← All companies ← JBL Manual JBSS → ← DAL Airlines LTM →
JBLU, JetBlue Airways Corporation
JetBlue is the carrier of choice for the majority of travelers who have been underserved by other airlines.
Looking to the future, we plan to continue to grow in our high-value geographies, invest in industry-leading products, and provide award-winning service by our 23,000 dedicated employees, whom we refer to as crewmembers.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- Situation
- Unprofitable. No sustained operating profit across the record; an earnings multiple has nothing to rest on. What the record does show is revenue, the gross-margin trajectory, and the burn against the cash on hand. Distress / turnaround. Thin interest coverage, or operating cash burned against real debt, across the record. The balance sheet carries this situation; the debt schedule sets the clock.
- What moves the needle
- Operating margin has reached 19% at its best but run negative through the cycle (median −2.4%) — so the question is which reading is truer: whether the median was pulled below zero by one-off charges, by the cycle, or by spending it is still growing into, and whether it settles back at a profit. Capital spending runs about 12% of sales, well above depreciation, so the return earned on what it sinks into that plant weighs as much as the margin. Read this kind of business on load factor against unit cost, and fuel. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has rarely cleared the cost of capital (median −2%, above 15% in 2 of 10 years). By owner earnings: roughly 4% of revenue reaches owners as cash, though it swings. This is price-taker territory, where the balance sheet and the cycle matter more than any multiple; the rest is in the 10-K.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 10-K →40% of revenue comes from outside the United States.
- Domestic & Canada60%$5.5B
- Caribbean and Latin America35%$3.1B
- Atlantic5%$471M
From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMMar 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $6.6B | $7.0B | $7.7B | $8.1B | $3.0B | $6.0B | $9.2B | $9.6B | $9.3B | $9.1B | $9.2B | RevenueRevenue |
| $1.3B | $973M | $266M | $800M | ($1.7B) | ($80M) | ($298M) | ($230M) | ($684M) | ($368M) | ($418M) | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 19.1% | 13.9% | 3.5% | 9.9% | −58.0% | −1.3% | −3.3% | −2.4% | −7.4% | −4.1% | −4.6% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| $727M | $1.1B | $189M | $569M | ($1.4B) | ($182M) | ($362M) | ($310M) | ($795M) | ($602M) | ($713M) | Net incomeNet inc. |
| 38% | — | 14% | 26% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| $1.6B | $1.4B | $1.2B | $1.4B | ($683M) | $1.6B | $379M | $400M | $144M | ($94M) | ($88M) | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $393M | $424M | $469M | $525M | $535M | $540M | $585M | $621M | $655M | $688M | $699M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| $489M | ($214M) | $514M | $324M | $108M | $1.3B | $126M | $50M | $245M | ($220M) | ($115M) | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $850M | $1.1B | $908M | $932M | $715M | $907M | $767M | $1.1B | $1.5B | $1.1B | $1.0B | CapexCapex |
| 12.9% | 15.3% | 11.9% | 11.5% | 24.2% | 15.0% | 8.4% | 11.7% | 15.9% | 11.9% | 11.2% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $1.2B | $955M | $731M | $924M | ($1.2B) | $1.1B | ($206M) | ($221M) | ($511M) | ($782M) | ($787M) | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 18.8% | 13.6% | 9.5% | 11.4% | −41.2% | 18.3% | −2.2% | −2.3% | −5.5% | −8.6% | −8.6% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| $782M | $305M | $292M | $517M | ($1.4B) | $735M | ($388M) | ($728M) | ($1.3B) | ($1.2B) | ($1.1B) | Free cash flowFCF |
| 11.9% | 4.3% | 3.8% | 6.4% | −47.3% | 12.2% | −4.2% | −7.6% | −14.4% | −12.9% | −12.2% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| — | — | — | — | $0 | $0 | $297M | $131M | $22M | $0 | $0 | AcquisitionsAcquis. |
| $120M | $380M | $375M | $535M | $160M | — | — | — | — | — | — | BuybacksBuybacks |
| 16% | 17% | 4% | 10% | -20% | -1% | -4% | -3% | -6% | -3% | -4% | ROICROIC |
| 18% | 24% | 4% | 12% | -34% | -5% | -10% | -9% | -30% | -28% | -39% | Return on equityROE |
| 18% | 24% | 4% | 12% | −34% | −5% | −10% | −9% | −30% | −28% | −39% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $1.1B | $695M | $890M | $1.3B | $3.1B | $2.9B | $1.6B | $1.7B | $3.9B | $2.5B | $2.4B | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| $172M | $245M | $211M | $231M | $98M | $207M | $317M | $336M | $348M | $372M | $399M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| $47M | $55M | $78M | $81M | $71M | $74M | $87M | $109M | $158M | $193M | $282M | InventoryInvent. |
| $242M | $378M | $437M | $401M | $365M | $499M | $532M | $641M | $619M | $655M | $728M | Accounts payablePayables |
| ($23M) | ($78M) | ($148M) | ($89M) | ($196M) | ($218M) | ($128M) | ($196M) | ($113M) | ($90M) | ($47M) | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| $1.4B | $1.2B | $1.4B | $1.8B | $3.3B | $3.2B | $1.9B | $2.2B | $4.3B | $3.2B | $3.4B | Current assetsCur. assets |
| $2.2B | $2.1B | $2.5B | $2.7B | $2.7B | $3.4B | $3.7B | $3.6B | $3.9B | $4.4B | $4.8B | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 0.6× | 0.6× | 0.5× | 0.7× | 1.3× | 0.9× | 0.5× | 0.6× | 1.1× | 0.7× | 0.7× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| $9.3B | $9.8B | $11.0B | $11.9B | $13.4B | $13.6B | $13.0B | $13.9B | $16.8B | $16.6B | $16.6B | Total assetsAssets |
| $1.4B | $1.2B | $1.7B | $2.4B | $4.9B | $4.0B | $3.7B | $4.7B | $8.6B | $8.6B | $8.5B | Total debtDebt |
| $334M | $512M | $790M | $1.0B | $1.9B | $1.2B | $2.1B | $3.0B | $4.7B | $6.1B | $6.1B | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | -1.8× | -1.1× | -1.9× | -0.6× | -0.7× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| $4.0B | $4.7B | $4.7B | $4.8B | $4.0B | $3.8B | $3.6B | $3.3B | $2.6B | $2.1B | $1.8B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.9% | 0.5% | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.4% | Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 342M | 330M | 315M | 298M | 278M | 318M | 324M | 333M | 346M | 362M | 371M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $19.24 | $21.22 | $24.35 | $27.12 | $10.66 | $18.98 | $28.30 | $28.88 | $26.82 | $25.03 | $24.71 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $2.12 | $3.45 | $0.60 | $1.91 | $-4.88 | $-0.57 | $-1.12 | $-0.93 | $-2.30 | $-1.66 | $-1.92 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $3.62 | $2.89 | $2.32 | $3.10 | $-4.39 | $3.47 | $-0.64 | $-0.66 | $-1.48 | $-2.16 | $-2.12 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $2.29 | $0.92 | $0.93 | $1.73 | $-5.04 | $2.31 | $-1.20 | $-2.19 | $-3.86 | $-3.24 | $-3.01 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $2.48 | $3.25 | $2.89 | $3.12 | $2.58 | $2.85 | $2.37 | $3.39 | $4.27 | $2.98 | $2.77 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $11.73 | $14.32 | $14.90 | $16.08 | $14.24 | $12.10 | $11.01 | $10.02 | $7.63 | $5.85 | $4.88 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +3.0%/yr | +18.6%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +2.0%/yr | +2.9%/yr |
| Book value / share | −7.4%/yr | −16.3%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2016–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedBeyond op. cashEach year's outlays against its operating cash: the mix, and how it drifts. The hatched cap is spending beyond that year's operating cash — financed from the balance sheet or borrowing, not operations.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business earned ($782M) of owner earnings, the operating cash left after the $688M it takes just to hold its position. It put $390M more into growth; free cash flow, after that spending, was ($1.2B).
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | ($602M) | ($795M) | ($310M) | ($362M) | ($182M) |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$688M | +$655M | +$621M | +$585M | +$540M |
| Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost | +$40M | +$39M | +$39M | +$30M | +$28M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | −$220M | +$245M | +$50M | +$126M | +$1.3B |
| Cash from operations | ($94M) | $144M | $400M | $379M | $1.6B |
| Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume | −$688M | −$655M | −$621M | −$585M | −$540M |
| Owner earnings | ($782M) | ($511M) | ($221M) | ($206M) | $1.1B |
| Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still | −$390M | −$823M | −$507M | −$182M | −$367M |
| Free cash flow | ($1.2B) | ($1.3B) | ($728M) | ($388M) | $735M |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | -9% | -6% | -2% | -2% | 18% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position (here about $688M, roughly its depreciation, the rate its assets wear out). The other $390M of its capital spending is growth it chose, not upkeep it owed; charged only with the maintenance it must do, the business earns well more than the year's free cash flow shows. The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $40M), owner earnings is nearer ($822M).
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- Can it pay its interest? -0.6×Does not cover its interestOperating income ($368M) ÷ interest expense $588M
What this means
A full year of operating profit didn't cover the interest bill. This is the zombie zone: the business depends on refinancing, asset sales, or forbearance to service its debt.
- Net debt against an operating lossCash $1.9B + ST investments $213M − debt $8.6B
What this means
Netting $2.2B of cash and short-term investments against $8.6B of debt leaves $6.4B owed, with no operating profit this year to measure it against — understand that combination before anything else about the company. It also holds $318M in longer-dated marketable securities; counting those, it sits at $6.1B of net debt. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
Is it a good business?
- Below average through the cycle10-yr median, range -20%–17%; -3% latest = NOPAT ($291M) ÷ invested capital $8.7BIndustry peers: median 7%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 10 years (it ran -3% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Consumes cash through the cycle10-yr median margin, range -41%–19%; latest ($782M) = operating cash ($94M) − maintenance capex $688MIndustry peers: median 10%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's -9% of revenue this year, a -2% median across 10 years. It chose to put $390M more into growth, so free cash flow this year was ($1.2B) — the gap is investment, not weakness. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $40M of SBC) leaves ($822M).
- Are earnings backed by cash? ($94M)Loss, and burning cashNet income ($602M) · cash from operations ($94M)
In the filing’s words And the filing leans heavily on adjusted, non-GAAP earnings — steering you off the GAAP figure just where the cash is not backing it. Read the reconciliation in the notes before taking the adjusted number.
What this means
The company reported a net loss, so a conversion ratio isn't meaningful. What matters then is whether operations still threw off cash, here, they did not.
How is the cash used?
- No surplus to allocate
What this means
The business didn't generate positive Owner Earnings this year, so any distributions came from the balance sheet or borrowing, not from operations.
- Investing or harvesting? 1.57×ExpandingCapex $1.1B ÷ depreciation $688M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 1 of 6 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size PassRevenue ≥ $2B · $9.1B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity MissCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 0.74×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt MissDebt ≤ working capital · $8.6B vs ($1.2B) WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability MissA profit every year (10-yr record) · 6 loss years
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record MissUninterrupted dividends · none paid
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth MissEarnings +33% over the record · −183%
What this means
At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $-1.53/share (latest year $-1.62), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $5.70/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2016–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 4 of 10
What this means
Lost money in 6 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 2 of 10 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin 12% → −5% (3-yr avg ends)
In the filing’s words Input costs rose and the filing says it could not fully pass them on — which is where this margin compressed.
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about 12% early to −5% lately, median −2% — competition or costs are biting in.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC −35%
What this means
Reinvested capital came back at a negative incremental return over this window — the invested base grew while operating profit did not. The filings show where it went.
- Worst year 2020 · −58.0% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2020, understand why before trusting the good years.
- Share count +0.6%/yr
What this means
Roughly flat share count, little dilution, little buyback.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
Its FY2025 10-K names artificial intelligence as a competitive threat.
“Artificial Intelligence ("AI") Related Risks Our development and use of AI-powered solutions could lead to operational, reputational, or competitive harm, legal and regulatory risk, and additional costs.”
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat, and the company is using it that way.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of the latest quarter, Mar 31, 2026Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$2.2B
- Receivables$399M
- Inventory$282M
- Other current assets$518M
- Accounts payable$728M
- Other current liabilities$4.1B
From the company's latest filing.
Lease obligations
the lease note, SEC EDGAR →Debt by another name. What the business owes on the property, aircraft, stores and equipment it rents rather than owns is a fixed claim due on a schedule; added back to the debt, it is the true leverage. That ladder, operating and finance leases together, and what it adds to the debt on the page above.
Lease payments by year, scaled to the largest; “later” is everything beyond year five, shown apart. These are the contractual cash payments, before the interest the filing imputes back out to the balance-sheet liability.
True leverage: debt plus leases
Counting the leases the way Buffett does, the fixed claims on this business come to $9.9B, of which the leases are 14%. The lease wall above and the debt schedule together are the calendar of what must be paid, and when.
Lease ladder read from the ASC 842 tags in the company’s Dec 31, 2025 annual report and reconciled: the yearly buckets sum to the undiscounted total, which less the imputed interest equals the balance-sheet liability; a ladder that doesn’t tie out is withheld.
How the cash was used, 2016–2025
Over the record, the business generated $7.4B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a reinvestor, most operating cash is plowed back into the business.
- Reinvested$9.8B · 132%
- Buybacks$1.6B · 21%
- Returned to owners$1.6B
78% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $0 as dividends and $1.6B as buybacks.
- Source of funding−$4.0B
Reinvestment and shareholder returns ran $4.0B beyond the operating cash the business generated, so the gap was financed off the balance sheet: debt rose from $1.4B to $8.5B.
- Average price paid for buybacks$18.54
Across the years where the filing reports a share count, 85M shares were bought for $1.6B, about $18.54 each. Year to year the price paid ranged from $12.31 (2020) to $20.69 (2016); its heaviest year, 2019, paid $19.04 ($535M).
- Net change in share count8.4%
The diluted count rose from 342M to 371M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.
- Dividend record—
No dividend line was reported in the filing data over the span; the record here neither confirms nor rules out a payout.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.
| Fiscal year | Pay, as filed | “Actually paid” | Owner earnings |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | $3.4M | $3.4M | $1.1B |
| 2022 | $3.5M | $1.9M | ($206M) |
| 2023 | $10.8M | $9.1M | ($221M) |
| 2024 | $6.8M | $8.1M | ($511M) |
| 2024 | $2.4M | $1.5M | ($511M) |
| 2025 | $5.2M | $971k | ($782M) |
Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.
- Insider ownership2.4%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
- Stock-based compensation$40M
The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 0% of revenue. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why JetBlue Airways Corporation is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.
4 of the 5 tests turned up something to look into; the other 1 came back clean.
- Look hereIs it less profitable than it was?−5.5% vs 14.0%
The owner-earnings margin averaged 14.0% early in the record and −5.5% across the last three years, and the latest year has not recovered. Ask the filing whether that is a structural drift or a cyclical trough — price, mix, cost, or a competitor — and whether it is permanent.
- Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?8.4%
Diluted shares grew 8.4% over 2016–2025, even as the company spent $1.6B on buybacks. The repurchases were a treadmill: stock issued to staff outran them, so owners' slice still shrank. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.
- Look hereDid debt outgrow the business?$1.4B → $8.5B
Debt rose from $1.4B to $8.5B while owner earnings went from about $975M to ($505M): the borrowing grew and the earnings that would carry it are not there now. Debt raised for buybacks or deals rather than growth is the kind that bites in a downturn.
- Look hereDid receivables and inventory outpace sales?3% → 7% of sales
Receivables and inventory grew from $219M to $681M while revenue grew 39%: working capital is climbing faster than sales (3% of revenue then, 7% now). That can mean customers paying slower, stock building up, or revenue pulled forward. The filing's cash-flow and receivables notes say which.
- Are "one-time" charges a yearly habit?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
What an owner would ask, FY2025
read the 10-K →- Which reported numbers are a judgment call?Management names Revenue recognition as critical estimates
each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →
The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.
Peers, Airlines
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UALUnited Airlines Holdings | $59.1B | — | 7.9% | 12% | 9% |
| AALAmerican Airlines Group | $54.6B | — | 5.3% | 8% | 2% |
| LUVSouthwest Airlines Co. | $28.1B | — | 7.6% | 11% | 11% |
| ALKAlaska Air | $14.2B | — | 6.3% | 7% | 10% |
| JBLUJetBlue Airways Corporation | $9.1B | — | -1.9% | -2% | 4% |
| SKYWSkyWest Inc. | $4.1B | 12% | 11.3% | 6% | 22% |
| ULCCFrontier Group Holdings Inc. | $3.7B | — | -1.4% | -24% | -4% |
| ALGTAllegiant Travel Company | $2.3B | — | 12.7% | 6% | 12% |
| Group median | — | — | 7.0% | 6% | 9% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFType today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what JetBlue Airways Corporation has delivered.
JetBlue Airways Corporation’s latest year shows negative owner earnings, below the record’s own through-cycle owner earnings. So the tool opens on the through-cycle base, the cash it would earn at rest; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.
Through the cycle, JetBlue Airways Corporation earns about $331M on its 3.6% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s −8.6% margin runs below that; the reported figure may understate a lean year. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Free cash flow ($1.1B) on 372M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-03-31; net debt $6.1B. The base opens on the through-cycle figure (the latest year sits off the record’s own median, and Graham’s averaging cuts both ways); clear Normalize to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. Capex ($1.0B) runs well above depreciation ($699M), so this is a build-out; Steady-state swaps total capex for maintenance (≈ depreciation), lifting the base to about ($776M), the cash it would throw off if it stopped expanding. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← JBL its page in the Manual JBSS →
Industry order: ← DAL the Airlines chapter LTM →