Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← QUAD Manual QUCY → ← QTWO Software QXL →

QUBT, Quantum Computing Inc.

Software asset-light UnprofitableCapital build-outNet current asset value

Our Entropy Quantum Computer, is a quantum application of our Core Photonics Technology, designed to solve complex optimization problems.

Optimization deals with finding the best solution to a problem according to a defined criteria from a set of possible solutions.

Solving large-scale optimization problems requires complex calculations that cannot currently be performed in a reasonable amount of time using classical computing systems for problem sizes relevant to many industrial and real-world applications.

Latest annual: FY2025 10-K
QUBT · Quantum Computing Inc.
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$682K
+82.8% YoY · 71% 3-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM
Cash & investments $986M
Cash burn · annual $35M
Runway 10+ yrs
Gross margin −15%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What it is
Revenue is Services (54%) and Products (46%).
Situation
Unprofitable. No meaningful revenue yet; the record is the cash on hand against the burn. Capital build-out. Capital spending has surged to 981% of sales, today's earnings are charged less depreciation than tomorrow's will be. Net current asset value. Current assets alone exceed every liability combined, and the surplus is most of the balance sheet: the shape Graham called a net-net.
What moves the needle
Operating margin has run around −7489% through the cycle on a 30% gross margin, the operating line deeply negative — so the lever is the path to a margin at all: revenue growth against the cost curve and the cash runway, not the level of a margin that isn't there yet. Stock-based pay runs about 1270% of sales, a real and recurring claim on owners that the GAAP margin understates. Read this kind of business on retention and the cost of growth. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Return on capital has rarely cleared the cost of capital (median −32%, above 15% in 0 of 4 years). Owner earnings, the cash-based check, have been thin too. This is price-taker territory, where the balance sheet and the cycle matter more than any multiple; the rest is in the 10-K.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

Where the money comes from

read the 10-K →

Revenue spreads across 2 lines, the largest Services at 54%.

Revenue by product line, FY2025
  • Services54%$368K
  • Products46%$314K
By geographyUnited States87%Europe10%Asia4%

From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2022–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMMar 2026
Income statement
$136K$358K$373K$682K$4MRevenueRevenue
55%45%30%10%−15%Gross marginGross mgn
n/mn/mn/mn/m781%SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev
n/mn/mn/mn/m564%R&D / revenueR&D/rev
($29M)($26M)($26M)($51M)($63M)Operating incomeOp. inc.
n/mn/mn/mn/mn/mOperating marginOp. mgn
($26M)($27M)($69M)($19M)($40M)Net incomeNet inc.
Cash flow & returns
($15M)($18M)($16M)($30M)($35M)Operating cash flowOp. cash
$2M$3M$4M$4M$5MDepreciationDeprec.
($586K)$1M$43M($25M)($9M)Working capital & otherWC & other
$870K$2M$6M$7M$7MCapexCapex
639.7%589.9%n/m980.9%156.4%Capex / revenueCapex/rev
($16M)($20M)($20M)($35M)($41M)Owner earningsOwner earn.
n/mn/mn/mn/m−938.8%Owner earnings marginOE mgn
($16M)($20M)($22M)($37M)($42M)Free cash flowFCF
n/mn/mn/mn/m−970.6%Free cash flow marginFCF mgn
$1M$82M$82MAcquisitionsAcquis.
$787K$865K$215K$215KDividends paidDiv. paid
-33%-30%-72%-5%-4%ROICROIC
-40%-39%-64%-1%-2%Return on equityROE
−41%−41%−64%−2%Retained to equityRetained/eq
Balance sheet
$5M$2M$79M$1.1B$986MCash & investmentsCash+inv
$13K$65K$27K$519K$4MReceivablesReceiv.
$73K$18K$352K$4MInventoryInvent.
$872K$1M$1M$778K$3MAccounts payablePayables
($859K)($1M)($1M)$93K$6MOperating working capitalOper. WC
$5M$3M$79M$1.1B$1.0BCurrent assetsCur. assets
$5M$5M$5M$11M$15MCurrent liabilitiesCur. liab.
1.2×0.6×17.4×102.4×66.7×Current ratioCurr. ratio
$56M$56M$56M$56M$147MGoodwillGoodwill
$79M$74M$154M$1.6B$1.6BTotal assetsAssets
$8M$2M$10MTotal debtDebt
$3M($134K)($976M)Net debt / (cash)Net debt
-37.1×-16.4×-10.4×-785.8×-355.8×Interest coverageInt. cov.
$65M$69M$107M$1.6B$1.6BShareholders’ equityEquity
n/mn/mn/mn/m196.5%Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev
$8M$8MGoodwill written downGW imp.
Per share
73.4M66.6M93.9M164M224MShares out (diluted)Shares
$0.00$0.01$0.00$0.00$0.02Revenue / shareRev/sh
$-0.35$-0.41$-0.73$-0.11$-0.18EPS (diluted)EPS
$-0.22$-0.31$-0.21$-0.21$-0.18Owner earnings / shareOE/sh
$-0.22$-0.31$-0.24$-0.22$-0.19Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh
$0.01$0.01$0.00$0.00Dividends / shareDiv/sh
$0.01$0.03$0.06$0.04$0.03Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh
$0.89$1.03$1.14$9.72$7.13Book value / shareBVPS

Share counts before 2023 are restated ×2 for a stock split, so per-share figures sit on one basis.

The diluted share count moved ×1.41 into 2024 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.

The diluted share count moved ×1.75 into 2025 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.

Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
3-yr5-yr
Revenue / share+30.8%/yr+30.8%/yr (3-yr)
Dividends / share−53.8%/yr (2-yr)−53.8%/yr (2-yr)
Capital spending / share+50.8%/yr+50.8%/yr (3-yr)
Book value / share+122.0%/yr+122.0%/yr (3-yr)

The record, charted

FY2022–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked. Share counts on the current split basis.

Share count
164Mpeak FY2025
ROIC
−5%low FY2024
Gross margin
10%low FY2025

Owner earnings vs. net income

Owner earningsNet income

The accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.

($35M)owner earningsvs.($19M)net incomelow FY2025

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2025 the business earned ($35M) of owner earnings, the operating cash left after the $4M it takes just to hold its position. It put $2M more into growth; free cash flow, after that spending, was ($37M).

FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Reported net income($19M)($69M)($27M)($26M)
Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back+$4M+$4M+$3M+$2M
Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost+$9M+$6M+$4M+$9M
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items−$25M+$43M+$1M−$586K
Cash from operations($30M)($16M)($18M)($15M)
Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume−$4M−$4M−$2M−$870K
Owner earnings($35M)($20M)($20M)($16M)
Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still−$2M−$2M
Free cash flow($37M)($22M)($20M)($16M)
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue-5088%-5365%-5706%-11947%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position (here about $4M, roughly its depreciation, the rate its assets wear out). The other $2M of its capital spending is growth it chose, not upkeep it owed; charged only with the maintenance it must do, the business earns well more than the year's free cash flow shows. The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $9M), owner earnings is nearer ($43M).

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 10-K · source on SEC EDGAR →
Material weakness in financial controls
“We have identified material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024 and 2023.”

The figures below are only as sound as the controls that produced them. read the note →

Will it survive?

  • Does not cover its interest
    Operating income ($51M) ÷ interest expense $65K
    What this means

    A full year of operating profit didn't cover the interest bill. This is the zombie zone: the business depends on refinancing, asset sales, or forbearance to service its debt.

  • Net cash
    Cash $738M + ST investments $379M − debt $10M
    What this means

    Cash and short-term investments exceed every dollar of debt by $1.1B, on net the company owes nothing, and can act from strength when others can't. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.

  • Tight
    DSO 278 + DIO 209 − DPO 462 days
    What this means

    Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.

Is it a good business?

  • Below average through the cycle
    4-yr median, range -72%–-5%; -5% latest = NOPAT ($40M) ÷ invested capital $870M
    Industry peers: median -37%
    What this means

    The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 4 years (it ran -5% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.

  • Consumes cash through the cycle
    4-yr median margin, range -11947%–-5088%; latest ($35M) = operating cash ($30M) − maintenance capex $4M
    Industry peers: median -612%
    What this means

    What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's -5088% of revenue this year, a -5706% median across 4 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $9M of SBC) leaves ($43M).

  • Loss, and burning cash
    Net income ($19M) · cash from operations ($30M)

    In the filing’s words The filing discloses a material weakness in its financial controls — the reported numbers here, and the record built on them, are only as reliable as the controls that produced them.

    What this means

    The company reported a net loss, so a conversion ratio isn't meaningful. What matters then is whether operations still threw off cash, here, they did not.

How is the cash used?

  • No surplus to allocate
    What this means

    The business didn't generate positive Owner Earnings this year, so any distributions came from the balance sheet or borrowing, not from operations.

  • Investing or harvesting? 1.52×
    Expanding
    Capex $7M ÷ depreciation $4M
    What this means

    Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.

Graham’s defensive tests · 2 of 3 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size Miss
    Revenue ≥ $2B · $682K
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.

  • Strong liquidity Pass
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 102.38×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Conservative debt Pass
    Debt ≤ working capital · $10M vs $1.1B WC
    What this means

    Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $-0.17/share (latest year $-0.08), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $7.09/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Durability & moat, 2022–2025

Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.

  • Profitable years 0 of 4
    What this means

    Lost money in 4 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.

  • Operating margin −14196% → −7221% (2-yr avg ends)
    What this means

    Through the cycle the operating margin widened — about −14196% early to −7221% lately, median −7489% — pricing power intact or improving.

  • Reinvestment, incremental ROIC returns capital
    What this means

    The capital base barely grew: this business returns cash through dividends and buybacks rather than reinvesting. Judge it on the cash returned, not on compounding.

  • Worst year 2022 · −21062.5% op. margin
    What this means

    Operations went underwater in 2022, understand why before trusting the good years.

  • Dividend record paid
    What this means

    Paid a dividend in 3 of the years on record.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Elevated contestability

The product is software or information, the very thing capable AI now produces more cheaply, so the moat is more contestable than the record alone implies.

In its own filing Framed as a capability

Despite the structural exposure, the filing positions AI as something it uses, not a threat to its product.

“The recent emergence of artificial intelligence ("AI"), large language models ("LLMs"), and machine learning ("ML") algorithms has added to the need for efficient processing of vast volumes of data.”

AI has collapsed the cost of building a capable substitute for the very thing this business sells. When a credible alternative can be assembled for a fraction of the incumbent's price, it is pricing power that erodes first, not revenue tomorrow. The live question is whether the moat survives that, not whether it held in the past. Whether that question is answerable at all is yours to decide, against your own circle of competence.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Current Position

as of the latest quarter, Mar 31, 2026

Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.

Current assets$1.0B
  • Cash & short-term investments$986M
  • Receivables$4M
  • Inventory$4M
  • Other current assets$11M
Current liabilities$15M
  • Debt due within a year$2M
  • Accounts payable$3M
  • Other current liabilities$10M
Current ratio66.67×all current assets ÷ what's due · Graham looked for 2×
Quick ratio66.40×stricter: inventory excluded
Cash ratio65.41×strictest: cash alone against what's due
Working capital$990Mthe cushion left after near-term bills
Debt due this year vs. cash$2M due · $986M cash covered by cash on hand, no refinancing forced · both figures from the Mar 31, 2026 balance sheet
Cash runway23.4 yrsthe business is consuming cash; this is how long the cash on hand lasts at that rate
Revenue, latest quarter vs. a year ago+9364.1%the freshest read on whether the business is still growing
Current ratio, recent quarters1.2× → 66.7×
Deeper floors
Tangible book value$1.4Bequity stripped of goodwill & intangibles
Net current asset value$982MGraham's net-net: current assets less all liabilities
Debt incl. operating leases$15M$5M of it operating leases
Deferred revenue$2Mcustomer cash collected before delivery; operating float

From the company's latest filing.

Management, ownership & pay

read the proxy →

From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.

Fiscal yearChief executivePay, as filed“Actually paid”Owner earnings
2021Robert Liscouski$2.3M$1.5M
2022$5.1M$4.2M($16M)
2023$472k$543k($20M)
2024William McGann$444k$4.7M($20M)
2025Yuping Huang$508k−$205k($35M)

Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years. A dash under the name means the filing tags the figure without naming the officer.

  • Stock-based compensation$9M

    The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 1270% of revenue. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.

Inverting the record

Invert: instead of why Quantum Computing Inc. is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2022–2025.

1 of the 3 tests turned up something to look into; the other 2 came back clean.

  • Look hereDid receivables and inventory outpace sales?10% → 99% of sales

    Receivables and inventory grew from $13K to $4M while revenue grew 3087%: working capital is climbing faster than sales (10% of revenue then, 99% now). That can mean customers paying slower, stock building up, or revenue pulled forward. The filing's cash-flow and receivables notes say which.

And these came back clean
  • Did debt outgrow the business?
  • Are "one-time" charges a yearly habit?

Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.

What an owner would ask, FY2025

read the 10-K →
  • Which reported numbers are a judgment call?
    Management names Income taxes, Contingencies as critical estimates

    each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →

The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.

Peers, Software

The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueGross marginOp. marginROICOwner earn. margin
BMBLBumble Inc.$966M71%-14.5%-6%
MNTNMNTN Inc.$290M77%8.3%20%
RGTIRigetti Computing Inc.$7M65%-733.7%-61%-612%
KDKKodiak AI Inc. Common Stock$4M-413.3%-363%
AURAurora Innovation Inc.$3M-1807.5%-37%-758%
SHAZSharonAI Holdings Inc.$2M6%-880.0%-299%
QUBTQuantum Computing Inc.$682K38%-7409.9%-32%-5535%
MOVECorvex Inc.$433K-3580.4%-243%-2604%
Group median65%-806.9%-35%-685%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Quantum Computing Inc. is profitable, but owner earnings are negative this year because capital spending currently outruns operating cash, a build-out, so the owner-earnings reverse-DCF has no positive base to grow. We read the price from both ends instead: type a price to see the steady-state profitability it demands, then set the mature margin you would believe and weigh the two against each other. Nothing leaves your browser unless you enter it in your notebook.

$
The assumptions

Revenue, delivered63%/yr’22→’25

Enter a price to run it.

Owner earnings it must reach
Margin the price demands
Owner-earnings margin today−971%

Two reads of one future. From your price: the owner earnings the company must reach, valued at a mature multiple and discounted back at your rate, expressed as the margin it implies on revenue grown at your rate. From your belief: the mature margin you would credit, set on the dial above. When the margin the price demands runs above the one you would believe, you are paying for a future taken on faith. For a deep cyclical at a trough, normalized through-cycle earnings are the better lens; this mode is for the genuinely unprofitable, and for the profitable business whose capital spending currently outruns its cash.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Quantum Computing Inc. (QUBT), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/QUBT, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← QUAD its page in the Manual QUCY →

Industry order: ← QTWO the Software chapter QXL →