← All companies ← TMUS Manual TNDM → ← TKR Industrial Machinery TRS →
TNC, Tennant Company
Tennant, Tennant Company, headquartered in Eden Prairie, Minnesota, is a world leader in designing, manufacturing and marketing of solutions that help create a cleaner, safer and healthier world.
Throughout its history, the Company has remained focused on advancing its industry by aggressively pursuing new technologies and creating a culture that celebrates innovation.
Our commitment to innovation and excellence extends across every aspect of our business—from product development and customer service to manufacturing and marketing.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What it is
- Revenue is Equipment (59%), Parts and consumables (23%) and Service and other (18%).
- What moves the needle
- Gross margin has run about 40% and operating margin about 6.4% through the cycle, a solid spread between what it charges and what the product costs to make. The operating margin has swung widely — from 3.3% to 11% — on a steadier 40% gross margin, so what moves it sits below the gross line, in operating spend and one-off charges more than in the cost of the product itself. Inventory runs near 13% of sales, so how fast it turns back into cash — and the risk of writing it down when demand softens — sits alongside the margin. Read this kind of business on the capital-goods cycle and the aftermarket. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has sat near the cost of capital (median 10%). By owner earnings: roughly 5% of revenue reaches owners as cash, consistently. This is price-taker territory, where the balance sheet and the cycle matter more than any multiple; the rest is in the 10-K.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 10-K →Revenue spreads across 3 lines, the largest Equipment at 59%.
- Equipment59%$715M
- Parts and consumables23%$276M
- Service and other18%$213M
From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMMar 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $809M | $1.0B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.0B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.2B | $1.3B | $1.2B | $1.2B | RevenueRevenue |
| 43% | 40% | 40% | 41% | 41% | 40% | 39% | 42% | 43% | 40% | 39% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| 31% | 33% | 32% | 31% | 31% | 30% | 28% | 28% | 30% | 31% | 32% | SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev |
| 4% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 3% | R&D / revenueR&D/rev |
| $68M | $33M | $58M | $72M | $64M | $94M | $87M | $139M | $114M | $68M | $54M | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 8.4% | 3.3% | 5.2% | 6.3% | 6.4% | 8.6% | 8.0% | 11.1% | 8.9% | 5.7% | 4.4% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| $47M | ($6M) | $33M | $46M | $34M | $65M | $66M | $110M | $84M | $44M | $31M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| 30% | — | 6% | 15% | 18% | 12% | 17% | 12% | 20% | 24% | 26% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| $58M | $54M | $80M | $72M | $134M | $69M | ($25M) | $188M | $90M | $65M | $34M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $18M | $26M | $32M | $32M | $33M | $33M | $33M | $36M | $40M | $45M | $46M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| ($11M) | $28M | $6M | ($18M) | $62M | ($38M) | ($132M) | $31M | ($46M) | ($34M) | ($51M) | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $27M | $20M | $19M | $38M | $30M | $19M | $25M | $23M | $21M | $22M | $18M | CapexCapex |
| 3.3% | 2.0% | 1.7% | 3.4% | 3.0% | 1.8% | 2.3% | 1.8% | 1.6% | 1.8% | 1.5% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $40M | $34M | $61M | $34M | $104M | $50M | ($50M) | $166M | $69M | $43M | $16M | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 4.9% | 3.4% | 5.4% | 2.9% | 10.4% | 4.6% | −4.6% | 13.3% | 5.3% | 3.6% | 1.3% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| $31M | $34M | $61M | $34M | $104M | $50M | ($50M) | $166M | $69M | $43M | $16M | Free cash flowFCF |
| 3.9% | 3.4% | 5.4% | 2.9% | 10.4% | 4.6% | −4.6% | 13.3% | 5.3% | 3.6% | 1.3% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| $13M | $354M | $0 | $20M | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $26M | $3M | $10M | AcquisitionsAcquis. |
| $14M | $15M | $15M | $16M | $16M | $18M | $19M | $20M | $21M | $22M | $22M | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| $13M | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $15M | $5M | $22M | $20M | $89M | — | BuybacksBuybacks |
| 19% | — | 9% | 10% | 9% | 14% | 10% | 18% | 13% | 7% | 5% | ROICROIC |
| 17% | -2% | 11% | 13% | 8% | 15% | 14% | 19% | 13% | 7% | 6% | Return on equityROE |
| 12% | −7% | 6% | 8% | 4% | 11% | 10% | 15% | 10% | 4% | 2% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $58M | $58M | $86M | $75M | $141M | $124M | $77M | $117M | $100M | $106M | $83M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| $145M | $203M | $208M | $217M | $200M | $211M | $252M | $248M | $259M | $257M | $281M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| $79M | $128M | $135M | $150M | $128M | $161M | $207M | $176M | $184M | $199M | $205M | InventoryInvent. |
| $47M | $96M | $98M | $94M | $106M | $122M | $126M | $111M | $127M | $128M | $123M | Accounts payablePayables |
| $177M | $235M | $245M | $273M | $221M | $251M | $332M | $312M | $316M | $328M | $362M | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| $298M | $423M | $469M | $481M | $494M | $527M | $575M | $569M | $577M | $600M | $611M | Current assetsCur. assets |
| $133M | $237M | $249M | $275M | $254M | $290M | $262M | $274M | $292M | $293M | $289M | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 2.2× | 1.8× | 1.9× | 1.7× | 1.9× | 1.8× | 2.2× | 2.1× | 2.0× | 2.0× | 2.1× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| $21M | $186M | $183M | $195M | $208M | $193M | $182M | $187M | $186M | $209M | $210M | GoodwillGoodwill |
| $470M | $994M | $993M | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.2B | $1.3B | $1.3B | Total assetsAssets |
| $36M | $377M | $355M | $339M | $323M | $272M | $306M | $207M | $201M | $274M | $359M | Total debtDebt |
| ($22M) | $318M | $269M | $264M | $182M | $148M | $228M | $90M | $101M | $168M | $276M | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| 53.4× | 1.3× | 2.5× | 4.0× | 3.7× | 12.8× | — | — | — | — | 7.3× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| $279M | $297M | $314M | $360M | $405M | $434M | $471M | $577M | $621M | $602M | $531M | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| 0.5% | 0.6% | 0.7% | 1.0% | 0.6% | 0.9% | 0.7% | 0.9% | 0.9% | 0.9% | 0.7% | Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 18.0M | 17.7M | 18.3M | 18.5M | 18.6M | 18.8M | 18.7M | 18.8M | 19.1M | 18.6M | 17.8M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $44.98 | $56.69 | $61.26 | $61.65 | $53.72 | $57.87 | $58.41 | $66.21 | $67.38 | $64.77 | $68.04 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $2.59 | $-0.35 | $1.82 | $2.48 | $1.81 | $3.44 | $3.55 | $5.83 | $4.38 | $2.36 | $1.74 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $2.22 | $1.91 | $3.34 | $1.82 | $5.58 | $2.65 | $-2.68 | $8.82 | $3.60 | $2.33 | $0.92 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $1.74 | $1.91 | $3.34 | $1.82 | $5.58 | $2.65 | $-2.68 | $8.82 | $3.60 | $2.33 | $0.92 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $0.80 | $0.85 | $0.83 | $0.87 | $0.87 | $0.93 | $1.01 | $1.07 | $1.12 | $1.18 | $1.22 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| $1.48 | $1.15 | $1.03 | $2.08 | $1.60 | $1.03 | $1.34 | $1.21 | $1.09 | $1.17 | $1.01 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $15.50 | $16.76 | $17.14 | $19.50 | $21.72 | $23.01 | $25.18 | $30.72 | $32.51 | $32.38 | $29.83 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +4.1%/yr | +3.8%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | +0.5%/yr | −16.0%/yr |
| EPS | −1.1%/yr | +5.4%/yr |
| Dividends / share | +4.5%/yr | +6.1%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | −2.6%/yr | −6.2%/yr |
| Book value / share | +8.5%/yr | +8.3%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2016–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedBeyond op. cashEach year's outlays against its operating cash: the mix, and how it drifts. The hatched cap is spending beyond that year's operating cash — financed from the balance sheet or borrowing, not operations.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business reported $44M of profit but $43M of owner earnings: $500K less than the profit line, taken out by capital spending and the timing of cash.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | $44M | $84M | $110M | $66M | $65M |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$45M | +$40M | +$36M | +$33M | +$33M |
| Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost | +$10M | +$12M | +$12M | +$8M | +$10M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | −$34M | −$46M | +$31M | −$132M | −$38M |
| Cash from operations | $65M | $90M | $188M | ($25M) | $69M |
| Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow | −$22M | −$21M | −$23M | −$25M | −$19M |
| Owner earnings | $43M | $69M | $166M | ($50M) | $50M |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 4% | 5% | 13% | -5% | 5% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position . The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $10M), owner earnings is nearer $33M.
Much of fiscal 2025's profit didn't arrive as operating cash; it sits in “working capital & other” above. That can be a real inventory or timing swing, or profit that doesn't run through operating cash at all: a heavy tax year, equity-method earnings, or investment income booked through investing. For a year like this, owner earnings understates the cash earned; the full cash-flow statement carries the rest.
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- ComfortableOperating income $68M ÷ interest expense $7M
What this means
Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient, it says solvent, not cheap.
- How heavy is the debt, net of cash? $168M · 2.5× operating profitMeaningful net debtCash $106M − debt $274M
What this means
Netting $106M of cash and short-term investments against $274M of debt leaves $168M owed, about 2.5× a year's operating profit (4.0× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Long (60+ days)DSO 78 + DIO 101 − DPO 65 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.
Is it a good business?
- Solid through the cycle9-yr median, range 7%–19%; 7% latest = NOPAT $52M ÷ invested capital $769MIndustry peers: median 10%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 9 years (it ran 7% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Thin, recently turned positivelatest $43M = operating cash $65M − maintenance capex $22M; positive each of the last 3 years, after an earlier loss stretch (10-yr median 5%)Industry peers: median 10%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 4% of revenue this year, a 5% median across 10 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $10M of SBC) leaves $33M.
- Cash-backedCash from ops $65M ÷ net income $44M
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Returned more than it generatedDividends + buybacks $110M ÷ Owner Earnings $43M
What this means
The company returned more than it generated: against $43M of Owner Earnings, $110M (255%) went back to shareholders, $22M dividends, $89M buybacks — the excess came from the balance sheet or borrowing, not the year's operations. Net of $10M stock comp, the real buyback was about $78M. Sustained, that pattern draws down cash or adds debt; the net-debt line above shows where it stands.
- Investing or harvesting? 0.48×HarvestingCapex $22M ÷ depreciation $45M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 4 of 6 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size NearRevenue ≥ $2B · $1.2B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity PassCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 2.05×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt PassDebt ≤ working capital · $274M vs $307M WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability NearA profit every year (10-yr record) · 1 loss year
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record PassUninterrupted dividends · paid every year (10)
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth PassEarnings +33% over the record · +221%
What this means
At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $4.64/share (latest year $2.57), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $35.31/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2016–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 9 of 10
What this means
Lost money in 1 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 2 of 10 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin 6% → 9% (3-yr avg ends)
In the filing’s words The words confirm the number: the filing says price increases held their volume, and the margin widened with them — Buffett’s strongest mark of pricing power.
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin widened — about 6% early to 9% lately, median 6% — pricing power intact or improving.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC 20%
What this means
Every extra dollar the business reinvested came back at a high incremental return — the lens GBM read for a moat that reinvests rather than merely harvests. The record and the 10-K are where you check whether the rate holds.
- Owner earnings growth +5%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings grew about 5% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2017 · 3.3% op. margin
What this means
Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.
- Share count +0.4%/yr
What this means
Roughly flat share count, little dilution, little buyback.
- Dividend record rising
What this means
Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.
- How management talks about it Promotional
What this means
The record is compounding, but the filing leans on a promoter’s vocabulary rather than the per-share, return-on-capital terms an owner uses. The results back the talk here; the register is still worth noting.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of the latest quarter, Mar 31, 2026Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$83M
- Receivables$281M
- Inventory$205M
- Other current assets$43M
- Debt due within a year$400K
- Accounts payable$123M
- Other current liabilities$165M
From the company's latest filing.
Debt maturity
the debt note, SEC EDGAR →Not how much it owes, but when it falls due, and against what. The ladder the company files, beside cash on hand and a year's owner earnings.
Bars scaled to the largest single year.
Against what the business has and earns
Cash on hand as of Mar 31, 2026 plus a year’s owner earnings comes to $126M against the $400K due in the twelve months after the Dec 31, 2025 schedule: 315 times it.
Maturity schedule extracted from the company’s Dec 31, 2025 annual report and reconciled to the balance-sheet debt.
How the cash was used, 2016–2025
Over the record, the business generated $785M of operating cash; how management split it reads as a balanced allocator, splitting cash between the business, owners, and the balance sheet.
- Reinvested$244M · 31%
- Dividends$177M · 23%
- Buybacks$163M · 21%
- Retained (debt / cash)$202M · 26%
- Returned to owners$339M
62% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $177M as dividends and $163M as buybacks.
- Source of fundingOperating cash
Operating cash covered reinvestment and returns; over the span debt rose $323M and cash and short-term investments rose $25M.
- Average price paid for buybacks$73.46
Across the years where the filing reports a share count, 1M shares were bought for $42M, about $73.46 each.
- Net change in share count−1.0%
The diluted count barely moved (18M to 18M): buybacks roughly offset the stock issued to staff.
- Dividend record$1.18/sh
Paid in 10 of the years on record, the per-share dividend growing about 4% a year. It was never cut over the span.
- Return on what it retained26%
Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out ($182M over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) grew $48M, so each retained $1 added about 0.26 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Acquisitions & goodwill
from the balance sheet & the 10-year cash-flow recordGoodwill grows only when a company acquires and falls only when it concedes it overpaid. The size of that bet, the cash put into buying rather than building, and how much has already been written off.
None written down over the record; the goodwill is still carried at full cost. That is the deals holding their value on the books so far; whether they keep doing so is the test an owner watches, since the write-down, when it comes, is the admission the price was too high.
Goodwill, acquired intangibles and equity from the latest balance sheet; acquisition spend and write-downs summed across the 10-year record, from the company's own filings.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.
| Fiscal year | Chief executive | Pay, as filed | “Actually paid” | Owner earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | David W. Huml | $4.3M | $4.9M | $50M |
| 2021 | David W. Huml | $2.7M | $4.7M | $50M |
| 2022 | David W. Huml | $4.1M | $2.1M | ($50M) |
| 2023 | David W. Huml | $5.5M | $11.5M | $166M |
| 2024 | David W. Huml | $5.1M | $3.6M | $69M |
| 2025 | David W. Huml | $4.7M | $2.3M | $43M |
Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.
- Stock-based compensation$10M
The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 1% of revenue, equal to 15% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why Tennant Company is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.
2 of the 5 tests turned up something to look into; the other 3 came back clean.
- Look hereDid debt outgrow the business?$36M → $359M
Debt rose from $36M to $359M while owner earnings went from about $45M to $93M — about 0.8 years of owner earnings in debt then, about 3.9 now: measured against what the business earns, the balance sheet carries more debt than it did. Debt raised for buybacks or deals rather than growth is the kind that bites in a downturn.
- Look hereDid receivables and inventory outpace sales?28% → 40% of sales
Receivables and inventory grew from $224M to $485M while revenue grew 50%: working capital is climbing faster than sales (28% of revenue then, 40% now). That can mean customers paying slower, stock building up, or revenue pulled forward. The filing's cash-flow and receivables notes say which.
- Is it less profitable than it was?
- Did the share count rise anyway?
- Did reported profit become cash?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
What an owner would ask, FY2025
read the 10-K →- Which reported numbers are a judgment call?Management names Income taxes as critical estimates
each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →
The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.
Peers, Industrial Machinery
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIDDMiddleby | $3.2B | 38% | 16.9% | 9% | 15% |
| ALHAlliance Laundry Holdings Inc. | $1.7B | — | 18.6% | — | 9% |
| AAONAaon, Inc. | $1.4B | 29% | 15.8% | 20% | 10% |
| TNCTennant Company | $1.2B | 40% | 7.2% | 10% | 5% |
| CMCOColumbus McKinnon Corporation | $1.2B | 34% | 8.0% | 5% | 7% |
| HAYWHayward Holdings Inc. | $1.1B | 45% | 19.9% | 9% | 16% |
| KAIKadant | $1.1B | 44% | 14.0% | 12% | 12% |
| SXIStandex International Corporation | $790M | 37% | 11.9% | 11% | 7% |
| Group median | — | 38% | 14.9% | 10% | 10% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFType today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Tennant Company has delivered.
Through the cycle, Tennant Company earns about $57M on its 4.8% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 3.6% margin runs below that; the reported figure may understate a lean year. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings $16M on 17M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-05-01; net debt $276M. The if-converted diluted count is 18M, 4% above the shares outstanding: the dilution overhang (convertibles, options) a buyer inherits. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← TMUS its page in the Manual TNDM →
Industry order: ← TKR the Industrial Machinery chapter TRS →