Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← ODC Manual ODYS → ← NCEW Trucking & Logistics OMAB →

ODFL, Old Dominion Freight Line Inc.

Trucking & Logistics capital-intensive

We provide regional, inter-regional and national LTL services through a single integrated, union-free organization.

Our service offerings, which include expedited transportation, are provided through an expansive network of service centers located throughout the continental United States.

Through strategic alliances, we also provide LTL services throughout North America.

Latest annual: FY2025 10-K
ODFL · Old Dominion Freight Line Inc.
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$5.5B
−5.5% YoY · 6% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 5-yr average
Revenue $5.5B 5-yr avg $5.7B
Operating margin 24.6% 5-yr avg 27.0%
ROIC 23% 5-yr avg 31%
Owner-earnings margin 19% 5-yr avg 20%
Free cash flow margin 19% 5-yr avg 15%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What moves the needle
Operating margin has run about 23% through the cycle, a solid margin the cost base and competition set as much as the price does. Capital spending runs about 12% of sales, well above depreciation, so the return earned on what it sinks into that plant weighs as much as the margin. Read this kind of business on volume, density and yield. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Return on capital has run high across the record (median 24%, above 15% in 10 of 10 years). Owner earnings agree: roughly 18% of revenue reaches owners as cash, consistently. Whether these returns reflect real pricing power or an accounting artifact is the judgment the 10-K is for.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2016–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2016’162017’172018’182019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMMar 2026
Income statement
$3.0B$3.4B$4.0B$4.1B$4.0B$5.3B$6.3B$5.9B$5.8B$5.5B$5.5BRevenueRevenue
$484M$576M$817M$819M$907M$1.4B$1.8B$1.6B$1.5B$1.4B$1.3BOperating incomeOp. inc.
16.2%17.1%20.2%19.9%22.6%26.5%29.4%28.0%26.6%24.8%24.6%Operating marginOp. mgn
$296M$464M$606M$616M$673M$1.0B$1.4B$1.2B$1.2B$1.0B$1.0BNet incomeNet inc.
38%19%26%25%25%26%25%25%24%25%25%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
$566M$536M$900M$984M$933M$1.2B$1.7B$1.6B$1.7B$1.4B$1.4BOperating cash flowOp. cash
$190M$206M$230M$254M$261M$260M$276M$324M$345M$365M$368MDepreciationDeprec.
$79M($136M)$59M$98M($12M)($97M)$22M($6M)$117M($31M)$19MWorking capital & otherWC & other
$418M$382M$588M$479M$225M$550M$775M$757M$771M$415M$389MCapexCapex
14.0%11.4%14.5%11.7%5.6%10.5%12.4%12.9%13.3%7.6%7.1%Capex / revenueCapex/rev
$376M$331M$670M$730M$708M$953M$1.4B$1.2B$1.3B$955M$1.0BOwner earningsOwner earn.
12.6%9.8%16.6%17.8%17.6%18.1%22.6%21.2%22.6%17.4%18.7%Owner earnings marginOE mgn
$148M$154M$312M$505M$708M$663M$916M$812M$888M$955M$1.0BFree cash flowFCF
4.9%4.6%7.7%12.3%17.6%12.6%14.6%13.8%15.3%17.4%18.7%Free cash flow marginFCF mgn
$33M$43M$55M$71M$92M$134M$175M$224M$236M$237MDividends paidDiv. paid
$130M$8M$163M$241M$364M$536M$1.3B$454M$967M$730MBuybacksBuybacks
15%21%24%22%22%31%39%32%28%24%23%ROICROIC
16%20%23%20%20%28%38%29%28%24%23%Return on equityROE
19%21%18%18%26%34%25%23%18%18%Retained to equityRetained/eq
Balance sheet
$10M$127M$190M$404M$732M$717M$236M$434M$109M$120M$288MCash & investmentsCash+inv
$320M$394M$428M$398M$445M$567M$579M$579M$502M$472M$542MReceivablesReceiv.
$89M$74M$79M$70M$69M$83M$106M$113M$92M$63M$94MAccounts payablePayables
$231M$320M$349M$327M$376M$485M$472M$466M$410M$409M$448MOperating working capitalOper. WC
$383M$585M$706M$867M$1.2B$1.4B$934M$1.1B$721M$695M$926MCurrent assetsCur. assets
$289M$351M$357M$366M$373M$464M$530M$545M$541M$484M$592MCurrent liabilitiesCur. liab.
1.3×1.7×2.0×2.4×3.3×3.0×1.8×2.1×1.3×1.4×1.6×Current ratioCurr. ratio
$19M$19M$19M$19M$19MGoodwillGoodwill
$2.7B$3.1B$3.5B$4.0B$4.4B$4.8B$4.8B$5.5B$5.5B$5.5B$5.7BTotal assetsAssets
$105M$95M$45M$45M$100M$100M$100M$80M$60M$40M$263MTotal debtDebt
$95M($32M)($145M)($359M)($632M)($617M)($136M)($354M)($49M)($80M)($25M)Net debt / (cash)Net debt
111.7×267.4×4323.0×2171.6×326.0×805.8×1177.6×3535.9×7283.0×4598.1×2260.3×Interest coverageInt. cov.
$1.9B$2.3B$2.7B$3.1B$3.3B$3.7B$3.7B$4.3B$4.2B$4.3B$4.4BShareholders’ equityEquity
0.0%0.1%0.1%0.4%0.3%0.3%0.3%0.2%0.2%0.2%0.2%Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev
Per share
249M247M246M241M237M233M226M220M216M212M209MShares out (diluted)Shares
$11.99$13.58$16.43$17.03$16.94$22.58$27.68$26.64$26.86$25.98$26.07Revenue / shareRev/sh
$1.19$1.88$2.46$2.55$2.84$4.44$6.09$5.63$5.48$4.84$4.81EPS (diluted)EPS
$1.51$1.34$2.72$3.03$2.99$4.09$6.26$5.65$6.07$4.51$4.86Owner earnings / shareOE/sh
$0.59$0.62$1.27$2.09$2.99$2.85$4.05$3.69$4.10$4.51$4.86Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh
$0.13$0.17$0.23$0.30$0.40$0.59$0.80$1.03$1.11$1.13Dividends / shareDiv/sh
$1.68$1.55$2.39$1.99$0.95$2.36$3.43$3.44$3.56$1.96$1.86Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh
$7.42$9.21$10.89$12.77$14.04$15.81$16.15$19.34$19.61$20.37$21.02Book value / shareBVPS

Share counts before 2018 are restated ×1.5 for a stock split, so per-share figures sit on one basis.

Share counts before 2022 are restated ×2 for a stock split, so per-share figures sit on one basis.

Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
9-yr5-yr
Revenue / share+9.0%/yr+8.9%/yr
Owner earnings / share+13.0%/yr+8.6%/yr
EPS+16.9%/yr+11.3%/yr
Dividends / share+30.4%/yr (8-yr)+30.0%/yr
Capital spending / share+1.8%/yr+15.6%/yr
Book value / share+11.9%/yr+7.7%/yr

The year, in the company's words

the filing →

Verbatim from the 10-K's management discussion. Each sentence is shown only because its subject, direction, and stated figures check out against the filed numbers on this page. The words are the company's; the arithmetic is the record's.

  • Revenue-5.5%
    “Revenue Revenue decreased $318.4 million, or 5.5%, in 2025 compared to 2024 due to a decrease in volumes that was partially offset by an increase in LTL revenue per hundredweight.”
    ✓ figure matches the filed record

The record, charted

FY2016–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked. Share counts on the current split basis.

Share count
212Mpeak FY2016
ROIC
24%low FY2016

Owner earnings vs. net income

Owner earningsNet income

The accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.

$955Mowner earningsvs.$1.0Bnet incomelow FY2017

Where the cash went

ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetained

Each year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.

FY2016FY2025

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2025 the business reported $1.0B of profit but $955M of owner earnings: $69M less than the profit line, taken out by capital spending and the timing of cash.

Reported net income$1.0B
Owner earnings$955M · 17% of revenue
FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Reported net income$1.0B$1.2B$1.2B$1.4B$1.0B
Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back+$365M+$345M+$324M+$276M+$260M
Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost+$13M+$11M+$11M+$16M+$15M
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items−$31M+$117M−$6M+$22M−$97M
Cash from operations$1.4B$1.7B$1.6B$1.7B$1.2B
Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume−$415M−$345M−$324M−$276M−$260M
Owner earnings$955M$1.3B$1.2B$1.4B$953M
Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still−$427M−$433M−$499M−$290M
Free cash flow$955M$888M$812M$916M$663M
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue17%23%21%23%18%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position . The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $13M), owner earnings is nearer $942M.

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 10-K · source on SEC EDGAR →

Will it survive?

  • Comfortable
    Operating income $1.4B ÷ interest expense $296K
    What this means

    Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient, it says solvent, not cheap.

  • How heavy is the debt, net of cash? $143M · 0.1× operating profit
    Modest net debt
    Cash $120M − debt $263M
    What this means

    Netting $120M of cash and short-term investments against $263M of debt leaves $143M owed, about 0.1× a year's operating profit (0.2× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.

  • Not enough data
    What this means

    The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

Is it a good business?

  • High through the cycle
    10-yr median, range 15%–39%; 23% latest = NOPAT $1.0B ÷ invested capital $4.5B
    Industry peers: median 12%
    What this means

    The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 10 years (it ran 23% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.

  • High through the cycle
    10-yr median margin, range 10%–23%; latest $955M = operating cash $1.4B − maintenance capex $415M
    Industry peers: median 5%
    What this means

    What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 17% of revenue this year, a 18% median across 10 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $13M of SBC) leaves $942M.

  • Cash-backed
    Cash from ops $1.4B ÷ net income $1.0B
    What this means

    How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.

How is the cash used?

  • Returned more than it generated
    Dividends + buybacks $966M ÷ Owner Earnings $955M
    What this means

    The company returned more than it generated: against $955M of Owner Earnings, $966M (101%) went back to shareholders, $236M dividends, $730M buybacks — the excess came from the balance sheet or borrowing, not the year's operations. Net of $13M stock comp, the real buyback was about $717M. Sustained, that pattern draws down cash or adds debt; the net-debt line above shows where it stands.

  • Investing or harvesting? 1.14×
    Maintaining
    Capex $415M ÷ depreciation $365M
    What this means

    Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.

Graham’s defensive tests · 3 of 6 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size Pass
    Revenue ≥ $2B · $5.5B
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.

  • Strong liquidity Miss
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 1.44×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Conservative debt Near
    Debt ≤ working capital · $263M vs $211M WC
    What this means

    Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.

  • Earnings stability Pass
    A profit every year (10-yr record) · no losses
    What this means

    Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.

  • Dividend record Near
    Uninterrupted dividends · 9 of 10 yrs
    What this means

    An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.

  • Earnings growth Pass
    Earnings +33% over the record · +153%
    What this means

    At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $5.53/share (latest year $4.92), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $20.73/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Durability & moat, 2016–2025

Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.

  • Profitable years 10 of 10
    What this means

    Never lost money over the record, the earnings stability Graham insisted on.

  • Return on capital ≥ 15% 10 of 10 yrs
    What this means

    A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.

  • Operating margin 18% → 26% (3-yr avg ends)

    In the filing’s words The record and the words agree: the margin widened and the filing attributes the gain to its own pricing, not volume alone.

    What this means

    Through the cycle the operating margin widened — about 18% early to 26% lately, median 23% — pricing power intact or improving.

  • Reinvestment, incremental ROIC 37%
    What this means

    Every extra dollar the business reinvested came back at a high incremental return — the lens GBM read for a moat that reinvests rather than merely harvests. The record and the 10-K are where you check whether the rate holds.

  • Owner earnings growth +14%/yr
    What this means

    Owner earnings grew about 14% a year over the record.

  • Worst year 2016 · 16.2% op. margin
    What this means

    Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.

  • Dividend record rising
    What this means

    Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Low contestability

The moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.

In its own filing A competitive risk, new this year

Its FY2025 10-K names artificial intelligence as a competitive threat, in language that was not in the prior year's filing.

“The rapid evolution of AI, including potential government regulation of AI, will require significant resources to develop, test, implement and maintain our AI solutions to minimize unintended harmful impacts. 13 Our competitors may implement new technology, including AI applications, that could improve their service, p…”

AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat, and the company is using it that way.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Current Position

as of the latest quarter, Mar 31, 2026

Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.

Current assets$926M
  • Cash & short-term investments$288M
  • Receivables$542M
  • Other current assets$96M
Current liabilities$592M
  • Debt due within a year$20M
  • Accounts payable$94M
  • Other current liabilities$478M
Current ratio1.57×all current assets ÷ what's due · Graham looked for 2×
Quick ratio1.57×stricter: inventory excluded
Cash ratio0.49×strictest: cash alone against what's due
Working capital$335Mthe cushion left after near-term bills
Debt due this year vs. cash$20M due · $288M cash covered by cash on hand, no refinancing forced · both figures from the Mar 31, 2026 balance sheet
Revenue, latest quarter vs. a year ago−2.9%the freshest read on whether the business is still growing
Current ratio, recent quarters1.5× → 1.6×
Deeper floors
Tangible book value$4.4Bequity stripped of goodwill & intangibles
Net current asset value($331M)Graham's net-net: current assets less all liabilities
Debt incl. operating leases$141M$101M of it operating leases

From the company's latest filing.

How the cash was used, 2016–2025

Over the record, the business generated $11.4B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a balanced allocator, splitting cash between the business, owners, and the balance sheet.

  • Reinvested$5.4B · 47%
  • Dividends$1.1B · 9%
  • Buybacks$4.9B · 43%
  • Retained (debt / cash)$126M · 1%
  • Returned to owners$5.9B

    68% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $1.1B as dividends and $4.9B as buybacks.

  • Average price paid for buybacks

    Buybacks ran $4.9B over the span, but the filings don't tag the share count needed to deduce the average price paid.

  • Net change in share count−16.1%

    The diluted count fell from 249M to 209M, so the buybacks outran the stock issued to staff.

  • Dividend record$1.11/sh

    Paid in 9 of the years on record, the per-share dividend growing about 30% a year. It was never cut over the span.

  • Return on what it retained28%

    Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out ($2.6B over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) grew $713M, so each retained $1 added about 0.28 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.

Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.

Management, ownership & pay

read the proxy →

From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.

Fiscal yearPay, as filed“Actually paid”Owner earnings
2021$10.6M$16.4M$953M
2022$12.8M$10.5M$1.4B
2023$11.3M$7.7M$1.2B
2023$9.5M$10.5M$1.2B
2024$12.6M$11.3M$1.3B
2025$11.6M$10.6M$955M

Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.

  • Insider ownership8.2%

    The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.

  • Stock-based compensation$13M

    The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 0% of revenue, equal to 1% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.

Inverting the record

Invert: instead of why Old Dominion Freight Line Inc. is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.

None of the 5 tests turned up a mark; each came back clean. A clean panel says only that these particular ways of being wrong are not written into the record.

Each test came back clean
  • Is it less profitable than it was?
  • Did the share count rise anyway?
  • Did debt outgrow the business?
  • Did reported profit become cash?
  • Did receivables and inventory outpace sales?

Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.

What an owner would ask, FY2025

read the 10-K →
  • Which reported numbers are a judgment call?
    Management names Revenue recognition as critical estimates

    each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →

The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.

Peers, Trucking & Logistics

The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueGross marginOp. marginROICOwner earn. margin
JBHTJ.B. Hunt$12.0B8.0%16%7%
KNXKnight-swift Transportation Holdings Inc.$7.5B9.7%6%8%
SNDRSchneider National$5.7B62%6.3%12%5%
ODFLOld Dominion Freight Line Inc.$5.5B23.7%24%18%
LSTRLandstar$4.7B6.9%48%5%
ARCBArcBest$4.0B3.4%10%4%
SAIASaia, Inc.$3.2B10.4%14%10%
WERNWerner Enterprises$2.9B8.0%12%5%
Group median8.0%13%6%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Old Dominion Freight Line Inc. has delivered.

$

Through the cycle, Old Dominion Freight Line Inc. earns about $973M on its 17.7% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 17.4% margin runs in line with that. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.

Base

The assumptions

9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.

Enter a price above to run it.

Implied by the price
Owner-earnings growth · ’21→’25−1%/yr
Owner-earnings growth · ’16→’25+22%/yr
Owner-earnings yield
P/E (3-yr earnings ’23–’25)
P/B
Graham’s price gate

Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.

Against a high-grade bond: Graham’s yardstick bond yield%

Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.

Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.

Owner earnings $1.0B on 208M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-05-01; net cash $25M. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Old Dominion Freight Line Inc. (ODFL), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/ODFL, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← ODC its page in the Manual ODYS →

Industry order: ← NCEW the Trucking & Logistics chapter OMAB →