Share count
175Mpeak FY2019
← All companies ← YQ Manual YSG → ← XYF Capital Markets & Asset Management ZSQR →
YRD, Yiren Digital Ltd.
Capital Markets & Asset Management financial
We are a Cayman Islands exempted company with limited liability and our affairs are governed by our memorandum and articles of association, as amended and restated from time to time, and the Companies Act of the Cayman Islands, which is referred to as the Companies Act below, and the common law of the Cayman Islands.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
Revenue · FY2025
CN¥5.7B
−1.5% YoY · 8% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 5-yr average
Revenue CN¥5.7B 5-yr avg CN¥4.9B
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What it is
- Revenue is Credit solution business (88%), Others (7%) and Insurance brokerage business (5%).
- What moves the needle
- Net interest margin, loan losses, and book value. A lender is read on the quality of its balance sheet, not an earnings multiple, and the worst year of credit losses matters more than the best. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on equity has sat below the cost of equity (median 9%, above 12% in only 5 of 10 years). The cycle and the loan book decide this one; weigh the recession years in the record, not the average, and read the 10-K.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 20-F →The largest slice of sales is Credit solution business at 88%, but the profit engine is Others: 7% of revenue and 94% of the profitable segments' operating profit. Credit solution business ran a CN¥318M operating loss.
Revenue by reportable segment, FY2025
Operating profit profitable segments only
- Credit solution business88%CN¥5.0Bloss of CN¥318M
- Others7%CN¥382M94% of profit
- Insurance brokerage business5%CN¥298M6% of profit
From the segment footnote of the company's own 20-F. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of the profitable segments' operating profit (a loss-making segment carries its loss in dollars in the legend, not a share of the bar), before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMDec 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| CN¥3.2B | CN¥11.5B | CN¥11.2B | CN¥8.6B | CN¥4.0B | CN¥4.5B | CN¥3.4B | CN¥4.9B | CN¥5.8B | CN¥5.7B | CN¥5.7B | RevenueRevenue |
| — | — | — | CN¥73M | CN¥62M | (CN¥73M) | (CN¥26M) | CN¥81M | CN¥105M | — | CN¥105M | Net interest incomeNet int. |
| — | — | CN¥993M | CN¥1.6B | CN¥372M | CN¥370M | CN¥167M | CN¥261M | CN¥100M | CN¥266M | CN¥266M | Credit-loss provisionProvision |
| CN¥1.1B | (CN¥188M) | CN¥1.6B | CN¥1.2B | (CN¥693M) | CN¥1.0B | CN¥1.2B | CN¥2.1B | CN¥1.6B | CN¥55M | CN¥55M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| -1% | — | 11% | 17% | — | 14% | 20% | 21% | 15% | — | — | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| 23.3% | -2.5% | 11.1% | 12.0% | -10.3% | 13.3% | 14.0% | 20.2% | 12.2% | 0.4% | 0.4% | Return on assetsROA |
| — | — | — | 26% | -18% | 21% | 20% | 26% | 17% | 1% | 1% | Return on equityROE |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 15% | −2% | −2% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| — | — | — | 26% | -18% | 21% | 20% | 26% | 17% | 1% | 1% | Return on tangible equityROTCE |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| CN¥4.8B | CN¥7.5B | CN¥14.3B | CN¥9.6B | CN¥6.7B | CN¥7.7B | CN¥8.5B | CN¥10.3B | CN¥13.0B | CN¥13.5B | CN¥13.5B | Total assetsAssets |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | CN¥5M | CN¥5M | CN¥5M | CN¥5M | CN¥5M | GoodwillGoodwill |
| (CN¥7.2B) | (CN¥7.9B) | (CN¥363M) | CN¥4.5B | CN¥3.8B | CN¥4.8B | CN¥6.0B | CN¥8.1B | CN¥9.5B | CN¥9.3B | CN¥9.3B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 119M | 182M | 186M | 187M | 180M | 171M | 175M | 179M | 175M | 175M | 175M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| CN¥9.39 | CN¥-1.03 | CN¥8.48 | CN¥6.20 | CN¥-3.84 | CN¥6.06 | CN¥6.81 | CN¥11.64 | CN¥9.06 | CN¥0.31 | CN¥0.31 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| — | CN¥3.32 | CN¥0.57 | — | — | — | — | — | CN¥0.70 | CN¥1.56 | CN¥1.56 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| CN¥-60.57 | CN¥-43.25 | CN¥-1.95 | CN¥24.07 | CN¥20.95 | CN¥28.26 | CN¥34.38 | CN¥45.25 | CN¥54.62 | CN¥53.08 | CN¥53.08 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| CN¥-60.57 | CN¥-43.25 | CN¥-1.95 | CN¥24.07 | CN¥20.95 | CN¥28.26 | CN¥34.36 | CN¥45.22 | CN¥54.59 | CN¥53.05 | CN¥53.05 | Tangible book / shareTBVPS |
The diluted share count moved ×1.53 into 2017 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.
Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +2.1%/yr | +8.3%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | −15.4%/yr | +21.1%/yr |
| EPS | −31.5%/yr | — |
| Dividends / share | −9.0%/yr (8-yr) | +123.3%/yr (1-yr) |
| Capital spending / share | −5.8%/yr | +14.1%/yr |
| Book value / share | — | +20.4%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2016–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Revenue
CN¥5.7Blow FY2016
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
FY2025 20-F · source on SEC EDGAR →
Is it a good business?
- Below the cost of equityNet income CN¥55M ÷ equity CN¥9.3BIndustry peers: median 5%
What this means
The bank's north star, what it earns on shareholders' capital. Cost of equity is roughly 10%, so a return durably above that builds value and below it destroys it. One year is noisy; the durability across a full credit cycle is what counts.
- ModestNet income ÷ (equity − goodwill CN¥5M − intangibles CN¥0)Industry peers: median 13%
What this means
The cleaner return, stripping out the goodwill paid for past acquisitions. This is the number a buyer of the whole bank actually earns on the hard capital.
- Not enough dataIndustry peers: median 47%
What this means
Noninterest expense or revenue missing.
Is it sound?
- Capital (equity / assets) 68.9%Well capitalizedEquity CN¥9.3B ÷ assets CN¥13.5B
What this means
A plain-English leverage read: how much of the balance sheet is the owners' own money. This is a rough proxy; the regulatory figure is the CET1 ratio, which is risk-weighted and reported in the filing. The point is the same, how much loss the bank can absorb before depositors are at risk.
- Funding —Not enough data
What this means
Deposits or total assets missing.
- Credit cost (provision / NII) 252%ElevatedProvision for credit losses CN¥266M ÷ net interest income CN¥105M
What this means
What the bank set aside this year against loans going bad, as a share of its lending income. This swings hard with the cycle, low in good years and spiking in recessions, so read it across the record, not in one year. Disciplined underwriting shows up as low, stable provisions through a downturn.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Low contestabilityThe moat is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded, the kind AI cuts costs within but does not contest.
In its own filing Named as a competitive risk
Its FY2025 10-K names artificial intelligence as a competitive threat.
“In light of a tightening regulatory landscape domestically, our ability to customize and innovate products, coupled with robust channel partnerships, will play a vital role in maintaining our competitiveness. 121 For our others business, we fully embrace AI to offer selected high-quality products and services that alig…”
AI is unlikely to contest a moat that is physical, regulated or balance-sheet-funded; here it reads more as a cost tool than a threat, and the company is using it that way.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Peers, Capital Markets & Asset Management
The same industry, side by side on the bank lens. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | ROE | ROTCE | Efficiency | NII / assets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YRDYiren Digital Ltd. | CN¥5.7B | 20% | 20% | — | 0.8% |
| BKKTBakkt Inc. | $2.3B | -146% | -252% | — | 0.5% |
| GDOTGreen DOT Corp | $2.0B | 5% | 13% | — | -0.1% |
| ATLCAtlanticus Holdings Corporation | $2.0B | 42% | 42% | 55% | 21.3% |
| UPSTUpstart | $1.0B | -7% | -8% | — | 0.0% |
| SOFISoFi Technologies | $3.6B | -6% | -9% | 85% | 3.6% |
| SYFSynchrony Financial | $19.0B | 21% | 25% | 27% | 15.5% |
| OMFOneMain Holdings Inc. | $4.9B | 23% | 48% | 39% | 15.3% |
| Group median | — | 13% | 16% | — | 2.2% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
price / tangible bookEnter the US price, in dollars: the NYSE/Nasdaq quote you hold. Per the filing's own cover, “American depositary shares, each of which represents two ordinary”; Yiren Digital Ltd. reports in CNY, so every figure in this tool is stated per ADS and translated at CNY 1 = $0.147 (2026-07-17, reference rate) so your dollar quote reconciles exactly. The record tables elsewhere on this page remain as filed, in CNY.
A bank is worth a multiple of its tangible book value, and the multiple it deserves is set by the return it earns on that book. Type today’s price; we show what you would be paying against what Yiren Digital Ltd.’s record justifies.
$
The assumptions
Tangible book / share, delivered22%/yr’20→’25
The justified multiple is (return on tangible equity − growth) ÷ (cost of equity − growth). A bank earning exactly its cost of equity is worth about one times tangible book; the premium above that prices each point of durable excess return. A higher cost of equity lowers the justified multiple for a bank.
Enter a price above to run it.
Price / tangible book—
Justified by the return—
Normalized return on tangible equity20%
Price / book—
Earnings yield—
P/E (3-yr avg ’23–’25)—
Graham’s price gate—
Graham applied the same standards to financial enterprises (Intelligent Investor ch.14): the 15× multiple cap on averaged earnings, and P/E times price-to-book at most 22.5. The gate marks the bargain-hunter’s floor, not a verdict.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Tangible book $1.4B on 87M shares, a 20% normalized return on it. The dials set the multiple such a return would justify; your price sets the multiple you are paying. It assumes the bank keeps earning that return; a credit cycle, a rate shock or a bad acquisition changes it, which is what the record and the 10-K are for.
Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Yiren Digital Ltd. (YRD), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/YRD, data as of 2026-07-09.
Manual order: ← YQ its page in the Manual YSG →
Industry order: ← XYF the Capital Markets & Asset Management chapter ZSQR →