← All companies ← CCO Manual CCRN → ← CALX Telecom Operators CHT →
CCOI, Cogent Communications Holdings Inc.
We are a facilities-based provider of low-cost, high-speed Internet access, private network services, optical wavelength and optical transport services and data center colocation space and power.
We deliver our services to a diverse global base of businesses, communications service providers and other bandwidth-intensive organizations in 57 countries across North America, Europe, South America, Asia, Oceania and Africa.
We provide our on-net Internet access and private network services to corporate, net-centric and enterprise customers.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What it is
- Revenue is On-net (54%), Off-net (41%) and Wavelength (4%).
- Situation
- Capital build-out. Capital spending has surged to 19% of sales, today's earnings are charged less depreciation than tomorrow's will be. Cyclical. Margins collapse and recover repeatedly across the record; a single year, good or bad, misstates the through-cycle earning power.
- What moves the needle
- Gross margin has run about 57% and operating margin about 16% through the cycle, a wide spread between price and the cost of what it sells — whether that advantage is durable pricing power or a margin that can erode is the question the record is for. The margin is cyclical, swinging between −19% and 20% over the years, so the through-cycle figure carries more than any single year — and the balance sheet at the trough more than the peak. Capital spending runs about 10% of sales, below what it charges for depreciation, so the return earned on what it sinks into that plant weighs as much as the margin. Read this kind of business on subscribers, revenue per user, and network capex. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has run in the teens (median 17%, above 15% in 6 of 9 years). Owner earnings agree: roughly 14% of revenue reaches owners as cash, though it swings. Returns like these are solid but short of clear franchise economics; whether they hold is what the 10-K settles, not the multiple.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 10-K →Revenue spreads across 4 lines, the largest On-net at 54%.
- On-net54%$532M
- Off-net41%$397M
- Wavelength4%$38M
- Non-core1%$8M
From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMMar 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $447M | $485M | $520M | $546M | $568M | $590M | $600M | $941M | $1.0B | $976M | $968M | RevenueRevenue |
| 57% | 57% | 58% | 60% | 61% | 62% | 62% | 42% | 38% | 45% | 46% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| 27% | 26% | 26% | 27% | 28% | 28% | 27% | 29% | 27% | 28% | 28% | SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev |
| $64M | $76M | $87M | $100M | $107M | $119M | $114M | ($129M) | ($198M) | ($101M) | ($74M) | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 14.3% | 15.6% | 16.6% | 18.4% | 18.8% | 20.2% | 19.0% | −13.7% | −19.1% | −10.4% | −7.7% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| $15M | $6M | $29M | $38M | $6M | $48M | $5M | $1.3B | ($204M) | ($182M) | ($170M) | Net incomeNet inc. |
| 38% | — | 31% | 29% | 40% | 33% | — | -4% | — | — | — | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| $108M | $112M | $134M | $149M | $140M | $170M | $174M | $17M | ($9M) | ($11M) | ($32M) | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $75M | $76M | $81M | $80M | $83M | $89M | $92M | $232M | $298M | $270M | $248M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| $7M | $17M | $24M | $31M | $51M | $33M | $76M | ($1.5B) | ($103M) | ($99M) | ($128M) | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $45M | $46M | $50M | $47M | $56M | $70M | $79M | $130M | $195M | $188M | $176M | CapexCapex |
| 10.1% | 9.4% | 9.6% | 8.6% | 9.8% | 11.9% | 13.2% | 13.8% | 18.8% | 19.2% | 18.2% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $63M | $66M | $84M | $102M | $84M | $100M | $95M | ($112M) | ($204M) | ($198M) | ($208M) | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 14.0% | 13.6% | 16.1% | 18.6% | 14.9% | 17.0% | 15.8% | −11.9% | −19.7% | −20.3% | −21.5% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| $63M | $66M | $84M | $102M | $84M | $100M | $95M | ($112M) | ($204M) | ($198M) | ($208M) | Free cash flowFCF |
| 14.0% | 13.6% | 16.1% | 18.6% | 14.9% | 17.0% | 15.8% | −11.9% | −19.7% | −20.3% | −21.5% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $0 | $0 | — | $0 | AcquisitionsAcquis. |
| $68M | $82M | $98M | $113M | $129M | $150M | $170M | $182M | $189M | $150M | $102M | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| $4M | $2M | $7M | — | $4M | — | — | — | $8M | $17M | — | BuybacksBuybacks |
| 16% | 17% | 27% | 37% | — | 39% | 27% | -9% | -11% | -5% | -4% | ROICROIC |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $274M | $247M | $276M | $399M | $371M | $320M | $224M | $75M | $198M | $149M | $140M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| $34M | $39M | $42M | $40M | $44M | $42M | $44M | $135M | $97M | $88M | $91M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| $12M | $12M | $9M | $11M | $10M | $12M | $27M | $48M | $40M | $31M | $36M | Accounts payablePayables |
| $22M | $28M | $33M | $29M | $34M | $30M | $17M | $87M | $57M | $57M | $55M | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| $328M | $306M | $350M | $476M | $456M | $410M | $366M | $514M | $482M | $451M | $430M | Current assetsCur. assets |
| $68M | $75M | $75M | $90M | $94M | $81M | $120M | $373M | $253M | $221M | $226M | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 4.8× | 4.1× | 4.7× | 5.3× | 4.8× | 5.1× | 3.0× | 1.4× | 1.9× | 2.0× | 1.9× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| $738M | $711M | $740M | $932M | $1.0B | $985M | $1.0B | $3.2B | $3.2B | $3.1B | $3.1B | Total assetsAssets |
| $570M | $575M | $645M | $798M | $882M | $898M | $950M | $950M | $1.5B | $1.7B | $1.7B | Total debtDebt |
| $295M | $328M | $369M | $399M | $511M | $578M | $726M | $875M | $1.3B | $1.6B | $1.6B | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| 1.6× | 1.6× | 1.7× | 1.7× | 1.7× | 2.1× | 1.0× | -1.4× | -1.6× | — | -0.6× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| ($53M) | ($103M) | ($149M) | ($204M) | ($293M) | ($373M) | ($519M) | $610M | $223M | ($64M) | ($104M) | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| 2.4% | 2.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.8% | Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 44.9M | 45.2M | 45.8M | 46.1M | 46.7M | 47.0M | 47.2M | 47.8M | 47.6M | 47.9M | 47.8M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $9.96 | $10.74 | $11.36 | $11.85 | $12.17 | $12.56 | $12.70 | $19.67 | $21.75 | $20.36 | $20.26 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $0.33 | $0.13 | $0.63 | $0.81 | $0.13 | $1.03 | $0.11 | $26.62 | $-4.28 | $-3.80 | $-3.55 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $1.40 | $1.46 | $1.83 | $2.21 | $1.81 | $2.14 | $2.01 | $-2.35 | $-4.28 | $-4.13 | $-4.35 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $1.40 | $1.46 | $1.83 | $2.21 | $1.81 | $2.14 | $2.01 | $-2.35 | $-4.28 | $-4.13 | $-4.35 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $1.52 | $1.81 | $2.14 | $2.44 | $2.77 | $3.20 | $3.60 | $3.80 | $3.98 | $3.13 | $2.14 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| $1.01 | $1.01 | $1.09 | $1.02 | $1.20 | $1.49 | $1.67 | $2.71 | $4.09 | $3.91 | $3.68 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $-1.19 | $-2.27 | $-3.25 | $-4.42 | $-6.28 | $-7.94 | $-10.99 | $12.74 | $4.68 | $-1.33 | $-2.18 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +8.3%/yr | +10.8%/yr |
| Dividends / share | +8.4%/yr | +2.5%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +16.3%/yr | +26.7%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2016–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedBeyond op. cashEach year's outlays against its operating cash: the mix, and how it drifts. The hatched cap is spending beyond that year's operating cash — financed from the balance sheet or borrowing, not operations.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business reported a $182M loss but ($198M) of owner earnings: $16M less than the profit line, taken out by capital spending and the timing of cash.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | ($182M) | ($204M) | $1.3B | $5M | $48M |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$270M | +$298M | +$232M | +$92M | +$89M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | −$99M | −$103M | −$1.5B | +$76M | +$33M |
| Cash from operations | ($11M) | ($9M) | $17M | $174M | $170M |
| Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow | −$188M | −$195M | −$130M | −$79M | −$70M |
| Owner earnings | ($198M) | ($204M) | ($112M) | $95M | $100M |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | -20% | -20% | -12% | 16% | 17% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- Can it pay its interest? -0.8×Does not cover its interestOperating income ($101M) ÷ interest expense $123M
What this means
A full year of operating profit didn't cover the interest bill. This is the zombie zone: the business depends on refinancing, asset sales, or forbearance to service its debt.
- Net debt against an operating lossCash $149M − debt $1.7B
What this means
Netting $149M of cash and short-term investments against $1.7B of debt leaves $1.6B owed, with no operating profit this year to measure it against — understand that combination before anything else about the company. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- TightDSO 33 + DIO 0 − DPO 21 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash. (Little or no inventory, a services / asset-light model, so the inventory leg is ~0.)
Is it a good business?
- High through the cycle9-yr median, range -11%–39%; -5% latest = NOPAT ($80M) ÷ invested capital $1.5BIndustry peers: median -2%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 9 years (it ran -5% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Solid through the cycle10-yr median margin, range -20%–19%; latest ($198M) = operating cash ($11M) − maintenance capex $188MIndustry peers: median 7%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's -20% of revenue this year, a 14% median across 10 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $13M of SBC) leaves ($211M).
- Are earnings backed by cash? ($11M)Loss, and burning cashNet income ($182M) · cash from operations ($11M)
What this means
The company reported a net loss, so a conversion ratio isn't meaningful. What matters then is whether operations still threw off cash, here, they did not.
How is the cash used?
- No surplus to allocate
What this means
The business didn't generate positive Owner Earnings this year, so any distributions came from the balance sheet or borrowing, not from operations.
- Investing or harvesting? 0.69×HarvestingCapex $188M ÷ depreciation $270M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 3 of 6 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size MissRevenue ≥ $2B · $976M
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity PassCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 2.04×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt MissDebt ≤ working capital · $1.7B vs $230M WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability MissA profit every year (10-yr record) · 2 loss years
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record PassUninterrupted dividends · paid every year (10)
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth PassEarnings +33% over the record · +1693%
What this means
At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $5.91/share (latest year $-3.64), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $-1.27/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2016–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 8 of 10
What this means
Lost money in 2 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 7 of 10 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin 16% → −14% (3-yr avg ends)
In the filing’s words The words explain the slip: the filing names price competition rather than pricing actions of its own — a business that looks to take its price, not set it.
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about 16% early to −14% lately, median 16% — competition or costs are biting in.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC −13%
What this means
Reinvested capital came back at a negative incremental return over this window — the invested base grew while operating profit did not. The filings show where it went.
- Worst year 2024 · −19.1% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2024, understand why before trusting the good years.
- Share count +0.7%/yr
What this means
Roughly flat share count, little dilution, little buyback.
- Dividend record rising
What this means
Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of the latest quarter, Mar 31, 2026Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$140M
- Receivables$91M
- Other current assets$199M
- Accounts payable$36M
- Other current liabilities$190M
From the company's latest filing.
How the cash was used, 2016–2025
Over the record, the business generated $985M of operating cash; how management split it reads as a cash returner, paying most of what it earns straight back to owners.
- Reinvested$905M · 92%
- Dividends$1.3B · 135%
- Buybacks$42M · 4%
- Returned to owners$1.4B
1720% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $1.3B as dividends and $42M as buybacks.
- Source of funding−$1.3B
Reinvestment and shareholder returns ran $1.3B beyond the operating cash the business generated, so the gap was financed off the balance sheet: debt rose from $570M to $1.7B.
- Average price paid for buybacks$48.37
Across the years where the filing reports a share count, 1M shares were bought for $42M, about $48.37 each. Year to year the price paid ranged from $39.12 (2017) to $56.86 (2020); its heaviest year, 2025, paid $48.82 ($17M).
- Net change in share count6.5%
The diluted count rose from 45M to 48M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.
- Dividend record$3.13/sh
Paid in 10 of the years on record, the per-share dividend growing about 8% a year. It was cut at least once along the way.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.
| Fiscal year | Chief executive | Pay, as filed | “Actually paid” | Owner earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Dave Schaeffer | $12k | $19k | $100M |
| 2022 | Dave Schaeffer | $11k | −$2,529 | $95M |
| 2023 | Dave Schaeffer | $8,839 | $20k | ($112M) |
| 2024 | Dave Schaeffer | $13k | $13k | ($204M) |
| 2025 | Dave Schaeffer | $25k | $8,796 | ($198M) |
Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.
- Insider ownership4.2%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
- CEO pay ratio259:1
What the chief earns for every dollar the median employee makes, per the 2026 proxy. A high ratio alone settles nothing; some businesses are genuinely top-heavy in scarce skill. A runaway figure is where Buffett starts asking whether the board is doing its job.
- Stock-based compensation$13M
The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 1% of revenue. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why Cogent Communications Holdings Inc. is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.
4 of the 5 tests turned up something to look into; the other 1 came back clean.
- Look hereIs it less profitable than it was?−17.3% vs 14.6%
The owner-earnings margin averaged 14.6% early in the record and −17.3% across the last three years, and the latest year has not recovered. Ask the filing whether that is a structural drift or a cyclical trough — price, mix, cost, or a competitor — and whether it is permanent.
- Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?6.5%
Diluted shares grew 6.5% over 2016–2025, even as the company spent $42M on buybacks. The repurchases were outrun by issuance — to staff, in a raise, or in a deal — and the filing says which; owners' slice still shrank. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.
- Look hereDid debt outgrow the business?$570M → $1.7B
Debt rose from $570M to $1.7B while owner earnings went from about $71M to ($171M): the borrowing grew and the earnings that would carry it are not there now. Debt raised for buybacks or deals rather than growth is the kind that bites in a downturn.
- Look hereDid receivables and inventory outpace sales?8% → 9% of sales
Receivables and inventory grew from $34M to $91M while revenue grew 117%: working capital is climbing faster than sales (8% of revenue then, 9% now). That can mean customers paying slower, stock building up, or revenue pulled forward. The filing's cash-flow and receivables notes say which.
- Did reported profit become cash?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
Peers, Telecom Operators
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VSATViaSat Inc. | $4.6B | 88% | -2.7% | -2% | 7% |
| GLIBAGCI Liberty, Inc. | $1.0B | — | -33.2% | -12% | 12% |
| LBRDALiberty Broadband | $1.0B | 100% | -54.0% | -0% | -40% |
| CALXCalix | $1.0B | 50% | -0.8% | -2% | 3% |
| CCOICogent Communications Holdings Inc. | $976M | 57% | 16.1% | 17% | 14% |
| GOGOGogo Inc. | $910M | 93% | 28.4% | 5% | 7% |
| IRDMIridium Communications Inc | $872M | 95% | 10.5% | 2% | 35% |
| GSATGlobalstar Inc. | $273M | 96% | -47.3% | -6% | 10% |
| Group median | — | 93% | -1.7% | -1% | 9% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFType today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Cogent Communications Holdings Inc. has delivered.
Cogent Communications Holdings Inc.’s latest year shows negative owner earnings, a cyclical trough. So the tool opens on the through-cycle base, the cash it would earn at rest; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.
Through the cycle, Cogent Communications Holdings Inc. earns about $141M on its 14.4% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s −20.3% margin runs below that; the reported figure may understate a lean year. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings ($208M) on 50M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-04-30; net debt $1.6B. The base opens on the through-cycle figure (the latest year sits off the record’s own median, and Graham’s averaging cuts both ways); clear Normalize to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← CCO its page in the Manual CCRN →
Industry order: ← CALX the Telecom Operators chapter CHT →