← All companies ← NAMSW Manual NATL → ← MCD Restaurants PLAY →
NATH, Nathan's Famous Inc.
We are a leading branded licensor, wholesaler and retailer of products marketed under our Nathan's Famous brand, including our popular Nathan's World Famous Beef Hot Dogs.
What began as a nickel hot dog stand on Coney Island in 1916 has evolved into a highly recognized brand throughout the United States and the world.
Our innovative business model seeks to maximize the points of distribution for and the consumption of Nathan's World Famous Beef Hot Dogs, crinkle-cut French fries and our other products across a wide-range of grocery retail and foodservice formats.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What it is
- Revenue is led by Branded Products (65%) and License (23%), with 4 more lines behind.
- What moves the needle
- Gross margin has run about 43% and operating margin about 26% through the cycle, a solid spread between what it charges and what the product costs to make. Read this kind of business on same-store sales and unit economics. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 10-K →Branded Products is 65% of revenue, with License the other meaningful line at 23%.
- Branded Products65%$106M
- License23%$37M
- Company-operated Restaurants8%$13M
- Franchise Fees and Royalties3%$4M
- Franchise Royalties2%$4M
- Advertising Fund Revenue1%$2M
- Franchise0%$420K
From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2017–2026
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | 2026’26 | TTMTTMMar 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $96M | $104M | $102M | $103M | $76M | $115M | $131M | $139M | $148M | $162M | $162M | RevenueRevenue |
| 46% | 44% | 48% | 47% | 57% | 43% | 43% | 40% | 39% | 34% | 34% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| 14% | 13% | 14% | 14% | 16% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 10% | 11% | 11% | SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev |
| $26M | $27M | $28M | $27M | $26M | $30M | $34M | $33M | $36M | $30M | $30M | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 27.3% | 26.0% | 27.5% | 26.3% | 33.6% | 26.0% | 26.3% | 23.5% | 24.6% | 18.6% | 18.6% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| $7M | $3M | $21M | $13M | $11M | $14M | $20M | $20M | $24M | $20M | $20M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| 37% | 36% | 27% | 25% | 28% | 27% | 27% | 29% | 27% | 29% | 29% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| $10M | $19M | $11M | $12M | $12M | $16M | $20M | $20M | $25M | $18M | $18M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $1M | $1M | $1M | $1M | $1M | $1M | $1M | $1M | $957K | $925K | $925K | DepreciationDeprec. |
| $1M | $14M | ($12M) | ($2M) | ($608K) | $2M | ($1M) | ($1M) | ($736K) | ($4M) | ($4M) | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $1M | $563K | $447K | $870K | $551K | $636K | $626K | $313K | $225K | $370K | $370K | CapexCapex |
| 1.2% | 0.5% | 0.4% | 0.8% | 0.7% | 0.6% | 0.5% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $9M | $18M | $11M | $11M | $11M | $16M | $19M | $20M | $25M | $18M | $18M | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 9.6% | 17.6% | 10.5% | 11.1% | 14.8% | 13.8% | 14.7% | 14.2% | 16.9% | 11.0% | 11.0% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| $9M | $18M | $11M | $11M | $11M | $16M | $19M | $20M | $25M | $18M | $18M | Free cash flowFCF |
| 9.6% | 17.6% | 10.5% | 11.1% | 14.8% | 13.8% | 14.7% | 14.2% | 16.9% | 11.0% | 11.0% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| $375K | $21M | — | $6M | — | $6M | $8M | — | — | — | $8M | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| $1M | — | $1M | $5M | $2M | $0 | $2M | $0 | — | — | — | BuybacksBuybacks |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $57M | $57M | $75M | $77M | $81M | $50M | $30M | $21M | $28M | $24M | $24M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| $579K | $384K | $535K | $378K | $624K | $522K | $539K | $842K | $1M | $891K | $891K | InventoryInvent. |
| $5M | $7M | $5M | $4M | $4M | $6M | $6M | $6M | $6M | $8M | $8M | Accounts payablePayables |
| ($4M) | ($6M) | ($5M) | ($3M) | ($3M) | ($6M) | ($6M) | ($5M) | ($5M) | ($7M) | ($7M) | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| $68M | $72M | $87M | $90M | $95M | $65M | $47M | $39M | $45M | $47M | $47M | Current assetsCur. assets |
| $11M | $18M | $15M | $15M | $15M | $16M | $17M | $16M | $17M | $19M | $19M | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 6.3× | 4.0× | 5.8× | 6.1× | 6.5× | 4.0× | 2.8× | 2.5× | 2.7× | 2.5× | 2.5× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| $95K | $95K | $95K | $95K | $95K | $95K | $95K | $95K | $95K | $95K | $95K | GoodwillGoodwill |
| $78M | $80M | $94M | $105M | $109M | $79M | $59M | $49M | $53M | $54M | $54M | Total assetsAssets |
| $131M | $145M | $145M | $146M | $147M | $108M | $79M | $60M | $50M | $48M | $48M | Total debtDebt |
| $75M | $87M | $70M | $69M | $66M | $58M | $49M | $39M | $23M | $24M | $24M | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6.1× | 8.9× | 10.5× | 10.5× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| ($66M) | ($85M) | ($70M) | ($66M) | ($62M) | ($55M) | ($45M) | ($33M) | ($17M) | ($14M) | ($14M) | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| 0.6% | 0.4% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.5% | 0.7% | 0.7% | 0.7% | Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 4.2M | 4.2M | 4.2M | 4.2M | 4.1M | 4.1M | 4.1M | 4.1M | 4.1M | 4.1M | 4.1M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $22.89 | $24.69 | $24.13 | $24.51 | $18.43 | $27.92 | $31.98 | $33.91 | $36.19 | $39.30 | $39.30 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $1.78 | $0.62 | $5.09 | $3.19 | $2.69 | $3.30 | $4.80 | $4.80 | $5.87 | $4.85 | $4.85 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $2.21 | $4.34 | $2.54 | $2.72 | $2.72 | $3.85 | $4.70 | $4.82 | $6.11 | $4.33 | $4.33 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $2.21 | $4.34 | $2.54 | $2.72 | $2.72 | $3.85 | $4.70 | $4.82 | $6.11 | $4.33 | $4.33 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $0.09 | $4.99 | — | $1.40 | — | $1.50 | $1.85 | — | — | — | $1.83 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| $0.27 | $0.13 | $0.11 | $0.21 | $0.13 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $0.08 | $0.05 | $0.09 | $0.09 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $-15.81 | $-20.04 | $-16.62 | $-15.75 | $-15.18 | $-13.36 | $-10.90 | $-8.06 | $-4.03 | $-3.45 | $-3.45 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +6.2%/yr | +16.4%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | +7.8%/yr | +9.7%/yr |
| EPS | +11.8%/yr | +12.5%/yr |
| Dividends / share | +65.8%/yr (6-yr) | −18.0%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | −11.5%/yr | −7.7%/yr |
The year, in the company's words
the filing →Verbatim from the 10-K's management discussion. Each sentence is shown only because its subject, direction check out against the filed numbers on this page. The words are the company's; the arithmetic is the record's.
- Franchise+10.2%
“Franchise restaurant sales increased to $70,117,000 in the fiscal 2026 period as compared to $66,905,000 in the fiscal 2025 period principally due to higher sales at travel plazas and airports, offset by lower sales at casino locations primarily in Las Vegas, Nevada.”
✓ direction matches the filed record
The record, charted
FY2017–2026Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedEach year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2026 the business reported $20M of profit but $18M of owner earnings: $2M less than the profit line, taken out by capital spending and the timing of cash.
| FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | $20M | $24M | $20M | $20M | $14M |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$925K | +$957K | +$1M | +$1M | +$1M |
| Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost | +$1M | +$993K | +$733K | +$258K | +$74K |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | −$4M | −$736K | −$1M | −$1M | +$2M |
| Cash from operations | $18M | $25M | $20M | $20M | $16M |
| Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow | −$370K | −$225K | −$313K | −$626K | −$636K |
| Owner earnings | $18M | $25M | $20M | $19M | $16M |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 11% | 17% | 14% | 15% | 14% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position . The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $1M), owner earnings is nearer $17M.
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- Can it pay its interest? 10.5×ComfortableOperating income $30M ÷ interest expense $3M
What this means
Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient, it says solvent, not cheap.
- How heavy is the debt, net of cash? $24M · 0.8× operating profitModest net debtCash $24M − debt $48M
What this means
Netting $24M of cash and short-term investments against $48M of debt leaves $24M owed, about 0.8× a year's operating profit (1.6× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
Is it a good business?
- Not enough dataIndustry peers: median 1%
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
- Solid through the cycle10-yr median margin, range 10%–18%; latest $18M = operating cash $18M − maintenance capex $370KIndustry peers: median 5%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 11% of revenue this year, a 14% median across 10 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $1M of SBC) leaves $17M.
- Mostly cash-backedCash from ops $18M ÷ net income $20M
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Returns about halfDividends + buybacks $8M ÷ Owner Earnings $18M
What this means
Of $18M Owner Earnings, $8M (42%) went back to shareholders, $8M dividends, $0 buybacks. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.
- Investing or harvesting? 0.40×HarvestingCapex $370K ÷ depreciation $925K
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 3 of 6 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size MissRevenue ≥ $2B · $162M
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity PassCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 2.49×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt MissDebt ≤ working capital · $48M vs $28M WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability PassA profit every year (10-yr record) · no losses
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record MissUninterrupted dividends · 5 of 8 tagged yrs
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design. 2 years of this record are untagged in the data, with the dividend paid on both sides; a lone missing tag is treated as unknown, not a suspension, so the streak is judged on the tagged years.
- Earnings growth PassEarnings +33% over the record · +101%
What this means
At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $5.18/share (latest year $4.89), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $-3.47/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2017–2026
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 10 of 10
What this means
Never lost money over the record, the earnings stability Graham insisted on.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 9 of 9 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin 27% → 22% (3-yr avg ends)
In the filing’s words The filing attributes gains to higher prices, but the margin in the record has not followed — the claim outruns the result here.
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about 27% early to 22% lately, median 26% — competition or costs are biting in.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC —
What this means
The reinvested base moved too little against the change in profit to read a reliable return on it here — the figure would be a small-denominator artifact, not a moat. Judge this one on the owner-earnings record and the cash it returns instead.
- Owner earnings growth +5%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings grew about 5% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2026 · 18.6% op. margin
What this means
Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.
- Share count −0.2%/yr
What this means
Roughly flat share count, little dilution, little buyback.
- Dividend record rising
What this means
Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Moderate contestabilityAI is likely to reshape costs and some products here without clearly contesting or sparing the core moat; how the company itself frames it is the tell.
The filing raises AI among its risks, but in other terms (security, regulation, energy or the like), not as a competitor to its product.
The question is whether a moat the record shows as durable outlasts a technology that lowers the cost of part of what the firm sells. The durability is read in the record above, the filing's own framing of AI beside it; the industry label decides nothing on its own.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of fiscal year-end, Mar 29, 2026Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$24M
- Inventory$891K
- Other current assets$22M
- Debt due within a year$2M
- Accounts payable$8M
- Other current liabilities$9M
From the company's latest filing.
How the cash was used, 2017–2026
Over the record, the business generated $164M of operating cash; how management split it reads as a deleverager, a meaningful share of cash went to paying down debt.
- Reinvested$6M · 3%
- Dividends$41M · 25%
- Buybacks$11M · 6%
- Retained (debt / cash)$107M · 65%
- Returned to owners$52M
33% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $41M as dividends and $11M as buybacks.
- Source of fundingOperating cash
Operating cash covered reinvestment and returns; over the span debt fell $83M and cash and short-term investments fell $33M.
- Average price paid for buybacks$50.48
Across the years where the filing reports a share count, 0M shares were bought for $2M, about $50.48 each.
- Net change in share count−1.9%
The diluted count fell from 4M to 4M, so the buybacks outran the stock issued to staff.
- Dividend record$1.85/sh
Paid in 5 of the years on record, the per-share dividend growing about 113% a year. It was cut at least once along the way.
- Return on what it retained8%
Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out ($101M over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) grew $8M, so each retained $1 added about 0.08 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.
| Fiscal year | Chief executive | Pay, as filed | “Actually paid” | Owner earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Eric Gatoff | $1.8M | $1.8M | $19M |
| 2024 | Eric Gatoff | $1.4M | $1.4M | $20M |
| 2025 | Eric Gatoff | $1.7M | $1.7M | $25M |
Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.
- Insider ownership30.7%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2025 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
- Stock-based compensation$1M
The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 1% of revenue, equal to 4% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why Nathan's Famous Inc. is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2017–2026.
None of the 6 tests turned up a mark; each came back clean. A clean panel says only that these particular ways of being wrong are not written into the record.
- Is it less profitable than it was?
- Did the share count rise anyway?
- Did debt outgrow the business?
- Did reported profit become cash?
- Did receivables and inventory outpace sales?
- Are "one-time" charges a yearly habit?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
Peers, Restaurants
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WINGWingstop | $697M | 80% | 25.6% | 48% | 19% |
| SGSweetgreen Inc. | $679M | — | -30.2% | -43% | -16% |
| LOCOEl Pollo Loco Holdings Inc. | $490M | — | 8.5% | 8% | 6% |
| CNNECannae Holdings Inc. | $424M | 15% | -19.4% | -5% | -14% |
| BHBiglari Holdings Inc. | $395M | 57% | 5.8% | 3% | 16% |
| KRUSKura Sushi USA Inc. | $283M | — | -1.1% | -2% | 5% |
| BRCBBlack Rock Coffee Bar Inc. | $200M | — | 1.5% | 1% | -3% |
| NATHNathan's Famous Inc. | $162M | 43% | 26.2% | — | 14% |
| Group median | — | 50% | 3.7% | — | 6% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFType today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Nathan's Famous Inc. has delivered.
Through the cycle, Nathan's Famous Inc. earns about $23M on its 14.0% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 11.0% margin runs below that; the reported figure may understate a lean year. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings $18M on 4M shares outstanding, per the 10-K cover, as of 2026-06-05; net debt $24M. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← NAMSW its page in the Manual NATL →
Industry order: ← MCD the Restaurants chapter PLAY →