← All companies ← ETR Manual EU → ← EEX Commercial Services & Supplies EXLS →
ETSY, Etsy Inc.
About our Company Etsy op erates two-sided online marketplaces that connect millions of creative entrepreneurs with buyers around the world.
We see lasting value in businesses that balance people, planet, and profit, and we strive to align our growth strategy with this principle—using our platform to foster entrepreneurship and sustainable economic impact.
The Etsy marketplace is the global destination for unique, creative goods from independent sellers, connecting artisans with thoughtful consumers seeking items that reflect their tastes and values.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What it is
- Revenue is Marketplace revenue (70%) and Services revenue (30%).
- Situation
- Cyclical. Margins collapse and recover repeatedly across the record; a single year, good or bad, misstates the through-cycle earning power.
- What moves the needle
- Gross margin has run about 70% and operating margin about 10% through the cycle, a wide spread between price and the cost of what it sells — whether that advantage is durable pricing power or a margin that can erode is the question the record is for. The operating margin has swung widely — from −26% to 25% — on a steadier 70% gross margin, so what moves it sits below the gross line, in operating spend and one-off charges more than in the cost of the product itself. The cash cycle has run negative through the cycle (a median of −11 days): the operation is paid before it pays, so working capital releases cash as the business grows rather than tying it up. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has run high across the record (median 24%, above 15% in 6 of 9 years), though buybacks and expensed R&D and brands shrink the capital base, so the figure overstates the underlying economics. The steadier read is owner earnings: roughly 26% of revenue reaches owners as cash, consistently, and customers and suppliers fund the business through negative working capital. Whether these returns reflect real pricing power or an accounting artifact is the judgment the 10-K is for.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 10-K →Marketplace revenue is 70% of revenue, with Services revenue the other meaningful line at 30%.
- Marketplace revenue70%$2.0B
- Services revenue30%$876M
From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMMar 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $365M | $441M | $604M | $818M | $1.7B | $2.3B | $2.6B | $2.7B | $2.8B | $2.9B | $2.9B | RevenueRevenue |
| 66% | 66% | 68% | 67% | 73% | 72% | 71% | 70% | 72% | 72% | 72% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| 24% | 21% | 14% | 15% | 9% | 12% | 12% | 12% | 13% | 12% | 11% | SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev |
| 15% | 17% | 16% | 15% | 10% | 12% | 16% | 17% | 16% | 16% | 15% | R&D / revenueR&D/rev |
| $18M | $12M | $75M | $89M | $424M | $466M | ($659M) | $280M | $380M | $266M | $390M | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 4.8% | 2.7% | 12.4% | 10.8% | 24.6% | 20.0% | −25.7% | 10.2% | 13.5% | 9.2% | 13.4% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| ($30M) | $82M | $77M | $96M | $349M | $494M | ($694M) | $308M | $303M | $163M | $285M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| — | — | — | — | 5% | -5% | — | -5% | 26% | 34% | 24% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| $48M | $69M | $199M | $207M | $679M | $652M | $684M | $706M | $752M | $693M | $725M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $23M | $27M | $27M | $48M | $58M | $74M | $97M | $91M | $108M | $102M | $100M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| $55M | ($66M) | $56M | $19M | $206M | ($56M) | $1.1B | $22M | $58M | $184M | $99M | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $36M | $4M | $1M | $8M | $1M | $11M | $10M | $13M | $14M | $15M | $14M | CapexCapex |
| 9.9% | 0.9% | 0.2% | 0.9% | 0.1% | 0.5% | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.5% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $25M | $65M | $198M | $199M | $678M | $640M | $673M | $693M | $738M | $678M | $711M | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 7.0% | 14.8% | 32.8% | 24.4% | 39.3% | 27.5% | 26.2% | 25.2% | 26.3% | 23.5% | 24.5% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| $12M | $65M | $198M | $199M | $678M | $640M | $673M | $693M | $738M | $678M | $711M | Free cash flowFCF |
| 3.3% | 14.8% | 32.8% | 24.4% | 39.3% | 27.5% | 26.2% | 25.2% | 26.3% | 23.5% | 24.5% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| $8M | $0 | $0 | $270M | $0 | $1.7B | $0 | $0 | — | — | $0 | AcquisitionsAcquis. |
| $0 | $10M | $135M | $177M | $269M | $303M | $426M | $577M | $724M | $777M | — | BuybacksBuybacks |
| — | 15% | 24% | 12% | 72% | 22% | -64% | 34% | 39% | 36% | 47% | ROICROIC |
| -9% | 21% | 19% | 24% | 47% | 79% | — | — | — | — | — | Return on equityROE |
| −9% | 21% | 19% | 24% | 47% | 79% | — | — | — | — | — | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $182M | $315M | $367M | $443M | $1.2B | $780M | $921M | $914M | $811M | $1.4B | $1.2B | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| $26M | $34M | $12M | $15M | $23M | $27M | $28M | $25M | $9M | $9M | $9M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| $11M | $14M | $27M | $26M | $41M | $28M | $29M | $30M | $26M | $29M | $15M | Accounts payablePayables |
| $15M | $20M | ($14M) | ($11M) | ($18M) | ($741K) | ($869K) | ($5M) | ($17M) | ($20M) | ($7M) | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| $371M | $439M | $680M | $921M | $1.9B | $1.3B | $1.5B | $1.6B | $1.3B | $2.0B | $2.1B | Current assetsCur. assets |
| $84M | $102M | $112M | $189M | $455M | $616M | $632M | $711M | $665M | $1.4B | $1.3B | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 4.4× | 4.3× | 6.1× | 4.9× | 4.2× | 2.2× | 2.4× | 2.2× | 2.0× | 1.4× | 1.7× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| $36M | $39M | $37M | $139M | $141M | $1.4B | $138M | $138M | $137M | $38M | $38M | GoodwillGoodwill |
| $581M | $606M | $902M | $1.5B | $2.4B | $3.8B | $2.6B | $2.7B | $2.4B | $2.8B | $2.7B | Total assetsAssets |
| — | $0 | $276M | $785M | $1.1B | $2.3B | $2.3B | $2.3B | $2.3B | $3.0B | $3.0B | Total debtDebt |
| — | ($315M) | ($90M) | $342M | ($182M) | $1.5B | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.5B | $1.6B | $1.8B | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| 2.4× | 1.1× | 3.4× | 3.6× | 10.1× | 47.1× | -46.5× | 19.9× | 27.5× | 14.4× | 21.1× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| $345M | $397M | $401M | $407M | $742M | $629M | ($547M) | ($544M) | ($759M) | ($1.1B) | ($1.1B) | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| — | 6.0% | 6.3% | 5.4% | 3.8% | 6.0% | 9.0% | 10.4% | 10.1% | 8.5% | 8.3% | Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | $1.0B | — | — | $102M | $3K | Goodwill written downGW imp. |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 114M | 122M | 127M | 126M | 136M | 147M | 127M | 140M | 132M | 124M | 121M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $3.21 | $3.61 | $4.75 | $6.51 | $12.65 | $15.88 | $20.24 | $19.61 | $21.32 | $23.23 | $23.98 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $-0.26 | $0.67 | $0.61 | $0.76 | $2.56 | $3.36 | $-5.48 | $2.19 | $2.30 | $1.31 | $2.35 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $0.22 | $0.53 | $1.56 | $1.59 | $4.97 | $4.37 | $5.31 | $4.94 | $5.60 | $5.46 | $5.88 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $0.11 | $0.53 | $1.56 | $1.59 | $4.97 | $4.37 | $5.31 | $4.94 | $5.60 | $5.46 | $5.88 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $0.32 | $0.03 | $0.01 | $0.06 | $0.01 | $0.08 | $0.08 | $0.09 | $0.11 | $0.12 | $0.11 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $3.04 | $3.25 | $3.15 | $3.23 | $5.44 | $4.29 | $-4.32 | $-3.88 | $-5.76 | $-8.85 | $-9.39 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +24.6%/yr | +12.9%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | +42.6%/yr | +1.9%/yr |
| EPS | — | −12.5%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | −9.9%/yr | +63.6%/yr |
The year, in the company's words
the filing →Verbatim from the 10-K's management discussion. Each sentence is shown only because its subject, direction check out against the filed numbers on this page. The words are the company's; the arithmetic is the record's.
- Marketplace revenue-0.7%
“Marketplace revenue decreased primarily due to a $47.1 million decrease related to the sale of the Reverb marketplace on June 2, 2025 and a decrease of $16.8 million in transaction fee revenue, which was driven by a decline in Etsy marketplace GMS partially offset by an increase in Depop GMS.”
✓ direction matches the filed record - Services revenue+11.3%
“Services revenue increased primarily due to a $62.2 million increase in advertising revenue, largely driven by an increase in average price per click on Etsy Ads.”
✓ direction matches the filed record
The record, charted
FY2016–2025Each measure over its full record; the current point and the worst year marked.
Owner earnings vs. net income
Owner earningsNet incomeThe accountant's number, and the cash an owner can take; the gap is the tell.
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedBeyond op. cashEach year's outlays against its operating cash: the mix, and how it drifts. The hatched cap is spending beyond that year's operating cash — financed from the balance sheet or borrowing, not operations.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business turned $163M of profit into $678M of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | $163M | $303M | $308M | ($694M) | $494M |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$102M | +$108M | +$91M | +$97M | +$74M |
| Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost | +$245M | +$283M | +$285M | +$231M | +$140M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | +$184M | +$58M | +$22M | +$1.1B | −$56M |
| Cash from operations | $693M | $752M | $706M | $684M | $652M |
| Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow | −$15M | −$14M | −$13M | −$10M | −$11M |
| Owner earnings | $678M | $738M | $693M | $673M | $640M |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 24% | 26% | 25% | 26% | 27% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position . The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $245M), owner earnings is nearer $433M.
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- Can it pay its interest? 14.4×ComfortableOperating income $266M ÷ interest expense $19M
What this means
Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient, it says solvent, not cheap.
- How heavy is the debt, net of cash? $1.6B · 6.0× operating profitHeavy net debtCash $1.4B − debt $3.0B
What this means
Netting $1.4B of cash and short-term investments against $3.0B of debt leaves $1.6B owed, about 6.0× a year's operating profit (11.2× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Negative, funded by othersDSO 1 + DIO 0 − DPO 13 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. A negative cycle is a quiet moat: suppliers and customers fund the operation (Buffett's “float”), the company grows on other people's money. (Little or no inventory, a services / asset-light model, so the inventory leg is ~0.)
Is it a good business?
- High through the cycle9-yr median, range -64%–72%; 36% latest = NOPAT $176M ÷ invested capital $488MIndustry peers: median 14%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 9 years (it ran 36% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- High through the cycle10-yr median margin, range 7%–39%; latest $678M = operating cash $693M − maintenance capex $15MIndustry peers: median 18%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 24% of revenue this year, a 25% median across 10 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $245M of SBC) leaves $433M.
- Cash-backedCash from ops $693M ÷ net income $163M
In the filing’s words The filing leans on adjusted, non-GAAP earnings, but the GAAP profit is itself cash-backed — the adjustments are not papering over a cash shortfall here.
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Returned more than it generatedDividends + buybacks $777M ÷ Owner Earnings $678M
What this means
The company returned more than it generated: against $678M of Owner Earnings, $777M (115%) went back to shareholders, $0 dividends, $777M buybacks — the excess came from the balance sheet or borrowing, not the year's operations. Net of $245M stock comp, the real buyback was about $532M. Sustained, that pattern draws down cash or adds debt; the net-debt line above shows where it stands.
- Investing or harvesting? 0.15×HarvestingCapex $15M ÷ depreciation $102M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 2 of 6 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size PassRevenue ≥ $2B · $2.9B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity MissCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 1.44×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt MissDebt ≤ working capital · $3.0B vs $597M WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability MissA profit every year (10-yr record) · 2 loss years
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record MissUninterrupted dividends · none paid
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth PassEarnings +33% over the record · +498%
What this means
At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $2.72/share (latest year $1.72), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $-11.57/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2016–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 8 of 10
What this means
Lost money in 2 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 6 of 9 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin 7% → 11% (3-yr avg ends)
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin widened — about 7% early to 11% lately, median 10% — pricing power intact or improving.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC —
What this means
The reinvested base moved too little against the change in profit to read a reliable return on it here — the figure would be a small-denominator artifact, not a moat. Judge this one on the owner-earnings record and the cash it returns instead.
- Owner earnings growth +36%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings grew about 36% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2022 · −25.7% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2022, understand why before trusting the good years.
- Share count +1.0%/yr
What this means
Roughly flat share count, little dilution, little buyback.
- How management talks about it Owner’s terms
What this means
The record and the register agree: capital is compounding and the filing reasons in an owner’s terms — per-share value, return on capital, the long term — not a promoter’s.
Does AI threaten the moat?
Elevated contestabilityThe product is software or information, the very thing capable AI now produces more cheaply, so the moat is more contestable than the record alone implies.
Its FY2025 10-K names artificial intelligence as a competitive threat, in language that was not in the prior year's filing.
“The use of AI, a relatively new and emerging technology in the early stages of commercial use, exposes us to additional risks, such as damage to our reputation, competitive position, and business, legal, and regulatory risks and additional costs.”
The moat the record shows, a high return on capital held across years, was earned before AI collapsed the cost of building a capable substitute for the very thing this business sells. When a credible alternative can be assembled for a fraction of the incumbent's price, it is pricing power that erodes first, not revenue tomorrow. The live question is whether the moat survives that, not whether it held in the past. Whether that question is answerable at all is yours to decide, against your own circle of competence.
Read from the filing's own risk factors, paired with the industry's structure under its SIC code; the durability is read above, the price below.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of the latest quarter, Mar 31, 2026Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$1.2B
- Receivables$9M
- Other current assets$890M
- Accounts payable$15M
- Other current liabilities$1.2B
From the company's latest filing.
How the cash was used, 2016–2025
Over the record, the business generated $4.7B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a cash returner, paying most of what it earns straight back to owners.
- Reinvested$114M · 2%
- Buybacks$3.4B · 72%
- Retained (debt / cash)$1.2B · 25%
- Returned to owners$3.4B
74% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $0 as dividends and $3.4B as buybacks.
- Source of fundingOperating cash
Operating cash covered reinvestment and returns; over the span cash and short-term investments rose $1.0B.
- Average price paid for buybacks$74.21
Across the years where the filing reports a share count, 46M shares were bought for $3.4B, about $74.21 each. Year to year the price paid ranged from $17.57 (2017) to $545.82 (2021); its heaviest year, 2025, paid $53.98 ($777M).
- Net change in share count6.6%
The diluted count rose from 114M to 121M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.
- Dividend record—
No dividend line was reported in the filing data over the span; the record here neither confirms nor rules out a payout.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Acquisitions & goodwill
from the balance sheet & the 10-year cash-flow recordGoodwill grows only when a company acquires and falls only when it concedes it overpaid. The size of that bet, the cash put into buying rather than building, and how much has already been written off.
$1.1B written down across 2 years (2022, 2025): goodwill the company has already conceded it overpaid for, charged against earnings. That is roughly 58% of the cash it put into acquisitions over the span. A write-down costs no cash (the cash went out when the deal was signed), but it is management marking its own past judgment to market.
Goodwill, acquired intangibles and equity from the latest balance sheet; acquisition spend and write-downs summed across the 10-year record, from the company's own filings.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.
| Fiscal year | Chief executive | Pay, as filed | “Actually paid” | Owner earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Silverman | $40.6M | $52.4M | $640M |
| 2022 | Silverman | $16.5M | −$15.8M | $673M |
| 2023 | Silverman | $16.6M | $5.9M | $693M |
| 2024 | Silverman | $18.0M | $3.7M | $738M |
| 2025 | Silverman | $18.1M | $19.6M | $678M |
Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.
- Insider ownership5%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
- Stock-based compensation$245M
The slice of the business handed to employees in shares this year, 8% of revenue, equal to 92% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.
Inverting the record
Invert: instead of why Etsy Inc. is a good business, the question is what would make owning it a mistake, and whether those marks are in the record. Disconfirming tests across 2016–2025.
2 of the 5 tests turned up something to look into; the other 3 came back clean.
- Look hereDid the share count rise anyway?6.6%
Diluted shares grew 6.6% over 2016–2025, even as the company spent $3.4B on buybacks. The repurchases were a treadmill: stock issued to staff outran them, so owners' slice still shrank. Read the buyback line beside this one, not on its own.
- Look hereAre "one-time" charges a yearly habit?5 of 10 years
Management took an impairment or write-down in 5 of the last 10 years, $2.4B in all. Taken across the majority of the record, the "one-time" label is wearing thin — ask whether these are past deals coming due rather than genuinely isolated events. Read it beside the goodwill the company still carries.
- Is it less profitable than it was?
- Did reported profit become cash?
- Did receivables and inventory outpace sales?
Each test is read from the filings and is noisy alone; a flag can mark a cyclical trough or a year of heavy investment as easily as a problem. The filing says which.
Peers, Commercial Services & Supplies
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each figure is a through-cycle median, so a peak or trough year can’t distort it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each against.
| Company | Revenue | Gross margin | Op. margin | ROIC | Owner earn. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPAYCorpay Inc. | $4.5B | 98% | 43.9% | 11% | 37% |
| FOURShift4 Payments | $4.2B | 23% | 1.9% | -1% | 9% |
| CARTMaplebear Inc. | $3.7B | 74% | 2.4% | 21% | 18% |
| MSCIMSCI Inc. | $3.1B | 80% | 52.3% | 38% | 46% |
| ETSYEtsy Inc. | $2.9B | 70% | 10.5% | 24% | 26% |
| ZZillow Group Inc. Class C Capital Stock | $2.6B | 78% | -8.9% | -3% | 10% |
| EXLSExlService | $2.1B | 86% | 12.5% | 14% | 12% |
| FICOFair Isaac | $2.0B | 73% | 30.6% | 35% | 29% |
| Group median | — | 76% | 11.5% | 18% | 22% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFType today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Etsy Inc. has delivered.
Through the cycle, Etsy Inc. earns about $742M on its 25.7% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 23.5% margin runs in line with that. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.
—
9.0% = the 4.55% 10-year Treasury (Jul 15, 2026) + 4.45 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.55%, as of Jul 15, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings $711M on 95M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-04-24; net debt $1.8B. The if-converted diluted count is 121M, 28% above the shares outstanding: the dilution overhang (convertibles, options) a buyer inherits. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← ETR its page in the Manual EU →
Industry order: ← EEX the Commercial Services & Supplies chapter EXLS →