← All companies ← FA Manual FANG → ← ESNT Insurance — Property & Casualty FNF →
FAF, First American Fin
The Company, through its subsidiaries, is engaged in the business of providing title insurance, settlement services and other financial services and risk solutions through its title insurance and services segment and its home warranty segment.
Many of these products, services and solutions involve the use of real property-related data, including data derived from the Company's proprietary databases.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What moves the needle
- Underwriting discipline and the float. What decides it: whether the combined ratio stays below 100% so the policies make money on their own, how large the float is against equity, and what that float earns once it is invested. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- The underwriting result is not cleanly tagged in the filings. Book value per share, the measure Berkshire is judged on, has compounded about 8% a year across the record. The float runs about 0.2× equity, the leverage that magnifies both the underwriting and the investing. Whether the discipline holds through a soft market, and how the float is invested, are what the 10-K decides.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMMar 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $5.6B | $5.8B | $5.7B | $6.2B | $7.1B | $9.2B | $7.6B | $6.0B | $6.1B | $7.5B | $7.7B | RevenueRevenue |
| $126M | $162M | $230M | $316M | $221M | $215M | $340M | $570M | $561M | $621M | $638M | Investment incomeInv. inc. |
| $343M | $423M | $474M | $707M | $696M | $1.2B | $263M | $217M | $131M | $622M | $673M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| 28% | 5% | 22% | 22% | 24% | 24% | 19% | 21% | 20% | 24% | 24% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| $489M | $632M | $793M | $913M | $1.1B | $1.2B | $778M | $354M | $898M | $951M | $1.0B | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $390M | $498M | $675M | $806M | $971M | $1.1B | $610M | $166M | $679M | $763M | $824M | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 11% | 12% | 13% | 16% | 14% | 22% | 6% | 4% | 3% | 11% | 12% | Return on equityROE |
| 7% | 8% | 8% | 12% | 10% | 18% | 1% | 0% | −2% | 7% | 8% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $1.0B | $1.0B | $1.0B | $1.1B | $1.2B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.2B | $1.2B | $1.2B | Float (reserves)Float |
| $8.8B | $9.6B | $10.6B | $11.5B | $12.8B | $16.5B | $15.0B | $16.8B | $14.9B | $16.2B | $17.9B | Total assetsAssets |
| $1.0B | $1.4B | $1.5B | $1.5B | $1.3B | $1.2B | $1.2B | $3.6B | $1.7B | $1.4B | $2.4B | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| $3.0B | $3.5B | $3.7B | $4.4B | $4.9B | $5.8B | $4.7B | $4.8B | $4.9B | $5.5B | $5.5B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 111M | 112M | 113M | 114M | 113M | 111M | 107M | 105M | 104M | 104M | 103M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $3.09 | $3.76 | $4.19 | $6.22 | $6.16 | $11.14 | $2.45 | $2.07 | $1.26 | $6.00 | $6.51 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $3.51 | $4.43 | $5.96 | $7.09 | $8.59 | $9.51 | $5.69 | $1.59 | $6.51 | $7.35 | $7.98 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $1.18 | $1.42 | $1.58 | $1.65 | $1.76 | $1.91 | $2.03 | $2.07 | $2.12 | $2.15 | $2.16 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| $27.06 | $30.95 | $33.03 | $38.88 | $43.45 | $51.77 | $43.41 | $46.35 | $47.06 | $53.03 | $53.14 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +4.1%/yr | +2.8%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | +8.6%/yr | −3.1%/yr |
| EPS | +7.7%/yr | −0.5%/yr |
| Dividends / share | +6.9%/yr | +4.1%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +4.8%/yr | +12.5%/yr |
| Book value / share | +7.8%/yr | +4.1%/yr |
The year, in the company's words
the filing →Verbatim from the 10-K's management discussion. Each sentence is shown only because its subject, direction, and stated figures check out against the filed numbers on this page. The words are the company's; the arithmetic is the record's.
- Revenue+21.6%
“The Company’s total revenues for 2025 were $7.5 billion, which reflected an increase of $1.3 billion, or 21.6%, when compared with $6.1 billion for 2024. This increase was primarily attributable to increases in direct premiums and escrow fees of $316.7 million, or 12.9%, agent premiums of $397.5 million, or 15.5%, and information and other revenue of $127.4 million, or 13.3%.”
✓ figure matches the filed record
The record, charted
FY2016–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Is it a good business?
- Not enough dataIndustry peers: median 98%
What this means
Premiums or claims weren't found in the filing data.
- Return on equity 11%SolidNet income $622M ÷ equity $5.5BIndustry peers: median 10%
What this means
What it earns on shareholders' capital, the underwriting result plus what the float earns invested. Durably above the ~10% cost of equity is what compounds book value.
The float
- Float (reserves) $1.2B0.2× equityLoss and claim reserves $1.2B, 0.2× equity
What this means
Money held against future claims and invested in the meantime. Buffett's insight was that good underwriting makes this float cost less than nothing, a pool of other people's money the owners earn on. Measured here from loss and claim reserves only; it excludes unearned premiums and funds held, so the true float is somewhat larger than shown. The larger it is against equity, the more that leverage works, for better or worse.
- Investment income $621Mearned on investmentsNet investment income $621M
What this means
What the float and capital earned this year. This is the second engine: an insurer that breaks even on underwriting still wins if the float is large and invested well.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
The filing positions AI as something the company uses, not something it fears.
“While we hope to realize financial benefits from these venture investments, we make and hold these investments primarily for strategic reasons. 10 Innovation and Intellectual Property In an effort to speed the delivery of our products, increase efficiency, improve quality, improv…”
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat, and the company is using it that way.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Debt maturity
the debt note, SEC EDGAR →Not how much it owes, but when it falls due, and against what. The ladder the company files, beside cash on hand and a year's owner earnings.
Bars scaled to the largest single year; “later” is everything due after 2030, shown apart since it dwarfs the years.
Against what the business has and earns
Cash on hand as of Mar 31, 2026 plus a year’s owner earnings comes to $3.2B against the $3M due in the twelve months after the Dec 31, 2025 schedule: 941 times it.
Maturity schedule extracted from the company’s Dec 31, 2025 annual report and reconciled to the balance-sheet debt.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.
| Fiscal year | Pay, as filed | “Actually paid” | Owner earnings |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | $10.8M | $17.7M | $1.1B |
| 2022 | $6.0M | $2.9M | $610M |
| 2022 | $9.0M | $1.9M | $610M |
| 2023 | $7.1M | $9.0M | $166M |
| 2024 | $7.8M | $7.8M | $679M |
| 2025 | $8.3M | $8.2M | $763M |
| 2025 | $9.6M | $5.4M | $763M |
Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.
- Insider ownership3.5%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
- CEO pay ratio101:1
What the chief earns for every dollar the median employee makes, per the 2026 proxy. A high ratio alone settles nothing; some businesses are genuinely top-heavy in scarce skill. A runaway figure is where Buffett starts asking whether the board is doing its job.
- Stock-based compensation$68M
The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 1% of revenue, equal to 8% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.
Peers, Insurance — Property & Casualty
The same industry, side by side on the underwriting lens. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Combined ratio | Loss ratio | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VOYAVoya Financial Inc. | $8.2B | — | 75% | 11% |
| FAFFirst American Fin | $7.5B | — | — | 12% |
| GNWGenworth Financial Inc | $7.3B | — | — | 2% |
| THGHanover Insurance Group | $6.6B | 99% | 64% | 12% |
| GLGlobe Life Inc. | $6.0B | 98% | 66% | 20% |
| MCYMercury General | $6.0B | 100% | 76% | 10% |
| SIGISelective Insurance | $5.3B | 97% | 61% | 10% |
| STCStewart Information Services Corporation | $2.9B | — | — | 8% |
| Group median | — | — | — | 11% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
price / tangible bookAn insurer is worth a multiple of its tangible book value, and the multiple it deserves is set by the return it earns on that book. Type today’s price; we show what you would be paying against what First American Fin’s record justifies.
Tangible book / share, delivered1%/yr’20→’25
The justified multiple is (return on tangible equity − growth) ÷ (cost of equity − growth). An insurer earning exactly its cost of equity is worth about one times tangible book; the premium above that prices each point of durable excess return. A higher cost of equity lowers the justified multiple for an insurer.
Enter a price above to run it.
Graham applied the same standards to financial enterprises (Intelligent Investor ch.14): the 15× multiple cap on averaged earnings, and P/E times price-to-book at most 22.5. The gate marks the bargain-hunter’s floor, not a verdict.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Tangible book $3.6B on 102M shares, a 18% normalized return on it. The dials set the multiple such a return would justify; your price sets the multiple you are paying. It assumes the insurer keeps earning that return; an underwriting cycle, a reserve shortfall or a bad year on the float changes it, which is what the record and the 10-K are for.
Manual order: ← FA its page in the Manual FANG →
Industry order: ← ESNT the Insurance — Property & Casualty chapter FNF →