Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← SHC Manual SHLS → ← SATS Telecom Operators SKM →

SHEN, Shenandoah Telecom

Telecom Operators capital-intensive Distress / turnaroundCapital build-out

Shenandoah Telecommunications Company, provide broadband services through its high speed, state-of-the-art fiber-optic and cable networks to customers in eight contiguous states in the eastern United States.

The Company's services include: broadband internet, video and voice; high-speed Ethernet, dark fiber leasing; and managed network services.

Shentel provides broadband data, video and voice services to residential and commercial customers in portions of Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Kentucky, Delaware, Ohio and Indiana, via fiber optic and hybrid fiber coaxial ("HFC") cable networks.

Latest annual: FY2025 10-K
SHEN · Shenandoah Telecom
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$358M
+9.1% YoY · 10% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 5-yr average
Revenue $362M 5-yr avg $290M
Operating margin −7.6% 5-yr avg −4.6%
ROIC −1% 5-yr avg −1%
Owner-earnings margin −68% 5-yr avg −83%
Free cash flow margin −68% 5-yr avg −83%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What it is
Revenue is led by Residential and SMB - Incumbent Broadband (47%) and Residential and SMB - Glo Fiber Expansion Markets (23%), with 3 more lines behind.
Situation
Distress / turnaround. Thin interest coverage, or operating cash burned against real debt, across the record. The balance sheet carries this situation; the debt schedule sets the clock. Capital build-out. Capital spending has surged to 100% of sales, today's earnings are charged less depreciation than tomorrow's will be.
What moves the needle
Operating margin has run around −1.2% through the cycle, the operating line deeply negative — so the lever is the path to a margin at all: revenue growth against the cost curve and the cash runway, not the level of a margin that isn't there yet. Capital spending runs about 55% of sales, well above depreciation, so the return earned on what it sinks into that plant weighs as much as the margin. Read this kind of business on subscribers, revenue per user, and network capex. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Return on capital has rarely cleared the cost of capital (median −0%, above 15% in 0 of 10 years). Owner earnings, the cash-based check, have been thin too. This is price-taker territory, where the balance sheet and the cycle matter more than any multiple; the rest is in the 10-K.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

Where the money comes from

read the 10-K →

Revenue spreads across 5 lines, the largest Residential And SMB - Incumbent Broadband at 47%.

Revenue by product line, FY2025
  • Residential And SMB - Incumbent Broadband47%$170M
  • Residential And SMB - Glo Fiber Expansion Markets23%$83M
  • Commercial Fiber22%$79M
  • RLEC & Other7%$26M
  • Income From Leasing Arrangements2%$7M

From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2016–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2016’162017’172018’182019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMMar 2026
Income statement
$535M$612M$193M$207M$221M$245M$249M$269M$328M$358M$362MRevenueRevenue
64%65%41%Gross marginGross mgn
25%27%37%38%39%34%37%37%35%33%33%SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev
$23M$47M($3M)($1M)($3M)($2M)($17M)$142K($29M)($23M)($28M)Operating incomeOp. inc.
4.2%7.6%−1.5%−0.6%−1.2%−1.0%−7.0%0.1%−8.7%−6.5%−7.6%Operating marginOp. mgn
($895K)$66M$47M$56M$126M$999M($8M)$8M$194M($33M)($40M)Net incomeNet inc.
-3%0%-1%-0%6%-5%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
$162M$223M$266M$259M$303M($251M)$75M$114M$63M$101M$105MOperating cash flowOp. cash
$144M$177M$44M$47M$49M$55M$66M$63M$97M$130M$135MDepreciationDeprec.
$16M($24M)$170M$153M$123M($1.3B)$9M$33M($238M)($5M)($2M)Working capital & otherWC & other
$173M$146M$57M$67M$120M$160M$189M$255M$319M$359M$352MCapexCapex
32.4%23.9%29.4%32.4%54.6%65.3%75.9%94.8%97.3%100.3%97.1%Capex / revenueCapex/rev
($12M)$76M$209M$192M$182M($411M)($114M)($141M)($257M)($258M)($247M)Owner earningsOwner earn.
−2.2%12.5%108.5%92.9%82.6%−167.6%−45.8%−52.5%−78.2%−72.1%−68.1%Owner earnings marginOE mgn
($12M)$76M$209M$192M$182M($411M)($114M)($141M)($257M)($258M)($247M)Free cash flowFCF
−2.2%12.5%108.5%92.9%82.6%−167.6%−45.8%−52.5%−78.2%−72.1%−68.1%Free cash flow marginFCF mgn
$657M$6M$0$10M$2M$0$0$0$347M$5M$5MAcquisitionsAcquis.
$12M$12M$13M$14M$16M$940M$4M$5M$6M$6M$6MDividends paidDiv. paid
$5M$0$0$7M$0$0BuybacksBuybacks
1%4%-0%-0%-0%-0%-2%0%-2%-1%-1%ROICROIC
-0%19%11%12%22%156%-1%1%21%-4%-5%Return on equityROE
−4%15%8%9%19%9%−2%1%20%−4%−5%Retained to equityRetained/eq
Balance sheet
$36M$79M$85M$102M$195M$84M$44M$139M$46M$27M$44MCash & investmentsCash+inv
$70M$54M$54M$64M$70M$22M$21M$20M$30M$31M$25MReceivablesReceiv.
$39M$6M$5M$6M$3MInventoryInvent.
$73M$29M$36M$40M$20M$29M$49M$54M$58M$61M$54MAccounts payablePayables
$36M$31M$24M$29M$51M($7M)($29M)($34M)($28M)($30M)($26M)Operating working capitalOper. WC
$161M$173M$210M$242M$1.4B$166M$129M$176M$95M$97M$114MCurrent assetsCur. assets
$164M$138M$89M$154M$1.2B$67M$96M$98M$115M$108M$102MCurrent liabilitiesCur. liab.
1.0×1.3×2.4×1.6×1.2×2.5×1.3×1.8×0.8×0.9×1.1×Current ratioCurr. ratio
$145M$146M$146M$149M$67M$68M$68MGoodwillGoodwill
$1.5B$1.4B$1.5B$1.9B$2.0B$891M$978M$1.2B$1.7B$1.9B$2.0BTotal assetsAssets
$829M$822M$770M$720M$688M$0$75M$300M$417M$628M$694MTotal debtDebt
$793M$743M$685M$618M$493M($84M)$31M$161M$371M$601M$650MNet debt / (cash)Net debt
0.9×1.2×-0.1×-0.0×-0.9×-11.1×0.0×-1.8×-0.9×-0.9×Interest coverageInt. cov.
$296M$352M$440M$468M$577M$642M$638M$653M$919M$881M$867MShareholders’ equityEquity
0.6%0.6%2.5%1.6%2.7%1.4%3.4%3.7%3.0%2.7%2.9%Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev
Per share
48.8M50.0M50.1M50.1M50.0M50.1M50.2M50.7M53.7M55.1M55.6MShares out (diluted)Shares
$10.97$12.23$3.85$4.13$4.41$4.89$4.96$5.31$6.11$6.49$6.52Revenue / shareRev/sh
$-0.02$1.33$0.93$1.11$2.51$19.92$-0.17$0.16$3.61$-0.60$-0.71EPS (diluted)EPS
$-0.24$1.53$4.18$3.83$3.65$-8.20$-2.27$-2.79$-4.77$-4.68$-4.44Owner earnings / shareOE/sh
$-0.24$1.53$4.18$3.83$3.65$-8.20$-2.27$-2.79$-4.77$-4.68$-4.44Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh
$0.24$0.25$0.26$0.28$0.33$18.75$0.08$0.09$0.11$0.12$0.12Dividends / shareDiv/sh
$3.55$2.93$1.13$1.34$2.41$3.19$3.77$5.03$5.94$6.51$6.33Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh
$6.06$7.04$8.80$9.34$11.54$12.81$12.72$12.87$17.10$15.99$15.61Book value / shareBVPS
Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
9-yr5-yr
Revenue / share−5.7%/yr+8.0%/yr
Dividends / share−7.7%/yr−18.7%/yr
Capital spending / share+7.0%/yr+22.0%/yr
Book value / share+11.4%/yr+6.7%/yr

The record, charted

FY2016–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.

Share count
55Mpeak FY2025
ROIC
−1%low FY2024
Net debt ÷ owner earnings
2.7×peak FY2017

Owner earnings vs. net income

Owner earningsNet income

The accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.

($258M)owner earningsvs.($33M)net incomelow FY2021

Where the cash went

ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedBeyond op. cash

Each year's outlays against its operating cash: the mix, and how it drifts. The hatched cap is spending beyond that year's operating cash — financed from the balance sheet or borrowing, not operations.

FY2016FY2025

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2025 the business reported a $33M loss but ($258M) of owner earnings: $225M less than the profit line, taken out by capital spending and the timing of cash.

FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Reported net income($33M)$194M$8M($8M)$999M
Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back+$130M+$97M+$63M+$66M+$55M
Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost+$10M+$10M+$10M+$9M+$3M
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items−$5M−$238M+$33M+$9M−$1.3B
Cash from operations$101M$63M$114M$75M($251M)
Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow−$359M−$319M−$255M−$189M−$160M
Owner earnings($258M)($257M)($141M)($114M)($411M)
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue-72%-78%-53%-46%-168%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position . The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $10M), owner earnings is nearer ($268M).

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 10-K · source on SEC EDGAR →

Will it survive?

  • Does not cover its interest
    Operating income ($23M) ÷ interest expense $25M
    What this means

    A full year of operating profit didn't cover the interest bill. This is the zombie zone: the business depends on refinancing, asset sales, or forbearance to service its debt.

  • Net debt against an operating loss
    Cash $27M − debt $628M
    What this means

    Netting $27M of cash and short-term investments against $628M of debt leaves $601M owed, with no operating profit this year to measure it against — understand that combination before anything else about the company. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.

  • Negative, funded by others
    DSO 32 + DIO 10 − DPO 106 days
    What this means

    Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. A negative cycle is a quiet moat: suppliers and customers fund the operation (Buffett's “float”), the company grows on other people's money.

Is it a good business?

  • Below average through the cycle
    10-yr median, range -2%–4%; -1% latest = NOPAT ($18M) ÷ invested capital $1.5B
    Industry peers: median 3%
    What this means

    The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 10 years (it ran -1% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.

  • Consumes cash through the cycle
    10-yr median margin, range -168%–108%; latest ($258M) = operating cash $101M − maintenance capex $359M
    Industry peers: median 3%
    What this means

    What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's -72% of revenue this year, a -46% median across 10 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $10M of SBC) leaves ($268M).

  • Loss, but cash-generative
    Net income ($33M) · cash from operations $101M
    What this means

    The company reported a net loss, so a conversion ratio isn't meaningful. What matters then is whether operations still threw off cash, here, they did.

How is the cash used?

  • No surplus to allocate
    What this means

    The business didn't generate positive Owner Earnings this year, so any distributions came from the balance sheet or borrowing, not from operations.

  • Investing or harvesting? 2.77×
    Expanding
    Capex $359M ÷ depreciation $130M
    What this means

    Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.

Graham’s defensive tests · 2 of 6 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size Miss
    Revenue ≥ $2B · $358M
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.

  • Strong liquidity Miss
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 0.90×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Conservative debt Miss
    Debt ≤ working capital · $628M vs ($11M) WC
    What this means

    Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.

  • Earnings stability Miss
    A profit every year (10-yr record) · 3 loss years
    What this means

    Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.

  • Dividend record Pass
    Uninterrupted dividends · paid every year (10)
    What this means

    An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.

  • Earnings growth Pass
    Earnings +33% over the record · +51%
    What this means

    At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $1.02/share (latest year $-0.60), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $15.92/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Durability & moat, 2016–2025

Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.

  • Profitable years 7 of 10
    What this means

    Lost money in 3 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.

  • Return on capital ≥ 15% 0 of 10 yrs
    What this means

    A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.

  • Operating margin 3% → −5% (3-yr avg ends)
    What this means

    Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about 3% early to −5% lately, median −1% — competition or costs are biting in.

  • Reinvestment, incremental ROIC returns capital
    What this means

    The capital base barely grew: this business returns cash through dividends and buybacks rather than reinvesting. Judge it on the cash returned, not on compounding.

  • Worst year 2024 · −8.7% op. margin
    What this means

    Operations went underwater in 2024, understand why before trusting the good years.

  • Share count +1.4%/yr
    What this means

    The share count is rising, dilution works against you on a per-share basis.

  • Dividend record paid
    What this means

    Paid a dividend in 10 of the years on record.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Low contestability

The moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.

AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Current Position

as of the latest quarter, Mar 31, 2026

Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.

Current assets$114M
  • Cash & short-term investments$44M
  • Receivables$25M
  • Inventory$3M
  • Other current assets$42M
Current liabilities$102M
  • Accounts payable$54M
  • Other current liabilities$47M
Current ratio1.12×all current assets ÷ what's due · Graham looked for 2×
Quick ratio1.09×stricter: inventory excluded
Cash ratio0.43×strictest: cash alone against what's due
Working capital$13Mthe cushion left after near-term bills
Revenue, latest quarter vs. a year ago+4.8%the freshest read on whether the business is still growing
Current ratio, recent quarters0.9× → 1.1×
Deeper floors
Tangible book value$710Mequity stripped of goodwill & intangibles
Debt incl. operating leases$707M$13M of it operating leases
Deferred revenue$25Mcustomer cash collected before delivery; operating float

From the company's latest filing.

How the cash was used, 2016–2025

Over the record, the business generated $1.3B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a cash returner, paying most of what it earns straight back to owners.

  • Reinvested$1.8B · 141%
  • Dividends$1.0B · 78%
  • Buybacks$12M · 1%
  • Returned to owners$1.0B

    $1.0B as dividends and $12M as buybacks.

  • Source of funding−$1.6B

    Reinvestment and shareholder returns ran $1.6B beyond the operating cash the business generated, so the gap was financed off the balance sheet.

  • Average price paid for buybacks

    Buybacks ran $12M over the span, but the filings don't tag the share count needed to deduce the average price paid.

  • Net change in share count13.8%

    The diluted count rose from 49M to 56M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.

  • Dividend record$0.12/sh

    Paid in 10 of the years on record, the per-share dividend shrinking about 8% a year. It was cut at least once along the way.

  • Return on what it retained−75%

    Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out ($412M over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) fell $310M, so each retained $1 gave back about 0.75 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.

Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.

Acquisitions & goodwill

from the balance sheet & the 10-year cash-flow record

Goodwill grows only when a company acquires and falls only when it concedes it overpaid. The size of that bet, the cash put into buying rather than building, and how much has already been written off.

Goodwill & intangibles$157M8% of all assets; the premium carried on the balance sheet for businesses acquired
Against book equity8%goodwill is this share of book equity; the rest is the company’s own retained and paid-in capital
Cash spent acquiring$1.0Bover 10 years buying other businesses, against $1.8B of capital spent building

None written down over the record; the goodwill is still carried at full cost. That is the deals holding their value on the books so far; whether they keep doing so is the test an owner watches, since the write-down, when it comes, is the admission the price was too high.

Goodwill, acquired intangibles and equity from the latest balance sheet; acquisition spend and write-downs summed across the 10-year record, from the company's own filings.

Management, ownership & pay

read the proxy →

From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.

Fiscal yearChief executivePay, as filed“Actually paid”Owner earnings
2021Mr. French$2.4M$1.6M($411M)
2022Mr. French$2.8M$2.2M($114M)
2023Mr. French$3.4M$4.0M($141M)
2024Mr. French$3.3M$941k($257M)
2025Mr. French$3.0M$2.6M($258M)
2025Mr. McKay$2.3M$1.9M($258M)

Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.

  • Insider ownership<1%

    The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.

  • CEO pay ratio36:1

    What the chief earns for every dollar the median employee makes, per the 2026 proxy. A high ratio alone settles nothing; some businesses are genuinely top-heavy in scarce skill. A runaway figure is where Buffett starts asking whether the board is doing its job.

  • Stock-based compensation$10M

    The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 3% of revenue. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.

Inverting the record

Invert: instead of why Shenandoah Telecom is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.

2 of the 6 tests turned up something to look into; the other 4 came back clean.

  • Look hereIs it less profitable than it was?−67.6% vs 39.6%

    The owner-earnings margin averaged 39.6% early in the record and −67.6% across the last three years, and the latest year has not recovered. Ask the filing whether that is a structural drift or a cyclical trough — price, mix, cost, or a competitor — and whether it is permanent.

  • Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?13.8%

    Diluted shares grew 13.8% over 2016–2025, even as the company spent $12M on buybacks. The repurchases were outrun by issuance — to staff, in a raise, or in a deal — and the filing says which; owners' slice still shrank. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.

And these came back clean
  • Did debt outgrow the business?
  • Did reported profit become cash?
  • Did receivables and inventory outpace sales?
  • Are "one-time" charges a yearly habit?

Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.

What an owner would ask, FY2025

read the 10-K →
  • Which reported numbers are a judgment call?
    Management names Acquisitions as critical estimates

    each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →

The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.

Peers, Telecom Operators

The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueGross marginOp. marginROICOwner earn. margin
UNITUniti Group Inc.$2.2B32.9%3%1%
IDTIDT Corporation$1.2B24%2.8%75%2%
TDSTelephone and Data Systems$1.1B2.2%1%3%
ATNIATN International Inc.$667M2.5%1%3%
EVCEntravision Communications Corporation$448M70%4.9%4%16%
ADEAAdeia Inc.$443M34.5%13%47%
SHENShenandoah Telecom$358M41%-1.1%-0%-24%
ADArray Digital Infrastructure Inc.$163M72%1.4%1%5%
Group median56%2.7%2%3%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Shenandoah Telecom is profitable, but owner earnings are negative this year because capital spending currently outruns operating cash, a build-out, so the owner-earnings reverse-DCF has no positive base to grow. We read the price from both ends instead: type a price to see the steady-state profitability it demands, then set the mature margin you would believe and weigh the two against each other. Nothing leaves your browser unless you enter it in your notebook.

$
The assumptions

Revenue, delivered10%/yr’20→’25

Enter a price to run it.

Owner earnings it must reach
Margin the price demands
Owner-earnings margin today−68%

Two reads of one future. From your price: the owner earnings the company must reach, valued at a mature multiple and discounted back at your rate, expressed as the margin it implies on revenue grown at your rate. From your belief: the mature margin you would credit, set on the dial above. When the margin the price demands runs above the one you would believe, you are paying for a future taken on faith. For a deep cyclical at a trough, normalized through-cycle earnings are the better lens; this mode is for the genuinely unprofitable, and for the profitable business whose capital spending currently outruns its cash.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Shenandoah Telecom (SHEN), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/SHEN, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← SHC its page in the Manual SHLS →

Industry order: ← SATS the Telecom Operators chapter SKM →