Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← CCRN Manual CCSI → ← BZH Homebuilders CVCO →

CCS, Century Communities Inc.

Homebuilders capital-intensive

Century Communities, Inc. is engaged in the development, design , construction, marketing and sale of single-family attached and detached homes in 16 states.

We build and sell homes under our Century Communities and Century Complete brands.

Our Century Complete brand targets entry-level homebuyers, primarily sells homes through retail studios, centralized locations and the internet, and generally provides no option or upgrade selections.

Latest annual: FY2025 10-K
CCS · Century Communities Inc.
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$4.1B
−6.4% YoY · 5% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 5-yr average
Revenue $4.0B 5-yr avg $4.2B
Operating margin 1.8% 5-yr avg 10.9%
ROIC 1% 5-yr avg 11%
Owner-earnings margin 3% 5-yr avg 2%
Free cash flow margin 3% 5-yr avg 1%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What moves the needle
Operating margin has run about 7.2% through the cycle, a thin margin, where volume, cost discipline and the price it gets all bear on the result. The operating margin has swung widely — from 4.7% to 15% over the years — so the through-cycle figure carries more than any single year, and the worst year more than the best. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Return on capital has rarely cleared the cost of capital (median 6%, above 15% in 2 of 10 years). Owner earnings, the cash-based check, have been thin too. This is price-taker territory, where the balance sheet and the cycle matter more than any multiple; the rest is in the 10-K.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2016–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2016’162017’172018’182019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMMar 2026
Income statement
$994M$1.4B$2.1B$2.5B$3.2B$4.2B$4.5B$3.7B$4.4B$4.1B$4.0BRevenueRevenue
12%12%12%12%11%9%10%12%12%12%12%SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev
$72M$84M$129M$133M$270M$641M$677M$351M$440M$194M$72MOperating incomeOp. inc.
7.2%5.9%6.0%5.2%8.5%15.2%15.0%9.5%10.0%4.7%1.8%Operating marginOp. mgn
$50M$50M$96M$113M$206M$499M$525M$259M$334M$148M$133MNet incomeNet inc.
32%40%25%15%24%22%22%26%24%24%24%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
($45M)($111M)($196M)($69M)$341M($201M)$315M$42M$126M$153M$139MOperating cash flowOp. cash
$6M$7M$12M$13M$13M$11M$11M$16M$24M$25M$24MDepreciationDeprec.
($106M)($178M)($318M)($210M)$103M($725M)($241M)($270M)($260M)($39M)($39M)Working capital & otherWC & other
$8M$18M$16M$17M$9M$9M$20M$43M$39M$29M$32MCapexCapex
0.8%1.2%0.7%0.7%0.3%0.2%0.5%1.2%0.9%0.7%0.8%Capex / revenueCapex/rev
($50M)($118M)($208M)($82M)$332M($210M)$304M$26M$101M$124M$116MOwner earningsOwner earn.
−5.1%−8.3%−9.7%−3.2%10.5%−5.0%6.7%0.7%2.3%3.0%2.9%Owner earnings marginOE mgn
($52M)($129M)($211M)($86M)$332M($210M)$295M($2M)$87M$124M$107MFree cash flowFCF
−5.3%−9.1%−9.8%−3.4%10.5%−5.0%6.5%−0.0%2.0%3.0%2.7%Free cash flow marginFCF mgn
$130M$28M$160M$160MAcquisitionsAcquis.
$15M$26M$29M$33M$35M$35MDividends paidDiv. paid
$2M$11M$1M$121M$19M$84M$144MBuybacksBuybacks
5%3%5%5%10%18%17%7%8%4%1%ROICROIC
10%7%11%11%16%28%24%11%13%6%5%Return on equityROE
27%23%10%11%4%4%Retained to equityRetained/eq
Balance sheet
$29M$89M$33M$55M$394M$316M$297M$226M$150M$109M$78MCash & investmentsCash+inv
$6M$13M$13M$27M$22M$42M$53M$76M$50M$57M$56MReceivablesReceiv.
$6M$13M$13M$27M$22M$42M$53M$76M$50M$57M$56MOperating working capitalOper. WC
$21M$27M$30M$30M$30M$30M$30M$30M$41M$41M$41MGoodwillGoodwill
$1.0B$1.7B$2.3B$2.5B$2.8B$3.5B$3.8B$4.1B$4.5B$4.5B$4.5BTotal assetsAssets
$454M$825M$1.1B$1.1B$1.2B$1.3B$1.2B$1.3B$1.5B$1.4B$1.5BTotal debtDebt
$425M$736M$1.1B$1.1B$760M$1.0B$920M$1.1B$1.3B$1.3B$1.4BNet debt / (cash)Net debt
$474M$735M$859M$1.1B$1.3B$1.8B$2.2B$2.4B$2.6B$2.6B$2.6BShareholders’ equityEquity
0.7%0.7%0.6%0.6%0.6%0.3%0.4%1.0%0.6%0.5%0.5%Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev
Per share
20.8M24.6M30.4M31.2M33.6M34.4M33.0M32.2M32.1M30.4M29.2MShares out (diluted)Shares
$47.83$57.98$70.66$81.31$94.05$122.41$136.63$114.63$136.97$135.63$137.05Revenue / shareRev/sh
$2.38$2.05$3.17$3.62$6.13$14.47$15.92$8.05$10.40$4.86$4.54EPS (diluted)EPS
$-2.42$-4.82$-6.83$-2.64$9.87$-6.10$9.22$0.80$3.16$4.09$3.96Owner earnings / shareOE/sh
$-2.52$-5.25$-6.96$-2.74$9.87$-6.10$8.94$-0.05$2.70$4.09$3.67Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh
$0.44$0.79$0.91$1.02$1.14$1.20Dividends / shareDiv/sh
$0.37$0.72$0.52$0.54$0.27$0.26$0.62$1.34$1.21$0.95$1.10Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh
$22.78$29.94$28.28$34.04$38.10$51.23$65.20$74.11$81.62$85.37$87.39Book value / shareBVPS
Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
9-yr5-yr
Revenue / share+12.3%/yr+7.6%/yr
Owner earnings / share−16.1%/yr
EPS+8.2%/yr−4.5%/yr
Dividends / share+26.9%/yr (4-yr)+26.9%/yr (4-yr)
Capital spending / share+10.9%/yr+28.7%/yr
Book value / share+15.8%/yr+17.5%/yr

The record, charted

FY2016–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.

Share count
30Mpeak FY2021
ROIC
4%low FY2017
Net debt ÷ owner earnings
10.7×peak FY2023

Owner earnings vs. net income

Owner earningsNet income

The accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.

$124Mowner earningsvs.$148Mnet incomelow FY2021

Where the cash went

ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedBeyond op. cash

Each year's outlays against its operating cash: the mix, and how it drifts. The hatched cap is spending beyond that year's operating cash — financed from the balance sheet or borrowing, not operations.

FY2020FY2025

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2025 the business reported $148M of profit but $124M of owner earnings: $23M less than the profit line, taken out by capital spending and the timing of cash.

Reported net income$148M
Owner earnings$124M · 3% of revenue
FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Reported net income$148M$334M$259M$525M$499M
Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back+$25M+$24M+$16M+$11M+$11M
Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost+$20M+$28M+$37M+$20M+$14M
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items−$39M−$260M−$270M−$241M−$725M
Cash from operations$153M$126M$42M$315M($201M)
Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume−$29M−$24M−$16M−$11M−$9M
Owner earnings$124M$101M$26M$304M($210M)
Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still−$15M−$28M−$9M
Free cash flow$124M$87M($2M)$295M($210M)
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue3%2%1%7%-5%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position . The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $20M), owner earnings is nearer $104M.

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 10-K · source on SEC EDGAR →

Will it survive?

  • Comfortable
    Operating income $72M ÷ interest expense $10K
    What this means

    Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient, it says solvent, not cheap.

  • How heavy is the debt, net of cash? $1.3B · 18.6× operating profit
    Heavy net debt
    Cash $109M − debt $1.4B
    What this means

    Netting $109M of cash and short-term investments against $1.4B of debt leaves $1.3B owed, about 18.6× a year's operating profit (20.1× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.

  • Not enough data
    What this means

    The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

Is it a good business?

  • Below average through the cycle
    10-yr median, range 3%–18%; 1% latest = NOPAT $55M ÷ invested capital $3.9B
    Industry peers: median 15%
    What this means

    The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 10 years (it ran 1% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.

  • Thin, recently turned positive
    latest $124M = operating cash $153M − maintenance capex $29M; positive each of the last 3 years, after an earlier loss stretch (10-yr median -3%)
    Industry peers: median 4%
    What this means

    What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 3% of revenue this year, a -3% median across 10 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $20M of SBC) leaves $104M.

  • Cash-backed
    Cash from ops $153M ÷ net income $148M

    In the filing’s words Read against the cash, reported earnings have run ahead of the operating cash the business generated over the record — about 6% of assets a year, among the widest gaps in the catalogue. For an inventory- or content-heavy grower that can be cash tied up in real assets as it expands; elsewhere it can mean the earnings lean on accounting estimates — the cash-flow statement against the income statement is where to tell which.

    What this means

    How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.

How is the cash used?

  • Returned more than it generated
    Dividends + buybacks $178M ÷ Owner Earnings $124M
    What this means

    The company returned more than it generated: against $124M of Owner Earnings, $178M (143%) went back to shareholders, $35M dividends, $144M buybacks — the excess came from the balance sheet or borrowing, not the year's operations. Net of $20M stock comp, the real buyback was about $124M. Sustained, that pattern draws down cash or adds debt; the net-debt line above shows where it stands.

  • Investing or harvesting? 1.16×
    Maintaining
    Capex $29M ÷ depreciation $25M
    What this means

    Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.

Graham’s defensive tests · 3 of 4 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size Pass
    Revenue ≥ $2B · $4.1B
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.

  • Strong liquidity
    Current ratio ≥ 2× ·
    What this means

    Current assets / liabilities not in the data yet.

  • Earnings stability Pass
    A profit every year (10-yr record) · no losses
    What this means

    Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.

  • Dividend record Miss
    Uninterrupted dividends · 5 of 10 yrs
    What this means

    An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.

  • Earnings growth Pass
    Earnings +33% over the record · +277%
    What this means

    At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $8.58/share (latest year $5.13), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $90.09/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Durability & moat, 2016–2025

Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.

  • Profitable years 10 of 10
    What this means

    Never lost money over the record, the earnings stability Graham insisted on.

  • Return on capital ≥ 15% 2 of 10 yrs
    What this means

    A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.

  • Operating margin 6% → 8% (3-yr avg ends)

    In the filing’s words The margin has held, but the filing names price competition — the pressure is present even where the margin has absorbed it so far.

    What this means

    Through the cycle the operating margin widened — about 6% early to 8% lately, median 7% — pricing power intact or improving.

  • Reinvestment, incremental ROIC 8%
    What this means

    Reinvested capital came back at only a modest incremental return — near the cost of capital, where extra growth adds little per dollar. The record shows whether it is a soft stretch or a thinning moat.

  • Worst year 2025 · 4.7% op. margin
    What this means

    Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.

  • Share count +4.3%/yr
    What this means

    The share count is rising, dilution works against you on a per-share basis.

  • Dividend record rising
    What this means

    Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Low contestability

The moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.

In its own filing Named as a competitive risk

Its FY2025 10-K names artificial intelligence as a competitive threat.

“Our competitors or other third parties may incorporate AI into their IT systems and homebuilding and financial services operations more quickly or more successfully than us, which could impair our ability to compete effectively and adversely affect our operating results.”

AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat, and the company is using it that way.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

How the cash was used, 2016–2025

Over the record, the business generated $355M of operating cash; how management split it reads as a cash returner, paying most of what it earns straight back to owners.

  • Reinvested$207M · 58%
  • Dividends$138M · 39%
  • Buybacks$382M · 108%
  • Returned to owners$520M

    238% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $138M as dividends and $382M as buybacks.

  • Source of funding−$373M

    Reinvestment and shareholder returns ran $373M beyond the operating cash the business generated, so the gap was financed off the balance sheet: debt rose from $454M to $1.5B.

  • Average price paid for buybacks$17.34

    Across the years where the filing reports a share count, 0M shares were bought for $1M, about $17.34 each.

  • Net change in share count40.5%

    The diluted count rose from 21M to 29M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.

  • Dividend record$1.14/sh

    Paid in 5 of the years on record, the per-share dividend growing about 27% a year. It was never cut over the span.

  • Return on what it retained12%

    Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out ($1.8B over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) grew $209M, so each retained $1 added about 0.12 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.

Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.

Management, ownership & pay

read the proxy →

From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.

Fiscal yearChief executivePay, as filed“Actually paid”Owner earnings
2022Dale Francescon$11.2M$4.2M$304M
2022Robert J. Francescon$11.2M$4.2M$304M
2023Dale Francescon$12.6M$30.6M$26M
2023Robert J. Francescon$12.6M$30.6M$26M
2024Dale Francescon$11.9M$18.5M$101M
2024Robert J. Francescon$11.9M$18.5M$101M
2025Dale Francescon$7.4M$1.6M$124M
2025Robert J. Francescon$8.5M$2.9M$124M

Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.

  • Insider ownership13.7%

    The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.

  • Stock-based compensation$20M

    The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 0% of revenue, equal to 28% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.

Inverting the record

Invert: instead of why Century Communities Inc. is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.

5 of the 6 tests turned up something to look into; the other 1 came back clean.

  • Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?40.5%

    Diluted shares grew 40.5% over 2016–2025, even as the company spent $382M on buybacks. The repurchases were a treadmill: stock issued to staff outran them, so owners' slice still shrank. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.

  • Look hereDid debt outgrow the business?$454M → $1.5B

    Debt rose from $454M to $1.5B while owner earnings went from about ($125M) to $84M: measured against what the business earns, the balance sheet carries more debt than it did. Debt raised for buybacks or deals rather than growth is the kind that bites in a downturn.

  • Look hereDid reported profit become cash?0.16×

    Across the record the business reported $2.3B of net income but generated $355M of operating cash, a 0.16-to-one conversion. Profit that does not turn into cash over many years is the classic mark of earnings that are softer than they look. Ask where the gap sits, receivables, inventory, or costs being capitalized rather than expensed.

  • Look hereDid receivables and inventory outpace sales?1% → 1% of sales

    Receivables and inventory grew from $6M to $56M while revenue grew 303%: working capital is climbing faster than sales (1% of revenue then, 1% now). That can mean customers paying slower, stock building up, or revenue pulled forward. The filing's cash-flow and receivables notes say which.

  • Look hereAre "one-time" charges a yearly habit?9 of 10 years

    Management took an impairment or write-down in 9 of the last 10 years, $54M in all. A charge taken almost every year is not one-time; it is the business — past deals coming due, and an admission the assets were worth less than what was paid. Munger's rule: when the "one-time" keeps happening, it is the business. Read it beside the goodwill the company still carries.

And these came back clean
  • Is it less profitable than it was?

Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.

Peers, Homebuilders

The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueGross marginOp. marginROICOwner earn. margin
TMHCTaylor Morrison Home Corporation$8.1B20%9.1%8%10%
KBHKB Home$6.2B8.8%15%5%
MHOM/I Homes Inc.$4.4B23%11.0%20%3%
DFHDream Finders Homes Inc.$4.3B16%7.8%41%3%
CCSCentury Communities Inc.$4.1B7.9%6%-1%
ECGEverus Construction Group Inc.$3.7B12%6.7%29%4%
HOVHovnanian Enterprises Inc.$3.0B1.8%3%7%
BZHBeazer Homes USA Inc.$2.4B16%3.9%5%3%
Group median7.8%11%4%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Century Communities Inc. has delivered.

$
Base

The assumptions

9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.

Enter a price above to run it.

Implied by the price
Owner-earnings growth · ’21→’25+24%/yr
Owner-earnings growth · since FY2024+43%/yr
Owner-earnings yield
P/E (3-yr earnings ’23–’25)
P/B
Graham’s price gate

Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.

Against a high-grade bond: Graham’s yardstick bond yield%

Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.

Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.

Free cash flow $107M on 29M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-04-17; net debt $1.4B. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. Capex ($32M) runs well above depreciation ($24M), so this is a build-out; Steady-state swaps total capex for maintenance (≈ depreciation), lifting the base to about $111M, the cash it would throw off if it stopped expanding. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Century Communities Inc. (CCS), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/CCS, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← CCRN its page in the Manual CCSI →

Industry order: ← BZH the Homebuilders chapter CVCO →