← All companies ← FORM Manual FOX → ← FLYW Commercial Services & Supplies FTDR →
FOUR, Shift4 Payments
We are a leading independent provider of software and payment processing solutions in the U.S. and we are expanding our payment processing solutions to international markets.
Global Blue is a leading technology and travel services platform, primarily providing TFS, dynamic currency conversion, and payments solutions to many of the world's largest retail brands.
We achieved our leadership position through decades of solving business and operational challenges facing our customers' overall commerce needs.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What it is
- Revenue is Payments-based revenue (83%), Subscription and other revenues (11%) and TFS revenue (6%).
- Situation
- Distress / turnaround. Thin interest coverage, or operating cash burned against real debt, across the record. The balance sheet carries this situation; the debt schedule sets the clock. Cyclical. Margins collapse and recover repeatedly across the record; a single year, good or bad, misstates the through-cycle earning power. Serial acquirer. Goodwill and acquired intangibles are 66% of assets, with meaningful acquisition spending in 7 of the record's 8 years; much of what this business is was bought, at prices the record carries.
- What moves the needle
- Operating margin has run around −0.6% through the cycle on a 23% gross margin, the operating line deeply negative — so the lever is the path to a margin at all: revenue growth against the cost curve and the cash runway, not the level of a margin that isn't there yet. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has rarely cleared the cost of capital (median −1%, above 15% in 0 of 7 years). The steadier read is owner earnings: roughly 9% of revenue reaches owners as cash, though it swings, and customers and suppliers fund the business through negative working capital. The cycle and the balance sheet decide this one; the worst year tells more than the median, and the rest is in the 10-K.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 10-K →Payments-based revenue is 83% of revenue, with Subscription and other revenues the other meaningful line at 11%.
- Payments-based revenue83%$3.5B
- Subscription and other revenues11%$454M
- TFS revenue6%$255M
From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2018–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMMar 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||
| $561M | $731M | $767M | $1.4B | $2.0B | $2.6B | $3.3B | $4.2B | $4.5B | RevenueRevenue |
| 25% | 24% | 23% | 20% | — | — | — | — | 70% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| 14% | 16% | 24% | 16% | 13% | 13% | 14% | 16% | 17% | SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev |
| 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | R&D / revenueR&D/rev |
| ($13M) | ($4M) | ($58M) | ($49M) | $95M | $115M | $247M | $351M | $376M | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| −2.3% | −0.6% | −7.5% | −3.6% | 4.8% | 4.5% | 7.4% | 8.4% | 8.4% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| ($55M) | ($57M) | ($18M) | ($48M) | $75M | $86M | $230M | $119M | $117M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| — | — | — | — | 0% | -4% | — | 29% | 22% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||
| $26M | $8M | $4M | $3M | $275M | $346M | $500M | $634M | $672M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $71M | $63M | $84M | $104M | $149M | $215M | $297M | $432M | $482M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| $10M | $2M | ($128M) | ($94M) | $2M | ($12M) | ($92M) | $1M | $1M | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $2M | $8M | $5M | $8M | $8M | $14M | $7M | $10M | $15M | CapexCapex |
| 0.3% | 1.1% | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.3% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $24M | ($200K) | ($800K) | ($5M) | $267M | $332M | $493M | $624M | $657M | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 4.3% | −0.0% | −0.1% | −0.4% | 13.4% | 12.9% | 14.8% | 14.9% | 14.8% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| $24M | ($200K) | ($800K) | ($5M) | $267M | $332M | $493M | $624M | $657M | Free cash flowFCF |
| 4.3% | −0.0% | −0.1% | −0.4% | 13.4% | 12.9% | 14.8% | 14.9% | 14.8% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| $2M | $60M | $50M | $55M | $135M | $170M | $555M | $2.7B | $2.6B | AcquisitionsAcquis. |
| — | $0 | $0 | $20M | $186M | $105M | $146M | $453M | — | BuybacksBuybacks |
| -29% | -1% | -8% | -5% | 7% | 6% | — | 5% | 5% | ROICROIC |
| -154% | — | -4% | -18% | 22% | 13% | 29% | 8% | 7% | Return on equityROE |
| −154% | — | −4% | −18% | 22% | 13% | 29% | 8% | 7% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||
| — | $4M | $928M | $1.2B | $703M | $455M | $1.2B | $964M | $473M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| — | $79M | $93M | $206M | $195M | $257M | $349M | $742M | $694M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| — | $9M | $2M | $4M | $5M | $3M | $9M | — | $6M | InventoryInvent. |
| — | $58M | $61M | $121M | $167M | $205M | $248M | $679M | $615M | Accounts payablePayables |
| — | $29M | $34M | $88M | $33M | $56M | $110M | $63M | $85M | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| — | $106M | $1.0B | $1.5B | $992M | $1.2B | $1.9B | $2.2B | $2.1B | Current assetsCur. assets |
| — | $130M | $99M | $184M | $268M | $704M | $1.4B | $1.3B | $1.7B | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| — | 0.8× | 10.4× | 7.9× | 3.7× | 1.6× | 1.4× | 1.7× | 1.2× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| $392M | $421M | $477M | $538M | $735M | $1.1B | $1.5B | $2.7B | $2.7B | GoodwillGoodwill |
| — | $784M | $1.8B | $2.3B | $2.6B | $3.4B | $5.0B | $8.7B | $8.8B | Total assetsAssets |
| — | $640M | $1.0B | $1.7B | $1.7B | $1.8B | $2.8B | $4.5B | $4.5B | Total debtDebt |
| — | $637M | $79M | $507M | $1.0B | $1.3B | $1.6B | $3.6B | $4.0B | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| -0.3× | -0.1× | -1.4× | -1.8× | 2.9× | 3.6× | 4.0× | 1.8× | 1.7× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| $36M | ($33M) | $460M | $273M | $347M | $653M | $807M | $1.4B | $1.7B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| — | 0.0% | 8.6% | 3.0% | 2.5% | 2.2% | 2.0% | 2.0% | 1.6% | Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev |
| Per share | |||||||||
| — | — | 78.0M | — | 3.9M | 1.9M | 1.7M | 1.3M | 1.3M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| — | — | $9.83 | — | $515.86 | $1320.77 | $1996.01 | $3134.17 | $3338.87 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| — | — | $-0.24 | — | $19.43 | $44.28 | $137.82 | $89.23 | $87.73 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| — | — | $-0.01 | — | $69.19 | $170.95 | $295.42 | $467.88 | $492.62 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| — | — | $-0.01 | — | $69.19 | $170.95 | $295.42 | $467.88 | $492.62 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| — | — | $0.06 | — | $2.07 | $7.21 | $4.19 | $7.50 | $11.25 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| — | — | $5.89 | — | $89.87 | $336.40 | $483.57 | $1081.21 | $1239.42 | Book value / shareBVPS |
The diluted share count moved ×1/20.19 into 2022 — shares retired, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.
The diluted share count moved ×1/1.99 into 2023 — shares retired, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.
| 7-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +216.8%/yr (5-yr) | +216.8%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +161.3%/yr (5-yr) | +161.3%/yr |
| Book value / share | +183.6%/yr (5-yr) | +183.6%/yr |
The year, in the company's words
the filing →Verbatim from the 10-K's management discussion. Each sentence is shown only because its subject, direction, and stated figures check out against the filed numbers on this page. The words are the company's; the arithmetic is the record's.
- Payments-based revenue+16.1%
“Payments-based revenue increased by $481 million, or 16%, primarily due to: •the increase in volume of $44 billion, or 27%, for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the year ended December 31, 2024, and; •our recent acquisitions in 2024 and 2025.”
✓ figure matches the filed record
The record, charted
FY2018–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedBeyond op. cashEach year's outlays against its operating cash: the mix, and how it drifts. The hatched cap is spending beyond that year's operating cash — financed from the balance sheet or borrowing, not operations.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business turned $119M of profit into $624M of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | $119M | $230M | $86M | $75M | ($48M) |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$432M | +$297M | +$215M | +$149M | +$104M |
| Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost | +$82M | +$65M | +$57M | +$50M | +$41M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | +$1M | −$92M | −$12M | +$2M | −$94M |
| Cash from operations | $634M | $500M | $346M | $275M | $3M |
| Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow | −$10M | −$7M | −$14M | −$8M | −$8M |
| Owner earnings | $624M | $493M | $332M | $267M | ($5M) |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 15% | 15% | 13% | 13% | 0% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position . The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $82M), owner earnings is nearer $542M.
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- ThinOperating income $351M ÷ interest expense $190M
What this means
Operating profit covers interest, but with little room. A bad year, a refinancing at higher rates, or a revenue wobble closes the gap fast.
- How heavy is the debt, net of cash? $3.6B · 10.2× operating profitHeavy net debtCash $964M − debt $4.5B
What this means
Netting $964M of cash and short-term investments against $4.5B of debt leaves $3.6B owed, about 10.2× a year's operating profit (13.0× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Negative, funded by othersDSO 65 + DIO 3 − DPO 228 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. A negative cycle is a quiet moat: suppliers and customers fund the operation (Buffett's “float”), the company grows on other people's money.
Is it a good business?
- Below average through the cycle7-yr median, range -29%–7%; 5% latest = NOPAT $250M ÷ invested capital $5.0BIndustry peers: median 21%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 7 years (it ran 5% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Solid, recently turned positivelatest $624M = operating cash $634M − maintenance capex $10M; positive each of the last 3 years, after an earlier loss stretch (8-yr median 4%)Industry peers: median 26%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 15% of revenue this year, a 4% median across 8 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $82M of SBC) leaves $542M.
- Cash-backedCash from ops $634M ÷ net income $119M
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Returns about halfDividends + buybacks $453M ÷ Owner Earnings $624M
What this means
Of $624M Owner Earnings, $453M (73%) went back to shareholders, $0 dividends, $453M buybacks. Net of $82M stock comp, the real buyback was about $371M. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.
- Investing or harvesting? 0.02×HarvestingCapex $10M ÷ depreciation $432M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 1 of 5 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size PassRevenue ≥ $2B · $4.2B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity NearCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 1.66×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt MissDebt ≤ working capital · $4.5B vs $867M WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability MissA profit every year (8-yr record) · 4 loss years
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record MissUninterrupted dividends · none paid
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth —Earnings +33% over the record · —
What this means
Earnings were negative early in the record, a growth rate isn't meaningful.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $1.83/share (latest year $1.50), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $18.18/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2018–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 4 of 8
What this means
Lost money in 4 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 0 of 7 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin −3% → 7% (3-yr avg ends)
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin widened — about −3% early to 7% lately, median −1% — pricing power intact or improving.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC 8%
What this means
Reinvested capital came back at only a modest incremental return — near the cost of capital, where extra growth adds little per dollar. The record shows whether it is a soft stretch or a thinning moat.
- Owner earnings growth +73%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings grew about 73% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2020 · −7.5% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2020, understand why before trusting the good years.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Elevated contestabilityThe product is software or information, the very thing capable AI now produces more cheaply, so the moat is more contestable than the record alone implies.
Its FY2025 10-K names artificial intelligence as a competitive threat.
“Further, our ability to continue to develop or use such technologies may be dependent on access to specific third-party software and infrastructure, such as processing hardware or third-party artificial intelligence models, and we cannot control the availability or pricing of such third-party software and infrastructur…”
AI has collapsed the cost of building a capable substitute for the very thing this business sells. When a credible alternative can be assembled for a fraction of the incumbent's price, it is pricing power that erodes first, not revenue tomorrow. The live question is whether the moat survives that, not whether it held in the past. Whether that question is answerable at all is yours to decide, against your own circle of competence.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of the latest quarter, Mar 31, 2026Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$473M
- Receivables$694M
- Inventory$6M
- Other current assets$888M
- Debt due within a year$10M
- Accounts payable$615M
- Other current liabilities$1.1B
From the company's latest filing.
Debt maturity
the debt note, SEC EDGAR →Not how much it owes, but when it falls due, and against what. The ladder the company files, beside cash on hand and a year's owner earnings.
Bars scaled to the largest single year; “later” is everything due after 2030, shown apart since it dwarfs the years.
Against what the business has and earns
Cash on hand as of Mar 31, 2026 plus a year’s owner earnings comes to $1.1B against the $10M due in the twelve months after the Dec 31, 2025 schedule: 110 times it.
Maturity schedule extracted from the company’s Dec 31, 2025 annual report and reconciled to the total the table states.
How the cash was used, 2018–2025
Over the record, the business generated $1.8B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a balanced allocator, splitting cash between the business, owners, and the balance sheet.
- Reinvested$62M · 3%
- Buybacks$909M · 51%
- Retained (debt / cash)$825M · 46%
- Returned to owners$909M
52% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $0 as dividends and $909M as buybacks.
- Average price paid for buybacks—
Buybacks ran $909M over the span, but the filings don't tag the share count needed to deduce the average price paid.
- Net change in share count−98.3%
The diluted count fell from 78M to 1M, so the buybacks outran the stock issued to staff.
- Dividend record—
No dividend line was reported in the filing data over the span; the record here neither confirms nor rules out a payout.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Acquisitions & goodwill
from the balance sheet & the 8-year cash-flow recordGoodwill grows only when a company acquires and falls only when it concedes it overpaid. The size of that bet, the cash put into buying rather than building, and how much has already been written off.
None written down over the record; the goodwill is still carried at full cost. That is the deals holding their value on the books so far; whether they keep doing so is the test an owner watches, since the write-down, when it comes, is the admission the price was too high.
Goodwill, acquired intangibles and equity from the latest balance sheet; acquisition spend and write-downs summed across the 8-year record, from the company's own filings.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.
| Fiscal year | Chief executive | Pay, as filed | “Actually paid” | Owner earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Jared Isaacman | $7.1M | $7.1M | $267M |
| 2023 | Jared Isaacman | $8.9M | $8.9M | $332M |
| 2024 | Jared Isaacman | $9.5M | $9.5M | $493M |
| 2025 | Jared Isaacman | $21.8M | $21.8M | $624M |
| 2025 | Taylor Lauber | $12.2M | $4.8M | $624M |
Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.
- Insider ownership1.5%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
- Stock-based compensation$82M
The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 2% of revenue, equal to 23% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why Shift4 Payments is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2018–2025.
1 of the 4 tests turned up something to look into; the other 3 came back clean.
- Look hereAre "one-time" charges a yearly habit?4 of 8 years
Management took an impairment or write-down in 4 of the last 8 years, $30M in all. Taken across the majority of the record, the "one-time" label is wearing thin — ask whether these are past deals coming due rather than genuinely isolated events. Read it beside the goodwill the company still carries.
- Is it less profitable than it was?
- Did the share count rise anyway?
- Did reported profit become cash?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
What an owner would ask, FY2025
read the 10-K →- Which reported numbers are a judgment call?Management names Revenue recognition, Income taxes, Acquisitions as critical estimates
each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →
The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.
Peers, Commercial Services & Supplies
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPAYCorpay Inc. | $4.5B | 98% | 43.9% | 11% | 37% |
| FOURShift4 Payments | $4.2B | 23% | 1.9% | -1% | 9% |
| CARTMaplebear Inc. | $3.7B | 74% | 2.4% | 21% | 18% |
| MSCIMSCI Inc. | $3.1B | 80% | 52.3% | 38% | 46% |
| ETSYEtsy Inc. | $2.9B | 70% | 10.5% | 24% | 26% |
| ZZillow Group Inc. Class C Capital Stock | $2.6B | 78% | -8.9% | -3% | 10% |
| EXLSExlService | $2.1B | 86% | 12.5% | 14% | 12% |
| FICOFair Isaac | $2.0B | 73% | 30.6% | 35% | 29% |
| Group median | — | 76% | 11.5% | 18% | 22% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFType today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Shift4 Payments has delivered.
Shift4 Payments’s latest year runs above its own through-cycle margin — the reported figure may flatter a peak. So the tool opens on the through-cycle base, Graham’s averaging cutting both ways; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.
Through the cycle, Shift4 Payments earns about $360M on its 8.6% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 14.9% margin runs above that; the reported figure may flatter a peak you'd be paying on. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year. It comes pre-checked here for that reason, the same rule that already normalizes a trough; clear it to price the year as filed.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Free cash flow $657M on 79M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-04-30; net debt $4.0B. The base opens on the through-cycle figure (the latest year sits above the record’s own median, and Graham’s averaging cuts both ways); clear Normalize to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. Capex ($15M) runs well above depreciation ($482M), so this is a build-out; Steady-state swaps total capex for maintenance (≈ depreciation), lifting the base to about $662M, the cash it would throw off if it stopped expanding. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← FORM its page in the Manual FOX →
Industry order: ← FLYW the Commercial Services & Supplies chapter FTDR →