Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← ESEA Manual ETOR → ← EMBJ Aerospace & Defense FLY →

ESLT, Elbit Systems Ltd.

Aerospace & Defense capital-intensive

Revenue is led by Land (28%) and Aerospace (23%), with 3 more segments behind.

Latest annual: FY2025 20-F · US listing is the ordinary share
ESLT · Elbit Systems Ltd.
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$7.9B
+16.3% YoY · 11% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 5-yr average
Revenue $7.9B 5-yr avg $6.3B
Gross margin 24% 5-yr avg 25%
Operating margin 8.5% 5-yr avg 7.3%
Owner-earnings margin 8% 5-yr avg 4%
Free cash flow margin 7% 5-yr avg 3%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What it is
An aerospace and defense contractor, working a multi-year backlog of large programs.
What moves the needle
Gross margin has run about 25% and operating margin about 7.2% through the cycle, a thin spread that turns the result on volume and the cost of what it sells far more than on the price it sets. That margin has held in a narrow 6.2%–10% band over the years, so steadiness itself is the evidence — the lever is unit growth and cost discipline, not a moving line. Inventory runs near 31% of sales, so how fast it turns back into cash — and the risk of writing it down when demand softens — sits alongside the margin. Read this kind of business on the backlog and program execution. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

Where the money comes from

read the 20-F →

Revenue spreads across 5 segments, the largest Land at 28%.

Revenue by reportable segment, FY2025
  • Land28%$2.3B
  • Aerospace23%$1.8B
  • ESA21%$1.7B
  • ISTAR and EW17%$1.3B
  • C4I and Cyber11%$866M
By geographyIsrael32%Europe27%North America21%Asia Pacific16%Other Areas3%Latin America1%

From the segment footnote of the company's own 20-F. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2016–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2016’162017’172018’182019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMDec 2025
Income statement
$3.3B$3.4B$3.7B$4.5B$4.7B$5.3B$5.5B$6.0B$6.8B$7.9B$7.9BRevenueRevenue
30%30%27%25%25%26%25%25%24%24%24%Gross marginGross mgn
$305M$324M$293M$322M$326M$419M$367M$369M$489M$671M$671MOperating incomeOp. inc.
9.3%9.6%7.9%7.1%7.0%7.9%6.7%6.2%7.2%8.5%8.5%Operating marginOp. mgn
$239M$241M$209M$229M$238M$275M$275M$216M$322M$536M$536MNet incomeNet inc.
16%19%11%8%13%32%8%10%11%9%9%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
$208M$101M$192M($53M)$279M$417M$240M$114M$535M$778M$778MOperating cash flowOp. cash
$123M$114M$118M$137M$144M$153M$161M$165M$158M$171M$171MDepreciationDeprec.
($154M)($254M)($135M)($419M)($104M)($11M)($197M)($267M)$54M$71M$71MWorking capital & otherWC & other
$124M$108M$102M$138M$132M$189M$205M$187M$215M$226M$226MCapexCapex
3.8%3.2%2.8%3.1%2.8%3.6%3.7%3.1%3.1%2.8%2.8%Capex / revenueCapex/rev
$84M($7M)$89M($191M)$147M$228M$79M($73M)$376M$607M$607MOwner earningsOwner earn.
2.6%−0.2%2.4%−4.2%3.1%4.3%1.4%−1.2%5.5%7.6%7.6%Owner earnings marginOE mgn
$84M($7M)$89M($191M)$147M$228M$35M($73M)$320M$553M$553MFree cash flowFCF
2.6%−0.2%2.4%−4.2%3.1%4.3%0.6%−1.2%4.7%7.0%7.0%Free cash flow marginFCF mgn
$68M$75M$75M$63M$78M$79M$87M$89M$89M$112M$78MDividends paidDiv. paid
15%14%11%11%11%11%10%7%10%13%13%Return on equityROE
11%10%7%8%7%8%7%4%7%10%11%Retained to equityRetained/eq
Balance sheet
$223M$156M$208M$221M$279M$259M$211M$197M$265M$635M$657MCash & investmentsCash+inv
$1.2B$1.4B$1.7B$2.1B$2.5B$2.8B$2.6B$2.7B$2.9B$3.3B$3.3BReceivablesReceiv.
$840M$903M$1.1B$1.2B$1.3B$1.7B$1.9B$2.3B$2.8B$3.1B$3.1BInventoryInvent.
$514M$634M$776M$926M$1.0B$1.0B$1.1B$1.3B$1.3B$1.5B$1.5BAccounts payablePayables
$1.6B$1.7B$2.1B$2.4B$2.8B$3.4B$3.5B$3.8B$4.4B$5.0B$5.0BOperating working capitalOper. WC
$2.4B$2.6B$3.3B$3.7B$4.3B$5.0B$5.0B$5.5B$6.4B$7.7B$7.7BCurrent assetsCur. assets
$1.9B$2.1B$2.9B$3.2B$3.6B$4.0B$4.3B$4.8B$5.3B$6.0B$6.0BCurrent liabilitiesCur. liab.
1.3×1.2×1.1×1.2×1.2×1.2×1.2×1.1×1.2×1.3×1.3×Current ratioCurr. ratio
$617M$647M$1.0B$1.3B$1.3B$1.6B$1.5B$1.5B$1.5B$1.5B$1.5BGoodwillGoodwill
$4.4B$4.7B$6.5B$7.3B$8.1B$9.3B$9.2B$9.7B$11.0B$12.7B$12.7BTotal assetsAssets
12.1×9.0×6.3×4.4×4.4×9.9×6.8×2.6×3.1×4.6×4.7×Interest coverageInt. cov.
$1.6B$1.7B$1.8B$2.1B$2.2B$2.5B$2.8B$2.9B$3.3B$4.1B$4.1BShareholders’ equityEquity
Per share
42.8M42.8M42.8M43.8M44.2M44.3M44.6M44.6M44.7M46.9M46.4MShares out (diluted)Shares
$76.26$78.94$86.09$102.82$105.45$119.21$123.63$133.99$152.72$169.20$170.94Revenue / shareRev/sh
$5.59$5.62$4.88$5.21$5.38$6.20$6.18$4.84$7.20$11.42$11.53EPS (diluted)EPS
$1.96$-0.16$2.09$-4.35$3.32$5.16$1.77$-1.64$8.41$12.94$13.07Owner earnings / shareOE/sh
$1.96$-0.16$2.09$-4.35$3.32$5.16$0.78$-1.64$7.15$11.78$11.90Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh
$1.60$1.76$1.76$1.43$1.77$1.79$1.95$2.00$1.99$2.38$1.68Dividends / shareDiv/sh
$2.91$2.52$2.39$3.14$2.99$4.26$4.60$4.19$4.81$4.81$4.86Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh
$36.49$39.92$42.83$48.84$50.17$57.18$61.80$66.10$73.31$88.02$88.92Book value / shareBVPS
Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
9-yr5-yr
Revenue / share+9.3%/yr+9.9%/yr
Owner earnings / share+23.3%/yr+31.3%/yr
EPS+8.3%/yr+16.2%/yr
Dividends / share+4.5%/yr+6.1%/yr
Capital spending / share+5.8%/yr+10.0%/yr
Book value / share+10.3%/yr+11.9%/yr

The record, charted

FY2016–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.

Share count
47Mpeak FY2025
Gross margin
24%low FY2024

Owner earnings vs. net income

Owner earningsNet income

The accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.

$607Mowner earningsvs.$536Mnet incomelow FY2019

Where the cash went

ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetained

Each year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.

FY2016FY2025

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2025 the business earned $607M of owner earnings, the operating cash left after the $171M it takes just to hold its position. It put $54M more into growth; free cash flow, after that spending, was $553M.

Reported net income$536M
Owner earnings$607M · 8% of revenue
FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Reported net income$536M$322M$216M$275M$275M
Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back+$171M+$158M+$165M+$161M+$153M
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items+$71M+$54M−$267M−$197M−$11M
Cash from operations$778M$535M$114M$240M$417M
Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume−$171M−$158M−$187M−$161M−$189M
Owner earnings$607M$376M($73M)$79M$228M
Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still−$54M−$57M−$44M
Free cash flow$553M$320M($73M)$35M$228M
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue8%6%-1%1%4%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position (here about $171M, roughly its depreciation, the rate its assets wear out). The other $54M of its capital spending is growth it chose, not upkeep it owed; charged only with the maintenance it must do, the business earns well more than the year's free cash flow shows.

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 20-F · source on SEC EDGAR →

Will it survive?

  • Adequate
    Operating income $671M ÷ interest expense $144M
    What this means

    Comfortable in a normal year, but below the margin of safety Graham looked for. Worth checking how stable the coverage has been across a full cycle.

  • Debt under-captured — leverage unknown, not low
    What this means

    This company pays far more interest than its tagged debt implies (the rest sits under segment dimensions the data source strips), so its net cash or net debt cannot be read honestly: the gap is unknown, not zero, and 'net cash' here would be exactly the fiction the figure is meant to prevent. Judge it on the record and owner earnings instead.

  • Long (60+ days)
    DSO 153 + DIO 190 − DPO 92 days
    What this means

    Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.

Is it a good business?

  • Debt under-captured
    Industry peers: median 14%
    What this means

    This company's interest bill implies far more debt than its filings tag at the consolidated level (the rest sits under segment dimensions the data source strips), so invested capital, and the return on it, cannot be read honestly. Judge this one on Owner Earnings and the record instead.

  • Thin through the cycle
    10-yr median margin, range -4%–8%; latest $607M = operating cash $778M − maintenance capex $171M
    Industry peers: median 5%
    What this means

    What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 8% of revenue this year, a 2% median across 10 years.

  • Cash-backed
    Cash from ops $778M ÷ net income $536M
    What this means

    How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.

How is the cash used?

  • Reinvests most of it
    Dividends + buybacks $78M ÷ Owner Earnings $607M
    What this means

    Of $607M Owner Earnings, $78M (13%) went back to shareholders, $78M dividends, $0 buybacks. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.

  • Investing or harvesting? 1.32×
    Expanding
    Capex $226M ÷ depreciation $171M
    What this means

    Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.

Graham’s defensive tests · 4 of 5 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size Pass
    Revenue ≥ $2B · $7.9B
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.

  • Strong liquidity Miss
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 1.29×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Conservative debt
    Debt ≤ working capital ·
    What this means

    The filings tag only a fraction of the debt this company's interest bill implies (much of it sits under segment dimensions the data source strips), so this test can't be run honestly.

  • Earnings stability Pass
    A profit every year (10-yr record) · no losses
    What this means

    Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.

  • Dividend record Pass
    Uninterrupted dividends · paid every year (10)
    What this means

    An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.

  • Earnings growth Pass
    Earnings +33% over the record · +56%
    What this means

    At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $7.70/share (latest year $11.53), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $88.92/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Durability & moat, 2016–2025

Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.

  • Profitable years 10 of 10
    What this means

    Never lost money over the record, the earnings stability Graham insisted on.

  • Operating margin 9% → 7% (3-yr avg ends)
    What this means

    The recent-years average (7%) sits below the early years (9%), but the latest year (8%) is back near the early level: a cyclical trough dragging the window down, not a one-way slide. The through-cycle median is 7% — read it across the cycle, not on the dip.

  • Owner earnings growth +33%/yr
    What this means

    Owner earnings grew about 33% a year over the record.

  • Worst year 2023 · 6.2% op. margin
    What this means

    Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.

  • Share count +1.0%/yr
    What this means

    The share count is rising, dilution works against you on a per-share basis.

  • Dividend record rising
    What this means

    Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.

  • How management talks about it Promotional
    What this means

    The record is compounding, but the filing leans on a promoter’s vocabulary rather than the per-share, return-on-capital terms an owner uses. The results back the talk here; the register is still worth noting.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Low contestability

The moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.

In its own filing A competitive risk, new this year

Its FY2025 10-K names artificial intelligence as a competitive threat, in language that was not in the prior year's filing.

“We are facing increased competition from startups and non-traditional defense contractors, including companies active in the deep-tech and more specifically, the defense-tech field, which is usually characterized by rapid innovation in areas such as AI, autonomous systems, software only products and the introduction of…”

AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat, and the company is using it that way.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Current Position

as of fiscal year-end, Dec 31, 2025

Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.

Current assets$7.7B
  • Cash & short-term investments$657M
  • Receivables$3.3B
  • Inventory$3.1B
  • Other current assets$616M
Current liabilities$6.0B
  • Debt due within a year$83M
  • Accounts payable$1.5B
  • Other current liabilities$4.4B
Current ratio1.29×all current assets ÷ what's due · Graham looked for 2×
Quick ratio0.77×stricter: inventory excluded
Cash ratio0.11×strictest: cash alone against what's due
Working capital$1.8Bthe cushion left after near-term bills
Debt due this year vs. cash$83M due · $657M cash covered by cash on hand, no refinancing forced · both figures from the Dec 31, 2025 balance sheet
Deeper floors
Tangible book value$2.3Bequity stripped of goodwill & intangibles
Debt incl. operating leases$200M$98M of it operating leases
Deferred revenue$2.7Bcustomer cash collected before delivery; operating float

From the company's latest filing.

How the cash was used, 2016–2025

Over the record, the business generated $2.8B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a reinvestor, most operating cash is plowed back into the business.

  • Reinvested$1.6B · 58%
  • Dividends$816M · 29%
  • Retained (debt / cash)$368M · 13%
  • Returned to owners$816M

    61% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $816M as dividends and $0 as buybacks.

  • Net change in share count8.6%

    The diluted count rose from 43M to 46M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.

  • Dividend record$2.38/sh

    Paid in 10 of the years on record, the per-share dividend growing about 5% a year. It was cut at least once along the way.

  • Return on what it retained13%

    Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out ($2.0B over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) grew $248M, so each retained $1 added about 0.13 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.

Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.

Inverting the record

Invert: instead of why Elbit Systems Ltd. is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.

2 of the 4 tests turned up something to look into; the other 2 came back clean.

  • Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?8.6%

    Diluted shares grew 8.6% over 2016–2025. Owners were diluted on net; each share owns less of the business than it did. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.

  • Look hereDid receivables and inventory outpace sales?64% → 81% of sales

    Receivables and inventory grew from $2.1B to $6.5B while revenue grew 143%: working capital is climbing faster than sales (64% of revenue then, 81% now). That can mean customers paying slower, stock building up, or revenue pulled forward. The filing's cash-flow and receivables notes say which.

And these came back clean
  • Is it less profitable than it was?
  • Did reported profit become cash?

Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.

Peers, Aerospace & Defense

The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueGross marginOp. marginROICOwner earn. margin
TXTTextron$14.8B17%7.8%16%5%
THOThor Industries$9.6B14%6.5%14%5%
TDGTransDigm$8.8B57%42.3%14%20%
ESLTElbit Systems Ltd.$7.9B25%7.5%12%2%
DANDana Incorporated Common Stock$7.5B9%2.6%5%2%
PIIPolaris Inc.$7.2B24%7.8%14%7%
SAROStandardAero Inc.$6.1B14%7.5%9%-0%
HEIHeico Corp.$4.5B39%21.1%14%18%
Group median20%7.7%14%5%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Enter the US price, in dollars: the NYSE/Nasdaq quote you hold. Elbit Systems Ltd.'s US listing is the ordinary share itself. The record tables elsewhere on this page remain as filed.

Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Elbit Systems Ltd. has delivered.

Elbit Systems Ltd.’s latest year runs above its own through-cycle margin — the reported figure may flatter a peak. So the tool opens on the through-cycle base, Graham’s averaging cutting both ways; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.

$

Through the cycle, Elbit Systems Ltd. earns about $198M on its 2.5% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 7.6% margin runs above that; the reported figure may flatter a peak you'd be paying on. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year. It comes pre-checked here for that reason, the same rule that already normalizes a trough; clear it to price the year as filed.

Base

The assumptions

9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.

Enter a price above to run it.

Implied by the price
Owner-earnings growth · ’21→’25+34%/yr
Owner-earnings growth · ’16→’25+31%/yr
Owner-earnings yield
P/E (3-yr earnings ’23–’25)
P/B
Graham’s price gate

Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.

Against a high-grade bond: Graham’s yardstick bond yield%

Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.

Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.

Free cash flow $553M on 46M shares outstanding, per the 20-F cover, as of 2025-12-31; net cash $555M. The base opens on the through-cycle figure (the latest year sits above the record’s own median, and Graham’s averaging cuts both ways); clear Normalize to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. Capex ($226M) runs well above depreciation ($171M), so this is a build-out; Steady-state swaps total capex for maintenance (≈ depreciation), lifting the base to about $607M, the cash it would throw off if it stopped expanding. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Elbit Systems Ltd. (ESLT), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/ESLT, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← ESEA its page in the Manual ETOR →

Industry order: ← EMBJ the Aerospace & Defense chapter FLY →