Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← TEN Manual TFII → ← TDS Telecom Operators TIGO →

TEO, Telecom Argentina SA

Telecom Operators capital-intensive UnprofitableDistress / turnaroundCyclical

We extend our footprint to other markets, with new businesses based on the development of APIs and applications, highlighting our infrastructure and network capabilities for developers around the world.

To achieve this, we use the latest technologies available for our networks, systems, and business models, partnering with renowned global companies.

We are also pursuing new business opportunities through a digital platform and marketplace development model that allows us to maximize opportunities across the region.

Latest annual: FY2025 20-F · figures as filed, in ARS · 1 ADS = 5 ordinary shares
TEO · Telecom Argentina SA
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
ARS 8.33T
+53.0% YoY · 57% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 5-yr average
Revenue ARS 8.33T 5-yr avg ARS 5.44T
Operating margin 5.4% 5-yr avg −9.1%
Owner-earnings margin 29% 5-yr avg 13%
Free cash flow margin 12% 5-yr avg 13%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

Situation
Unprofitable. No sustained operating profit across the record; an earnings multiple has nothing to rest on. What the record does show is revenue, the gross-margin trajectory, and the burn against the cash on hand. Distress / turnaround. Thin interest coverage, or operating cash burned against real debt, across the record. The balance sheet carries this situation; the debt schedule sets the clock. Cyclical. Margins collapse and recover repeatedly across the record; a single year, good or bad, misstates the through-cycle earning power.
What moves the needle
Operating margin has run about 5.4% through the cycle, a thin margin, where volume, cost discipline and the price it gets all bear on the result. The margin is cyclical, swinging between −40% and 34% over the years, so the through-cycle figure carries more than any single year — and the balance sheet at the trough more than the peak. Capital spending runs about 17% of sales, below what it charges for depreciation, so the return earned on what it sinks into that plant weighs as much as the margin. Read this kind of business on subscribers, revenue per user, and network capex. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Return on capital has rarely cleared the cost of capital (median 1%, above 15% in 2 of 8 years). By owner earnings: roughly 14% of revenue reaches owners as cash, consistently. The cycle and the balance sheet decide this one; the worst year tells more than the median, and the rest is in the 10-K.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2016–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2016’162017’172018’182019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMDec 2025
Income statement
ARS 53.2BARS 65.2BARS 351.9BARS 487.1BARS 886.8BARS 2.58TARS 4.94TARS 5.90TARS 5.44TARS 8.33TARS 8.33TRevenueRevenue
ARS 12.3BARS 22.0BARS 44.5BARS 32.5BARS 59.7B(ARS 16.9B)(ARS 2.00T)(ARS 358.3B)(ARS 192.7B)ARS 450.0BARS 450.0BOperating incomeOp. inc.
23.1%33.8%12.6%6.7%6.7%−0.7%−40.4%−6.1%−3.5%5.4%5.4%Operating marginOp. mgn
ARS 10.5BARS 15.0BARS 11.1B(ARS 9.0B)(ARS 16.8B)ARS 52.6B(ARS 1.41T)(ARS 738.3B)ARS 1.33T(ARS 170.0B)(ARS 170.0B)Net incomeNet inc.
37%36%29%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
ARS 26.0BARS 35.1BARS 70.4BARS 168.4BARS 293.9BARS 788.8BARS 1.45TARS 1.77TARS 1.07TARS 2.39TARS 2.39TOperating cash flowOp. cash
ARS 6.2BARS 6.9BARS 73.5BARS 125.9BARS 242.8BARS 822.3BARS 3.36TARS 2.02TARS 1.73TARS 2.08TARS 6.9BDepreciationDeprec.
ARS 9.3BARS 13.2B(ARS 14.2B)ARS 51.5BARS 67.8B(ARS 86.0B)(ARS 498.2B)ARS 489.8B(ARS 1.99T)ARS 480.4BARS 2.55TWorking capital & otherWC & other
ARS 19.4BARS 29.4BARS 64.6BARS 101.0BARS 153.7BARS 446.4BARS 795.1BARS 756.1BARS 458.0BARS 1.36TARS 1.36TCapexCapex
36.4%45.1%18.4%20.7%17.3%17.3%16.1%12.8%8.4%16.3%16.3%Capex / revenueCapex/rev
ARS 19.8BARS 28.2BARS 5.7BARS 67.3BARS 140.1BARS 342.4BARS 656.2BARS 1.01TARS 609.6BARS 1.03TARS 2.38TOwner earningsOwner earn.
37.2%43.2%1.6%13.8%15.8%13.3%13.3%17.2%11.2%12.4%28.6%Owner earnings marginOE mgn
ARS 6.6BARS 5.7BARS 5.7BARS 67.3BARS 140.1BARS 342.4BARS 656.2BARS 1.01TARS 609.6BARS 1.03TARS 1.03TFree cash flowFCF
12.4%8.7%1.6%13.8%15.8%13.3%13.3%17.2%11.2%12.4%12.4%Free cash flow marginFCF mgn
ARS 3.0BARS 4.0BARS 71.3BARS 73.0BARS 1.1BARS 1.4BARS 1.2BARS 20.3BARS 20.3BDividends paidDiv. paid
34%23%3%5%-1%-44%-3%-1%ROICROIC
54%28%3%-2%-3%5%-57%-16%19%-2%-2%Return on equityROE
39%20%−17%−20%−3%5%−57%−3%−3%Retained to equityRetained/eq
Balance sheet
ARS 6.6BARS 6.7BARS 12.7BARS 35.4BARS 177.4BARS 283.2BARS 383.4BARS 727.7BARS 462.9BARS 792.1BARS 792.1BCash & investmentsCash+inv
ARS 7.6BARS 2.6BARS 26.8BARS 23.1BARS 28.6BARS 43.9BARS 117.1BARS 289.3BARS 389.4BARS 799.2BARS 799.2BReceivablesReceiv.
ARS 1.3BARS 136MARS 4.2BARS 4.4BARS 5.6BARS 6.1BARS 20.1BARS 68.7BARS 79.5BARS 79.5BARS 79.5BInventoryInvent.
ARS 8.9BARS 2.7BARS 31.0BARS 27.5BARS 34.2BARS 50.0BARS 137.2BARS 358.0BARS 468.9BARS 878.7BARS 878.7BOperating working capitalOper. WC
ARS 15.6BARS 10.6BARS 51.5BARS 69.1BARS 80.4BARS 126.9BARS 351.8BARS 1.05TARS 993.0BARS 1.83TARS 1.83TCurrent assetsCur. assets
ARS 16.5BARS 18.6BARS 82.2BARS 117.1BARS 160.1BARS 322.5BARS 897.8BARS 2.41TARS 2.58TARS 3.84TARS 3.84TCurrent liabilitiesCur. liab.
0.9×0.6×0.6×0.6×0.5×0.4×0.4×0.4×0.4×0.5×0.5×Current ratioCurr. ratio
ARS 32.0BARS 185.3BARS 252.1BARS 380.2BARS 2.30TARS 3.36TARS 4.42TARS 4.44TARS 4.44TARS 4.44TGoodwillGoodwill
ARS 47.9BARS 94.1BARS 571.9BARS 787.1BARS 1.14TARS 2.10TARS 5.38TARS 11.93TARS 14.39TARS 16.62TARS 16.62TTotal assetsAssets
ARS 8.6BARS 14.6BARS 91.2BARS 158.9BARS 239.4BARS 393.6BARS 1.46TARS 4.63TARS 3.79TARS 5.44TARS 5.44TTotal debtDebt
ARS 2.1BARS 7.9BARS 78.5BARS 123.5BARS 62.0BARS 110.4BARS 1.08TARS 3.91TARS 3.32TARS 4.64TARS 4.64TNet debt / (cash)Net debt
20.7×65.9×0.6×0.9×0.8×-0.2×0.6×0.6×Interest coverageInt. cov.
ARS 19.3BARS 54.2BARS 347.2BARS 415.3BARS 577.3BARS 1.05TARS 2.48TARS 4.72TARS 7.14TARS 6.86TARS 6.86TShareholders’ equityEquity
Per share
1.18B1.18B2.15B2.15B2.15B2.15B2.15B2.15B2.15B2.15B2.17BShares out (diluted)Shares
ARS 44.95ARS 55.03ARS 163.42ARS 226.15ARS 411.74ARS 1198.43ARS 2295.98ARS 2738.84ARS 2527.27ARS 3867.23ARS 3846.61Revenue / shareRev/sh
ARS 8.83ARS 12.64ARS 5.15ARS -4.19ARS -7.80ARS 24.40ARS -654.40ARS -342.81ARS 618.38ARS -78.94ARS -78.52EPS (diluted)EPS
ARS 16.70ARS 23.78ARS 2.67ARS 31.26ARS 65.07ARS 158.99ARS 304.70ARS 470.54ARS 283.03ARS 478.62ARS 1098.69Owner earnings / shareOE/sh
ARS 5.55ARS 4.80ARS 2.67ARS 31.26ARS 65.07ARS 158.99ARS 304.70ARS 470.54ARS 283.03ARS 478.62ARS 476.07Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh
ARS 2.54ARS 3.39ARS 33.09ARS 33.90ARS 0.50ARS 0.67ARS 0.57ARS 9.42ARS 9.37Dividends / shareDiv/sh
ARS 16.38ARS 24.83ARS 30.01ARS 46.91ARS 71.38ARS 207.26ARS 369.20ARS 351.07ARS 212.64ARS 629.18ARS 625.83Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh
ARS 16.32ARS 45.74ARS 161.21ARS 192.85ARS 268.04ARS 489.59ARS 1151.45ARS 2191.98ARS 3313.62ARS 3187.03ARS 3170.03Book value / shareBVPS

The diluted share count moved ×1.82 into 2018 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.

Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
9-yr5-yr
Revenue / share+64.0%/yr+56.5%/yr
Owner earnings / share+45.2%/yr+49.0%/yr
Dividends / share+15.7%/yr+79.8%/yr
Capital spending / share+50.0%/yr+54.5%/yr
Book value / share+79.7%/yr+64.1%/yr

The record, charted

FY2016–2025

Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.

Share count
2.2Bpeak FY2018
ROIC
−1%low FY2022
Net debt ÷ owner earnings
4.5×peak FY2024

Owner earnings vs. net income

Owner earningsNet income

The accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.

ARS 1.03Towner earningsvs.(ARS 170.0B)net incomelow FY2018

Where the cash went

ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetained

Each year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.

FY2016FY2025

Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.

In fiscal 2025 the business turned a ARS 170.0B loss into ARS 1.03T of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.

FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Reported net income(ARS 170.0B)ARS 1.33T(ARS 738.3B)(ARS 1.41T)ARS 52.6B
Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back+ARS 2.08T+ARS 1.73T+ARS 2.02T+ARS 3.36T+ARS 822.3B
Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items+ARS 480.4B−ARS 1.99T+ARS 489.8B−ARS 498.2B−ARS 86.0B
Cash from operationsARS 2.39TARS 1.07TARS 1.77TARS 1.45TARS 788.8B
Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow−ARS 1.36T−ARS 458.0B−ARS 756.1B−ARS 795.1B−ARS 446.4B
Owner earningsARS 1.03TARS 609.6BARS 1.01TARS 656.2BARS 342.4B
Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue12%11%17%13%13%

Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .

Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.

III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 20-F · source on SEC EDGAR →
Restated past financials
“Therefore, we have restated our Consolidated Financial Statements and the financial information in current Argentine Pesos as of December 31, 2025, for all the periods reported in this Annual Report based on certain price indexes to consider the effect of…”

The figures below are only as sound as the controls that produced them. read the note →

Will it survive?

  • Does not cover its interest
    Operating income ARS 450.0B ÷ interest expense ARS 748.8B
    What this means

    A full year of operating profit didn't cover the interest bill. This is the zombie zone: the business depends on refinancing, asset sales, or forbearance to service its debt.

  • How heavy is the debt, net of cash? ARS 4.64T · 10.3× operating profit
    Heavy net debt
    Cash ARS 469.1B + ST investments ARS 323.1B − debt ARS 5.44T
    What this means

    Netting ARS 792.1B of cash and short-term investments against ARS 5.44T of debt leaves ARS 4.64T owed, about 10.3× a year's operating profit (12.1× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.

  • Not enough data
    What this means

    The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.

Is it a good business?

  • Below average through the cycle
    8-yr median, range -44%–34%; the latest year is left out — large non-operating charges put its operating line well above pretax profit
    Industry peers: median 7%
    What this means

    The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 8 years, so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.

  • Solid through the cycle
    10-yr median margin, range 2%–43%; latest ARS 2.38T = operating cash ARS 2.39T − maintenance capex ARS 6.9B
    Industry peers: median 10%
    What this means

    What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 29% of revenue this year, a 13% median across 10 years. It chose to put ARS 1.35T more into growth, so free cash flow this year was ARS 1.03T — the gap is investment, not weakness.

  • Loss, but cash-generative
    Net income (ARS 170.0B) · cash from operations ARS 2.39T

    In the filing’s words The filing discloses a restatement of previously reported figures — some numbers in the record have moved since they were first filed; read what changed, and why, before trusting the trend.

    What this means

    The company reported a net loss, so a conversion ratio isn't meaningful. What matters then is whether operations still threw off cash, here, they did.

How is the cash used?

  • Reinvests most of it
    Dividends + buybacks ARS 20.3B ÷ Owner Earnings ARS 2.38T
    What this means

    Of ARS 2.38T Owner Earnings, ARS 20.3B (1%) went back to shareholders, ARS 20.3B dividends, ARS 0 buybacks. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.

  • Investing or harvesting? 195.59×
    Expanding
    Capex ARS 1.36T ÷ depreciation ARS 6.9B
    What this means

    Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.

Graham’s defensive tests · 1 of 5 met

Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.

  • Adequate size
    Revenue ≥ $2B (a dollar floor) · ARS 8.33T
    What this means

    Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's floor is a dollar figure — about $2B of revenue as a conservative modern stand-in. This company reports in its home currency and we carry no exchange rate, so we show the figure and leave the size bar for you to apply rather than convert it with a number we don't have.

  • Strong liquidity Miss
    Current ratio ≥ 2× · 0.48×
    What this means

    Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.

  • Conservative debt Miss
    Debt ≤ working capital · ARS 5.44T vs (ARS 2.00T) WC
    What this means

    Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.

  • Earnings stability Miss
    A profit every year (10-yr record) · 5 loss years
    What this means

    Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.

  • Dividend record Miss
    Uninterrupted dividends · 8 of 10 yrs
    What this means

    An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.

  • Earnings growth Pass
    Earnings +33% over the record · +1060%
    What this means

    At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.

  • Moderate price
    P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
    What this means

    Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are ARS 65.55/share (latest year ARS -78.94), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is ARS 3187.03/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.

Durability & moat, 2016–2025

Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.

  • Profitable years 5 of 10
    What this means

    Lost money in 5 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.

  • Return on capital ≥ 15% 2 of 10 yrs
    What this means

    A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.

  • Operating margin 23% → −1% (3-yr avg ends)

    In the filing’s words The filing attributes gains to higher prices but names price competition too — and the margin slipped, so the pressure is winning here.

    What this means

    Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about 23% early to −1% lately, median 5% — competition or costs are biting in.

  • Reinvestment, incremental ROIC −0%
    What this means

    Reinvested capital came back at a negative incremental return over this window — the invested base grew while operating profit did not. The filings show where it went.

  • Owner earnings growth +48%/yr
    What this means

    Owner earnings grew about 48% a year over the record.

  • Worst year 2022 · −40.4% op. margin
    What this means

    Operations went underwater in 2022, understand why before trusting the good years.

  • Dividend record rising
    What this means

    Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.

Does AI threaten the moat?

Low contestability

The moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.

In its own filing Raised, but not as a competitor

The filing raises AI among its risks, but in other terms (security, regulation, energy or the like), not as a competitor to its product; it frames AI mainly as a capability.

AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat, and the company is using it that way.

Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Current Position

as of fiscal year-end, Dec 31, 2025

Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.

Current assetsARS 1.83T
  • Cash & short-term investmentsARS 792.1B
  • ReceivablesARS 799.2B
  • InventoryARS 79.5B
  • Other current assetsARS 163.0B
Current liabilitiesARS 3.84T
  • Debt due within a yearARS 1.62T
  • Other current liabilitiesARS 2.22T
Current ratio0.48×all current assets ÷ what's due · Graham looked for 2×
Quick ratio0.46×stricter: inventory excluded
Cash ratio0.21×strictest: cash alone against what's due
Working capital(ARS 2.00T)the cushion left after near-term bills
Debt due this year vs. cashARS 1.62T due · ARS 792.1B cash cash alone won't cover the maturities; it leans on refinancing or operating cash · both figures from the Dec 31, 2025 balance sheet
Deeper floors
Tangible book value(ARS 251.7B)equity stripped of goodwill & intangibles
Net current asset value(ARS 7.81T)Graham's net-net: current assets less all liabilities
Debt incl. operating leasesARS 5.82TARS 388.3B of it operating leases

From the company's latest filing.

How the cash was used, 2016–2025

Over the record, the business generated ARS 8.06T of operating cash; how management split it reads as a reinvestor, most operating cash is plowed back into the business.

  • ReinvestedARS 4.18T · 52%
  • DividendsARS 175.3B · 2%
  • Retained (debt / cash)ARS 3.70T · 46%
  • Returned to ownersARS 175.3B

    4% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, ARS 175.3B as dividends and ARS 0 as buybacks.

  • Source of fundingOperating cash

    Operating cash covered reinvestment and returns; over the span debt rose ARS 5.43T and cash and short-term investments rose ARS 785.5B.

  • Net change in share count82.8%

    The diluted count rose from 1185M to 2165M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.

  • Dividend recordARS 9.42/sh

    Paid in 8 of the years on record, the per-share dividend growing about 21% a year. It was cut at least once along the way.

Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.

Acquisitions & goodwill

from the balance sheet & the 10-year cash-flow record

Goodwill grows only when a company acquires and falls only when it concedes it overpaid. The size of that bet, the cash put into buying rather than building, and how much has already been written off.

Goodwill & intangiblesARS 7.12T43% of all assets; the premium carried on the balance sheet for businesses acquired
Against book equity65%goodwill is this share of book equity; the rest is the company’s own retained and paid-in capital
Cash spent acquiringARS 0over 10 years buying other businesses, against ARS 4.18T of capital spent building

None written down over the record; the goodwill is still carried at full cost. That is the deals holding their value on the books so far; whether they keep doing so is the test an owner watches, since the write-down, when it comes, is the admission the price was too high.

Goodwill, acquired intangibles and equity from the latest balance sheet; acquisition spend and write-downs summed across the 10-year record, from the company's own filings.

Inverting the record

Invert: instead of why Telecom Argentina SA is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.

3 of the 4 tests turned up something to look into; the other 1 came back clean.

  • Look hereIs it less profitable than it was?13.6% vs 27.3%

    The owner-earnings margin averaged 27.3% early in the record and 13.6% across the last three years, and the latest year has not recovered. Ask the filing whether that is a structural drift or a cyclical trough — price, mix, cost, or a competitor — and whether it is permanent.

  • Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?82.8%

    Diluted shares grew 82.8% over 2016–2025. Owners were diluted on net; each share owns less of the business than it did. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.

  • Look hereDid debt outgrow the business?ARS 8.6B → ARS 5.44T

    Debt rose from ARS 8.6B to ARS 5.44T while owner earnings went from about ARS 17.9B to ARS 884.6B — about 0.5 years of owner earnings in debt then, about 6.1 now: measured against what the business earns, the balance sheet carries more debt than it did. Debt raised for buybacks or deals rather than growth is the kind that bites in a downturn.

And these came back clean
  • Did receivables and inventory outpace sales?

Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.

Peers, Telecom Operators

The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.

CompanyRevenueGross marginOp. marginROICOwner earn. margin
TEOTelecom Argentina SAARS 8.33T6.0%1%14%
VZVerizon Communications$138.2B84%22.0%11%6%
TAT&T Inc.$125.6B52%15.4%6%15%
CCZComcast Holdings ZONES$123.7B19.0%9%14%
TMUST-Mobile US Inc.$88.3B87%12.1%8%1%
CHTRCharter Communications, Inc.$54.8B18.9%7%10%
WBDWarner Bros. Discovery, Inc.$37.3B63%13.4%5%20%
LUMNLumen Technologies$11.3B52%3.3%2%10%
Group median14.4%7%12%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

Enter the US price, in dollars: the NYSE/Nasdaq quote you hold. Per the filing's own cover, “American Depositary Shares, each representing 5 Class”; Telecom Argentina SA reports in ARS, so every figure in this tool is stated per ADS and translated at ARS 1 = $0.001 (2026-07-17, reference rate) so your dollar quote reconciles exactly. The record tables elsewhere on this page remain as filed, in ARS.

Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Telecom Argentina SA has delivered.

Telecom Argentina SA’s latest year runs above its own through-cycle margin — the reported figure may flatter a peak. So the tool opens on the through-cycle base, Graham’s averaging cutting both ways; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.

$

Through the cycle, Telecom Argentina SA earns about $836M on its 14.8% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 28.6% margin runs above that; the reported figure may flatter a peak you'd be paying on. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year. It comes pre-checked here for that reason, the same rule that already normalizes a trough; clear it to price the year as filed.

Base

The assumptions

9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.

Enter a price above to run it.

Implied by the price
Owner-earnings growth · ’21→’25+13%/yr
Owner-earnings growth · ’16→’25+72%/yr
Owner-earnings yield
P/E (3-yr earnings ’23–’25)
P/B
Graham’s price gate

Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.

Against a high-grade bond: Graham’s yardstick bond yield%

Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.

Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.

Free cash flow $699M on 431M shares outstanding (a weighted average, the only count this filer tags); net debt $3.1B. The base opens on the through-cycle figure (the latest year sits above the record’s own median, and Graham’s averaging cuts both ways); clear Normalize to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. Capex ($919M) runs well above depreciation ($5M), so this is a build-out; Steady-state swaps total capex for maintenance (≈ depreciation), lifting the base to about $1.6B, the cash it would throw off if it stopped expanding. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Telecom Argentina SA (TEO), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/TEO, data as of 2026-07-09.

Manual order: ← TEN its page in the Manual TFII →

Industry order: ← TDS the Telecom Operators chapter TIGO →