flowFCF |
| −193.3% | −18.3% | −24.5% | −31.5% | 14.2% | 44.6% | 51.8% | 33.5% | 32.9% | 20.3% | 20.3% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| — | $0 | $0 | $5M | $5M | $230M | $669M | $158M | $277M | $34M | $34M | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| $0 | $0 | $3M | $21M | $0 | $10M | $20M | $393M | $25M | $98M | — | BuybacksBuybacks |
| -5% | — | 10% | — | 6% | 45% | 35% | 17% | 19% | 7% | — | ROICROIC |
| -15% | -1% | 4% | -1% | 1% | 33% | 28% | 10% | 12% | 3% | -18% | Return on equityROE |
| — | −1% | 4% | −1% | 0% | 22% | −5% | 1% | 1% | 2% | −19% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $182M | $258M | $205M | $118M | $183M | $450M | $270M | $227M | $425M | $489M | $489M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| $13M | $19M | $38M | $59M | $38M | $81M | $84M | $69M | $79M | $84M | $84M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| $15M | $19M | $27M | $51M | $47M | $75M | $67M | $62M | $79M | $51M | $51M | InventoryInvent. |
| $27M | $38M | $66M | $110M | $85M | $156M | $151M | $131M | $158M | $135M | $135M | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| $228M | $313M | $299M | $266M | $307M | $683M | $502M | $454M | $659M | $683M | $683M | Current assetsCur. assets |
| $28M | $219M | $223M | $311M | $266M | $291M | $283M | $359M | $400M | $384M | $384M | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 8.1× | 1.4× | 1.3× | 0.9× | 1.2× | 2.3× | 1.8× | 1.3× | 1.6× | 1.8× | 1.8× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| $2.0B | $2.1B | $3.0B | $3.2B | $3.2B | $3.8B | $3.4B | $3.0B | $4.1B | $3.8B | $3.8B | Total assetsAssets |
| -2.7× | 0.8× | 1.8× | 0.8× | 1.2× | 13.2× | 11.6× | 3.3× | 4.2× | 1.9× | 1.9× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| $1.0B | $1.1B | $1.5B | $1.5B | $1.5B | $2.1B | $2.0B | $1.7B | $2.5B | $2.4B | $2.4B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 47.6M | 63.0M | 77.3M | 93.7M | 96.3M | 101M | 103M | 98.9M | 109M | 115M | 115M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $4.67 | $5.27 | $8.43 | $8.76 | $7.20 | $14.07 | $14.02 | $9.60 | $11.64 | $9.03 | $9.03 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $-3.24 | $-0.16 | $0.76 | $-0.17 | $0.10 | $6.71 | $5.52 | $1.75 | $2.80 | $0.73 | $-3.77 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $-2.42 | $0.00 | $0.86 | $-0.38 | $1.02 | $6.28 | $7.26 | $3.21 | $3.83 | $1.84 | $1.84 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $-9.03 | $-0.97 | $-2.06 | $-2.76 | $1.02 | $6.28 | $7.26 | $3.21 | $3.83 | $1.84 | $1.84 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| — | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.05 | $0.05 | $2.27 | $6.52 | $1.60 | $2.55 | $0.30 | $0.30 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| $8.33 | $2.28 | $4.25 | $3.70 | $0.75 | $1.28 | $0.25 | $0.18 | $0.51 | $0.73 | $0.73 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $21.80 | $17.26 | $19.66 | $16.47 | $16.09 | $20.50 | $19.69 | $16.78 | $22.83 | $21.22 | $21.22 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +7.6%/yr | +4.6%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | — | +12.4%/yr |
| EPS | — | +48.7%/yr |
| Dividends / share | — | +42.9%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | −23.7%/yr | −0.6%/yr |
| Book value / share | −0.3%/yr | +5.7%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2016–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedEach year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business turned $84M of profit into $212M of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | $84M | $305M | $174M | $566M | $681M |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$168M | +$164M | +$138M | +$157M | +$153M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | +$43M | +$2M | +$24M | +$47M | −$66M |
| Cash from operations | $296M | $471M | $336M | $770M | $767M |
| Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow | −$84M | −$55M | −$18M | −$25M | −$130M |
| Owner earnings | $212M | $416M | $318M | $744M | $637M |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 20% | 33% | 33% | 52% | 45% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- ThinOperating income $137M ÷ interest expense $71M
What this means
Operating profit covers interest, but with little room. A bad year, a refinancing at higher rates, or a revenue wobble closes the gap fast.
- How heavy is the debt, net of cash? $273M · 2.0× operating profitModest net debtCash $489M − debt $762M
What this means
Netting $489M of cash and short-term investments against $762M of debt leaves $273M owed, about 2.0× a year's operating profit (5.6× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
Is it a good business?
- Solid through the cycle8-yr median, range -5%–45%; the latest year is left out — large non-operating charges put its operating line well above pretax profitIndustry peers: median 4%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 8 years, so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Solid through the cycle10-yr median margin, range -52%–52%; latest $212M = operating cash $296M − maintenance capex $84MIndustry peers: median 12%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 20% of revenue this year, a 14% median across 10 years.
- Loss, but cash-generativeNet income ($435M) · cash from operations $296M
What this means
The company reported a net loss, so a conversion ratio isn't meaningful. What matters then is whether operations still threw off cash, here, they did.
How is the cash used?
- Returns about halfDividends + buybacks $133M ÷ Owner Earnings $212M
What this means
Of $212M Owner Earnings, $133M (63%) went back to shareholders, $34M dividends, $98M buybacks. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.
- Investing or harvesting? 0.50×HarvestingCapex $84M ÷ depreciation $168M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 0 of 5 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size NearRevenue ≥ $2B · $1.0B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity NearCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 1.78×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt MissDebt ≤ working capital · $762M vs $300M WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability MissA profit every year (10-yr record) · 3 loss years
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record MissUninterrupted dividends · 7 of 10 yrs
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth —Earnings +33% over the record · —
What this means
Earnings were negative early in the record, a growth rate isn't meaningful.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $1.65/share (latest year $-3.83), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $21.59/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2016–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 7 of 10
What this means
Lost money in 3 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Operating margin −6% → 23% (3-yr avg ends)
In the filing’s words The record and the words agree: the margin widened and the filing attributes the gain to its own pricing, not volume alone.
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin widened — about −6% early to 23% lately, median 13% — pricing power intact or improving.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC returns capital
What this means
The capital base barely grew: this business returns cash through dividends and buybacks rather than reinvesting. Judge it on the cash returned, not on compounding.
- Worst year 2016 · −49.2% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2016, understand why before trusting the good years.
- Dividend record rising
What this means
Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
The filing raises AI among its risks, but in other terms (security, regulation, energy or the like), not as a competitor to its product.
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of fiscal year-end, Dec 31, 2025Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$489M
- Receivables$84M
- Inventory$51M
- Other current assets$60M
- Other current liabilities$384M
From the company's latest filing.
How the cash was used, 2016–2025
Over the record, the business generated $3.1B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a cash returner, paying most of what it earns straight back to owners.
- Reinvested$1.6B · 51%
- Dividends$1.4B · 44%
- Buybacks$571M · 18%
- Returned to owners$1.9B
83% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $1.4B as dividends and $571M as buybacks.
- Source of funding−$431M
Reinvestment and shareholder returns ran $431M beyond the operating cash the business generated, so the gap was financed off the balance sheet.
- Average price paid for buybacks—
Buybacks ran $571M over the span, but the filings don't tag the share count needed to deduce the average price paid.
- Net change in share count142.6%
The diluted count rose from 48M to 115M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.
- Dividend record$0.30/sh
Paid in 7 of the years on record. It was cut at least once along the way.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why Star Bulk Carriers Corp. is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.
1 of the 5 tests turned up something to look into; the other 4 came back clean.
- Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?142.6%
Diluted shares grew 142.6% over 2016–2025, even as the company spent $571M on buybacks. The repurchases were outrun by issuance — to staff, in a raise, or in a deal — and the filing says which; owners' slice still shrank. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.
- Is it less profitable than it was?
- Did debt outgrow the business?
- Did reported profit become cash?
- Did receivables and inventory outpace sales?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
Peers, Marine Shipping
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KEXKirby | $3.4B | — | 7.7% | 4% | 10% |
| MATXMatson | $3.3B | 96% | 11.4% | 11% | 12% |
| TDWTidewater Inc. | $1.4B | — | -12.5% | -6% | 3% |
| SBLKStar Bulk Carriers Corp. | $1.0B | — | 16.7% | 13% | 17% |
| INSWInternational Seaways Inc. Common Stock | $843M | — | 12.3% | 3% | 33% |
| PANLPangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. | $632M | — | 7.7% | 10% | 10% |
| LPGDorian LPG Ltd. | $482M | — | 35.2% | 7% | 38% |
| GNKGenco Shipping & Trading Limited | $342M | — | -1.1% | -0% | 31% |
| Group median | — | — | 9.6% | 5% | 14% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFEnter the US price, in dollars: the NYSE/Nasdaq quote you hold. Star Bulk Carriers Corp.'s US listing is the ordinary share itself. The record tables elsewhere on this page remain as filed.
Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Star Bulk Carriers Corp. has delivered.
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.’s latest year runs above its own through-cycle margin — the reported figure may flatter a peak. So the tool opens on the through-cycle base, Graham’s averaging cutting both ways; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.
Through the cycle, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. earns about $180M on its 17.3% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 20.3% margin runs above that; the reported figure may flatter a peak you'd be paying on. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year. It comes pre-checked here for that reason, the same rule that already normalizes a trough; clear it to price the year as filed.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings $212M on 113M shares outstanding, per the 20-F cover, as of 2025-12-31; net debt $273M. The base opens on the through-cycle figure (the latest year sits above the record’s own median, and Graham’s averaging cuts both ways); clear Normalize to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← SB its page in the Manual SBS →
Industry order: ← SB the Marine Shipping chapter SFL →