← All companies ← SHLS Manual SHOE → ← RXO Hotels & Resorts SPCE →
SHO, Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.
All of our hotels are operated under nationally recognized brands, except the Oceans Edge Resort & Marina, which operates independently.
As of December 31, 2025, our third-party managers included: subsidiaries of Marriott International, Inc. or Marriott Hotel Services, Inc.
Our hotels and resorts are located in highly desirable markets and possess unique attributes that are difficult to replicate.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What it is
- Revenue is Room (61%), Food and Beverage (29%) and Other Operating (10%).
- Situation
- Cyclical. Margins collapse and recover repeatedly across the record; a single year, good or bad, misstates the through-cycle earning power.
- What moves the needle
- Operating margin has run about 12% through the cycle, a solid margin the cost base and competition set as much as the price does. The margin is cyclical, swinging between −134% and 26% over the years, so the through-cycle figure carries more than any single year — and the balance sheet at the trough more than the peak. Capital spending runs about 13% of sales, below what it charges for depreciation, so the return earned on what it sinks into that plant weighs as much as the margin. Read this kind of business on occupancy and revenue per available room, and the model. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has rarely cleared the cost of capital (median 5%, above 15% in 0 of 10 years). By owner earnings: roughly 9% of revenue reaches owners as cash, though it swings. The cycle and the balance sheet decide this one; the worst year tells more than the median, and the rest is in the 10-K.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 10-K →Room is 61% of revenue, with Food and Beverage the other meaningful line at 29%.
- Room61%$583M
- Food and Beverage29%$279M
- Other Operating10%$99M
From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMMar 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $1.2B | $1.2B | $1.2B | $1.1B | $268M | $509M | $912M | $986M | $906M | $960M | $986M | RevenueRevenue |
| 2% | 2% | 3% | 3% | 11% | 8% | 4% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 3% | SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev |
| $189M | $186M | $299M | $176M | ($358M) | $45M | $105M | $248M | $77M | $61M | $299M | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 15.9% | 15.6% | 25.8% | 15.8% | −133.5% | 8.8% | 11.5% | 25.1% | 8.5% | 6.4% | 30.3% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| $117M | $132M | $236M | $122M | ($418M) | $14M | $73M | $192M | $28M | $8M | $23M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| -1% | -6% | 1% | -0% | — | 1% | 0% | 2% | -4% | 3% | 1% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| $288M | $307M | $305M | $291M | ($117M) | $28M | $209M | $198M | $170M | $182M | $195M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $163M | $159M | $146M | $148M | $137M | $129M | $126M | $127M | $125M | $135M | $136M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| $136K | $8M | ($87M) | $12M | $154M | ($127M) | ($494K) | ($131M) | $8M | $30M | $27M | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $182M | $115M | $159M | $96M | $51M | $64M | $129M | $110M | $157M | $103M | $106M | CapexCapex |
| 15.3% | 9.6% | 13.7% | 8.6% | 19.2% | 12.5% | 14.1% | 11.2% | 17.4% | 10.7% | 10.7% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $106M | $192M | $146M | $195M | ($168M) | ($35M) | $81M | $88M | $13M | $79M | $89M | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 8.9% | 16.1% | 12.6% | 17.5% | −62.8% | −6.9% | 8.9% | 8.9% | 1.4% | 8.2% | 9.1% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| $106M | $192M | $146M | $195M | ($168M) | ($35M) | $81M | $88M | $13M | $79M | $89M | Free cash flowFCF |
| 8.9% | 16.1% | 12.6% | 17.5% | −62.8% | −6.9% | 8.9% | 8.9% | 1.4% | 8.2% | 9.1% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| $2M | $174M | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $174M | AcquisitionsAcquis. |
| — | $163M | $178M | $170M | $156M | $14M | $25M | $60M | $91M | $86M | $86M | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| — | — | — | $50M | $104M | — | $108M | $56M | $27M | $103M | — | BuybacksBuybacks |
| 6% | 6% | 10% | 6% | -12% | 2% | 4% | 9% | 3% | 2% | — | ROICROIC |
| 5% | 5% | 9% | 5% | -20% | 1% | 3% | 9% | 1% | 0% | 1% | Return on equityROE |
| — | −1% | 2% | −2% | −28% | −0% | 2% | 6% | −3% | −4% | −3% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $370M | $488M | $809M | $817M | $368M | $120M | $101M | $426M | $107M | $109M | $91M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| $39M | $34M | $34M | $35M | $9M | $29M | $42M | $31M | $34M | $34M | $45M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| $1M | $1M | $1M | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $1M | InventoryInvent. |
| — | — | — | — | — | $48M | $57M | — | — | — | $45M | Accounts payablePayables |
| $41M | $36M | $35M | $35M | $9M | ($19M) | ($15M) | $31M | $34M | $34M | $1M | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| $568M | $728M | $908M | $914M | $435M | $282M | $214M | — | — | — | $227M | Current assetsCur. assets |
| $409M | $243M | $233M | $326M | $91M | $176M | $381M | — | — | — | $147M | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 1.4× | 3.0× | 3.9× | 2.8× | 4.8× | 1.6× | 0.6× | — | — | — | 1.5× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| $990K | $990K | $990K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $990K | GoodwillGoodwill |
| $3.7B | $3.9B | $4.0B | $3.9B | $3.0B | $3.0B | $3.1B | $3.1B | $3.1B | $3.0B | $3.0B | Total assetsAssets |
| $936M | $990M | $983M | $975M | $748M | $611M | $816M | $819M | $845M | $930M | $955M | Total debtDebt |
| $566M | $502M | $174M | $158M | $380M | $491M | $715M | $393M | $738M | $821M | $864M | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| 3.8× | 3.6× | 6.3× | 3.2× | -6.7× | 1.4× | 3.3× | 4.8× | 1.5× | 1.2× | 5.8× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| $2.5B | $2.5B | $2.7B | $2.6B | $2.0B | $2.2B | $2.1B | $2.2B | $2.1B | $1.9B | $1.9B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| 0.6% | 0.7% | 0.8% | 0.8% | 3.6% | 2.5% | 1.2% | 1.1% | 1.2% | 0.9% | 0.9% | Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 215M | 222M | 226M | 226M | 216M | 216M | 213M | 206M | 203M | 194M | 189M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $5.53 | $5.38 | $5.13 | $4.94 | $1.24 | $2.35 | $4.29 | $4.79 | $4.47 | $4.94 | $5.22 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $0.55 | $0.59 | $1.05 | $0.54 | $-1.93 | $0.06 | $0.34 | $0.93 | $0.14 | $0.04 | $0.12 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $0.49 | $0.86 | $0.65 | $0.86 | $-0.78 | $-0.16 | $0.38 | $0.43 | $0.06 | $0.41 | $0.47 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $0.49 | $0.86 | $0.65 | $0.86 | $-0.78 | $-0.16 | $0.38 | $0.43 | $0.06 | $0.41 | $0.47 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| — | $0.73 | $0.79 | $0.75 | $0.72 | $0.06 | $0.12 | $0.29 | $0.45 | $0.44 | $0.46 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| $0.85 | $0.52 | $0.70 | $0.43 | $0.24 | $0.29 | $0.60 | $0.53 | $0.78 | $0.53 | $0.56 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $11.55 | $11.42 | $11.79 | $11.41 | $9.49 | $10.17 | $9.80 | $10.52 | $10.38 | $10.01 | $10.09 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | −1.2%/yr | +31.8%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | −2.1%/yr | — |
| EPS | −24.8%/yr | — |
| Dividends / share | −6.1%/yr (8-yr) | −9.3%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | −5.1%/yr | +17.4%/yr |
| Book value / share | −1.6%/yr | +1.1%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2016–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedBeyond op. cashEach year's outlays against its operating cash: the mix, and how it drifts. The hatched cap is spending beyond that year's operating cash — financed from the balance sheet or borrowing, not operations.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business turned $8M of profit into $79M of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | $8M | $28M | $192M | $73M | $14M |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$135M | +$125M | +$127M | +$126M | +$129M |
| Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost | +$9M | +$10M | +$11M | +$11M | +$13M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | +$30M | +$8M | −$131M | −$494K | −$127M |
| Cash from operations | $182M | $170M | $198M | $209M | $28M |
| Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow | −$103M | −$157M | −$110M | −$129M | −$64M |
| Owner earnings | $79M | $13M | $88M | $81M | ($35M) |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 8% | 1% | 9% | 9% | -7% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position . The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $9M), owner earnings is nearer $70M.
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- ComfortableOperating income $299M ÷ interest expense $53M
What this means
Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient, it says solvent, not cheap.
- How heavy is the debt, net of cash? $1.0B · 3.4× operating profitMeaningful net debtCash $109M − debt $1.1B
What this means
Netting $109M of cash and short-term investments against $1.1B of debt leaves $1.0B owed, about 3.4× a year's operating profit (3.8× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
Is it a good business?
- Below average through the cycle10-yr median, range -12%–10%; the latest year is left out — large non-operating charges put its operating line well above pretax profitIndustry peers: median 8%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 10 years, so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Solid through the cycle10-yr median margin, range -63%–17%; latest $79M = operating cash $182M − maintenance capex $103MIndustry peers: median 10%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 8% of revenue this year, a 9% median across 10 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $9M of SBC) leaves $70M.
- Are earnings backed by cash? 22.14×Cash-backedCash from ops $182M ÷ net income $8M
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Returned more than it generatedDividends + buybacks $189M ÷ Owner Earnings $79M
What this means
The company returned more than it generated: against $79M of Owner Earnings, $189M (240%) went back to shareholders, $86M dividends, $103M buybacks — the excess came from the balance sheet or borrowing, not the year's operations. Net of $9M stock comp, the real buyback was about $94M. Sustained, that pattern draws down cash or adds debt; the net-debt line above shows where it stands.
- Investing or harvesting? 0.77×HarvestingCapex $103M ÷ depreciation $135M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 0 of 6 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size MissRevenue ≥ $2B · $960M
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity MissCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 0.56×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt MissDebt ≤ working capital · $1.1B vs ($167M) WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability NearA profit every year (10-yr record) · 1 loss year
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record NearUninterrupted dividends · 9 of 10 yrs
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth MissEarnings +33% over the record · −53%
What this means
At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $0.41/share (latest year $0.04), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $10.44/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2016–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 9 of 10
What this means
Lost money in 1 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 0 of 10 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin 19% → 13% (3-yr avg ends)
In the filing’s words The filing attributes gains to higher prices, but the margin in the record has not followed — the claim outruns the result here.
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about 19% early to 13% lately, median 12% — competition or costs are biting in.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC returns capital
What this means
The capital base barely grew: this business returns cash through dividends and buybacks rather than reinvesting. Judge it on the cash returned, not on compounding.
- Owner earnings growth −12%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings shrank about 12% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2020 · −133.5% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2020, understand why before trusting the good years.
- Share count −1.1%/yr
What this means
The share count is shrinking, buybacks are quietly growing your slice of the business.
- Dividend record paid
What this means
Paid a dividend in 9 of the years on record.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Moderate contestabilityAI is likely to reshape costs and some products here without clearly contesting or sparing the core moat; how the company itself frames it is the tell.
The filing positions AI as something the company uses, not something it fears.
“Further, any adoption of AI by us or by third parties may pose new security challenges.”
The question is whether a moat the record shows as durable outlasts a technology that lowers the cost of part of what the firm sells. The durability is read in the record above, the filing's own framing of AI beside it; the industry label decides nothing on its own.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of the latest quarter, Jun 30, 2023Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$91M
- Receivables$45M
- Inventory$1M
- Other current assets$89M
- Debt due within a year$2M
- Accounts payable$45M
- Other current liabilities$100M
From the company's latest filing.
How the cash was used, 2016–2025
Over the record, the business generated $1.9B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a cash returner, paying most of what it earns straight back to owners.
- Reinvested$1.2B · 63%
- Dividends$943M · 51%
- Buybacks$449M · 24%
- Returned to owners$1.4B
200% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $943M as dividends and $449M as buybacks.
- Source of funding−$696M
Reinvestment and shareholder returns ran $696M beyond the operating cash the business generated, so the gap was financed off the balance sheet: cash and short-term investments drew down $278M.
- Average price paid for buybacks—
Buybacks ran $449M over the span, but the filings don't tag the share count needed to deduce the average price paid.
- Net change in share count−12.2%
The diluted count fell from 215M to 189M, so the buybacks outran the stock issued to staff.
- Dividend record$0.44/sh
Paid in 9 of the years on record, the per-share dividend shrinking about 6% a year. It was cut at least once along the way.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.
| Fiscal year | Chief executive | Pay, as filed | “Actually paid” | Owner earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Bryan A. Giglia | $8.2M | $8.5M | ($35M) |
| 2021 | Bryan A. Giglia | $2.9M | $2.9M | ($35M) |
| 2022 | Bryan A. Giglia | $3.1M | $3.0M | $81M |
| 2022 | Bryan A. Giglia | $5.4M | $4.5M | $81M |
| 2023 | Bryan A. Giglia | $4.1M | $4.3M | $88M |
| 2024 | Bryan A. Giglia | $3.9M | $7.3M | $13M |
| 2025 | Bryan A. Giglia | $4.5M | −$688k | $79M |
Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.
- Insider ownership1.4%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
- Stock-based compensation$9M
The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 1% of revenue, equal to 3% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.
2 of the 5 tests turned up something to look into; the other 3 came back clean.
- Look hereIs it less profitable than it was?6.2% vs 12.5%
The owner-earnings margin averaged 12.5% early in the record and 6.2% across the last three years, and the latest year has not recovered. Ask the filing whether that is a structural drift or a cyclical trough — price, mix, cost, or a competitor — and whether it is permanent.
- Look hereDid receivables and inventory outpace sales?3% → 5% of sales
Receivables and inventory grew from $41M to $46M while revenue grew −17%: working capital is climbing faster than sales (3% of revenue then, 5% now). That can mean customers paying slower, stock building up, or revenue pulled forward. The filing's cash-flow and receivables notes say which.
- Did the share count rise anyway?
- Did debt outgrow the business?
- Did reported profit become cash?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
What an owner would ask, FY2025
read the 10-K →- Which reported numbers are a judgment call?Management names Income taxes as critical estimates
each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →
The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.
Peers, Hotels & Resorts
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PENNPENN Entertainment Inc. | $7.0B | — | 12.1% | 12% | 8% |
| BYDBoyd Gaming | $4.1B | — | 16.3% | 14% | 13% |
| PKPark Hotels & Resorts | $2.5B | — | 13.0% | 4% | 8% |
| RRRRed Rock Resorts | $2.0B | — | 24.8% | — | 13% |
| XHRXenia Hotels & Resorts Inc. | $1.1B | 32% | 9.8% | 4% | 10% |
| SHOSunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. | $960M | — | 13.6% | 5% | 9% |
| CVEOCiveo Corporation (Canada) | $639M | 24% | -4.6% | -6% | 9% |
| MCRIMonarch Casino & Resort Inc. | $545M | — | 17.8% | 13% | 19% |
| Group median | — | — | 13.3% | 5% | 10% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFType today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. has delivered.
Through the cycle, Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. earns about $85M on its 8.9% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 8.2% margin runs in line with that. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings $89M on 186M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-04-28; net debt $864M. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← SHLS its page in the Manual SHOE →
Industry order: ← RXO the Hotels & Resorts chapter SPCE →