← All companies ← DOC Manual DOCS → ← DJTWW Software DOCU →
DOCN, DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean is an agentic inference cloud platform that helps AI and Digital Native Enterprises build, run, and scale intelligent applications with speed, simplicity, and predictable economics.
The platform combines production-ready GPU infrastructure, a full-stack cloud, model-first inference workflows, and an agentic experience layer to reduce operational complexity and accelerate time to production.
Our platform is designed to be simple, scalable and approachable by providing a variety of product offerings that were built with the needs of growing technology companies in mind.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What moves the needle
- Operating margin has reached 17% at its best but run negative through the cycle (median −2.6%) on a 60% gross margin — so the question is which reading is truer: whether the median was pulled below zero by one-off charges, by the cycle, or by spending it is still growing into, and whether it settles back at a profit. Capital spending runs about 21% of sales, so the return earned on what it sinks into that plant weighs as much as the margin. Read this kind of business on retention and the cost of growth. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has rarely cleared the cost of capital (median −0%, above 15% in 1 of 6 years). The steadier read is owner earnings: roughly 15% of revenue reaches owners as cash, though it swings, and customers and suppliers fund the business through negative working capital. This is price-taker territory, where the balance sheet and the cycle matter more than any multiple; the rest is in the 10-K.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2019–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMMar 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||||
| $255M | $318M | $429M | $576M | $693M | $781M | $901M | $949M | RevenueRevenue |
| 52% | 54% | 60% | 63% | 57% | 60% | 60% | 58% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| 28% | 25% | 24% | 29% | 23% | 21% | 15% | 15% | SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev |
| 24% | 24% | 27% | 25% | 20% | 18% | 18% | 18% | R&D / revenueR&D/rev |
| ($30M) | ($16M) | ($11M) | ($26M) | $12M | $91M | $157M | $156M | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| −11.7% | −5.0% | −2.6% | −4.5% | 1.7% | 11.7% | 17.4% | 16.4% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| ($40M) | ($44M) | ($20M) | ($28M) | $19M | $84M | $259M | $237M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| Cash flow & returns | ||||||||
| $40M | $58M | $133M | $195M | $235M | $283M | $310M | $292M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $63M | $76M | $88M | $102M | $118M | $130M | $137M | $154M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| ($1M) | ($3M) | $3M | $15M | $9M | ($22M) | ($167M) | ($181M) | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $54M | $98M | $97M | $106M | $119M | $178M | $129M | $107M | CapexCapex |
| 21.0% | 30.9% | 22.7% | 18.5% | 17.2% | 22.8% | 14.3% | 11.3% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| ($14M) | ($17M) | $36M | $89M | $116M | $153M | $181M | $185M | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| −5.3% | −5.4% | 8.4% | 15.4% | 16.7% | 19.6% | 20.0% | 19.5% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| ($14M) | ($40M) | $36M | $89M | $116M | $105M | $181M | $185M | Free cash flowFCF |
| −5.3% | −12.5% | 8.4% | 15.4% | 16.7% | 13.4% | 20.0% | 19.5% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| $3M | $0 | $5M | $305M | $99M | $0 | — | $0 | AcquisitionsAcquis. |
| $0 | $0 | $350M | $600M | $488M | $60M | $82M | — | BuybacksBuybacks |
| — | -14% | -3% | -1% | 1% | 9% | 16% | 15% | ROICROIC |
| — | — | -3% | -58% | — | — | — | 27% | Return on equityROE |
| — | — | −3% | −58% | — | — | — | 27% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | ||||||||
| $36M | $100M | $1.7B | $864M | $412M | $428M | $254M | $741M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| — | $28M | $40M | $54M | $62M | $72M | $91M | $105M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| — | $12M | $13M | $21M | $4M | $55M | $39M | $32M | Accounts payablePayables |
| — | $16M | $27M | $33M | $58M | $18M | $52M | $74M | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| — | $148M | $1.8B | $946M | $503M | $542M | $427M | $944M | Current assetsCur. assets |
| — | $85M | $58M | $166M | $193M | $221M | $619M | $647M | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| — | 1.7× | 30.4× | 5.7× | 2.6× | 2.5× | 0.7× | 1.5× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| $3M | $3M | $32M | $315M | $348M | $349M | $349M | $351M | GoodwillGoodwill |
| — | $430M | $2.1B | $1.8B | $1.5B | $1.6B | $1.8B | $2.6B | Total assetsAssets |
| — | $260M | $1.5B | $1.5B | $1.5B | $1.5B | $1.3B | $920M | Total debtDebt |
| — | $159M | ($251M) | $606M | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.0B | $178M | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| -3.2× | -1.2× | -3.0× | -3.1× | 1.3× | 10.0× | 8.8× | 5.9× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| ($72M) | ($72M) | $578M | $48M | ($314M) | ($203M) | ($29M) | $887M | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| 7.3% | 9.3% | 14.4% | 18.4% | 12.8% | 11.6% | 8.9% | 8.8% | Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev |
| Per share | ||||||||
| 38.0M | 41.7M | 93.2M | 101M | 96.4M | 94.5M | 105M | 112M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $6.71 | $7.64 | $4.60 | $5.72 | $7.19 | $8.26 | $8.56 | $8.48 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $-1.06 | $-1.05 | $-0.21 | $-0.28 | $0.20 | $0.89 | $2.46 | $2.12 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $-0.36 | $-0.41 | $0.39 | $0.88 | $1.20 | $1.62 | $1.71 | $1.66 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $-0.36 | $-0.96 | $0.39 | $0.88 | $1.20 | $1.11 | $1.71 | $1.66 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $1.41 | $2.36 | $1.04 | $1.06 | $1.24 | $1.89 | $1.23 | $0.96 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $-1.90 | $-1.73 | $6.20 | $0.47 | $-3.25 | $-2.15 | $-0.27 | $7.93 | Book value / shareBVPS |
The diluted share count moved ×2.24 into 2021 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.
| 6-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +4.1%/yr | +2.3%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | −2.3%/yr | −12.3%/yr |
The record, charted
FY2019–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedBeyond op. cashEach year's outlays against its operating cash: the mix, and how it drifts. The hatched cap is spending beyond that year's operating cash — financed from the balance sheet or borrowing, not operations.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business reported $259M of profit but $181M of owner earnings: $79M less than the profit line, taken out by capital spending and the timing of cash.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | $259M | $84M | $19M | ($28M) | ($20M) |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$137M | +$130M | +$118M | +$102M | +$88M |
| Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost | +$80M | +$91M | +$88M | +$106M | +$62M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | −$167M | −$22M | +$9M | +$15M | +$3M |
| Cash from operations | $310M | $283M | $235M | $195M | $133M |
| Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume | −$129M | −$130M | −$119M | −$106M | −$97M |
| Owner earnings | $181M | $153M | $116M | $89M | $36M |
| Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still | — | −$48M | — | — | — |
| Free cash flow | $181M | $105M | $116M | $89M | $36M |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 20% | 20% | 17% | 15% | 8% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position . The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $80M), owner earnings is nearer $100M.
Much of fiscal 2025's profit didn't arrive as operating cash; it sits in “working capital & other” above. That can be a real inventory or timing swing, or profit that doesn't run through operating cash at all: a heavy tax year, equity-method earnings, or investment income booked through investing. For a year like this, owner earnings understates the cash earned; the full cash-flow statement carries the rest.
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- ComfortableOperating income $157M ÷ interest expense $18M
What this means
Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient, it says solvent, not cheap.
- How heavy is the debt, net of cash? $1.0B · 6.6× operating profitHeavy net debtCash $254M − debt $1.3B
What this means
Netting $254M of cash and short-term investments against $1.3B of debt leaves $1.0B owed, about 6.6× a year's operating profit (8.3× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Negative, funded by othersDSO 37 + DIO 0 − DPO 39 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. A negative cycle is a quiet moat: suppliers and customers fund the operation (Buffett's “float”), the company grows on other people's money. (Little or no inventory, a services / asset-light model, so the inventory leg is ~0.)
Is it a good business?
- Below average through the cycle6-yr median, range -14%–16%; 16% latest = NOPAT $157M ÷ invested capital $1.0BIndustry peers: median -6%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 6 years (it ran 16% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- High through the cycle7-yr median margin, range -5%–20%; latest $181M = operating cash $310M − maintenance capex $129MIndustry peers: median 18%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 20% of revenue this year, a 15% median across 7 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $80M of SBC) leaves $100M.
- Cash-backedCash from ops $310M ÷ net income $259M
In the filing’s words The filing leans on adjusted, non-GAAP earnings, but the GAAP profit is itself cash-backed — the adjustments are not papering over a cash shortfall here.
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Returns about halfDividends + buybacks $82M ÷ Owner Earnings $181M
What this means
Of $181M Owner Earnings, $82M (45%) went back to shareholders, $0 dividends, $82M buybacks. Net of $80M stock comp, the real buyback was about $2M. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.
- Investing or harvesting? 0.94×MaintainingCapex $129M ÷ depreciation $137M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 0 of 5 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size MissRevenue ≥ $2B · $901M
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity MissCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 0.69×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt MissDebt ≤ working capital · $1.3B vs ($192M) WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability MissA profit every year (7-yr record) · 4 loss years
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record MissUninterrupted dividends · none paid
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth —Earnings +33% over the record · —
What this means
Earnings were negative early in the record, a growth rate isn't meaningful.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $1.16/share (latest year $2.48), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $-0.27/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2019–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 3 of 7
What this means
Lost money in 4 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 1 of 6 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin −6% → 10% (3-yr avg ends)
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin widened — about −6% early to 10% lately, median −3% — pricing power intact or improving.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC 31%
What this means
Every extra dollar the business reinvested came back at a high incremental return — the lens GBM read for a moat that reinvests rather than merely harvests. The record and the 10-K are where you check whether the rate holds.
- Worst year 2019 · −11.7% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2019, understand why before trusting the good years.
- How management talks about it Owner’s terms
What this means
The record and the register agree: capital is compounding and the filing reasons in an owner’s terms — per-share value, return on capital, the long term — not a promoter’s.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Elevated contestabilityThe product is software or information, the very thing capable AI now produces more cheaply, so the moat is more contestable than the record alone implies.
Its FY2025 10-K names artificial intelligence as a competitive threat, in language that was not in the prior year's filing.
“Accordingly, it is uncertain whether our AI/ML strategies will attract customers or generate revenue required to succeed in this highly competitive and rapidly changing market, and the failure to realize the anticipated benefits could adversely affect our business operating results or financial condition.…”
AI has collapsed the cost of building a capable substitute for the very thing this business sells. When a credible alternative can be assembled for a fraction of the incumbent's price, it is pricing power that erodes first, not revenue tomorrow. The live question is whether the moat survives that, not whether it held in the past. Whether that question is answerable at all is yours to decide, against your own circle of competence.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of the latest quarter, Mar 31, 2026Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$741M
- Receivables$105M
- Other current assets$97M
- Debt due within a year$311M
- Accounts payable$32M
- Other current liabilities$304M
From the company's latest filing.
Lease obligations
the lease note, SEC EDGAR →Debt by another name. What the business owes on the property, aircraft, stores and equipment it rents rather than owns is a fixed claim due on a schedule; added back to the debt, it is the true leverage. That ladder, operating and finance leases together, and what it adds to the debt on the page above.
Lease payments by year, scaled to the largest; “later” is everything beyond year five, shown apart. These are the contractual cash payments, before the interest the filing imputes back out to the balance-sheet liability.
True leverage: debt plus leases
Counting the leases the way Buffett does, the fixed claims on this business come to $1.7B, of which the leases are 24%. The lease wall above and the debt schedule together are the calendar of what must be paid, and when.
Lease ladder read from the ASC 842 tags in the company’s Dec 31, 2025 annual report and reconciled: the yearly buckets sum to the undiscounted total, which less the imputed interest equals the balance-sheet liability; a ladder that doesn’t tie out is withheld.
How the cash was used, 2019–2025
Over the record, the business generated $1.3B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a cash returner, paying most of what it earns straight back to owners.
- Reinvested$782M · 62%
- Buybacks$1.6B · 126%
- Returned to owners$1.6B
291% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $0 as dividends and $1.6B as buybacks.
- Source of funding−$1.1B
Reinvestment and shareholder returns ran $1.1B beyond the operating cash the business generated, so the gap was financed off the balance sheet.
- Average price paid for buybacks$44.03
Across the years where the filing reports a share count, 14M shares were bought for $600M, about $44.03 each.
- Net change in share count194.5%
The diluted count rose from 38M to 112M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.
- Dividend record—
No dividend line was reported in the filing data over the span; the record here neither confirms nor rules out a payout.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Acquisitions & goodwill
from the balance sheet & the 7-year cash-flow recordGoodwill grows only when a company acquires and falls only when it concedes it overpaid. The size of that bet, the cash put into buying rather than building, and how much has already been written off.
None written down over the record; the goodwill is still carried at full cost. That is the deals holding their value on the books so far; whether they keep doing so is the test an owner watches, since the write-down, when it comes, is the admission the price was too high.
Goodwill, acquired intangibles and equity from the latest balance sheet; acquisition spend and write-downs summed across the 7-year record, from the company's own filings.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.
| Fiscal year | Chief executive | Pay, as filed | “Actually paid” | Owner earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Yancey Spruill | $82.5M | $293.3M | $36M |
| 2022 | Yancey Spruill | $797k | −$200.1M | $89M |
| 2023 | Yancey Spruill | $1.0M | $30.0M | $116M |
| 2024 | Padmanabhan Srinivasan | $28.2M | $23.3M | $153M |
| 2024 | Yancey Spruill | $508k | −$58.8M | $153M |
| 2025 | Padmanabhan Srinivasan | $1.2M | $7.5M | $181M |
Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.
- Insider ownership<1%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
- Stock-based compensation$80M
The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 9% of revenue, equal to 51% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why DigitalOcean is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2019–2025.
2 of the 4 tests turned up something to look into; the other 2 came back clean.
- Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?194.5%
Diluted shares grew 194.5% over 2019–2025, even as the company spent $1.6B on buybacks. The repurchases were outrun by issuance — to staff, in a raise, or in a deal — and the filing says which; owners' slice still shrank. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.
- Look hereAre "one-time" charges a yearly habit?7 of 7 years
Management took an impairment or write-down in 7 of the last 7 years, $5M in all. A charge taken almost every year is not one-time; it is the business — past deals coming due, and an admission the assets were worth less than what was paid. Munger's rule: when the "one-time" keeps happening, it is the business. Read it beside the goodwill the company still carries.
- Is it less profitable than it was?
- Did reported profit become cash?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
What an owner would ask, FY2025
read the 10-K →- Which reported numbers are a judgment call?Management names Revenue recognition, Income taxes, Stock compensation as critical estimates
each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →
The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.
Peers, Software
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEMTempus AI Inc. | $1.3B | — | -59.8% | -210% | -37% |
| BMBLBumble Inc. | $966M | 71% | -14.5% | -6% | — |
| EVTCEvertec Inc. | $932M | 100% | 26.5% | 15% | 33% |
| DOCNDigitalOcean | $901M | 60% | -2.6% | -0% | 15% |
| YOUClear Secure Inc. | $901M | — | -8.2% | 52% | 33% |
| DVDoubleVerify | $748M | 83% | 12.5% | 7% | 18% |
| MGNIMagnite Inc. | $714M | 62% | -18.6% | -13% | 18% |
| EVEREverQuote Inc. | $693M | 94% | -3.7% | -34% | 1% |
| Group median | — | 77% | -6.0% | -3% | 18% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFType today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what DigitalOcean has delivered.
DigitalOcean’s latest year runs above its own through-cycle margin — the reported figure may flatter a peak. So the tool opens on the through-cycle base, Graham’s averaging cutting both ways; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.
Through the cycle, DigitalOcean earns about $139M on its 15.4% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 20.0% margin runs above that; the reported figure may flatter a peak you'd be paying on. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year. It comes pre-checked here for that reason, the same rule that already normalizes a trough; clear it to price the year as filed.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings $185M on 104M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-04-30; net debt $178M. The if-converted diluted count is 112M, 7% above the shares outstanding: the dilution overhang (convertibles, options) a buyer inherits. The base opens on the through-cycle figure (the latest year sits above the record’s own median, and Graham’s averaging cuts both ways); clear Normalize to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← DOC its page in the Manual DOCS →
Industry order: ← DJTWW the Software chapter DOCU →